Epistemological Status Of “Phantasia” In The Philosophy Of Ancient Greek

Öz

In this paper the concept of phantasia φαντασία , which has a complex adventure in the history of philosophy, will be discussed by its epistemological aspects in Ancient Greek Philosophy. For this purpose, we will firstly focus on Plato’s usage of this concept, and then we will analyze how he defines and uses phantasia epistemologically by taking into account Aristole’s De Anima. After this, Stoic and Epicurean philosophy will be emphasized and lastly Plotinus’ thought will be discussed in the context of phantasia. Throughout this study, we will try to put on the map that phantasia fulfills the task of establishing a bridge between the sensory and the rational elements, and at the same time it has an important function for the memory

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Plato,Aristotle,Epicureans,Stoicism,Plotinus,De Anima,Phantasia,Epistemology

ANTİK YUNAN FELSEFESİ’NDE “FANTASİA”NIN EPİSTEMOLOJİK ROLÜ

Öz

Bu makalede, düşünce tarihinde oldukça karmaşık bir serüveni olan fantasia φαντασία kavramının Antik Yunan Felsefesi’ndeki epistemolojik rolü üzerinde durulacaktır. Bu amaçla önce kavramın Platon'da nasıl kullanıldığına bakılacak, ardından Aristoteles'in bilhassa De Anima isimli eseri merkezinde fantasia’nın nasıl tanımlandığı ve ne gibi bir epistemolojik görev üstlendiği incelenecektir. Ardından Stoacılar ve Epikurosçular’ın konuyla ilgili görüşleri üzerinde durulacak ve son olarak da Plotinos’un düşüncelerine yer verilecektir. Bu çalışma yürütülürken, fantasia kavramının özellikle duyusal olan ve akılsal olan arasında nasıl bir köprü vazifesi gördüğü gösterilmeye çalışılacak, ayrıca fantasia’nın hafıza ile olan yakın ilgisine de dikkat çekilecektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Platon,Aristoteles,Epikurosçuluk,Stoacılık

Kaynakça

1. Albert William Levi; “The Two Imaginations”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Dec., 1964).
2. Aristoteles; İkinci Çözümlemeler, Çev. Ali Houshiary, Yapı Kredi Yay., İstanbul 2005.
3. Aristoteles; Metafizik, Çev. Ahmet Arslan, 2. b., Sosyal Yayınlar, İstanbul 1996.
4. Aristotle; “The Parva Naturalia-De Somniis”, Trans. J. I. Beare, The Works of
5. Aristotle Volume III, Ed. W. D. Ross, Oxford University Press, Great Britain 1931.
6. Aristotle; “De Memoria”, The Parva Naturalia, Trans. J. I. Beare, The Works of Aristotle Volume III, Ed. W. D. Ross, Oxford University Press, Great Britain 1931.
7. Aristotle; De Anima, Trans. J. A. Smith, The Works of Aristotle Volume III, Ed. W. D. Ross, Oxford University Press, Great Britain 1931.
8. Aristotle; De Sensu And De Memoria, Trans. G. R. T. Ross, Cambridge University Press, 1906.

9. Aristotle; Rhetorica, Trans. W. Rhys Roberts, The Works of Aristotle Volume XI, Ed. W. D. Ross, Oxford University Press, 4th Edition, Great Britain 1959.
10. Boethius; Felsefenin Tesellisi, Çev. Çiğdem Dürüşken, Kabalcı Yayınevi 2. b., İstanbul 2011.
11. Bundy, Murray Wright; The Theory of Imagination in Classical and Mediaeval Thought, The University of Illinois, 1927.
12. Caston, Victor; “Why Aristotle Needs Imagination”, Phronesis, Vol. 41, No. 1 (1996).
13. Engmann, Joyce; “Imagination and Truth in Aristotle”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, Volume 14, Number 3, July 1976.
14. Frede, Dorothea; “The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle”, Essays on Aristotle's De Anima (ed. Amélie Oksenberg Rorty&Martha C. Nussbaum), Oxford University Press, 1995.
15. Freudenthal, J.; Über den Begriff des Wortes Φαντασία Bei Aristotle, Druck Der Universitäts-Buchdrückerei von E. A. Huth, Göttingen 1863, s. 15.
16. Hankinson, R. J.; “Stoic Epistemology”, The Cambridge Companion to Stoics, Cambridge University Press 2002.
17. J. M. Cocking; Imgination-A Study in The History of Ideas, Routledge, London and New York 1991, s. 8.
18. Kranz, Walter; Antik Felsefe: Metinler ve Açıklamalar, Çev. Suad Y. Baydur, Sosyal Yay., 2. b., İstanbul 1994.
19. Laertius, Diogenes; Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Trans. R. D. Hicks, Cambridge Harvard University Press, 1972 (First published 1925).
20. Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., Jones, H. S.; McKenzie, R.; A Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford: Clarendon, 10th Edition, 1996.
21. Long, A. A., Sedley, D. N.; The Hellenistic Philosophers Volume 1-Translations Of The Principal Sources With Philosophical Commentary, Cambridge University Press 9. b., United Kingdom 2001, (First Publish 1987).
22. Malcolm, F. Lowe; “Aristotle on Kinds of Thinking”, Phronesis, Vol. 28 (1983).
23. Plato, Republic, Trans. Paul Shorey, Ed. Jeffrey Henderson, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, London 2006.
24. Plato; Sophist, Trans. Harold North Fowler, Ed. Jeffrey Henderson, Loeb Classical Library LCL 123, Harvard University Press, England 2006.
25. Plato; Theaetetus, Trans. Harold North Fowler, Ed. Jeffrey Henderson, The Loeb Classical Library LCL 123, Harvard University Press, London 2006.
26. Platon, Devlet, Çev. Sabahattin Eyuboğlu-M. Ali Cimcoz, 2. b., Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yay., İstanbul 2000.
27. Plotinus; Ennead, Trans. A. H. Armstrong, Ed. Jeffrey Henderson, Loeb Classical Library LCL 443, Harvard University Press, England 1984.
28. Schofield, Malcolm; “Aristotle on the Imagination”, Essays on Aristotle's De Anima (ed. Amélie Oksenberg Rorty&Martha C. Nussbaum), Oxford University Press, 1995.
29. Silverman, Allan; “Plato on ‘Phantasia’”, Classical Antiquity, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Apr., 1991).
30. St. Augustinus; Letter 7-4, Trans. J. G. Cunningham, Çevrimiçi: http://http.newadvent.org/fathers/1102007.htm
31. Türker, Sadık; Aristoteles, Gazzali ile Leibniz'de Yargı Mantığı, Dergah Yay., İstanbul 2002.
32. Watson, Gerard; Phantasia In Classical Thought, Galway University Press, Galway 1988.
33. Modrak, Deborah; “Φαντασία Reconsidered”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (1), 1986.
34. Sedley, David; “Zeno’s Definition of Phantasia Kataleptike”, The Philosophy of Zeno-Zeno of Citium And His Legacy (eds. T. Scaltsas&A. S. Mason), Larnaca 2002.