İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Ve Cam Tavan İlişkisine Türk Eğitim Sektörü’nden Niceliksel Bir Bakış: Kadın Kadının Destekçisi Mi?

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 693 - 721, 17.05.2021

Numan Aksoy

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.877314

Öz

Cam tavan sorununun örgütlerde kadınların üst yönetim kademelerine yükselmesini engelleyen ciddi bir sorun olduğu bilinmektedir. Kadınların kariyer ilerleyişine zarar veren bu sorunu ortaya çıkaran birçok neden vardır. İnsan kaynakları yönetimini ilgilendiren bazı uygulamalar da bu nedenler arasında sıralanır. Bu çalışmada cam tavan kavramına insan kaynakları yönetimi penceresinden bakılacaktır. Bir başka deyişle, insan kaynakları yönetimi fonksiyonlarının örgütlerde çalışan kadınların cam tavan algılarını nasıl değiştirdiğine odaklanılacaktır. Kısaca işe alım, kariyer geliştirme, eğitim, performans değerlendirme gibi insan kaynakları yönetimi faaliyetlerinin uygulanmasındaki cinsiyet etkisinin kadınların cam tavan algılarını nasıl değiştirdiği bu çalışmanın temel konusudur. Çalışmayla beraber Türk cam tavan yazınındaki bazı eksik noktaların tamamlanacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cam Tavan, Cinsiyet Eşitsizliği, İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi

A Quantitative Look To The Relationship Between Human Resources Management and Glass Ceiling From The Turkish Education Sector: Does A Woman Support Another Woman?

Öz

It is known that the glass ceiling problem is a serious problem in organizations that prevents women from advancing to top management positions. There are many reasons behind this problem which gives harm to women's career progression. In this study, the glass ceiling concept will be viewed from the perspective of human resources management. In other words, the focus will be on how human resources management functions change the perception of glass ceilings of women working in organizations. In short, how the gender effect in the implementation of human resources management activities such as recruitment, career development, training, performance evaluation changes women's perception of glass ceiling is the main subject of this study. With the study, it is thought that some of the missing points in Turkish glass ceiling literature will be completed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gender Inequality, Human Resources Management, Glass Ceiling

Kaynakça

• Abbas, Q., Hameed, A., ve Waheed, S. (2011). Gender Discrimination & its Effect on Employee Performance/Productivity. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,1(15): 170-176.
• Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Rosati, F. (2016). Gender Bias in Academic Recruitment. Scionometrics, 106: 119-141.
• Ackah, C. ve Heaton, N. (2003). Human Resources Management Careers: Different Paths for Men and Women. Career Development International, 8(3): 134-142.
• Acker, J., ve Van Houten, D.R. (1974). Differential Recruitment and Control: The Sex Structuring of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2): 152-163.
• Adler, N. J. (1994). Competitive Frontiers: Women Managing Across Borders. Journal of Management Development, 13(2): 24-41. Anbarasu, J., ve Barnabas, A. (2010). A Study on Attitudinal Hindrances and Human Resource Practices in Empowering Women Construction Workers. The IUP Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 9(3): 48-67.
• Arvey, R. D. (1986). Sex Bias in Job Evaluation Procedures. Personnel Psychology, 39(2): 315–335.
• Barrick, M. R., ve Swider B. W. (2010). Initial Evaluations in the Interview: Relationships With Subsequent Interviewer Evaluations and Employment Offers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6): 1163–1172.
• Beattie, J. C. (1991). Prohibiting Marital Status Discrimination: A Proposal for the Protection of Unmarried Couples. Hastings Law Journal, 42(5): 1415-1454.
• Bilimoria, D. (2006). The Relationship Between Women Corporate Directors and Women Corporate Officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1): 47-61.
• Bohnet, I., Van Geen, A., ve Bazerman, M. (2016). When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint Versus Separate Evaluation. Management Science, 62(5): 1225–1234.
• Borman, C. A. ve Guido-Dibrito, F. (1986). The Career Development of Women: Helping Cinderella Lose her Complex. Journal of Career Development, March Issue: 250-261.
• Bowman, J. S. (2010). The Success of Failure: the Paradox of Performance Pay. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1): 70–88.
• Brands, R., ve Fernandez-Mateo, I. (2017). Leaning Out: How Negative Recruitment Experiences Shape Women's Decisions to Compete for Executive Roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62 (3): 405-442.
• Brass, D. J. (1985). Men’s and Women’s Networks: A Study of Interaction Patterns and Influence in an Organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 327-343.
• Burgard, C., ve Görlitz, K. (2011). Continuous Training, Job Satisfaction and Gender: an Empirical Analysis Using German Panel Data. Ruhr Economic Papers, 265: 1-25.
• Burnier, D. (2006). Masculine Markets and Feminine Care: A Gender Analysis of the National Performance Review. Public Administration Review, November - December: 861-873.
• Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and Social Influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4): 725-741.
• Chênevert, D., ve Tremblay, M. (2002). Managerial Career Success in Canadian Organizations: Is Gender a Determinant?, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(6): 920-941.
• Cook, A., ve Glass, C. (2014). Above the Glass Ceiling: When are Women and Racial/Ethnic Minorities Promoted to CEO? Strategic Management Journal, 35(7):1080–1089.
• Correll, S.,ve Benard, S. (2006). Gender and Racial Bias in Hiring. Political Science, 1-22.
• Correll, S. J., Benard, S., ve Paik, I. (2007). Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5): 1297-1339.
• Costa, G., ve Gianecchini, M. (2007). Career Diversity Men's and Women's Careers in Human Resource Management. Management&Avenir, 4(4): 169-186.
• Davison, M., Maraist, C., ve Bing, M. N. (2011). Friend or Foe? The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Social Networking Sites for HR Decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26:153–159.
• DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the Meaning and Use of Kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2: 292-307.
• Defillippi, R. J., ve Arthur, M. B. (1994). The Boundaryless Career: A Competency-cased Perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4): 307-324.
• Dezsö, C. L., ve Ross, D. G. (2012). Does Female Representation in Top Management Improve Firm Performance? A Panel Data Investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1072–1089.
• Dion, K. L., Schuller, R. A. (1990). Ms. and the Manager: A Tale of Two Stereotypes. Sex Roles,22(9/10): 569-578.
• Dwyer, S., Richard, O. C., ve Chadwick, K. (2003). Gender Diversity in Management and Firm Performance: The Influence of Growth Orientation and Organizational Culture. Journal of Business Research, 56: 1009–1019.
• Eddleston, K. A., Veiga, J. F., ve Powell, G. N. (2006). Explaining Sex Differences in Managerial Career Satisfier Preferences: The Role of Gender Self-Schema. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2): 437-45.
• Eagly, A. H., ve Carli, L. L. (2003). The Female Leadership Advantage: an Evaluation of the Evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6): 807–834.
• Eagly, A.H. (2007). Female Leadership Advantage and Disadvantage: Resolving the Contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1): 1–12.
• Eagly, A. H., ve Wood, W. (2012). Social Role Theory. P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, ve E. T. Higgins (Der.), Handbook of theories of social psychology, 458–476.
• Fernandez, R. M., ve Campero, S. (2017). Gender Sorting and the Glass Ceiling in High-Tech Firms. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 70 (1):73-104.
• Festing, M. Knappert, L. ve Kornau, A. (2015). Gender Specific Preferances in Global Performance Management: an Empirical Study of Male and Female Managers in a Multinational Context. Human Resource Management, 54(1): 55-79.
• Foschi, M. (1996). Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3): 237-254.
• Fugate, D. L., Decker, P. J ve Brewer, J. J. (1988). Women in Professional Selling: A Human Resource Management Perspective. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 8: 33–41.
• Georgellis, Y., Lange, T., ve Tabvuma, V. (2012). The Impact of Life Events on Job Satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2): 464-473.
• Greer, C. R., ve Virick, M. (2008). Diverse Succession Planning: Lessons From The Industry Leaders. Human Resource Management, 47(2): 351–367.
• Hambrick, D. C., ve Mason P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193-206.
• Harcourt, S,. ve Harcourt, M. (2002). Do Employers Comply with Civil/Human Rights Legislation? New Evidence From New Zealand. Journal of Business Ethics, 35: 207-221.
• Hersby, M. D., Ryan, M. K., ve Jette, J. (2009). Getting Together to Get Ahead: The Impact of Social Structure on Women’s Networking. British Journal of Management, 20: 415–430.
• Higgins, M. C. ve Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing Mentoring at Work: A Developmental Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 264-288.
• Hopkins, K. D. ve Weeks, D. L. (1990). Tests for Normality and Measures of Skewness and Kurtosis: Their Place in Research Reporting. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50:717-729.
• Jackson, J. F. L. ve Callaghan, E. M. (2009). What Do We Know About Glass Ceiling Effects? A Taxonomy and Critical Review to Inform Higher Education Research. High Education Journal, 50: 460-482.
• Jordan, A. H, ve Zitek, E. M. (2012). Marital Status Bias in Perceptions of Employees. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34: 474–481.
• Kang E., Ding, D. K, ve Choerenwong, C. (2010). Investor Reactions to Women Directors. Journal of Business Research, 63: 888-894.
• Keck, T., ve Tang, W. (2019). When “Decoy Effect” Meets Gender Bias: The Role of Choice Set Composition in Hiring Decisions. Journal Of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(2): 240-254.
• Keaveny, T. J., ve Interrieden, E. J. (1999). Gender Differences in Employer-supported Training and Education. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54: 71–81.
• King, E. B. (2008). The Effect of Bias on the Advancement of Working Mothers: Disentangling Legitimate Concerns From Inaccurate Stereotypes as Predictors of Advancement in Academe. Human Relations, 61(12): 1677–1711.
• Ko, J., Hur, S., ve Smith-Walter, A. (2013). Performance: Moderating Effects of Managerial Support and Performance-oriented Management. Public Personnel Management, 42(4): 545-565.
• Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., ve Erkut, S. (2008). The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2): 145–164.
• Kumar, S, A. (2016). Is HR a Women' s Bastion? Human Capital Online, 14-19.
• Latu, I. M., Schmidt Mast, M., ve Stewart, T. L. (2015). Gender Biases in (inter) Action: The Role of Interviewers and Applicants Implicit and Explicit Stereotypes in Predicting Women's Job Interview Outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39 (4): 539-552.
• Lee, P. M. , ve Hayes-James, E. (2007). She'-e-os: Gender Effects and Investor Reactions to The Announcement of Top Eexecutive Appointments. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 227–241.
• Liebkind, K., Larja, L., & Brylka, A. (2016). Ethnic and Gender Discrimination in Recruitment: Experimental Evidence From Finland. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(1): 403–426.
• Litzky, B. ve Greenhaus, J. (2007). The Relationship Between Gender and Aspirations to Senior Management. Career Development International, 12(7): 637-659.
• Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013).Women on Boards and Firm Performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 17: 491-509.
• Lyness, K.S., ve Heilma, M. E. (2006). When Fit is Fundamental: Performance Evaluations and Promotions of Upper-level Female and Male Managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4): 777–785.
• Malcolmson, K. A., ve Sinclair, L. (2007). The ms. Stereotype Revisited: Implicit and Explicit Facets. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31: 305–310.
• Marlow, N.D., Marlow, E. K., ve Arnold, V. (1995). Career Development and Women Managers: Does One Size Fit All? Human Resource Planning, 18(2): 38-49.
• Mastracci, S. ve Arreola,V. I. (2016). Gendered Organizations: Human Resource Management Practices Produce and Reproduce Administrative Men. Administrative Theory&Praxis, 38: 137-144.
• Mavin, S. (2001). Women’s Career in Theory and Practice: Time For Change? Women in Management Review,16(4): 183 – 192.
• McShane, S. (1990). Two Tests of Direct Gender Bias in Job Evaluation Ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63(2): 129 – 140.
• Melero, E. (2011). Are Workplaces With Many Women in Management Run Differently? Journal of Business Research, 64: 385-393.
• Morrison, A. M., ve Von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and Minorities in Management. American Psychologist, 45(2): 200–208.
• Mullen, L.G.,Thakur, G. R., ve Hensel, K. (2007). Illegal Questioning: A Study of Marketing Students’ Recent Interview Experiences During Their Career Searches. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 10(1): 27-39.
• Nadler, J. T., Bartels L. K., Sliter, K. A., Stockdale, M. S., ve Lowery, M. (2013). Research on the Discrimination of Marginalized Employees: Fishing in Other Ponds. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(1): 66-70.
• Nadler, J. T., ve Kufahl, K. M. (2014). Marital Status, Gender and Sexual Oriantation: Implications for Employment Hiring Decisions. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(3): 270-278.
• Ng, E. S. W., ve Wyrick, C. R. (2011). Motivational Bases for Managing Diversity: A Model of Leadership Commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 21: 368–376.
• Ng, E. S. W., ve Sears, G. S. (2017). The Glass Ceiling in Context: The Influence of CEO Gender, Recruitment Practices and Firm Internationalisation on the Representation of Women in Management. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1): 133-151.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• O'Shea, M., ve Toohey, K. (2014). "Bringing Women Up to Equality With Men": Paradoxically Redressing and Reifying Gendered Recruitment and Selection Practices in Australian Sport Workplaces? Employment Relations Record, 14(1): 2-25.
• Paauwe, J., ve Boon, C. (2009). Strategic HRM: A Critical Review. D. G. Collings, G. Wood, M.A. Reid (Der.), Human resource management: a critical approach (38-54). London: Routledge.
• Papadakis, M., ve Barwise, P. (2002). How Much Do CEO’s and Top Managers Matter In Strategic Decision-Making? British Journal of Management, 13: 83–95.
• Pazy, A. (1987). Sex Differences in Responsiveness to Organizational Career Management. Human Resource Management, 26(2): 243–256.
• Pazy, A., ve Oron, I. (2001). Sex Proportion and Performance Evolution Among High Ranking Military Officers. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 22: 689-702.
• Petersen, T., Saporta, I., ve Seidel, D. L. (2005). Getting Hired: Sex and Race. Industrial Relations, 44(3): 416-443.
• Petersen,T., ve Togstad, T. (2006). Getting the Offer: Sex Discrimination in Hiring. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24(3): 239-257.
• Pichler, S., Simpson, P. A, ve Stroh L. K. (2008). The Glass Ceiling in Human Resources: Exploring the Link Between Women' s Representation in Management and the Practices of Strategic Human Resource Management and Employee Involvement. Human Resources Management,47(3): 463-479.
• Ragins, B. R. ve Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and Power in Organization: A Longitudinal Perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 108(1): 51-58.
• Ranson, G. (2003). Beyond Gender Differences. A Canadian Study of Women’s and Men’s Careers in Engineering. Gender Work And Organization, 10(1): 22-41.
• Reichel, A., Brandl, J., ve Mayrhofer, W. (2009). Departmental Status in Light of a Growing Proportion of Female Staff: The Case of Human Resource Management. European Journal Of International Management, 3(4): 457 – 477.
• Roh, H., ve Kim, E. (2016). The Business Case for Gender Diversity: Examining The Role of Human Resource Management Investments. Human Resource Management, 55(3): 519-534.
• Saks, A. M., ve McCarthy, J. M. (2006). Effects of Discriminatory Interview Questions and Gender on Applicant Reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(2): 175-189.
• Scheibl F., ve Dex, S. (1998). Should We Have More Family-friendly Policies? European Management Journal,16(5): 586–599.
• Schor, S. M. (1997). Seperate and Unequal. Business Horizons, 40: 51-58.
• Sealy, R. H. V., ve Singh, V. (2010). The Importance of Role Models and Demographic Context for Senior Women’s Work Identity Development. International Journal of Management Reviews,12(3): 284-300.
• Smith, N., Smith, V., ve Verner, M. (2005). Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,55(7) :1-34.
• Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., ve Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay Versus John McKay: Do Gender Stereotypes Bias Evaluations? Psychological Bulletin,105(3): 409-42.
• Syamala,G., ve Devi, R. T. (2015). A Study of Gender Discrimination of Campus Recruitment in The Professional colleges. Journal of Commerce and Management, 6(2): 323-339.
• Teigen, M. (1999). Documenting Discrimination: A Study of Recruitment Cases Brought to The Norwegian Gender Equality Ombud. Gender, Work and Organization, 6(2): 91-105.
• Terjesen, S., ve Singh, V. (2008). Female Presence on Corporate Boards: A Multi-Country Study of Environmental Context. Journal of Business Ethics,83: 55–63.
• Tsui, A. S., ve Gutek, B. A. (1984). A Role Set Analysis of Gender Differences in Performance, Affective Relationships, and Career Success of Industrial Middle Managers.The Academy of Management Journal, 27(3): 619-635.
• Truss, C. (1999). Human Resource Management: Gendered Terrain? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(2): 180-200.
• Van Den Brink, M. (2015). Gender Bias in Recruitment and Selection of Academics. Egera Project, 1-17.
• Van Vianen, A. E. M. ve Fischer, A. H. (2002). Illuminating The Glass Ceiling: The Role of Organizational Culture Preferences. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 75(3): 315-337.
• Veiga, J. F. 1976. Female career myopia. Human Resource Management, 15: 24-27.
• White, M. C., Crino, M. D. ve Desanctis, G. L. (1981). A Critical Review of Female Performance, Performance Training and Organizational Initiatives Designed to Aid Women in The Work Role Environment. Personnel Psychology, 34: 227-248.
• Wood, W. ve Eagly, A. H. (2002). A Cross-Cultural Analysis of The Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for The origins of Sex Differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128 (5): 699-727.
• Wooden, M., ve VandenHeuvel, A. (2002). Gender Discrimination In Training: A Note. British Journal of Industrial Relations 35(4): 627-633.
• Woodhams, C. ,Lupton,B., ve Xian, H. (2009). The Persistence of Gender Discrimination in China –Evidence From Recruitment Advertisements. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(10): 2084-2109.
• Yu, H. Y. (2018). Gender and Public Agency Hiring: An Exploratory Analysis of Recruitment Practices in Federal Law Enforcement. Public Personnel Management, 47(3): 247-264.