Dynamic Nature Representation of Schelling

Abstract

The nature has a quite distinctive role in the philosophy of Schelling. It can be considered that Schelling, who has put nature in the centre of philosophy and attempted to derive the ideal from the real, interrupted the Cartesian tradition as well as philosophies of Kant and Fichte, seeming to be the continuation of this tradition to him, and thus gave direction to the history of philosophy. His way of interpreting the nature is also distinctive when it is considered independent from the historical line. Schelling has asserted a quite comprehensive philosophy of nature which collects philosophical accumulation and scientific developments of his age in it and tried to offer solutions for philosophical and scientific problems of the age. He has designed a dynamic nature against the mechanism dominating the scientific understanding of the age and tried to surpass the current disconnection which he has claimed to exist between the nature and spirit.

Keywords

• Schelling, freedom, nature, spirit, organism, dynamism.

SCHELLİNG’İN DİNAMİK DOĞA TASARIMI

Öz

Doğanın Schelling’in felsefesinde oldukça belirleyici bir rolü bulunmaktadır. Felsefesinin merkezine doğayı koyan ve ideal olanı reel olandan türetme girişiminde bulunan Schelling’in, ortaya koyduğu doğa felsefesi aracılığıyla Kartezyen geleneği ve onun bir devamı olarak gördüğü Kant’ın ve Fichte’nin felsefelerini kesintiye uğrattığı ve böylelikle felsefe tarihine farklı bir yön verdiği söylenebilir. Onun doğayı anlamlandırma biçimi tarihsel çizgiden bağımsız olarak ele alındığında da yine ayırt edici bir niteliğe sahiptir. Schelling, çağının felsefi birikimini ve bilimsel gelişmelerini kendinde toplayan, yaşadığı zaman diliminin felsefi ve bilimsel sorunlarına çözüm getirmeye çalışan oldukça kapsamlı bir doğa felsefesi ortaya koymuştur. Döneminin bilim anlayışına damga vuran mekanizm karşısında dinamik bir doğa tasarlamış, doğa ile tin arasında var olduğunu öne sürdüğü mevcut kopukluğu böylelikle aşmaya çalışmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Schelling, özgürlük, doğa, tin, organizma, dinamizm.

Kaynakça

1. Baum, Manfred, The Beginnings of Schelling’s Philosophy of Nature, Sally Sedwigk (ed.), The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000.
2. Beiser, Frederick, German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781- 1801, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
3. Bowie, Andrew, Schelling and Modern European Philosophy, An Introduction, Routledge Press, London, 1993.
4. Descartes, Rene, Felsefenin İlkeleri, Çev. Mesut Akın, Say Yayınları, İstanbul,1998.
5. Fellbaum, Aaron, Kants Organismusbegriff und seine Transformation in der Naturphilosophie F. W. J. Schellings, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Vol. 47 (2005), s. 215-223.
6. Fichte, J. G., Werke, (Hrsg.) F. Medicus, 6 Bände, Leipzig, 1911.
7. Foster Ryan J., The Creativity of Nature: The Genesis of Schelling's Naturphilosophie, 1775-1799, A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillent of the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, Texas, 2008.
8. Frank, Manfred, Eine Einführung in Schellings Philosophie, Suhrkampf, Frankfurt, 1985.

9. Heckmann, Reinhard, Vorwort, Die Naturphilosophie Schellings – Eine Alternative zu Szientismus und Irrationalität? Reinhard Heckmann, Hermann Krings, Rudolf N. Meyer (Hrsg.), Natur und Subjektivität Zur Auseinandersetzung mit der Naturphilosophie des jungen Schelling, Referate, Voten und Protokolle der II. Internationalen SchellingTagung, Friedrich Frommann Verlag, Zürich, 1983, s.7-11.
10. Heckmann, Reinhard, Natur-Geist-Identität. Die Aktualität von Schellings Naturphilosophie Hinblick auf das moderne evolutionäre Weltbild, Reinhard Heckmann, Hermann Krings, Rudolf N. Meyer (Hrsg.), Natur und Subjektivität Zur Auseinandersetzung mit der Naturphilosophie des jungen Schelling, Referate, Voten und Protokolle der II. Internationalen Schelling-Tagung, Friedrich Frommann Verlag, Zürich, 1983, s.291-344.
11. Jantzen, Jörg, Die Philosophie der Natur, Hans Jörg Sandkühler (Hrsg.), F.W.J. Kant, Immanuel Kritik der Urteilskraft, Wilhelm Weischedel (Hrsg.), Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1974.
12. Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Wilhelm Weischedel (Hrsg.), Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1974.
13. Kant, Immanuel Schriften zur Naturphilosophie, Werkausgabe Band XI, Wilhelm Weischedel (Hrsg.), Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 2014.
14. Leibniz, G.W., Philosophical Essays, ed. and trans. by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, Hackett Publishing, Cambridge, 1989.
15. Meyer, Rudolf W., Zum Begriff der spekülativen Physik bei Schelling, Reinhard Heckmann, Hermann Krings, Rudolf N. Meyer (Hrsg.), Natur und Subjektivität Zur Auseinandersetzung mit der Naturphilosophie des jungen Schelling, Referate, Voten und Protokolle der II.
16. Internationalen Schelling-Tagung, Friedrich Frommann Verlag, Zürich, 1983, s.129-155.
17. Schelling, F.W.J., Sämmtliche Werke, Karl Friedrich August Schelling (Hrsg.), Stuttgart: J.G.Cotta, 1859.
18. Schelling, F.W.J., Briefe und Dokumente, Band I, 1775-1809, Horst Fuhrmans (Hrsg.), H. Bouvier u Co. Verlag, Bonn,1962.
19. Schelling, Metzler Verlag, Weimar, 1998, s.82-108.
20. Stone, Alison, Philosophy of Nature, Michael N. Forster (ed.), Kristin Gjesdal (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015, s.319-335.
21. Wetz, Franz Joseph, Friedrich W.J. Schelling zur Einführung, Junius Verlag, Hamburg, 1996.