Bir Metik ve Eski bir Köle: Aspasia ve Sojourner Truth`ta Kamusal ve Özel Alan Retoriği

Öz

Feminist retorik ve eleştirel hayal gücünü kuramsal çerçeve olarak kullanan bu nitel çalışma, dönemlerinin toplumsal cinsiyet kısıtlamalarına meydan okuyan iki kadının devrimci retorik politikasını inceler: antik Yunanistan'da hakları elinden alınmış bir metik olan Aspasia ve on dokuzuncu yüzyıl Amerika'sında özgürleşmiş bir köle olan Sojourner Truth. Her iki kadın da geleneksel olarak erkekler tarafından kontrol edilen kamusal retorik alanları stratejik olarak geri kazandı ve dönüştürdü, böylece son derece farklı tarihsel bağlamlarda toplumsal cinsiyet politikalarında derin değişimler yarattı. Çalışma, Aspasia'nın kadınların sistematik olarak kamusal söylemden dışlandığı Atina entelektüel yaşamına benzeri görülmemiş nüfuzunu ve Truth'un, Siyah kadınların seslerinin ırk ve toplumsal cinsiyetin kesişen baskılarıyla marjinalleştirildiği kölelik karşıtı ve kadın hakları alanlarındaki güçlü varlığını analiz eder. Aristoteles'in retorik tipolojilerini Lefebvre'in mekansal teorisi ve eleştirel feminist analizle birleştiren bu araştırma, mekan ve güç arasındaki karmaşık diyalektiği inceler. Bu öncü kadınların düşmanca retorik ortamlarda yalnızca yol bulmakla kalmayıp bunları temelden yeniden hayal ettiklerini ve yeniden yapılandırdıklarını, kadınların kamusal söyleme katılımı için hayati emsaller oluşturduklarını ortaya koyar. İki bin yılı aşkın bir süreyle ayrılmış ancak benzer mücadelelerle bağlantılı başarıları, kadınların mekansal kısıtlamalara karşı retorik direnişindeki tarihsel sürekliliği ve daha önce kendilerine yasaklanan retorik alanları işgal etme ve dönüştürme çabalarını aydınlatır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Baskı
• Aspasia
• Sojourner Truth
• Özgürlükçü Soylemleri
• Feminist Retorik

A Metic and a Former Slave: Rhetoric of Public and Private Space in Aspasia and Sojourner Truth

Öz

Drawing on feminist rhetoric and critical imagination as theoretical frameworks, this qualitative study examines the revolutionary rhetorical politics of two women who defied their eras' gender constraints: Aspasia, a disenfranchised metic in ancient Greece, and Sojourner Truth, an emancipated slave in nineteenth-century America. Both women strategically reclaimed and transformed public rhetorical spaces traditionally controlled by men, creating profound shifts in gender politics across vastly different historical contexts. It analyzes Aspasia's unprecedented penetration of Athenian intellectual life—where women were systematically excluded from public discourse—and Truth's commanding presence in abolitionist and suffragist spaces where Black women's voices were marginalized by intersecting oppressions of race and gender. Using Aristotle's rhetorical typologies with Lefebvre's spatial theory and critical feminist analysis, this research examines the complex dialectic between space and power. It reveals how these pioneering women not only navigated hostile rhetorical environments but fundamentally reimagined and reconstructed them, establishing vital precedents for women's participation in public discourse. Their achievements, separated by over two millennia yet linked by parallel struggles, illuminate historical continuities in women's rhetorical resistance to spatial confinement and their persistent efforts to occupy and transform rhetorical territories previously denied to them

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Oppresion
• Aspasia
• Sojourner Truth
• Liberational Discourses
• Feminist Rhetoric

Kaynakça

1. Ackerman, J. (2003). The space of rhetoric in everyday life. In Martin Nystrand and James Duff (Eds.) Towards a Rhetoric of Everyday Life: New Directions in Research and Writing, Text, and Discourse (pp. 84-117). University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Allen, P. (1985). The concept of women: The Aristotelian revolution, 750 B.C.-A.D. 1250. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
3. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. 2nd Edition (1998). The University of Chicago Press.
4. Aristotle (2004). Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts, Modern Library.
5. Atwater, D. F. (2009). African American women's rhetoric: The search for dignity, personhood, and honor. Lexington Books.
6. Bebee, K., et al. (2015). Space, place, and gendered identities: Feminist history and the spatial turn. Routledge.
7. Bizzell, P. et al. (2020). The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical times to present. 3rd ed., Bedford Books.
8. Bizzell, P. (1992). Opportunities for feminist research in the history of rhetoric." Rhetoric Review, 11 (1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350199209388986

9. Bryant, J. K. (2004). The literary foremother: An embodiment of the rhetoric of freedom. In Elaine B. Richardson and Ronald L. Jackson II (Eds.). African American rhetoric(s): Interdisciplinary perspectives, (pp. 73-85). Southern University of Illinois Press.
10. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
11. Cresswell, T. (1996). In place/out of place: Geography, ideology, and transgression. University of Minnesota Press.
12. Dickinson, G. (2019). Space, place, and the textures of rhetorical criticism. Western Journal of Communication, 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1672886
13. Endres, D. and Senda-Cook S. (2011). Location matters: The rhetoric of place in protest. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97 (3), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2011.585167
14. Enoch, J. (2013). Releasing Hold: Feminist historiography without the tradition. In Michelle Ballif, (Ed.) Theorizing histories of rhetoric (pp.58-73). Illinois University Press.
15. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, pp. 56-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
16. Gestrich, A. (2006). The public sphere and the Habermas debate. German History, 24(3), 413-430.
17. Gilyard, K., and Banks, A. (2018). On African American rhetoric. Routledge.
18. Gilyard, K. (2004). Aspects of African American rhetoric as a field. Routledge.
19. Glenn, C. (1994). Sex, lies, and manuscript: Refiguring Aspasia in the history of rhetoric.
20. College Composition and Communication, 45(2), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.2307/359005 -----------. (1997). Rhetoric retold: Regendering the tradition from antiquity through the renaissance. Southern Illinois Press.
21. Han, C.K. (1994). Aeschines on Socratic eros. In Paul A. Vander Waerdt (Ed.) The Socratic Movement, (pp.87-107). Cornell University Press.
22. Henry, M. M. (1995). Prisoner of history: Aspasia of Miletus and her biographical tradition. Oxford University Press.
23. Jackson, R. L., and Richardson E. B. (2003). Understanding African American rhetoric. Routledge.
24. Jackson, R. L. (1995). Toward an Afrocentric methodology for the critical assessment of rhetoric. In L.A. Niles (Ed.) African American Rhetoric: A Reader (pp.148-157). Kendall Hunt Publishing.
25. Jarratt, S. (1991). Reading the sophists: Classical rhetoric refigured. Southern Illinois University Press.
26. Jarratt, S. and Ong, R. (1996). Aspasia: Rhetoric, gender, and colonial ideology. In Andrea Lunsford (Ed.) Reclaiming rhetorica: Women in the rhetorical tradition, (pp.9-25). University of Pittsburgh Press.
27. Johnson, N. (2002). Gender and rhetorical space in American life, 1866-1910. Southern Illinois University Press.
28. Kennedy, G. A. (1994). History of classical rhetoric. Princeton University Press. ----------. (2007). Aristotle: On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. 2nd ed., Oxford University Press.
29. Kirsch, G. E., and Royster J. J. (2010). Feminist rhetorical practices: In search of excellence. College Composition and Communication, 61(4), 640-672. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27917867 Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
30. Lipscomb, D. R. (1995). Sojourner Truth: A practical public discourse. In Andrea Lunsford (Ed.) Reclaiming rhetorica: Women in the rhetorical tradition, (pp.227-247). University of Pittsburgh Press. Lunsford, Andrea A. (1995). On reclaiming rhetorica. In Andrea Lunsford (Ed.)
31. Reclaiming rhetorica: Women in the rhetorical tradition, (pp.3-9) University of Pittsburgh Press.
32. Massey, D. (2013). Space, place, and gender. John Wiley & Sons.
33. McAlister, J. F. (2019). Space in rhetorical theory. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, 28 Aug. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.123
34. Morse, H. (2014). Minding 'our Cicero': Nineteenth century African American women's rhetoric and the classical tradition. Unpublished Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
35. Mountford, R. (2001). On gender and rhetorical space. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 31(1), 41-71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3886401
36. Nevett, L. C. (2010). Domestic space in classical antiquity. Cambridge University Press. Painter, N. I. (1997). Sojourner Truth: A life, a symbol. W.W. Norton Company.
37. Plato. "Menexenus." (1997). Plato: Complete works, John M. Cooper (Ed.), translated by Paul Shorey (pp. 951-964). Hackett Publishing.
38. Rai, C. and Druschke, C. G. (2018). On being there: An introduction to studying rhetoric in the field. In Caroline Gottschalk Druschke and Candice Rai (Eds.) Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion (pp.1-21) University of Alabama Press.
39. Richardson, E. B., and Jackson, R. L. (2004). African American rhetoric(s): Interdisciplinary perspectives. Southern Illinois University Press.
40. Royster, J. J. (2000). Traces of a stream: Literacy and social change among African American women. University of Pittsburgh Press.
41. Rubinelli, S. (2006). The ancient argumentative game: Τóπoι and loci in action. Argumentation, 20 (3), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9010-2 ---. (2009). Dialectical and rhetorical use of topoi. Ars Topica, 15, Springer, 43-90, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9549-8_2
42. Shome, R. (2003). Space matters: The power and practice of space. Communication Theory, 13(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00281.x Smitherman, G. (1986). Talkin and testifyin: The Language of black America. Wayne State University Press.
43. Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso Press.
44. Susen, S. (2011). Critical notes on Habermas’ theory of the public sphere. Sociological Analysis, 5(1), 37-62.
45. Tomlin, C. (1999). Black language style in sacred and secular contexts. Caribbean Diaspora Press.
46. Türk, M.T. (2018). Edebiyat ve şölen: Aktör, mekân, ritüel. Çizgi Kitabevi
47. Walker, R. J. (1992). The rhetoric of struggle: Public address by African American women. Garland Publishing.
48. Westgate, R. (2015). Space and social complexity in Greece from the early iron age to classical period. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 84,47-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.2972/hesperia.84.1.0047.
49. Williams, K. L.H. (2004). Ties that bind: A comparative analysis of Zora Neale Hurston's and Geneva Smitherman's work. In Elaine B. Richardson and Ronald L. Jackson (Eds.) African American rhetoric(s): Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 86-110). Southern Illinois University Press.