The Political Reflections of Religious Thought in Benjamin Constant

Öz

De La Religion of Benjamin Constant -one of the founders of modern liberalism and negative freedom- has been admitted as a non political work and ignored by commentators. However Constant never went out the scope of politics via this anthropological work, rather he maintained in this book that there are approximations between politics and religion. According to that a liberal political system can endure with a religious doctrine rely on a pure “religious sentiment” and by rejecting the Clergy authority. Also Constant’s researches to purification of religious sentiment bring him to the individual’s natural tendency to perfection and communitarian roots of humans. So, we can claim that via religion Benjamin Constant worked to reconcile negative and positive liberty. In this manner, this study aims to expose the political content in his philosophy of religion.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Benjamin Constant, Negative Freedom, Positive Freedom, Religious Form, Religious Sentiment, Political Liberalism

BENJAMİN CONSTANT’DA DİN DÜŞÜNCESİNİN POLİTİK YANSIMALARI

Öz

Modern liberalizmin ve negatif özgürlük düşüncesinin kurucu isimlerinden biri olarak gösterilen Benjamin Constant’ın, dini konu alan De La Religion adlı eseri düşünürün politika dışı bir çalışması olarak görülüp göz ardı edilmiş ve hak ettiği ilgiyi görememiştir. Ancak bu antropolojik çalışma ile o siyasal alanın dışına çıkmamış, dinsel olan ile siyasal olan arasında büyük bir koşutluk olduğunu iddia etmiştir. Buna göre özgürlükçü bir siyasal rejim ancak ruhban otoritesini reddeden ve saf bir “dinsel imana” dayanan dinsel öğretiler ile mümkün olacaktır. Ayrıca Constant’ın dinsel imanı saflaştırmaya dönük arayışları onu bireyin hem komüniteryan köklerine hem de insan doğasının mükemmelleşme eğilimine götürmüştür. Böylelikle düşünür negatif özgürlük fikrine dayanan liberalizm içinden pozitif özgürlüğe bir dal uzatmıştır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı da bu doğrultuda düşünürün din felsefesindeki siyasal yansımaları ortaya koymaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Benjamin Constant, Negatif Özgürlük, Pozitif Özgürlük, Dinsel Form, Dinsel İman, Siyasal Liberalizm

Kaynakça

1. Berlin, Isaiah (2002), “Two Concepts of Liberty”, in Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Constant, Benjamin (2003), Principles of Politics Applicable to All Governments, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis.
3. Constant, Benjamin (2010), “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns” http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/conslibe.pdf (Erişim, 2016).
4. De Dijn, Annelien (2005), “Aristocratic Liberalism in Post-Revolutionary France”, The Historical Journal, 48:3, 661–681
5. Garsten, Bryan (2009), “Constant on the Religious Spirit of Liberalism”, in The Cambridge Companion to Constant, ed. Helena Rosenblatt, Cambridge University Press, USA.
6. Garsten, Bryan (2010), “Religion and The Case Against Liberty: Benjamin Constant’s Other Lectures”, Political Theory, 38 (1), 4-33.
7. Holmes, Steven (1984), Benjamin Constant and Making of Modern Liberalism, Yale University Press, New Heaven.
8. Jennings, Jeremy (2009), “Constant’s Idea of Modern Liberty”, in The Cambridge Companion to Constant, ed. Helena Rosenblatt, Cambridge University Press, USA.

9. Kalyvas, Andreas & Katznelson, Ira (2008), Liberal Beginnings: Making A Republic For The Moderns, Cambridge Press, New York.
10. Lee, James Mitchell (2002), “Doux Commerce, Social Organization, and Modern Liberty in the Thought of Benjamin Constant”, Annales Benjamin Constant, Vol. 25, 117-149.
11. McCalla, Arthur (2012), “The Free Market in Religion and the Metaphysical Invisible Hand: Benjamin Constant and The Construction of Religion as Private”, Religion, 42-1, 87-103.
12. Pettit, Philip (1998), Cumhuriyetçilik: Bir Özgürlük ve Yönetim Teorisi, çev. Abdullah Yılmaz, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
13. Raico, Ralph (2010), The Place Of Religion in the Liberal Philosophy of Constant, Tocqueville and Lord Acton, Ludwig VonMises Institute, Alabama.
14. Raynaud, Philiphe (1994), “Constant”, in New French Thought: Political Philosophy, Ed. Mark Lilla, Princeton University Press, USA.
15. Rosenblatt, Helena (2004), “Re-evaluating Benjamin Constant’s Liberalism: Industrialism, Saint-Simonianism and the Restoration years”, History of European Ideas, vol. 30, 23-37
16. Rosenblatt, Helena (2007), “On The Intellectual Sources of Laicite: Rousseau, Constant and the Debates about a National Religion”, French Politics, Culture&Society, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1-18.
17. Rosenblatt, Helena (2008), Liberal Values: Benjamin Constant and the Politics of Religion¸ Cambridge University Press, New York.
18. Skinner, Quentin (1998), Liberty Before Liberalism, Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Todorov, Tzvetan (2009), “Religion According to Constant”, in The Cambridge Companion to Constant, ed. Helena Rosenblatt, Cambridge University Press, USA.
20. Vincent, Steven (2003), “Benjamin Constant, The French Revolution, and The problem Of Modern Character”, History of European Ideas, 30:1, 5-21.
21. Vincent, Steven (2011), Benjamin Constant and the Birth of French Liberalism, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
22. Vincent, Steven (2015), “Benjamin Constant and Constitutionalism”, Historia Constitucional, vol. 16, pp. 19-46.