The Criticism of Hume’s Criticism of Religion in terms of his Skeptical and Agnostical Attitude

Öz

As it is known, Hume is described as a skeptic and agnostic. Allocating his epistemology to empirical area, the philosopher developed a skeptical and agnostical position concerning beyond the empirical area. Particularly, this is clearly seen in his analysis of causality. But his attitude on religion and God, in my opinion, is not as clear as causality. In this paper, we will try to examine Hume’s approach to the problem of religion in terms of his agnostical and skeptical position

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Scepticism,Agnosticism,Religion,Criticism,Hume

KUŞKUCU VE AGNOSTİK TUTUM BAKIMINDAN DAVID HUME’UN DİN ELEŞTİRİSİNE ELEŞTİREL BİR BAKIŞ

Öz

Bildiğimiz gibi, Hume kuşkucu ve agnostik olarak da nitelenir. Epistemolojisini deneysel alana özgüleyen filozof, söz konusu alanın ötesine dair kuşkucu ve agnostik bir tutum içindedir. Özellikle nedensellik çözümlemesinde bu açık bir biçimde görülebilir. Fakat filozofun din ve tanrı konusundaki tavrı bu denli net değildir. Biz bu çalışmamızda Hume’un din problemine yaklaşımını agnostik ve kuşkucu tutumu bakımından irdelemeye çalışacağız

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kuşkuculuk, Agnostisizm, Din, Eleştiri, Hume.

Kaynakça

1. BEAUDOİN, John, “On Some Criticisms of Hume Principle of Proportioning Cause to Effect” Leeds Electronic Centre, http://www.etext.leeds.ac.uk/hume/articles/beaudoin.htm, (Erişim Tarihi, 01.12.2002).
2. ÇELEBİ, Emin, David Hume’da Nedensellik Bağlamında Ahlak ve Hürriyet Problemi, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniv. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri ABD, 2008.
3. GROSSO, Mıchael, “Hume's Syndrome: Irrational Resistance to the Paranormal”, Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 22. No. 4. (2008), ss. 549-556.
4. GUIMARÃES, Lívia, “Skeptical Tranquility and Hume’s Manner of Death”, The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 6 (2). (DOI: 10.3366/E1479665108000171), ss. 115-134.
5. HUME, David, The Natural History of Religion, Dialogues and Natural History of Religion, (Ed. J. C. A. Gaskin), içinde, Oxford University Press, 1998.
6. HUME, David, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Web Edition: Leeds electronic Text Centre, July 2000, http://www.etext.leeds.ac.uk/hume/ehu/ehupbsb.htm, (Erişim Tar. 12.11.2002).
7. HUME, David, Essays, Moral,Political and Literary, Ed. By Eugene Miller, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis 1985.
8. HUME, David, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Prometheus Books, Newyork 1989.

9. LİVİNGSTON, Donald W., “Davıd Hume and The Conservatıve Tradition”, The Intercollegiate Review A Journal of Scholarship and Opinion, Vol. 44 No. 2., Fall 2009., ss. 30-41.
10. MOSSNER, Ernest C., “Hume ve Söyleşilerin Kalıtı”, (Çev. Mete Tunçay), Din Üstüne, içinde, İmge Kitabevi Yay., Ankara 1995.
11. NOXON, James, “Hume’s Agnosticism”, Modern Study In Philosophy Hume, Anchor Books, New York 1966.
12. WADIA, P. S., “Miracles and Common Understanding”, The PhilosophicalQuarterly, Vol. 26, No. 102, Hume Bicentenary Issue (Jan. 1976)., ss. 69-81.
13. WULF, Steven J., “The Skeptical Life in Hume’s Political Thought”, Polity, Fall 2000, V. 33. (İnfo Trac Web: Expanded Academic ASAP.).