Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

KUZEYBATI ANADOLU’DA (KIYI TROAS BÖLGESİ) KIRSAL HAYVANCILIK VE ARAZİ KULLANIMI: ETNOARKEOLOJİK BİR BAKIŞ

Yıl 2019, , 17 - 25, 31.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538315

Öz

Son yıllarda günümüzde
yaşanılan ya da yakın zamanda terk edilmiş kırsal yerleşmeleri kapsayan etnografik araştırmalar, arkeolojik
araştırmaların ilgi çekici bir alanı haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma modern
materyal kültür kalıntıları üzerinde arkeolojik hipotezler için etnografik
açıdan incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Çanakkale’nin Kıyı Troas bölgesinin kırsal
karma ekonomik aktiviteleri arasında hayvancılık ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bugün hâlâ kullanılmaya devam eden bölgeye has hayvan ağılları gibi
etnografik veriler ışığında, aynı coğrafyada ve benzer çevresel etkenler
karşısında, bölge insanının Prehistorik dönem toplulukları ile benzer arazi
kullanım alışkanlıkları ve üretim tekniklerini sürdürdükleri düşünülmektedir.
Bölgenin yakın geçmişine ait kırsal arazi kullanımı, kırsal ekonomik unsurlar
ve geleneksel üretim süreçlerine ait etnografik verilerin, arkeolojik
problemlerin çözümüne katkı sağlayacağı göz önüne alındığında, Troas kıyı bölgelerinde
yer alan hayvancılık ile ilgili yapıların ve ekonomik faaliyet alanlarının
etnografik yöntemlerle incelenmesi, aynı bölgede yaşayan prehistorik köy
toplumların geçim ekonomilerini anlama konusunda fikirler sunabilir.

Kaynakça

  • Blitzer, Harriet (1990), “Pastoral life in the mountains of Crete,” Expedition 32 (3): pp. 34-41.
  • Chang, C.; P.A. Tourtellotte (1993) “Ethnoarchaeological survey of pastoral transhumance sites in the Grevena Region, Greece,” Journal of Field Archaeology 20: pp. 249-264.
  • Murray, P.; C. Chang (1981), “An ethnoarchaeological study of contemporary herder’s site.” Journal of Field Archaeology 8: pp. 372-381.
  • Murray, P.; P.N. Kardulias (1986), “A modern-site survey in the Southern Argolid, Greece,” Journal of Field Archaeology 13: pp. 21-41.
  • Murray, P.; P.N. Kardulias (2000), “The present as past: an ethnoarchaeological study of modern sites in the Pikrodhafni Valley,” Contingent Countryside: Settlement, Economy, and Land Use in the Southern Argolid since 1700, edited by S. B. Sutton. Stanford, pp. 141-168.
  • Riehl, Simone; Elena Marinova (2008), “Mid-Holocene vegetation change in the Troad (W Anatolia): Man-made or natural?”, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 17, 3, pp. 297-312.
  • Sampson, Adamantios (2002), The Neolithic Settlement at Ftelia, Mykonos, University of the Aegean, Rhodes.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan (2006a), “The Late Neolithic in the eastern Aegean: Excavations at Gülpınar in the Troad,” Hesperia 75: pp. 289-315.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan (2006b), “Patterns of Dairying in Coastal Northwestern Anatolia”, Ethnoarchaeological Investigations in Rural Anatolia, Volume 3, T. Takaoğlu (ed.), Ege Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 23-44.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan (2007), “Modern Site Surveys in Ethnoarchaeology: The Case of North-Western Anatolia”, Ethnoarchaeological Investigations in Rural Anatolia, Volume 4, T. Takaoğlu (ed.), Ege Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 87-97.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan; A.O. Bamyacı (2005), Ethnoarchaeological Investigations in Rural Anatolia 2: pp. 115-137.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan; Göksel Sazcı; Devrim Çalış-Sazcı (2008), “Patterns Of Troy I Period Settlements On The Coastal Troad", The Aegean Early Bronze Age: New Evidence, C. Doumas, A. Giannikouri, O. Kouka (derl.), International Conference April 11th-14th 2008, Archaeological Institute of Aegean Studies, Yunanistan, pp. 1-12.
  • Uerpmann, M. (2003), “Environmental aspects of economic changes in Troia,” Troia and the Troad. Scientific Approaches, G.A. Wagner, E. Pernicka, H.-P. Uerpmann (derl.), Berlin, pp. 251-262.
  • Whitelaw, T.M. (1991), “The ethnoarchaeology of recent rural settlements and land use in northwest Kea,” Landscape Archaeology as Long-Term history: Northern Keos in the Cycladic Islands from Earliest Settlemnt to Modern Times, J.F. Cherry, J.L. Davis, and E. Mantzourani (derl.), Los Angeles, pp. 403-454.

Rural Stock-breeding and land-use at Northwestern Anatolia (Coastal Troad): An Ethnoarchaeological View

Yıl 2019, , 17 - 25, 31.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538315

Öz

In recent years,
ethnographic research, which includes modern pastoral sites or recently
abandoned, has become a curious field of archaeological research. The aim of
this study was to investigate the modern material culture ethnographically as a
source of archeological hypotheses about the past behaviors. Rural mixed
economic activities at the coastal Troad region of Çanakkale are mainly dominated
by stock-breeding. In the light of the ethnographic data such as the animal-related
structures that still continue to be used today, in the same area and similar
environmental factors, it is thought that the people of the region continue their
similar economic exploitation of the rural land use habits like as prehistoric
communities. Considering that the ethnographic data on rural land-use, rural
economic factors and traditional agrarian practices of present-day behavior
will contribute to our understanding of past mode of the rural economy of
prehistoric societies.

Kaynakça

  • Blitzer, Harriet (1990), “Pastoral life in the mountains of Crete,” Expedition 32 (3): pp. 34-41.
  • Chang, C.; P.A. Tourtellotte (1993) “Ethnoarchaeological survey of pastoral transhumance sites in the Grevena Region, Greece,” Journal of Field Archaeology 20: pp. 249-264.
  • Murray, P.; C. Chang (1981), “An ethnoarchaeological study of contemporary herder’s site.” Journal of Field Archaeology 8: pp. 372-381.
  • Murray, P.; P.N. Kardulias (1986), “A modern-site survey in the Southern Argolid, Greece,” Journal of Field Archaeology 13: pp. 21-41.
  • Murray, P.; P.N. Kardulias (2000), “The present as past: an ethnoarchaeological study of modern sites in the Pikrodhafni Valley,” Contingent Countryside: Settlement, Economy, and Land Use in the Southern Argolid since 1700, edited by S. B. Sutton. Stanford, pp. 141-168.
  • Riehl, Simone; Elena Marinova (2008), “Mid-Holocene vegetation change in the Troad (W Anatolia): Man-made or natural?”, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 17, 3, pp. 297-312.
  • Sampson, Adamantios (2002), The Neolithic Settlement at Ftelia, Mykonos, University of the Aegean, Rhodes.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan (2006a), “The Late Neolithic in the eastern Aegean: Excavations at Gülpınar in the Troad,” Hesperia 75: pp. 289-315.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan (2006b), “Patterns of Dairying in Coastal Northwestern Anatolia”, Ethnoarchaeological Investigations in Rural Anatolia, Volume 3, T. Takaoğlu (ed.), Ege Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 23-44.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan (2007), “Modern Site Surveys in Ethnoarchaeology: The Case of North-Western Anatolia”, Ethnoarchaeological Investigations in Rural Anatolia, Volume 4, T. Takaoğlu (ed.), Ege Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 87-97.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan; A.O. Bamyacı (2005), Ethnoarchaeological Investigations in Rural Anatolia 2: pp. 115-137.
  • Takaoğlu, Turan; Göksel Sazcı; Devrim Çalış-Sazcı (2008), “Patterns Of Troy I Period Settlements On The Coastal Troad", The Aegean Early Bronze Age: New Evidence, C. Doumas, A. Giannikouri, O. Kouka (derl.), International Conference April 11th-14th 2008, Archaeological Institute of Aegean Studies, Yunanistan, pp. 1-12.
  • Uerpmann, M. (2003), “Environmental aspects of economic changes in Troia,” Troia and the Troad. Scientific Approaches, G.A. Wagner, E. Pernicka, H.-P. Uerpmann (derl.), Berlin, pp. 251-262.
  • Whitelaw, T.M. (1991), “The ethnoarchaeology of recent rural settlements and land use in northwest Kea,” Landscape Archaeology as Long-Term history: Northern Keos in the Cycladic Islands from Earliest Settlemnt to Modern Times, J.F. Cherry, J.L. Davis, and E. Mantzourani (derl.), Los Angeles, pp. 403-454.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Arkeoloji
Yazarlar

Abdulkadir Özdemir

Abdulvahap Onur Bamyacı

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 28 Kasım 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Özdemir, A., & Bamyacı, A. O. (2019). KUZEYBATI ANADOLU’DA (KIYI TROAS BÖLGESİ) KIRSAL HAYVANCILIK VE ARAZİ KULLANIMI: ETNOARKEOLOJİK BİR BAKIŞ. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, 29(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538315