Mutluluk Ekonomisi ve Kamu Politikası

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 516 - 537, 25.02.2025

Yaprak Karadağ Duymazlar , Bernur Açıkgöz , Burak Önemli

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1421105

Öz

Geleneksel kalkınma anlayışının yerini sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya ve insani gelişmeye bırakması, refahın yeniden değerlendirilmesini gerekli kılmıştır. Ekonomik refahın göstergesi olarak kabul edilen milli gelirin toplumların refahını yansıtmada yetersiz kalması nedeniyle mutluluk ölçümlerinden yararlanılarak yeni göstergelerin oluşturulması çabası, içinde bulunduğumuz yüzyılda giderek yaygınlaşmaktadır. Mutluluğu belirleyen iktisadi değişkenler ve iktisadi politikaların olası etkileri üzerine interdisipliner çalışmaların yürütüldüğü mutluluk ekonomisi, politik karar alma süreçlerine ampirik temelli bulgular sunan bir çalışma alanıdır. Bu çalışma, mutluluk ekonomisi bulgularının ve mutluluk ölçümlerinin kamu politikasına dâhil edilme sürecini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Mutluluk ve kamu politikası ilişkisi, alandaki teorik tartışmalar ve bu tartışmaların getirdiği yenilikçi girişimler çerçevesinde sunulmuştur. Uluslararası uygulama ve ülke örneklerinin yanında, kalkınma planları ve yaşam memnuniyeti araştırmaları bağlamında Türkiye’deki durum da değerlendirilmiştir. Bu sayede çalışma, kamu politika yapım süreçlerinde mutluluk ekonomisi bulgularının ve mutluluk ölçümlerinin somut bir şekilde nasıl yer alabileceğini göstererek, literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, mutluluğun dâhil edildiği yeni refah göstergeleri oluşturma girişimlerinin ulusal ve uluslararası düzeyde varlığı tespit edilmiştir. Dahası, ülkelerin kamu politikalarında mutluluğu teşvik edecek uygulamaları hayata geçirdiği ve mutluluğun kamu politikasının hedeflerinden biri haline geldiği gözlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mutluluk Ekonomisi, Mutluluk, Kamu Politikaları, Kalkınma Ekonomisi, Refah Ekonomisi

Happiness Economics and Public Policy

Öz

The shift from traditional development to sustainable development and human development has necessitated the re-evaluation of welfare. Due to the inadequacy of national income measurements used as an indicator of economic prosperity in reflecting the welfare of societies, the studies on happiness economics and the effort to create new indicators by utilising happiness measurements are becoming increasingly widespread in the current century. Happiness economics is a field of study that provides empirically based evidence for the policy-making process by conducting interdisciplinary studies on the economic variables that determine happiness and the possible effects of economic policies. This study aims to reveal the process of including happiness economics findings and happiness measurements in public policy. The relationship between happiness and public policy is presented within the framework of theoretical debates in the field and the initiatives brought by those debates. Besides international examples, the current situation in Turkey has also been assessed in the context of development plans and life satisfaction surveys. In this way, the study contributes to the literature by showing how happiness economics and happiness measurement can be concretely incorporated into policy-making processes. The study concludes that there are national and international attempts to create new welfare indicators that include happiness. Furthermore, it has been observed that countries have implemented practices to promote happiness in public policies, and happiness has become one of the aims of public policy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

: Happiness Economics, Happiness, Public Policy, Development Economics, Welfare Economics

Kaynakça

• Adler, A. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Using wellbeing for public policy: Theory, measurement, and recommendations. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1), 1-35.
• Centre for Bhutan Studies & GNH Research. (2016). A compass towards a just and harmonious society: 2015 GNH survey report. Centre for Bhutan Studies & GNH Research.
• Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., Layard, R., Powdthavee, N. & Ward, G. (2018). The origins of happiness: The science of well-being over the life-course. Princeton University Press.
• Deviren, N. V. & Yıldız, O. (2017). Gayrisafi milli mutluluğun ekonomik kalkınmadaki rolü: Bhutan Krallığı örneği. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(4), 232-248.
• Di Tella, R. & MacCulloch, R. J. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspective, 20(1), 25-46.
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
• Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L. & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute?. Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195-223.
• Dumludağ, D. (2014). Fayda, mutluluk ve refah. A. F. Aysan & D. Dumludağ (Der.), Kalkınmada yeni yaklaşımlar. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
• Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot?. P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Ed.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
• Easterlin, R. A. & O’Connor, K. J. (2020). The easterlin paradox. IZA Discussion Papers, IZA DP No. 13923.
• Frey, B. S. (2018). Economics of happiness. Springer.
• Frey, B. S. & Stutzer A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110(466), 918-938.
• Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. (2009). Should national happiness be maximized?. A. K. Rutt & B. Radcliff (Ed.), Happiness, economics and politics. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Government of New Zeland (2019). Wellbeing budget 2019. https://www. treasury.govt.nz/publications/wellbeing-budget/wellbeing-budget-2019-html
• Government of New Zeland (2020). Wellbeing budget 2020 rebuilding together. https://www.treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2020-05/b20-wellbeing-budget.pdf
• Graham, C. (2005). The economics of happiness insights on globalization from a novel approach. World Economics, 6(3), 41-55.
• Helliwell, J. F. & Wang, S. (2012). The state of world happiness. World Happiness Report, 10-57.
• Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., Aknin, L. B., De Neve, J.-E. & Wang, S. (Eds.). (2023). World happiness report 2023 (11th Ed.). Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
• Indian Express (2022) Madhya Pradesh Govt eyes to introduce ‘happiness’ subject in school syllabus. https://indianexpress.com/article/ education/madhya-pradesh-govt-eyes-to-introduce-happiness-subject-in-school-syllabus-7756743/ (February 5, 2022).
• Jaswal, V., Kishore, K., Muniraju, M., Jaswal, N. & Kapoor, R. (2020). Understanding the determinants of happiness through gallup world poll. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(9), 4826.
• Johns, H. & Ormerod, P. (2007), Happiness, economics and public policy. Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
• Kahyaoğlu, O. (2008). Yaşam memnuniyeti ve yaşam memnuniyetini etkileyen değişkenler ile ekonometrik uygulama: Türkiye örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
• Kamilçelebi, H. (2023). Mutluluk İktisadında Easterlin’e Karşı Veenhoven: İktisadi Büyüme Mutluluğu Artırır mı?. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 10(2), 691-720.
• Kroll, C. (2010). Public policy and happiness. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. www.feslondon.org.uk
• Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.
• Lee, C. J. (2021). Effects of government characteristics on the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 157, 563-579.
• Levinson, A. (2013). Happiness, behavioral economics, and public policy (No. w19329). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Martela, F., Greve, B., Rothstein, B. & Saari, J. (2020). The nordic exceptionalism: What explains why the nordic countries are constantly among the happiest in the world. World Happiness Report, 129-146.
• Merkit, N. (2021). Nietzsche’nin ‘son insan’ının ve cesur yeni dünya’nın mutluluk anlayışı üzerine bir değerlendirme. Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 179-200.
• Mintrom, M. (2019). New Zealand's wellbeing budget invests in population health. The Milbank Quarterly, 97(4), 893.
• Musikanski, L. (2014). Happiness in public policy. Journal of Social Change, 6(1), 55-85.
• Papastergiou, E., Latinopoulos, D., Evdou, M. & Kalogeresis, A. (2023). Exploring associations between subjective well-being and non-market values when used in the evaluation of urban green spaces: A scoping review. Land, 12(3), 700.
• Rajya Anand Sansthan. (2022). Workshop: Developing happiness index for Madhya Pradesh. https://www.anandsansthanmp.in/hi/anandsansthan-workshop
• Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166.
• Ryff, C. D., Boylan, J. M. & Kirsch, J. A. (2021). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Measuring Well-Being, 92-135.
• Royal Government of Bhutan (2012). The report of the high-level meeting on wellbeing and happiness: Defining a new economic paradigm. New York: The Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of Bhutan to the United Nations. Thimphu: Office of the Prime Minister.
• Stevenson, B. & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. NBER Working Paper Series, http://www.nber.org/papers/w14282.
• Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr (01.12.2022)
• Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (2019). On birinci kalkınma planı (2019-2023). https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On_Birinci_Kalkinma_Plani-2019-2023.pdf
• Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (2023). On ikinci kalkınma planı (2024-2028). https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/On-Ikinci-Kalkinma-Plani_ 2024-2028_11122023.pdf
• Şeker, M. (2016). Mutluluk ekonomisi-kamu ekonomisi açısından bir analiz. Türkmen Kitabevi, İstanbul.
• T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı (2024). 2024-2028 stratejik planı. https://www.aile.gov.tr/media/157370/stratejik-plan-2024.pdf
• T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2013). Onuncu kalkınma planı (2014-2018). https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Onuncu_Kalkinma_Plani-2014-2018.pdf
• T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2018). Kentsel yaşam kalitesi özel ihtisas komisyonu raporu. Yayın No: KB: 3014- ÖİK: 795.
• The Treasury (2019). The living standards framework. https://treasury.govt.nz/information-and-services/nz-economy/living-standards
• The United Arab Emirates’ Goverment Portal (2022). National programme for happiness and wellbeing. https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/the-uae-government/government-of-future/happiness#:~:text=HappinessandWellbeing
• TÜİK (2021). Yaşam memnuniyeti araştırması, 2020. www.tuik.gov.tr/media/announcements/yasam _memnuniyeti_arastirmasi_2020.pdf
• TÜİK (2023). Yaşam memnuniyeti araştırması, 2022. data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Yasam-Memnuniyeti-Arastirmasi-2022-49691
• UK Parliament (2009). Wellbeing in public policy. https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/40060/wellbeing-in-public-policy
• United Nations General Assembly. (2012). Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 28 June 2012. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/475/68/PDF/ N1147568.pdf?OpenElement,
• Ura, K., Alkire, S. & Zangmo, T. (2012). Bhutan: Gross national happiness and the GNH Index.
• Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative?. Social Indicators Research, 24, 1-34.
• Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1-39.
• Veenhoven, R. (2004). Happiness as an aim in public policy: The greatest happiness principle. Positive Psychology in Practice, 1-31.
• Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(5), 605-629.
• Veenhoven, R. & Dumludağ, D. (2015). İktisat ve mutluluk. İktisat ve Toplum Dergisi, 58, 46-51.
• Veenhoven, R. & Vergunst, F. (2014). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 311-343.