Turkish Dialect Implementation of the Stroop Task

Öz

This study investigates the effect of language on cognitive control and attention processes in speakers of different Turkish dialects using the Stroop task. It differs from other studies investigating the Stroop task in the language domain in that it investigates the Stroop task across Turkish dialects. Specifically, the study aims to show how the Stroop effect works in different dialects of Turkish. For this purpose, Kazakh and Turkmen participants learning Turkish were administered the Stroop task. The choice of Kazakh and Turkmen dialects of Turkish was based on their close linguistic relationship to Turkish and the linguistic background of the participants. In the Stroop task, participants were presented with coloured words printed in either congruent or incongruent colours. The results showed that Turkmen and Kazakh participants responded slower in the incongruent condition, but had faster response times in the congruent condition. Furthermore, accuracy rates differed between the two groups, with Turkmen participants generally achieving higher correct response rates. These findings suggest that the strategies of reducing cognitive load and adding control cues are differentially effective across dialect groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• stroop task
• dialects
• Kazakh
• Turkmen

Stroop Testinin Türk Lehçelerine Uygulanması

Öz

Bu çalışma, Stroop görevini kullanarak farklı Türk lehçelerini konuşan bireylerde dilin bilişsel kontrol ve dikkat süreçleri üzerindeki etkisini incelemiştir. Stroop görevini dil alanında araştıran diğer çalışmalardan farklı olarak çalışma sadece Türkçe öğrenen Kazak ve Türkmen katılımcılara uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı, Stroop etkisinin Türkçenin farklı lehçelerinde nasıl işlediğini göstermektir. Stroop görevinde katılımcılara uyumlu veya uyumsuz renklerde basılmış renkli kelimeler sunulmuştur. Sonuçlar, Türkmen ve Kazak katılımcıların uyumsuz durumda daha yavaş tepki verdiklerini ancak uyumlu durumda daha hızlı tepki sürelerine sahip olduklarını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, doğruluk oranları iki grup arasında farklılık göstermiştir. Türkmen katılımcılar genel olarak daha yüksek doğru yanıt oranlarına ulaşmıştır. Bu bulgular, bilişsel yükü azaltma ve kontrol ipuçları ekleme stratejilerinin, her iki lehçe grubunda farklı şekilde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Türkmen öğrencilerinin daha yüksek doğru yanıt oranlarının, Türkiye Türkçesi ile Türkmencenin aynı lehçe grubunda yer almasından kaynaklanmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• stroop görevi
• dialect
• Kazakça
• Türkmence.

Kaynakça

1. Atlı, M. H. (2012). Yabancı dil nasıl edinilir?. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, 22(2), 1-12.
2. Aparicio, X., Heidlmayr, K., and Isel, F. (2017). Inhibition efficiency in highly proficient bilinguals and simultaneous interpreters: Evidence from language switching and Stroop tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1427-1451. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9501-3
3. Azizian, A., Nestor, L.J., Payer, D., Monterosso, J. R., Brody, A.L., and London, E.D. (2010). Smoking reduces conflict-related anterior cingulate activity in abstinent cigarette smokers performing a Stroop task. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(3):775-82. http://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.186.
4. Bayard, S., Erkes, J., and Moroni, C. (2011). Collège des Psychologues Cliniciens spécialisés en Neuropsychologie du Languedoc Roussillon (CPCN Languedoc Roussillon). Victoria Stroop Test: Normative data in a sample group of older people and the study of their clinical applications in the assessment of inhibition in Alzheimer's disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 26(7):653-61. http://doi.org/doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr053.
5. Becker, E. S., Rinck, M., Margraf, J., and Roth, W. T. (2001). The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders: General emotionality or disorder specificity?. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 15(3), 147-159. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6185(01)00055-x.
6. Berger, N., Richards, A., and Davelaar, E.J. (2019). Preserved Proactive Control in Ageing: A Stroop Study With Emotional Faces vs. Words. Front Psychol. 10, 1-16. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01906 Kar, B.R., Srinivasan, N., Yagyima, N. and Nigam, R. (2018): Proactive and reactive control depends on emotional valence: A Stroop study with emotional expressions and words. Cognition and Emotion, 32(2), 325-340. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1304897
7. Braet, W., Noppe, N., Wagemans, J., and Op de Beeck, H. (2011). Increased Stroop interference with better second-language reading skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 596-607. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.513735.
8. Brauer, M. (2013). Stroop interference in bilinguals: The role of similarity between the two languages. Foreign Language Learning, 317-337.

9. Breitenstein, C., and Knecht, S. (2002). Development and validation of a language learning model for behavioral and functional-imaging studies. J. Neurosci. Methods 114, 173–179. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(01)00525-8.
10. Buran, A., Alkaya, E. and Yalcin, S. K. (2014). Çağdaş Türk Yazı Dilleri I Güneybatı/Oğuz Grubu Contemporary Turkish Writing Languages I Southwestern/Oghuz Group. Ankara. Akçağ Yayınları.
11. Buran, A. and Alkaya, E. (2014). Çağdaş Türk Yazı Dilleri 3 Kuzeybatı/Kıpçak Grubu Contemporary Turkish Writing Languages 3 Northwestern/Kipchak Group. Ankara. Akçağ Yayınları.
12. Bush, G., Whalen, P.J., Rosen, B.R., Jenike, M.A., McInerney, S. C. and Rauch, S.L. (1998). The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Hum. Brain Mapp., 6, 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193.
13. Chen, H., and Ho, C. (1986). Development of Stroop interference in Chinese-English bilinguals. J. Exp. Psychol. Learning. Memory and Cognition. 12, 397–401.
14. Chen, Z., and Zou, L. (2021). The stroop effect under the interference of language. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021), 432-435.
15. Coderre, E. L., Filippi, C. G., Newhouse, P. A., and Dumas, J. A. (2008). The Stroop effect in kana and kanji scripts in native Japanese speakers: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 107(2), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.01.011
16. Coderre, E. L., Van Heuven, W. J., and Conklin, K. (2013). The timing and magnitude of Stroop interference and facilitation in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 420-441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000405
17. Coltheart, M., Woollams, A., Kinoshita, S., and Perry, C. (1999). A position-sensitive Stroop effect: Further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 456-463.
18. Costa, A., Albareda, B., and Santesteban, M. (2008). Assessing the presence of lexical competition across languages: Evidence from the Stroop task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003252
19. Dell’Acqua, R., Job, R., Peressotti, F., and Pascali, A. (2007). The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 717-722. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196827
20. Drobes, D.J., Elibero, A., and Evans, D.E. (2006). Attentional bias for smoking and affective stimuli: A Stroop task study. Psychol Addict Behav, 20(4), 490-5. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.490
21. Dudschig, C., De la Vega, I., and Kaup, B. (2014). Embodiment and second-language: Automatic activation of motor responses during processing spatially associated L2 words and emotion L2 words in a vertical Stroop paradigm. Brain and Language, 132, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.02.002
22. Fan, L., Xu, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, F., Yang, Y., and Liu, X. (2016). Neural correlates of task-irrelevant first and second language emotion words–evidence from the emotional face–word Stroop task. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 220614. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01672
23. Fang, S. P., Tzeng, O. J., and Alva, L. (1981). Intralanguage vs. interlanguage Stroop effects in two types of writing systems. Memory & Cognition, 9, 609-617.
24. Filippi, P., Ocklenburg, S., Bowling, D. L., Heege, L., Güntürkün, O., Newen, A., and De Boer, B. (2017). More than words (and faces): evidence for a Stroop effect of prosody in emotion word processing. Cognition and Emotion, 31(5), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1177489
25. Frings, C., Englert, J., Wentura, D., and Bermeitinger, C. (2010). Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903156594
26. Geukes, S., Gaskell, M. G., and Zwitserlood, P. (2015). Stroop effects from newly learned color words: Effects of memory consolidation and episodic context. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00278
27. Goldfarb, L., and Tzelgov, J. (2007). The cause of the within-language Stroop superiority effect and its implications. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600983415
28. Gootjes, L., Coppens, L. C., Zwaan, R. A., Franken, I. H., and Van Strien, J. W. (2011). Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: An ERP study. Int J Psychophysiol, 79(3), 356-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.12.003.
29. Heidlmayr, K., Moutier, S., Hemforth, B., Courtin, C., Tanzmeister, R., and Isel, F. (2014). Successive bilingualism and executive functions: The effect of second language use on inhibitory control in a behavioural Stroop Colour Word Task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 630-645. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000539 Houx, P. J., Jolles, J., and Vreeling, F. W. (1993). Stroop interference: aging effects assessed with the Stroop Color-Word Test. Experimental Aging Research, 19(3), 209-224.
30. Hu, Y., Kang, X. and Mao, R. (2021). The language impact on the stroop effect: Comparison in chinese and english. Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2021), 929-933.
31. Ingraham, L. J., Chard, F., Wood, M., and Mirsky, A. F. (1988). An Hebrew language version of the Stroop test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67(1), 187-192.
32. Kelly, S.D., Creigh, P. And Bartolotti, J. (2010). Integrating speech and iconic gestures in a Stroop-like task: evidence for automatic processing. J Cogn Neurosci, 22(4), 683-94. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21254.
33. Lee, T. M., and Chan, C. C. (2000). Stroop interference in Chinese and English. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(4), 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3395(200008)22:4;1-0;FT465
34. Lee, W. L., Wee, G. C., Tzeng, O. J., and Hung, D. L. (1992). A study of interlingual and intralingual Stroop effect in three different scripts: Logograph, syllabary, and alphabet. Advances in Psychology, 83, 427-442.
35. Leung, H. C., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J. C., Peterson, B. S., and Gore, J. C. (2000). An event-related functional MRI study of the Stroop color word interference task. Cerebral Cortex, 10(6), 552-560. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.6.552
36. Levinson, O., Hershey, A., Farah, R., and Horowitz-Kraus, T. (2018). Altered functional connectivity of the executive functions network during a stroop task in children with reading difficulties. Brain Connect. 8(8), 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2018.0595
37. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163.
38. MacLeod, C. M., and MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(10), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01530-8
39. Mägiste, E. (1984). Stroop tasks and dichotic translation: The development of interference patterns in bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(2), 304.
40. Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., Mizrahi, E., Kania, U., and Cordes, A. K. (2013). Multilingual Stroop performance: Effects of trilingualism and proficiency on inhibitory control. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(1), 82-104.
41. Moritz, S., Fischer, B. K., Hottenrott, B., Kellner, M., Fricke, S., Randjbar, S., and Jelinek, L. (2008). Words may not be enough! No increased emotional Stroop effect in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(9), 1101-1104. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14790718.2012.708037
42. Naylor, L. J., Stanley, E. M., and Wicha, N. Y. (2012). Cognitive and electrophysiological correlates of the bilingual Stroop effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 81. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00081
43. Nicosia, J. and Balota, D. (2020). The consequences of processing goal-irrelevant information during the Stroop task. Psychol Aging, 35(5):663-675. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000371
44. Norris, D.G., Zysset, S., Mildner, T., and Wiggins, C.J. (2002). An investigation of the value of spin-echo-based fMRI using a Stroop color-word matching task and EPI at 3 T. Neuroimage, 15(3):719-26. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1005
45. Periáñez, J.A., Lubrini, G., García-Gutiérrez, A., and Ríos-Lago, M. (2021). Construct validity of the stroop color-word test: Influence of speed of visual search, verbal fluency, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and conflict monitoring. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 36(1):99-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa034.
46. Starreveld, P.A. and Heij, W.D. (2017). Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings. Psychon Bull Rev, 24, 721–733. https://doi.org/ 10.3758/s13423-016-1167-6
47. Raz, A., Moreno-Íniguez, M., Martin, L., and Zhu, H. (2007). Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly hypnotizable individuals. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(2), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.04.004
48. Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.88.
49. Roelofs, A., and Hagoort, P. (2002). Control of language use: Cognitive modeling of the hemodynamics of Stroop task performance. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00218-5
50. Sabourin, L., and Vīnerte, S. (2020). Examining bilingual language control using the Stroop task. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), 26(156), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3791/60479.
51. Scarpina, F., and Tagini, S. (2017). The stroop color and word test. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557.
52. Schirmer, A., and Kotz, S. A. (2003). ERP evidence for a sex-specific Stroop effect in emotional speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1135-1148. https://doi.org/ 10.1162/089892903322598102
53. Schoene, D., Smith, S.T., Davies, T.A., Delbaere, K., and Lord, S.R., (2014). A Stroop Stepping Test (SST) using low-cost computer game technology discriminates between older fallers and non-fallers. Age Ageing. 43(2), 285-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/aft157
54. Singh, N., and Mishra, R. K. (2013). Second language proficiency modulates conflict-monitoring in an oculomotor Stroop task: Evidence from Hindi-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(4), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00322
55. Smith, M. C., and Kirsner, K. (1982). Language and orthography as irrelevant features in colour-word and picture-word Stroop interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34(1), 153-170.
56. Suarez, P. A., Gollan, T. H., Heaton, R., Grant, I., Cherner, M., and HNRC Group. (2014). Second-language fluency predicts native language Stroop effects: Evidence from Spanish–English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(3), 342-348. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1355617714000058
57. Sumiya, H., and Healy, A. F. (2004). Phonology in the bilingual Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 752-758. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195865.
58. Sutton, T. M., Altarriba, J., Gianico, J. L., and Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2007). The automatic access of emotion: Emotional Stroop effects in Spanish–English bilingual speakers. Cognition and Emotion, 21(5), 1077-1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930601054133
59. Tse, C. S., and Altarriba, J. (2012). The effects of first-and second-language proficiency on conflict resolution and goal maintenance in bilinguals: Evidence from reaction time distributional analyses in a Stroop task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 663-676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000077
60. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., and Leiser, D. (1990). Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(5), 760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.5.760
61. Van Heuven, W. J., Conklin, K., Coderre, E. L., Guo, T., and Dijkstra, T. (2011). The influence of cross-language similarity on within-and between-language Stroop effects in trilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00374
62. Wang, R., Fan, X., Liu, C., and Cai, Z. G. (2016). Cognitive control and word recognition speed influence the Stroop effect in bilinguals. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ijop.12115