Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

BANKA YAŞI VE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS: İLİŞKİ DOĞRUSAL MI DEĞİL Mİ? ÇİN’DE BORSAYA KAYITLI VE KAYITLI OLMAYAN TİCARET BANKALARINDAN KANITLAR

Yıl 2022, , 893 - 906, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1217119

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2006-2019 dönemi boyunca Çin bankacılık endüstrisinden 50 ticari bankanın bir örneğini kullanarak banka yaşının banka finansal performansı üzerindeki etkisini ampirik olarak araştırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, dengesiz bir panel veri seti ve PCSE panel tahmin prosedürü kullanıyoruz. Bankaya özgü, sektöre özgü ve makroekonomik göstergeler kontrol edildikten sonra, tahmin sonuçlarımız, borsada işlem gören için bankalar ROA ve ROE modellerinde banka yaşı ile karlılık göstergeleri arasında pozitif ve doğrusal bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, banka yaşı ve karesi için tahmin edilen katsayıların, kote olmayan bankalar için tüm modellerde (yani ROA, ROE ve NIM) istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, yaş-karlılık bağlantısının borsada işlem görmeyen bankalar için U-şeklinde bir model izlediğini göstermektedir.

Kaynakça

  • ADUSEI, M. (2011). Board structure and bank performance in Ghana. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 19(1), 72-84.
  • AKBEN SELÇUK, E. (2016). Does firm age affect profitability? Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 5(3), 1-9.
  • ALFADLİ, A. and RJOUB, H. (2020). The impacts of bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic variables on commercial bank financial performance: Evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Applied Economics Letters, 27(15), 1284-1288.
  • ARORA, A. (2022). Gender diversity in boardroom and its impact on firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(3), 735-755.
  • AYDEMIR, R., & GULOGLU, B. (2017). How do banks determine their spreads under credit and liquidity risks during business cycles?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 46, 147-157.
  • BECK, N. and KATZ, J.N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647.
  • BROOKS, C. (2008). Introductory econometrics for finance (2nd ed.).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • D'AMATO, A., & FALIVENA, C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Do firm size and age matter? Empirical evidence from European listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 909-924.
  • DEZSÖ, C.L. and ROSS, D.G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.
  • DIACONAȘU, D.E., BOSTAN, I., CĂUTIȘANU, C. and CHIRIAC, I. (2022). Insights into the sustainable development of the bioeconomy at the European level, in the context of the desired clean environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11286.
  • DIETRICH, A. and WANZENRIED, G. (2011). Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21(3), 307-327.
  • DJALİLOV, K. and PİESSE, J. (2016). Determinants of bank profitability in transition countries: What matters most? Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 69-82.
  • FUNGÁČOVÁ, Z., & POGHOSYAN, T. (2011). Determinants of bank interest margins in Russia: Does bank ownership matter?. Economic systems, 35(4), 481-495.
  • GILL, S. and KAUR, P. (2015). Family involvement in business and financial performance: A panel data analysis. Vikalpa, 40(4), 395-420.
  • HARB, E., EL KHOURY, R., MANSOUR, N., & DAOU, R. (2022). Risk management and bank performance: evidence from the MENA region. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.

BANK AGE AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: IS THE RELATIONSHIP LINEAR OR NONLINEAR? EVIDENCE FROM LISTED AND UNLISTED COMMERCIAL BANKS IN CHINA

Yıl 2022, , 893 - 906, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1217119

Öz

This study empirically investigates the impact of bank age on bank financial performance using a sample of 50 commercial banks from Chinese banking industry over the period 2006-2019. In this study, we employ an unbalanced panel data set and PCSE panel estimation procedure. After controlling for the bank-specific, the industry-specific, and the macroeconomic indicators, our estimation results suggest that there exists a positive and linear relationship between bank age and profitability indicators in ROA and ROE models for listed banks. However, the estimated coefficients for bank age and its square are found to be statistically significant in all models (i.e. ROA, ROE and NIM) for unlisted banks. These results suggest that age-profitability linkage follows the U-shaped pattern for unlisted banks.

Kaynakça

  • ADUSEI, M. (2011). Board structure and bank performance in Ghana. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 19(1), 72-84.
  • AKBEN SELÇUK, E. (2016). Does firm age affect profitability? Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 5(3), 1-9.
  • ALFADLİ, A. and RJOUB, H. (2020). The impacts of bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic variables on commercial bank financial performance: Evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Applied Economics Letters, 27(15), 1284-1288.
  • ARORA, A. (2022). Gender diversity in boardroom and its impact on firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(3), 735-755.
  • AYDEMIR, R., & GULOGLU, B. (2017). How do banks determine their spreads under credit and liquidity risks during business cycles?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 46, 147-157.
  • BECK, N. and KATZ, J.N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647.
  • BROOKS, C. (2008). Introductory econometrics for finance (2nd ed.).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • D'AMATO, A., & FALIVENA, C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Do firm size and age matter? Empirical evidence from European listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 909-924.
  • DEZSÖ, C.L. and ROSS, D.G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.
  • DIACONAȘU, D.E., BOSTAN, I., CĂUTIȘANU, C. and CHIRIAC, I. (2022). Insights into the sustainable development of the bioeconomy at the European level, in the context of the desired clean environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11286.
  • DIETRICH, A. and WANZENRIED, G. (2011). Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21(3), 307-327.
  • DJALİLOV, K. and PİESSE, J. (2016). Determinants of bank profitability in transition countries: What matters most? Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 69-82.
  • FUNGÁČOVÁ, Z., & POGHOSYAN, T. (2011). Determinants of bank interest margins in Russia: Does bank ownership matter?. Economic systems, 35(4), 481-495.
  • GILL, S. and KAUR, P. (2015). Family involvement in business and financial performance: A panel data analysis. Vikalpa, 40(4), 395-420.
  • HARB, E., EL KHOURY, R., MANSOUR, N., & DAOU, R. (2022). Risk management and bank performance: evidence from the MENA region. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Finans
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Özcan Işık 0000-0003-2230-8738

Ersan Ersoy 0000-0003-4079-2834

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Ekim 2022
Kabul Tarihi 30 Aralık 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

APA Işık, Ö., & Ersoy, E. (2022). BANK AGE AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: IS THE RELATIONSHIP LINEAR OR NONLINEAR? EVIDENCE FROM LISTED AND UNLISTED COMMERCIAL BANKS IN CHINA. Finans Ekonomi Ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(4), 893-906. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1217119