Araştırma Makalesi

Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 31 Ocak 2019
PDF İndir
EN

Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators

Öz

The main purpose of economic growth theories has been to increase the welfare of people by using scarce resources. In these theories, it is accepted that human welfare is directly proportional to indicators such as GDP and GNP. With the increase of environmental problems following the Second World War, the increase in these two indicators started to be seen as inadequate to represent human welfare. Human welfare and economic development are based on a more environmentally friendly structure in the green growth model, which is the result of environmental problems. In green growth, where classical economic indicators are insufficient, more comprehensive indicators are needed. In order to address this insufficiency, OECD prepared green growth indicators in Rio+20 conference in order to ensure the healthy implementation of the Green Growth strategy and to ensure a healthy and continuous control of the transition process. These indicators were chosen according to well-defined criteria and were placed in the structured conceptual framework around 4 main headings, which were created to observe the main characteristics of green growth. In this study, the steps that Turkey has taken in the context of the OECD green growth indicators have been investigated comparatively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Ateş, S. A. & Ateş, M., 2015. Sosyo-Ekolojik Dönüşüm Karşısında Türkiye: Bir Alternatif Olarak Yeşil Büyüme. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4).
  2. Bozoğlu, B., 2017. Hava Kirliliği Raporu 2016, TMMOB Çevre Mühendisleri Odası, http://www.cmo.orgBP (British Petroleum), 2015.
  3. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2015, BP publishing.
  4. Ceylan, C., 2011. Küreselleşmenin sektörel etkileri araştırma projesi. Küresel Ekonomik Araştırmalar, İTO yayınları, Yayın 2010-98.
  5. Eser Özen, A., 2015. Seçilmiş Göstergelerle Türkiye İmalat Sanayiinin Analizi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 5(1), s.140-162
  6. İncecik, S., & İm, U., 2013. Megaşehirlerde hava kalitesi ve İstanbul örneği. Hava Kirliliği Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 133-145.
  7. Lee, J. W., Jung H. S., & Lee, T. J. 2012. Korea’s Green Growth based on OECD Green Growth Indicators, Statistics Korea.
  8. MMO, 2012. Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Enerji Verimliliği, Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı, Ankara: TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası Oda Raporu, Yayın No: MMO/589,

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Ocak 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

14 Kasım 2018

Kabul Tarihi

14 Aralık 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Karadaş, H. A., & Işık, H. B. (2019). Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators. Fiscaoeconomia, 3(1), 268-317. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2019.01.012
AMA
1.Karadaş HA, Işık HB. Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators. FSECON. 2019;3(1):268-317. doi:10.25295/fsecon.2019.01.012
Chicago
Karadaş, Hacı Ahmet, ve Hacı Bayram Işık. 2019. “Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators”. Fiscaoeconomia 3 (1): 268-317. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2019.01.012.
EndNote
Karadaş HA, Işık HB (01 Ocak 2019) Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators. Fiscaoeconomia 3 1 268–317.
IEEE
[1]H. A. Karadaş ve H. B. Işık, “Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators”, FSECON, c. 3, sy 1, ss. 268–317, Oca. 2019, doi: 10.25295/fsecon.2019.01.012.
ISNAD
Karadaş, Hacı Ahmet - Işık, Hacı Bayram. “Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators”. Fiscaoeconomia 3/1 (01 Ocak 2019): 268-317. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2019.01.012.
JAMA
1.Karadaş HA, Işık HB. Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators. FSECON. 2019;3:268–317.
MLA
Karadaş, Hacı Ahmet, ve Hacı Bayram Işık. “Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators”. Fiscaoeconomia, c. 3, sy 1, Ocak 2019, ss. 268-17, doi:10.25295/fsecon.2019.01.012.
Vancouver
1.Hacı Ahmet Karadaş, Hacı Bayram Işık. Green Growth in Turkey: A Statistical Comparison with OECD Indicators. FSECON. 01 Ocak 2019;3(1):268-317. doi:10.25295/fsecon.2019.01.012

Cited By

download?token=eyJ1aWQiOjEwMTE3NywiYXV0aF9yb2xlcyI6WyJST0xFX1VTRVIiXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiMjAyNi0wMy0xNF8wMC0xOC01OC5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiNTVjMC82NjE0LzA5NGEvNjliNDdmNjNjMjdiMDUuMDA4NTE4OTUucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzczNDQwMzcxLCJub25jZSI6IjMzYzNhMDczOTJhZDBiOWUxMjA4MTJlMzAwOTdlMDhjIn0.uxgvoBOu5rdPPckMLotZ4eBnzOQVB_StL3DcxMXqMSU


Fiscaoeconomia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).