Su Havzası Yönetimi ve Planlaması için Stratejiler: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Öz

Yirminci yüzyılda havza planlamasına yönelik yönetişim yaklaşımları, potansiyel çevresel sorunlara yanıt olarak zaman içinde gelişmiştir. Çalışma öncelikle havza kavramına vurgu yapmaktadır. Küresel bilim camiasında son on yılda havza planlamasında kullanılan metodolojileri, özellikle en çok tercih edilen yöntemlere ve bunların popülerliğinin ardındaki gerekçelere odaklanarak araştırmaktadır. Bilim dünyasındaki önemli indekslerin incelenmesini içeren sistematik bir literatür taraması yapılmış ve toplam 10.154 yayın analiz edilmiştir. Sistematik literatür taramasında, bibliyografik atıf yönetim aracı olarak ENDNOTE X9 kullanılmıştır (Bramer, 2018). Ayrıca, seçilen 10.154 yayın arasından ilk okunacak yayınların seçimi için, VOSviewer ver.1.6.18 yazılımı (Van Eck ve Waltman, 2018) kullanılarak "Havza", "Planlama" ve "Yönetim" kavramlarıyla ilgili olan ve en fazla atıf alan yayınlar belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, bilim dünyasının en kapsamlı taranan indekslerinden birinden arama yöntemleri kullanılarak toplam 10.154 yayın seçilmiştirBu yayınların başlıkları, anahtar kelimeleri ve özetleri incelenmiş, çalışmanın hedefleriyle uyumlu olanlar, kapsamlı bir incelemesi için seçilmiştir. Bu tam metin incelemesi sırasında, kullanılan yaygın yöntemleri belirlemek için 270 yayın değerlendirilmiştir. Özellikle, en sık atıfta bulunulan yayınları incelemek için ilk olarak VOS görüntüleyici programı kullanılmıştır. Tam metin incelemelerinin bulguları, "Entegre Havza Yönetim Planlaması" ve morfometrik endeksler, örtüşme ağırlıklandırma ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) olmak üzere coğrafi bilgi sistemleri tekniklerinin kullanımı gibi yöntemlerin kayda değer bir yaygınlığını ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Havza yönetimi ve planlaması
• Bibliyometrik analiz
• VOS görüntüleyici

STRATEGIES FOR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Öz

In the twentieth century, governance approaches to watershed planning evolved in response to environmental challenges. The paper highlights the importance of watersheds and explores methodologies used in global watershed planning over the last decade, focusing on popular methods and their rationale. Through a systematic literature review of 10,154 publications, using ENDNOTE X9 for citation management (Bramer, 2018), and VOSviewer ver.1.6.18 software (Van Eck and Waltman, 2018) to prioritize publications, the study identified the most cited publications related to "Watershed", "Planning", and "Management". From these, publications aligning with study objectives underwent comprehensive review, totaling 270. Commonly used methods, such as "Integrated Watershed Management Planning" and geographic information systems techniques like morphometric indices, overlap weighting, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), emerged as prevalent findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Watershed management and planning
• Bibliometric analysis
• VOS viewer

Kaynakça

1. Baskent, E. Z. (2021, November 25). Assessment and Improvement Strategies of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) Planning Initiative in Turkey. Science of The Total Environment, 797, 149183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149183
2. Björnberg, K. E., Karlsson, M., Gilek, M., & Hansson, S. O. (2017). Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 229-241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.066
3. Boltz, F., LeRoy Poff, N., Folke, C., Kete, N., Brown, C. M., St, S., ... & Martinez, J. R. (2019). Water is a master variable: solving for resilience in the modern era. Water Security, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. WASEC.2019.100048
4. Bouchard, L., Albertini, M., Batista, R., & De Montigny, J. (2015). Research on health inequalities: a bibliometric analysis (1966–2014). Social Science & Medicine, 141, 100-108.
5. Bramer, W. M. (2018). Reference checking for systematic reviews using Endnote. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 542.
6. Dhamija, P., & Bag, S. (2020). Role of artificial intelligence in operations environment: a review and bibliometric analysis. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 869-896.
7. Dou, J., et al. (2019). "Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan." Science of the Total Environment 662: 332-346.
8. Green, B. J., & Alby, J. B. (1997). Watershed Planning. U. Denv. Water L. Rev., 1, 75.

9. Gu, J. J., Guo, P., & Huang, G. H. (2016). Achieving the objective of ecological planning for arid inland river basin under uncertainty based on ecological risk assessment. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 30(5), 1485-1501. doi:10.1007/s00477-015-1159-5
10. Gu, J. J., Li, M., Guo, P., & Huang, G. H. (2016). Risk Assessment for Ecological Planning of Arid Inland River Basins Under Hydrological and Management Uncertainties. Water Resources Management, 30(4), 1415-1431. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1230-0
11. Guan, Y., Kang, R., & Liu, J. (2019). Evolution of the field of ecological restoration over the last three decades: a bibliometric analysis. Restoration Ecology, 27(3), 647-660.
12. Hajkowicz, S. and K. Collins (2007). "A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management." Water Resources Management 21(9): 1553-1566.
13. Huang, C. L., Yang, Q. K., Huang, W. D., Zhang, J. L., Li, Y. R., & Yang, Y. C. (2018). Hydrological Response to Precipitation and Human Activities: A Case Study in the Zuli River Basin, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12), 18. doi:10.3390/ijerph15122780
14. Huang, J. J., Li, Y., Yin, J. X., & McBean, E. A. (2016). Precipitation regional extreme mapping as a tool for ungauged areas and the assessment of climate changes. Hydrological Processes, 30(12), 1940-1954. doi:10.1002/hyp.10743
15. Huang, X., & Chen, X. (2022). A regional eco-compensation assessment framework for blue water scarcity based on the spatial effects of socio-economic factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133171
16. Hung, F. W., et al. (2016). Exploring Win-Win Strategies for Urban Stormwater Management: A Case Study in Philadelphia's Combined Sewer Area. 16th Annual World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Amer Soc Civil Engineers, West Palm Beach, FL, Amer Soc Civil Engineers.
17. Kenee, F. B., Feyisa, A., Dallmeier, F., Jones, M., Jones, M., Duan, Y., Tang, J., et al. Determinants of Perception on Soil Erosion and Investment in Watershed Management: Evidence from Awash Basin in Ethiopia
18. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
19. Khan, M. A., Pattnaik, D., Ashraf, R., Ali, I., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2021). Value of special issues in the Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 125, 295-313.
20. Khosravi, K., Shahabi, H., Pham, B. T., Adamowski, J., Shirzadi, A., Pradhan, B., Dou, J., et al. (2019). A Comparative Assessment of Flood Susceptibility Modeling Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Hydrology, 573, 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
21. Lai, V., Huang, Y. F., Koo, C. H., Ahmed, A. N., & El-Shafie, A. (2022). Conceptual Sim-Heuristic Optimization Algorithm to Evaluate the Climate Impact on Reservoir Operations. Journal of Hydrology, 614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128530
22. Leitao, A. B. and J. Ahern (2002). "Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning." Landscape and Urban Planning 59(2): 65-93.
23. Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling extended in time: ten case histories Inform. Stor. Retr.
24. Madani, K. (2010). Game theory and water resources. Journal of Hydrology, 381(3-4), 225-238. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.045
25. Meninski, F. M. (1680). "Thesaurus Linguarum Orientalium Turcicae-Arabicae-Persicae: Lexicon Turcico-Arabico-Persicum," Bibliotheca Regia Monacensis, Austria. (Please note that this entry is different from the others as it doesn't have a traditional publication date or a DOI.)
26. Miraki, S., Zanganeh, S. H., Chapi, K., Singh, V. P., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., & Pham, B. T. (2019). Mapping Groundwater Potential Using a Novel Hybrid Intelligence Approach. Water Resources Management, 33(1), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2102-6
27. Mirchi, A., Watkins Jr, D., & Madani, K. (2010). Modeling for watershed planning, management, and decision making. In Watersheds: Management, restoration and environmental impact (pp. 354-392).
28. Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885-900. doi:10.13031/2013.23153
29. Naghibi, S. A., et al. (2016). "GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran." Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 188(1): 27.
30. Niu, G., Li, Y. P., Huang, G. H., Liu, J., & Fan, Y. R. (2016). Crop Planning and Water Resource Allocation for Sustainable Development of an Irrigation Region in China under Multiple Uncertainties. Agricultural Water Management, 166, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.011
31. Ohl, C., Krauze, K., & Grünbühel, C. (2007). Towards an understanding of long-term ecosystem dynamics by merging socio-economic and environmental research: criteria for long-term socio-ecological research sites selection. Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), 383-391.
32. Ojeda-Revah, L., Bocco, G., Ezcurra, E., & Espejel, I. (2008). Land-cover/use transitions in the binational Tijuana River watershed during a period of rapid industrialization. Applied Vegetation Science, 11(1), 107-116. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109X.2008.tb00209.x
33. Osenberg, C. W., & Schmitt, R. J. (1996). Detecting ecological impacts caused by human activities. In R. J. Schmitt & C. W. Osenberg (Eds.), Detecting ecological impacts: Concepts and applications in coastal habitats (pp. 3–16). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Öztürk, A. (2020). Bütüncül havza yönetimi yaklaşımının Ermenek çayı havzası örneğinde uygulanabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi / Evaluation of the applicability of the holistic basin management approach in the example of Ermenek river basin. Karabük Üniversitesi / Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü / Doğal Kaynakların Sürdürülebilir Yönetimi ve Planlaması Ana Bilim Dalı.
35. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906.
36. Pham-Duc, B., Nguyen, H., Phan, H., & Tran-Anh, Q. (2023). Trends and applications of Google Earth Engine in remote sensing and Earth science research: a bibliometric analysis using Scopus database. Earth Science Informatics, 16(3), 2355-2371.
37. Pourghasemi, H. R., Moradi, H. R., Aghda, S. M. F., Gokceoglu, C., & Pradhan, B. (2014). GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Probabilistic Likelihood Ratio and Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation Models (North of Tehran, Iran). Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(5), 1857-1878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0825-x
38. Raymond, C. M., et al. (2009). "Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services." Ecological Economics 68(5): 1301-1315.
39. Schmitt, R. J., & Osenberg, C. W. (Eds.). (1996). Detecting ecological impacts: concepts and applications in coastal habitats.
40. Seifu, W., et al. (2021). "Impact of land use type and altitudinal gradient on topsoil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in the semi-arid watershed of northern Ethiopia." Heliyon 7(4): 18.
41. Singh, V. P., & Frevert, D. K. (Eds.). (2006). Watershed Models. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
42. Şimşek, A., & Küçükesmen, E. (2019). Web of Science veri tabaninda analitik hiyerarşi prosesiyle ilgili yayinlarin bibliyometrik analizi. Busad Journal of Business Administration, 5(2), 148-162.
43. Tejwani, K. G. (1993). Water management issues: Population, Agriculture and Forests–a focus on watershed management. In M. Bonell, M. M. Hufschmidt, & J. S. Gladwell (Eds.), Hydrology and Water Management in the Humid Tropics (pp. 496-525). Paris: UNESCO.
44. Termeh, S. V. R., et al. (2018). "Flood susceptibility mapping using novel ensembles of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic algorithms." Science of the Total Environment 615: 438-451.
45. Theobald, D. M. and W. H. Romme (2007). "Expansion of the US wildland-urban interface." Landscape and Urban Planning 83(4): 340-354.
46. Tian, Y., Wen, C., & Hong, S. (2008). Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 65-74.
47. Tsakiris, G., et al. (2007). "Regional drought assessment based on the Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI)." Water Resources Management 21(5): 821-833.
48. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
49. Van Lier, H. N. (1998). The role of land use planning in sustainable rural systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 41(2), 83-91.
50. Yilmaz, E., Yilmaz, A., & Arslan, D. (2010). Su Havzalarında Yönetim Planlamasının Önemi. (1), 75-78.
51. Zhang, Q., Li, J. F., Singh, V. P., & Xiao, M. Z. (2013). Spatio-Temporal Relations between Temperature and Precipitation Regimes: Implications for Temperature-Induced Changes in the Hydrological Cycle. Global and Planetary Change, 111, 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.08.012