Teknolojik Yenilikten Sosyal Yeniliğe Türkiye Ekonomisinin Yakın Dönem Yenilik Performansının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı Türkiye ekonomisinin 21. yüzyıldaki yenilik performansını kendi gelişmişlik düzeyine yakın farklı coğrafyalardan seçilmiş ülkelerle karşılaştırmalı analizler aracılığıyla ve farklı bileşik endeks değerlerini kullanarak incelemektir. Elde edilen bulgular ülkenin, 2000’lerin ortalarıyla karşılaştırıldığında, göreli konumundaki iyileşmenin tatminkar olmaktan uzak olduğunu göstermektedir. 2025 yılında Türkiye AB’ne üye ülkelerin ortalama performansından önemli ölçüde geri kalmış, sadece AB’ye sonradan katılan bir kaç ülkeyle kısmen başedebilir konumdadır. Benzer durum yüksek orta gelirli ülke grubuyla yapılan karşılaştırmalarda da karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Ülkenin yenilik performansı mutlak değer olarak 2010’lu yıllarda yükselmekle birlikte, göreli konumunda beklentilerin ötesine geçen bir iyileşmenin olmadığı tespit edilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal Yenilik
• Teknolojik Yenilik
• Yenilik Ölçümleri
• Türkiye Ekonomisi

An Assessment of the Recent Innovation Performance of the Turkish Economy from Technological Innovation to Social Innovation

Öz

The primary objective of this study is to analyze the innovation performance of the Turkish economy in the 21st century through comparative analyses with selected countries from different geographies close to its own level of development, using different composite index values. The findings indicate that the improvement in the country's relative position compared to the mid-2000s is far from satisfactory. By 2025, Turkey significantly lagged behind the average performance of the EU member states, remaining only partially competitive with a few countries that joined the EU later. A similar situation is detected in comparisons with upper-middle-income countries. While the country's innovation performance increased in absolute terms in the 2010s, its relative position has not improved beyond expectations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social Innovation
• Technological Innovation
• Innovation Metrics
• Turkish Economy

Kaynakça

1. Bucio-Mendoza, S., & Solis-Navarrete, J. A. (2024). Institutionalising social innovation in the global south: Lessons learned. Heliyon, 10(2024), e39556.
2. Bund, E., Gerhard, U., Hoelscher, M., & Mildenberger, G. (2015). A methodological framework for measuring social innovation. Historical Social Research, 40(3), 48–78.
3. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: moving the field forward. a conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51.
4. Çakmak, U. & Tanrıverdi, A. (2021). İnovasyon sürecinde türkiye’nin konumuna ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 56(1), 470-494.
5. Castro-Spila, J., Luna, A. & Unceta, A. (2016). Social innovation regime. an exploratory framework to measure social innovation. SIMPACT Working Paper, 2016(1). Gelsenkirschen: Institute for Work and Technology.
6. Coccia, M. (2021). Technological innovation. G. Ritzer & C. Rojek (eds.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeost011.pub2
7. Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO (2015). The global innovation index 2015: Effective innovation policies for development. Fontainebleau, Ithaca ve Cenevre.
8. Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO (2020). The global innovation index 2020: Who will finance innovation?. Ithaca, Fontainebleau ve Cenevre.

9. Cunha, C. & Benneworth, P. (2020). How to measure the impact of social innovation initiatives?. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17, 59-75.
10. Dawson, P. & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: a provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51, 9–21.
11. de Muro, P., Hamdouch, A., Cameron, S., & Moulaert, F. (2007). Organisations de la société civile, innovation sociale et gouvernance de la lutte contre la pauvreté dans le tiers-monde. Mondes en Développement, 139, 25–42.
12. Drucker, P. F. (1987). Social innovation-management-new dimension. Long Range Planning, 20(6), 29–34.
13. EC (European Commission). (2001). 2001 Innovation Scoreboard, Commission Staff Working Paper. SEC (2001) 1414, Brüksel.
14. EC (European Commission). (2008). European Innovation Scoreboard 2007: Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. Lüksemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
15. EC (European Commission). (2010). European Innovation Scoreboard 2009: Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance, Lüksemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
16. EC (European Commission). (2012). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011. Belçika: European Union.
17. EC (European Commission). (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Lüksemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
18. EC (European Commission). (2019). European Innovation Scoreboard 2019. Lüksemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
19. EC (European Commission). (2025). European Innovation Scoreboard 2025. Lüksemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
20. Edwards-Schachter, M. & Wallace, M. L. (2017). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 64–79.
21. Edwards-Schachter, M., Matti, C. E. & Alcántara, E. (2012). Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672–692.
22. EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit). (2016). Old problems, new solutions: Measuring the capacity for social innovation across the world. Londra: EIU Publications.
23. Encyclopedia Britannica. (1888). Communism. T. S. Baynes (ed.) (211–219). New York: Henry G. Allen.
24. European Commission. (2013). Guide to social innovation, Bürüksel: EU Commission.
25. Freeman, C., & Parez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment: Business cycles and investment behaviour. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (eds.). Technical change and economic theory (38-66). Londra: Pinter Publishers.
26. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2004). Yenilik iktisadı (Çeviren: E. Türkcan, 5. Baskı). Ankara: TÜBİTAK Akademik Dizi 2.
27. Godin, B. (2012). Social innovation: Utopias of innovation from circa-1830 to the Present. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Working Paper No: 11, INRS, Montréal.
28. Godin, B. (2015). Innovation contested the idea of innovathen over the centuries, New York: Routledge.
29. Howaldt, J., & Schwarz (2010). Social innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Study for the Project of international monitoring (IMO), Dortmund. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7384/3671651b23a2bce86c29ff34214765866b53.pdf
30. INSEAD. (2010). The Global Innovation Index 2009-10, Fontainebleau: INSEAD.
31. INSEAD. (2011). The Global Innovation Index 2011: Accelerating Growth and Development, Fontainebleau: INSEAD.
32. Karahan, M. (2024). Türkiye’de yapılan yenilik faaliyetleri ve yenilik performansının AB ortalamasıyla karşılaştırmalı analizi. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 12(1), 99-119.
33. Köse, Ş., & Velibeyoğlu, K. (2025). Super citizens: The power of social innovation in İzmir/Turkey. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 38(1), 419-446.
34. Lisetchi, M., & Brancu, L. (2014). The entrepreneurship concept as a subject of social innovation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 87–92.
35. Mıhcı, H. (2020). Is measuring social innovation a mission impossible. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(3), 337-367.
36. Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Londra: The Young Foundation.
37. Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? – Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48–69.
38. Nicholls, A., & Murdoch, A. (2012). The nature of social innovation. A. Nicholls & A. Murdoch (eds.), Social innovation blurring the boundaries to reconfigure markets (1-32). Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th. Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg: OECD Publishing.
40. Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall, http://www.ssireview.org/images/articles/2008FA_feature_phills_deiglmeier_miller.pdf
41. Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 878–885.
42. Pot, F., & Vaas, F. (2008). Social innovation, the new challenge for Europe. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(6), 468–473.
43. Sertkaya, A. (2015). Yenilik ve ülkelerarası karşılaştırmalar. Verimlilik Dergisi, 2014(3), 103-126.
44. Simchenko, N. O., & Zhaldak, G. P. (2014). Scientific approaches to assessment of social innovations at industrial enterprises. Actual Problems of Economics, 151(1), 376–382.
45. SINNERGIAK Social Innovation. (2013). Regional Social Innovation Index. A Regional Index to Measure Social Innovation. Bilbao: Basque Innovation Agency.
46. TEPSIE. (2014). Social Innovation Theory and Research: A Summary of the Findings from TEPSIE. A deliverable of the project: “The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th. Framework Programme, Brüksel: European Commission, DG Research.
47. Türkcan, E. (2009). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de bilim, teknoloji ve politika. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
48. Unceta, A., Luna, A., Castro, J., & Wintjes, R. (2020). Social innovation regime: An integrated approach to measure social innovation. European Planning Studies, 28(5), 906-924.
49. Ünlü, F. (2015). Avrupa Birliği yenilik karnesi ve Türkiye: Karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 161-192.
50. van Beers, C., Havas, A., & Chiappero-Martinetti, E. (2015). Overview of Existing Innovation Indicators, CRESSI (Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation) Working Papers, No: 24/2015.
51. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the Future of Innovation-driven Growth?, Cenevre: WIPO.
52. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2024). Global Innovation Index 2025: Innovation at a Crossroads, Cenevre: WIPO.
53. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2024a). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the Promise of Social Entrepreneurship, Cenevre: WIPO.
54. Wolfe, A. B. (1921). The motivation of radicalism. Psychological Review, 28(4), 280–300.
55. World Business/INSEAD. (2007). The World’s Top Innovators. World Business, January-February 2007, 26–37.