Enerji Tüketimi, Dışa Açıklık ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: 28 Avrupa Birliği Ülkesi için Panel Granger Nedensellik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmada 28 Avrupa Birliği ülkesindeki enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla 1996-2013 yılları arasındaki veriler kullanılarak panel eş-bütünleşme, panel Granger nedensellik ve panel vektör hata düzeltme modeli kullanılmıştır. Panel eş-bütünleşme test çıktıları ekonomik büyüme, enerji tüketimi, işgücü, sermaye oluşumu ve dışa açıklık değişkenleri arasında uzun dönemli bir denge olduğunu desteklemiştir. Panel vektör hata düzeltme modelinin kullanılmasından elde edilen sonuçlar kısa dönemde enerji tüketiminden ekonomik büyümeye doğru tek taraflı bir nedensellik bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Enerji tüketimi ile ekonomik büyüme arasında uzun dönemli bir nedensellik bulunmamıştır. Bu sonuçlar Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinin enerjiye bağımlı olduğunu ve bu ülkeler için büyüme hipotezinin geçerli olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu ülkelerde enerji tüketimini kısıtlayıcı politikaların uygulanması sırasında enerji tüketiminin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerinin göz önünde bulundurulması gerekmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Enerji tüketimi,ekonomik büyüme,ticari açıklık,panel veri

The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Trade Openness and Economic Growth: Panel Granger Causality Analysis for EU-28 Countries

Öz

This paper aims to investigate the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in EU-28 countries. For this purpose, we used panel cointegration, panel Granger causality and panel vector error correction model over the period 1996-2013. The outcomes of panel cointegration test support the long-run equilibrium relationship among economic growth, energy consumption, labor force, capital formation and trade openness. The results obtained from panel vector error correction model suggest that there is evidence of a unidirectional causality from energy consumption to economic growth in the short-run. A long-run causality is not found between energy consumption and economic growth. These results indicate that the EU-28 countries are energy-dependent countries and the growth hypothesis is valid for EU-28 countries. Policy makers in EU-28 countries should consider the impact of energy consumption on growth while employing conservative energy policies

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Energy consumption,economic growth,trade openness,panel data

Kaynakça

1. ABID, Mehdi, Maamar SEBRI; (2012), “Energy consumption- economic growth nexus: Does the level of aggregation mat- ter?”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, (2), pp. 55-62.
2. AJMI, Ahdi N., Shawkat HAMMOUDEH, Duc Khuong NGUYEN ve João Ricardo SATO; (2015), “On the relationships between
3. CO2 emissions, energy consumption and income: The impor- tance of time variation”, Energy Economics, 49, pp. 629-638. ALRAGAS, Rajeh, Tapas K. MISHRA, Mamata PARHI, Ba- zoumana OUTTARA; (2015), “Trade Openness and Economic
4. Growth Empirical Investigation”, UK Global Conference on Business and Finance Proceedings, 10:1. APERGIS, Nicolas ve James, E. PAYNE; (2012), “Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: Evi- dence from a panel error correction model”, Energy Econom- ics, 34, pp. 733-738.
5. APERGIS, Nicolas ve James, E. PAYNE; (2010b), “Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia”, Energy Econom- ics, 32, pp. 1392-1397.
6. APERGIS, Nicolas ve James, E. PAYNE; (2010b), “Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries”, Energy Policy, 38, pp. 656-660.
7. BALTAGI, Badi H.; (2001), “Econometric analysis of panel data”, (2d ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. BELKE, Ansgar, Frauke DOBNIK, Christian DREGER; (2011)

9. “Energy consumption and economicgrowth: New insights into the cointegration relationship”, Energy Economics, 33(5), pp. 789. BİLGİLİ, Faik ve İlhan ÖZTÜRK; (2015), “Biomass energy and economic growth nexus in G7 countries: Evidence from dynamic panel data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re- views”, 49, pp. 132-138.
10. BİRİNCİ, Serdar; (2010), “Trade opennes, growth, and infor- mality: Panel VAR evidence from OECD economies”, Boğazici
11. University Economics Bulletin, 33:1. BOZOKLU, Şeref, Veli YILANCI; (2013), “Energy consumption and economic growth for selected OECD countries: Further evidence from the Granger causality test in the frequency do- main”, Energy Policy, 63, pp. 877–881.
12. COSTANTINI, Valeria, Chiara MARTINI; (2009), “The causality between energy consumption and economic growth: A multi- sectoral analysis using non-stationary cointegrated panel data”
13. Working Paper No: 102, Roma Tre Universita Degli Studi. DeHOYOS, Rafael E. ve Vasilis SARAFIDIS; (2006), “Testing for Cross-sectional Dependence in Panel Data Models”, The Stata Journal, 6(4), pp. 482-496.
14. ENGLE, Robert ve Clive W.J. GRANGER; (1987), “Cointegra- tion and error correction: representation, estimation, and test- ing”, Econometrica, 55, pp. 257–276.
15. HARRIS, Richard D.F. ve Elias TZAVALIS; (1999), “Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed”, Journal of Econometrics, 91, pp. 201–226.
16. HATZIGEORGIOU, Emmanouil, Heracles POLATIDIS, Dias HARAMLAMBOPOULOS; (2011), “CO2 emissions, GDP and energy intensity: A multivariate cointegration and causality analysis for Greece 1977–2007”, Applied Energy, 88, pp. 1377
17. IM, Kyung So, M. Hashem PESARAN, Yongcheol SHIN; (2003), “Testing for unit roots in heterogenous panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, pp. 53–74.
18. JAMMAZI, Rania, Chaker ALOUI; (2015), “On the interplay between energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission nexus in the GCC countries: A comparative analysis through wavelet approaches”, Renewable and Sustainable En- ergy Reviews, 51, pp. 1737-1751.
19. JEBLI, Mehdi. B., Slim B. YOUSSEF, Ilhan ÖZTÜRK; (2016)
20. “Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries”, Ecological Indicators, 60, pp. 824-831. KATIRCIOĞLU, Salih, Sami FETHİ, Demet BETON KALMAZ, Dilber ÇAĞLAR, Nigar TAŞPINAR; (2014), “Energy consump- tion, international trade, and real income in the USA: An em- pirical investigation using conditional error correction models”
21. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 6, pp. 062701.
22. LEE, Chien-Chiang, Chun-Ping CHANG, Pei-Fen CHEN; (2008), “Energy-income causality in OECD countries revis- ited: the key role of capital stock”, Energy Economics, 30, pp. –2373.
23. LEE, Chien-Chiang, Chun-Ping CHANG; (2008), “ Energy con- sumption and economic growth in Asian economies: A more comprehensive analysis using panel data”, Resource and En- ergy Economics, 30, pp. 50–65.
24. LEVIN, Andrew, Chien-Fu LIN ve Chia-Shang James CHU; (2002), “Unit roots tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1-24.
25. MOHAMMADI, Hassan, Modhurima Dey AMIN; (2015), “Long- run relation and short-run dynamics in energy consumption– output relationship: International evidence from country pan- els with different growth rates”, Energy Economics, 52, pp. –126.
26. NASREEN, Samia, ve Sofia ANWAR; (2014), “Causal relation- ship between trade openness, economic growth and energy consumption: A panel data analysis of Asian countries”, Energy Policy, 69, pp. 82–91.
27. NONEJAD, Mesud, Sarvoldin FATHI; (2014), “A survey of the causality relation between energy consumption and economic growth in Iran”, International Journal of Management, Account- ing and Economics, 1(1), pp. 15-27.
28. OMRI, Anis ve Bassem KAHOULI; (2014), “Causal relation- ships between energy consumption, foreign direct investment and economic growth: Fresh evidence from dynamic simulta- neous-equations models”, Energy Policy, 67, pp. 913–922.
29. OZTURK, İlhan ve Ali ACARAVCI; (2010a), “The causal re- lationship between energy consumption and GDP in Albania
30. Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania: Evidence from ARDL bound testing approach”, Applied Energy, 87, pp. 1938-1943.
31. OZTURK, İlhan ve Ali ACARAVCI; (2010b), “CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey”, Renew- able and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, pp. 3220-3225.
32. OZTURK, İlhan, Alper ASLAN ve Hüseyin KALYONCU; (2010)
33. “Energy consumption and economic growth relationship: Evi- dence from panel data for low and middle income countries”, Energy Policy, 38(8), pp. 4422 4428.
34. OZTURK, İlhan, AL-MULALİ, Usama; (2015), “Natural gas con- sumption and economic growth nexus: Panel data analysis for
35. GCC countries”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, , pp. 998-1003.
36. PALA, Aynur ve Dilek TEKER; (2014), “AB-27 Ülkeleri ve Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyümeyi Etkileyen Faktörlerin Be- lirlenmesi: Statik Panel Veri Modeli Uygulaması”, İşletme
37. Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), syf. 151-162. PALA, Aynur; (2016), “Which energy-growth hypothesis is valid in OECD countries? Evidence from panel Granger causality”
38. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6 (1), pp. 28-34. PASTEN, Roberto, Rodrigo SAENS, Rodrigo Contreras MARIN; (2015), “Does energy use cause economic growth in
39. Latin America?”, Applied Economics Letters, 22(17), pp. 1399
40. PESARAN, Hashem M.; (2004), “General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels”, University of Cambridge
41. Faculty of Economics, Cambridge Working Papers in Econom- ics, No. 0435.
42. PESARAN, Hashem M.; (2003), “A Simple Panel Unit Root
43. Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence”, Mimeo, University of Southern California. PESARAN, Hashem M.; (2007), “A Simple Panel Unit Root
44. Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, pp. 265-312. SADORSKY, Perry; (2011), “Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East”, Energy Economics, 33, pp. 739-749.
45. SALAHUDDIN, Mohammad, Jeff GOW; (2014), Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Gulf Coop- eration Council countries, Energy, 73, pp. 44-58.
46. SHAKEEL, Muhammad, M. Mazhar IQBAL, M. Tarik MAJEED; (2014), “Energy consumption, trade and GDP: A case study of south Asian countries”, MPRA Paper No. 57677.
47. SIDDIQUE, Hafız Muhammad Abubakar, M. Tarik MAJEED; (2015), “Energy consumption, economic growth, trade and fi- nancial development nexus in South Asia”, Pakistan Journal of
48. Commerce and Social Sciences, 9 (2), pp. 658-682. SOYTAS, Uğur ve Ramazan, SARI; (2006), “Energy consump- tion and income in G-7 countries”, Journal of Policy Modeling, (7), pp. 739-750.
49. UCAN, Okyay, Ebru ARICIOĞLU ve Fatih YÜCEL; (2014)
50. “Energy consumption and economic growth nexus: Evidence from developed countries in Europe”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(3), pp. 411-419. YILDIRIM, Ertuğrul ve Alper ASLAN; (2012), “Energy con- sumption and economic growth nexus for 17 highly developed
51. OECD countries: further evidence based on bootstrap-correct- ed causality tests”, Energy Policy, 51, pp. 985–993. YILDIRIM, Ertuğrul, Alper ASLAN, İlhan ÖZTÜRK; (2014), “En- ergy consumption and GDP in ASEAN countries: bootstrap- corrected panel and time series causality tests”, The Singapore
52. Economic Review, 59 (2), pp. 1450010-1_1450010-16.
53. YILDIRIM, Ertuğrul, Deniz ŞÜKRÜOĞLU ve Alper ASLAN; (2014), “Energy consumption and economic growth in the next countries: The bootstrapped autoregressive metric causality approach”, Energy Economics, 44, pp. 14–21.
54. WESTERLUND, Joakim; (2007), “Testing for error correction in panel data”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69, pp. 709–748.
55. YUAN, Jiahai, Yan XU ve Xingping ZHANG; (2014), “Income
56. Growth, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Emissions: The Case of China”, Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 50 (5), pp. 169–181. ZACHARIADIS, Theodoros; (2007), “Exploring the relation- ship between energy consumption and economic growth with bivariate models: New evidence from G-7 countries”, Energy Economics, 29, pp. 1233-1253.