Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Improving Addition Skills of 2nd Grade Primary School Students with Cognitive Apprenticeship Approach: An Action Research

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 177 - 197, 01.11.2024

Öz

This study investigates the effectiveness of the cognitive apprenticeship method in enhancing the addition skills of 2nd-grade primary school students. The study involved two students during the 2023-2024 academic year at a public school in Konya. A 12-task action plan was implemented, incorporating steps of cognitive apprenticeship: modeling, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection, and transfer of learning. The findings indicate that the cognitive apprenticeship boosts student motivation, improves addition skills, and reinforces self-confidence. Throughout the process, students developed a positive attitude towards mathematics, overcame their fear of making mistakes, and became more active in lessons. The study concludes that cognitive apprenticeship is an effective strategy for supporting mathematics learning at the primary level, as evidenced by the improvements in student attitudes and performance during the research.

Kaynakça

  • Akyol, H., & Özdemir, E. (2018). İlkokulda yazma bozukluğunu düzeltmeye yönelik eylem araştırması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(193), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7265
  • Albert, L. R., & Antos, J. (2000). Daily journals connect mathematics to real life. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(8), 526-531.
  • Alptekin, S. (2015). Matematik öğretiminde sistematik ve disiplinin önemi. Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 10(2), 89-101.
  • Alptekin, S. (2015). Sayma becerilerinin öğretimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 16(01), 63-72.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • Çakmakcı, G., Aydeniz, M., Brown, A., & Makokha, J. M. (2020). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship learning. In Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 293-310).
  • Cave, A. (2010). Learning math in second grade: An application of cognitive apprenticeship. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 1-16.
  • Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47-60). Cambridge University Press.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-494). Routledge.
  • Daley, G., & Valdés, R. (2006). Value-added analysis and classroom observation as measures of teacher performance (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9076-2
  • Imiere, E. (2019). An application of cognitive apprenticeship to philosophy instruction. Online Submission.
  • Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge.
  • Koç, B., & Korkmaz, İ. (2019). An action research on teaching addition and subtraction to an illiterate student with dyscalculia. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 65-82.
  • Köklü, N. (2001). Eğitim eylem araştırması-öğretmen araştırması. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 34(1), 35-43.
  • Köklü, N. (2001). Eğitimde eylem araştırması ve uygulamaları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 26(119), 24-28.
  • Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33(5), 541-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1279-2
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lyons, K., McLaughlin, J. E., Khanova, J., & Roth, M. T. (2017). Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: A qualitative review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22, 723-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9707-9
  • Lyons, R., Green, T., & Brown, C. (2017). Expanding cognitive apprenticeship models: New approaches to learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 731-742. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000189
  • Matsuo, M., & Tsukube, T. (2020). A review on cognitive apprenticeship in educational research: Application for management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100417
  • MEB. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ve 8.sınıflar). Ankara.
  • Mills, G. E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Olkun, S., & Toluk, U. Z. (2007). İlköğretimde etkinlik temelli matematik öğretimi. Maya Akademi.
  • Saadati, F., Ahmad Tarmizi, R., Mohd Ayub, A. F., & Abu Bakar, K. (2015). Effect of internet-based cognitive apprenticeship model (i-CAM) on statistics learning among postgraduate students. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0129938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129938
  • Saadati, F., Tarmizi, R. A., & Bayat, S. (2015). Internet-based cognitive apprenticeship model in teaching mathematics problem solving. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(3), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v4n3p118
  • Smith, M., & Brown, N. (2016). The cognitive apprenticeship. In Teaching Reference Today: New Directions, Novel Approaches (pp. 71). Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Smith, R., & Brown, K. (2016). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive apprenticeship in learning environments. Journal of Learning Sciences, 25(4), 563-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1168473
  • Van De Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). İlkokul ve ortaokul matematiği: Gelişimsel yaklaşımla öğretim (S. Durmuş, Ed.; Y. Dede, İ. Özgür, Zembat, B. Yanık, M. F. Özmantar, E. Bingölbali, S. Özel, & Z. E. Y. Özel, Trans.; Gözden geçirilmiş yeni basım). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Yenilmez, K. (2011). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematik tarihi dersine ilişkin düşünceleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, Article 30.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10th ed.). Seçkin.
  • Yusepa, B. G. P., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2018). Promoting middle school students’ abstract-thinking ability through cognitive apprenticeship instruction in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012051

İlkokul 2. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bilişsel Çıraklık Yaklaşımı ile Toplama İşlemi Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesi: Eylem Araştırması

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 177 - 197, 01.11.2024

Öz

Bu araştırma, ilkokul 2. sınıf öğrencilerinin toplama işlemi becerilerini geliştirmek için bilişsel çıraklık yönteminin etkisini incelemiştir. Çalışma, 2023-2024 öğretim yılında Konya ilinde bir devlet okulunda öğrenim gören iki öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Öğrencilere 12 görevden oluşan bir eylem planı uygulanmış, bilişsel çıraklık adımları olan modelleme, koçluk, yapı iskelesi, ifade etme, yansıtma ve öğrenmenin transferi uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, bilişsel çıraklık yönteminin öğrenci motivasyonunu artırdığını, toplama işlemi becerilerini geliştirdiğini ve özgüvenlerini pekiştirdiğini göstermiştir. Öğrenciler, uygulama sürecinde matematik dersine karşı olumlu tutum geliştirmiş, yanlış yapma korkusunu yenerek derslere daha aktif katılım sağlamıştır. Elde edilen verilere göre, bilişsel çıraklık yöntemi, ilkokul düzeyinde matematik öğrenimini destekleyen etkili bir strateji olarak öne çıkmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Akyol, H., & Özdemir, E. (2018). İlkokulda yazma bozukluğunu düzeltmeye yönelik eylem araştırması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(193), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7265
  • Albert, L. R., & Antos, J. (2000). Daily journals connect mathematics to real life. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(8), 526-531.
  • Alptekin, S. (2015). Matematik öğretiminde sistematik ve disiplinin önemi. Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 10(2), 89-101.
  • Alptekin, S. (2015). Sayma becerilerinin öğretimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 16(01), 63-72.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • Çakmakcı, G., Aydeniz, M., Brown, A., & Makokha, J. M. (2020). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship learning. In Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 293-310).
  • Cave, A. (2010). Learning math in second grade: An application of cognitive apprenticeship. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 1-16.
  • Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 47-60). Cambridge University Press.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-494). Routledge.
  • Daley, G., & Valdés, R. (2006). Value-added analysis and classroom observation as measures of teacher performance (Doctoral dissertation).
  • Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9076-2
  • Imiere, E. (2019). An application of cognitive apprenticeship to philosophy instruction. Online Submission.
  • Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge.
  • Koç, B., & Korkmaz, İ. (2019). An action research on teaching addition and subtraction to an illiterate student with dyscalculia. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 65-82.
  • Köklü, N. (2001). Eğitim eylem araştırması-öğretmen araştırması. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 34(1), 35-43.
  • Köklü, N. (2001). Eğitimde eylem araştırması ve uygulamaları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 26(119), 24-28.
  • Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33(5), 541-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1279-2
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lyons, K., McLaughlin, J. E., Khanova, J., & Roth, M. T. (2017). Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: A qualitative review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22, 723-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9707-9
  • Lyons, R., Green, T., & Brown, C. (2017). Expanding cognitive apprenticeship models: New approaches to learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 731-742. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000189
  • Matsuo, M., & Tsukube, T. (2020). A review on cognitive apprenticeship in educational research: Application for management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100417
  • MEB. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ve 8.sınıflar). Ankara.
  • Mills, G. E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Olkun, S., & Toluk, U. Z. (2007). İlköğretimde etkinlik temelli matematik öğretimi. Maya Akademi.
  • Saadati, F., Ahmad Tarmizi, R., Mohd Ayub, A. F., & Abu Bakar, K. (2015). Effect of internet-based cognitive apprenticeship model (i-CAM) on statistics learning among postgraduate students. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0129938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129938
  • Saadati, F., Tarmizi, R. A., & Bayat, S. (2015). Internet-based cognitive apprenticeship model in teaching mathematics problem solving. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(3), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v4n3p118
  • Smith, M., & Brown, N. (2016). The cognitive apprenticeship. In Teaching Reference Today: New Directions, Novel Approaches (pp. 71). Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Smith, R., & Brown, K. (2016). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive apprenticeship in learning environments. Journal of Learning Sciences, 25(4), 563-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1168473
  • Van De Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). İlkokul ve ortaokul matematiği: Gelişimsel yaklaşımla öğretim (S. Durmuş, Ed.; Y. Dede, İ. Özgür, Zembat, B. Yanık, M. F. Özmantar, E. Bingölbali, S. Özel, & Z. E. Y. Özel, Trans.; Gözden geçirilmiş yeni basım). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Yenilmez, K. (2011). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematik tarihi dersine ilişkin düşünceleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, Article 30.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10th ed.). Seçkin.
  • Yusepa, B. G. P., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2018). Promoting middle school students’ abstract-thinking ability through cognitive apprenticeship instruction in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012051
Toplam 34 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Alan Eğitimleri (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Hakan Ulum 0000-0002-1398-6935

Fadime Ergün 0009-0001-8647-1297

Kübra Topdaş 0009-0006-0557-665X

Ömer Sağlam 0009-0002-6256-6811

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Kasım 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 8 Temmuz 2024
Kabul Tarihi 31 Ekim 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Ulum, H., Ergün, F., Topdaş, K., Sağlam, Ö. (2024). İlkokul 2. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bilişsel Çıraklık Yaklaşımı ile Toplama İşlemi Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesi: Eylem Araştırması. Fen Matematik Girişimcilik Ve Teknoloji Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(3), 177-197.