German Social Welfare Approach through Reference to Three Periods of History: Cameralism, Weimar Welfare State and Ordoliberalism

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 318 - 337, 31.01.2019

Reyhan Karababa

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2019.01.013

Öz

Welfare state understanding of a country can be precisely delineated through reference to history shaping the relationship between state, market, society and family. Welfare capitalism considers families working-class and design social policies in this frame. Country-specific sociological and economic structure plays a role in the formation of social policies and public finance. For these reasons, German view of public finance, social welfare and policies from the 18th century to the present is discussed through three periods of history in which Cameralism, Weimar Welfare State and Ordoliberalism emerge. These periods are evaluated as the rings nested in each other of a system to reach a higher plane of capitalist achievement rather than chronological order of the events.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Welfare State, Public Finance, Social Policy, Cameralism, Ordoliberalism

Kaynakça

• KaynakçaAbelshauser, W. (2005). The dynamics of German industry: Germany's path toward the new economy and the American challenge (Vol. 6). Berghahn Books.Abelshauser, W. (2009). Des Kaisers neue Kleider?: Wandlungen der sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Roman-Herzog-Inst.Albert, M., & Gonenc, R. (1996). The future of Rhenish capitalism. The political quarterly, 67(3), 184-193.Backhaus, J., & Wagner, R. E. (1987). The cameralists: A public choice perspective. Public choice, 53(1), 3-20.Barr, N. (2012). Economics of the welfare state. Oxford University Press.BBC,History. erişim:06.12.2018. Erişim adresi: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/bismarck_otto_von.shtml. Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press.Bock G. 1991. “Antinatalism, maternity and pa- ternity in National Socialist racism” Maternity and Gender Policies: Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States, 18805-1950. Bock & Thane (Eds), London&New York: Routledge, pp. 233-55.Bonefeld, W. (2012). Freedom and the strong state: on German ordoliberalism. New Political Economy, 17(5), 633-656.Cunha, A. M. (2011). Polizei and the System of Public Finance: Tracing the Impact of Cameralism in Eighteenth-Century Portugal. The dissemination of economic ideas, 65-83.Deutche Welle Article. Erişim Tarihi: 27.12.2018 Erişim adresi: https://www.dw.com/en/german-issues-in-a-nutshell-agenda-2010/a-38789461 Duden Almanca güncel sözlük içinde. Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2018 Erişim adresi: https://www.duden.de/suchen/dudenonline/Oekonomi Duden Almanca güncel sözlük içinde. Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2018 Erişim adresi: https://www.duden.de/suchen/dudenonline/WirtschaftDuden Almanca güncel sözlük içinde. Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2018 Erişim adresi: https://www.duden.de/suchen/dudenonline/HaushaltungDullien, S., & Guérot, U. (2012). The long shadow of ordoliberalism: Germany's approach to the euro crisis. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).Eichengreen, B., & Ritschl, A. (2009). Understanding West German economic growth in the 1950s. Cliometrica, 3(3), 191-219.Erhard, L. (1957). Wohlstand für alle. Econ-Verlag.Flora, P. (Ed.). (1986). Growth to limits: the Western European welfare states since World War II (Vol. 2). Walter de Gruyter.Friedrich, C. J. (1955). The political thought of neo-liberalism. American Political Science Review, 49(2), 509-525.Goldscheid, R. (1958). A sociological approach to problems of public finance. In Classics in the theory of public finance (pp. 202-213). Palgrave Macmillan, London.Goerke, L. (2001). Bismarck versus Beveridge: Flat-rate and earnings-related unemployment insurance in a general efficiency wage framework. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 57(3), 243-260.Gough, I. (1978). Theories of the welfare state: a critique. International Journal of Health Services, 8(1), 27-40.Hecker, C. (2011). Soziale Marktwirtschaft und Soziale Gerechtigkeit: Mythos, Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik, 12(2), 269-294.Hetzel, R. (2002). German monetary history in the first half of the twentieth century.Hien, J. (2013). The ordoliberalism that never was. Contemporary Political Theory, 12(4), 349-358.Hill, J. A. (1892). The Prussian Income Tax. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 6(2), 207-226.Hoffmann, F. (1943). Die Ausbildung für Verwaltung und Praxis im deutschen Kameralismus. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft/Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, (H. 2), 177-208.King, D., & Wood, S. (1999). The political economy of neoliberalism: Britain and the United States in the 1980s. Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism, 13, 371-397.Koloğlu, M. (1969). Ekonomi doktrinleri tarihi. Matbaasi.Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American sociological review, 661-687.Lapavitsas, Costas and Kaltenbrunner, A. and Lambrinidis, G. and Lindo, D. and Meadway, J. and Michell, J. and Painceira, J.P. and Powell, J. and Pires, E. and Stenfors, A. and Teles, N. and Vatikiotis, L. (2012) Crisis in the Eurozone. London: Verso.Lindenfeld, D. F. (2008). The practical imagination: The German sciences of state in the nineteenth century. University of Chicago Press.Monsen, N. (2002). The case for cameral accounting. Financial Accountability & Management, 18(1), 39-72.Noyes, P. H. (2015). Organization and Revolution: Working Class Associations in the German Revolutions of 1848-1849. Princeton University Press.OECD National Accounts at a Galance, Erişim Tarihi: 02.01.2019 Erişim adresi: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=NAAG#Oppenheimer, F. (1917). Staatswissenschaft und Politik der Gegenwart.Peukert, H. (2005). The Benevolent Prince in Veit Ludwig von Seckendorff’s Teutscher Fürsten Stat with Special Consideration of the Prince’s Revenues, Regalia and Taxes. European Journal of Law and Economics, 19(3), 287-303.Reichard, C. (2007). The study of public management in Germany. Poorly institutionalized and fragmented. In The study of public management in Europe and the US (pp. 56-83). Routledge.Rouette, S. (1997). Mothers and citizens: gender and social policy in Germany after the First World War. Central European History, 30(1), 48-66.Schefold, B. (2016). Antiquity. Faccarello, G., & Kurz, H. D. (Eds.). Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume II: Schools of Thought in Economics (Vol. 2). Edward Elgar Publishing.Schmidt, V. A., & Thatcher, M. (2013). Theorizing ideational continuity: The resilience of neo-liberal ideas in Europe.Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2010). Socio-economic change, party competition and intra-party conflict: The family policy of the grand coalition. German Politics, 19(3-4), 416-428.Small, A. W. (1923). Some Contributions to the History of Sociology. Section VIII. Approaches to Objective Economic and Political Science in Germany: Cameralism. American Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 158-165.Small, A. W. (1963). The Cameralists: The pioneers of German social policy. Franklin.Steinmetz, G. (1993). Regulating the social: the welfare state and local politics in imperial Germany. Princeton University Press.Streeck, W. (1997). German capitalism: does it exist? Can it survive?. New political economy, 2(2), 237-256.Stolleis, M. (2013). Origins of the German welfare state: Social policy in Germany to 1945. In Origins of the German Welfare State (pp. 23-176). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Tribe, K. (1984). Cameralism and the Science of Government. The Journal of Modern History, 56(2), 263-284.Wagner, R. E. (2012). The cameralists: fertile sources for a new science of public finance. In Handbook of the History of Economic Thought (pp. 123-135). Springer, New York, NY.Young, B. (2014). German ordoliberalism as agenda setter for the euro crisis: Myth trumps reality. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22(3), 276-287.