Kadınların Yazılım, Bilgisayar ve Yapay Zekâ Mühendisliğinde Eğitimi ve İstihdamı: Akademik Literatürdeki Eğilimler ve Tematik Yapılar

Öz

Bu çalışma, kadınların mühendislik alanlarındaki istihdamı ve eğitimiyle ilgili literatürü bibliyometrik yöntemlerle analiz etmektedir. Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanından elde edilen 220 kayıt, yayın türü, anahtar kelime, yazar üretkenliği, kaynak kullanımı ve kavramsal yoğunluk gibi açılardan incelenmiştir. Analiz sürecinde VOSviewer, RStudio (Bibliometrix) ve Gephi yazılımları kullanılmış; anahtar kelime ağları, tematik haritalar ve kümelenme yapıları görselleştirilmiştir. En sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeler arasında gender, software engineering ve education öne çıkarken, en etkili yayın kaynakları Bradford Yasası çerçevesinde belirlenmiştir. Lotka Yasası ise yazar üretkenliğini değerlendirmek için uygulanmıştır. Çalışma, kadınların mühendislik alanındaki temsiline ilişkin literatürdeki eğilimleri, bilgi yoğunluklarını ve iş birliği ağlarını sistematik biçimde ortaya koymakta; bu alanda yapılacak gelecekteki çalışmalara stratejik bir zemin sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mühendislikte kadınlar
• Bibliyometrik analiz
• Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği
• STEM eğitimi
• Bilimsel üretkenlik

Education and Employment of Women in Software, Computer, and Artificial Intelligence Engineering: Trends and Thematic Structures in the Academic Literature

Öz

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on the employment and education of women in engineering. A total of 220 records retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection were analyzed in terms of document types, keyword co-occurrence, author productivity, source distribution, and conceptual density. VOSviewer, RStudio (Bibliometrix), and Gephi were used for network visualization, thematic mapping, and clustering analysis. The most frequently used keywords were gender, software engineering, and education, while the most influential sources were identified using Bradford’s Law. Lotka’s Law was applied to evaluate author productivity. The study systematically reveals thematic trends, collaborative structures, and key focus areas in the literature, providing a strategic basis for future research on women's representation in engineering education and employment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Women in engineering
• Bibliometric analysis
• Gender equality
• STEM education
• Scientific productivity

Kaynakça

1. Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
2. Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. (2009, Mart). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361–362.
3. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.
4. Boman, L., Andersson, J. & de Oliveira Neto, F. G. (2024, Nisan). Breaking Barriers: Investigating the Sense of Belonging Among Women and Non-Binary Students in Software Engineering. Proceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training, 93–103.
5. Chatterjee, J. & Dethlefs, N. (2021). Scientometric review of artificial intelligence for operations & maintenance of wind turbines: The past, present and future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 111051.
6. Chen, K., Zhai, X., Wang, S., Li, X., Lu, Z., Xia, D. & Li, M. (2023). Emerging trends and research foci of deep learning in spine: bibliometric and visualization study. Neurosurgical Review, 46(1), 81.
7. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166.
8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.

9. Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford’s Law and related statistical patterns. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4, 476–483.
10. Hassan, W. & Duarte, A. E. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: a few suggestions. Current Problems in Cardiology, 102640.
11. Hertzel, D. H. (1987). Bibliometrics, history of the development of ideas. In A. Kent (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (s. 144–219). New York: Marcel Dekker.
12. Ioannides, M. G., Papaioannou, I. K. & Ioannidou, F. G. (2004). Electrical and computer engineering: Studies, students, academic staff and women representation.
13. Kumar, M., George, R. J. & PS, A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis for medical research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 45(3), 277–282.
14. Lagisz, M., Yang, Y., Young, S., & Nakagawa, S. (2025). A practical guide to evaluating sensitivity of literature search strings for systematic reviews using relative recall. Research Synthesis Methods, 16(1), 1-14.
15. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.
16. Marques, M. (2015, Ekim). Software engineering education—does gender matter in project results?—a Chilean case study. 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8.
17. Ouhbi, S. & Awad, M. A. M. (2021, Nisan). The impact of combining storytelling with lecture on female students in software engineering education. 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 443–447.
18. Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press.
19. Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: the main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2).
20. Tonta, Y. & Al, U. (2008). Türkçe makalelerin dergilere dağılımı ve Bradford Yasası. Bilgi Dünyası, 9(1), 41–66.
21. Torun, E. & Bozkuş, K. (2022). Sınıf yönetimi araştırmalarının bibliometrik analizi. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 6(1), 20–51.
22. UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls' and women's education in STEM. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
23. Xiao, L., Huo, X., Wang, Y., Li, W., Li, M., Wang, C. ... & Sun, T. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of global research status and trends in neuromodulation techniques in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), 183.
24. Yao, X., Xu, Z., Wang, X., Wang, L. & Škare, M. (2024). Energy efficiency and COVID-19: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on economic effects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(1), 287–311.
25. Yılmaz, M. (2006). Lotka Yasası ve Türkiye’de kütüphane ve bilgi bilimi literatürü. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 16(1), 61–69.