The Moderating Role of Organizational Politics Perception, Age, and Experience on the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and Job Satisfaction: A Study on Public Employees in Diyarbakır

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 1592 - 1608, 25.08.2025

Müslüm Kayacı

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1600812

Öz

There is extensive literature indicating that public service motivation (PSM) has a positive impact on job satisfaction among employees in public institutions. Additionally, public employees' perceptions of organizational politics—particularly regarding resource distribution and power struggles within their institutions—are also associated with PSM. This study primarily examines the effect of PSM on job satisfaction among public employees working in public institutions in Diyarbakır. Furthermore, it investigates the moderating roles of organizational politics perception, age, and experience levels in the relationship between PSM and job satisfaction. The research data were collected from 353 public employees in Diyarbakır using a convenience sampling method. The collected data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis in the JASP software. The findings reveal a positive relationship between PSM and job satisfaction. Moreover, as public employees' perceptions of organizational politics increase, the strength of this positive relationship also intensifies. However, age and experience levels were found to have no significant effect on the relationship between PSM and job satisfaction. The study's findings align with the broader literature on this topic, suggesting that the relationship between PSM and job satisfaction is of a universal nature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Public Service Motivation , Job Satisfaction , Organizational Politics Perception , Age , Experience

Kamu Hizmet Motivasyonunun İş Tatminine Etkisinde Örgütsel Politika Algısı, Yaş ve Tecrübenin Düzenleyici Rolü: Diyarbakır’daki Kamu Personeli Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Kamu hizmet motivasyonunun özellikle kamu kurumlarındaki çalışanların iş tatmin düzeyleri üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğuna dair geniş bir literatür bulunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte kamu kurumlarında çalışan kişilerin kurum ortamındaki kaynak dağılımına ve güç savaşlarına dair geliştirmiş oldukları örgütsel politika algısı da kamu hizmet motivasyonu ile ilgili görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada birincil olarak Diyarbakır’da kamu kurumlarında çalışan kamu personelinin kamu hizmet motivasyonu düzeyinin iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Ayrıca, kamu hizmet motivasyonu ve iş tatmini üzerindeki ilişkide kamu çalışanlarının örgütsel politika algısı, yaş ve tecrübe düzeyi faktörlerinin düzenleyici rolü irdelenmiştir. Araştırma verileri Diyarbakır’da bulunan kamu kurumlarında çalışan 353 kamu personelinde kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle elde edilmiştir. Toplanan veriler JASP programında çoklu regresyon analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, kamu hizmet motivasyonu ve iş tatmini arasında olumlu bir ilişki bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, kamu çalışanlarının örgütsel politika algısı arttıkça bu olumlu ilişkinin kuvveti de artmaktadır. Öte yandan, kamu çalışanlarının yaş ve tecrübe düzeyinin kamu hizmet motivasyonu ve iş tatmini arasındaki olumlu ilişkide hiçbir anlamlı etkisi bulunamamıştır. Araştırma bulguları, kamu hizmet motivasyonu ve iş tatmini arasındaki ilişkinin ilgili literatürün geneliyle ilişkili olduğunu ve evrensel bir nitelik taşıdığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kamu Hizmet Motivasyonu , İş Tatmini , Örgütsel Politika Algısı , Yaş , Tecrübe

Kaynakça

• Agho, A. O., Mueller, C. W., & Price, J. L. (1993). Determinants of employee job satisfaction: An empirical test of a causal model. Human Relations, 46(8), 1007-1027.
• Alcoba, R. C., & Phinaitrup, B. A. (2020). In search of the holy grail in public service: A study on the mediating effect of public service motivation on organizational politics and outcomes. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 73-83.
• Andersen, L. B., & Kjeldsen, A. M. (2013). Public service motivation, user orientation, and job satisfaction: A question of employment sector?. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 252-274.
• Arslan, M., & Karacaoğlu, K. (2018). Kamu görevlilerinin kurumsal itibar algılarının kamu hizmet motivasyonlarına etkisi: Nevşehir ilçe belediyeleri üzerinde bir araştırma. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 14-29.
• Berman, E., Chen, D. Y., Jan, C. Y., & Huang, T. Y. (2013). Public agency leadership: The impact of informal understandings with political appointees on perceived agency innovation in Taiwan. Public Administration, 91(2), 303-324.
• Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 413-440.
• Bright, L. (2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees?. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149-166.
• Cantarelli, P., Belardinelli, P., & Belle, N. (2016). A meta-analysis of job satisfaction correlates in the public administration literature. Review Of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 115-144.
• Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 459–484.
• Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 499-518.
• Drory, A. (1993). Perceived political climate and job attitudes. Organization Studies, 14(1), 59-71.
• Drory, A., & Romm, T. (1990). The definition of organizational politics: A review. Human Relations, 43(11), 1133-1154.
• Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1), 93–116.
• Garip, S. (2023). Sosyal bilimlerde nicel araştırma geleneği üzerine kuramsal bir inceleme. International Journal of Social Science Research, 12(1), 1-19.
• Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren‐Biget, S. (2012). Resigned but satisfied: The negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction. Public Administration, 90(1), 175-193.
• Gürbüz, S. & Şahin F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri, Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
• Homberg, F., McCarthy, D., & Tabvuma, V. (2015). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 711-722.
• Houston, D. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713-728.
• Kacmar, K. M., Bozeman, D. P., Carlson, D. S., & Anthony, W. P. (1999). An examination of the perceptions of organizational politics model: Replication and extension. Human Relations, 52, 383-416.
• Kim, J. (2018). The effects of relative organizational tenure on job behaviors in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 335-355.
• Kim, S. (2009). Revising Perry's measurement scale of public service motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 149-163.
• Kim, S. (2012), Does person-organization fit matter in the public -sector? Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit in the relationship between public service motivation and work attitudes. Public Administration Review, 72, 830-840.
• Kim, S. (2017). Comparison of a multidimensional to a unidimensional measure of public service motivation: Predicting work attitudes. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(6), 504-515.
• Kjeldsen, A. M., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2013). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 899-926.
• Liu, B., Hu, W., & Cheng, Y. C. (2015). From the west to the east: Validating servant leadership in the Chinese public sector. Public Personnel Management, 44(1), 25-45.
• Liu, B., Tang, N., & Zhu, X. (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China: An investigation of generalisability and instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 684-699.
• Locke, E.A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational behavior (1297-1343). Chicago: Rand McNally.
• Mayes, B. T., & Allen, R. W. (1977). Toward a definition of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 2(4), 672-678.
• Naff, K. C., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5-16.
• Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). Organizational tenure and job performance. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1220-1250.
• Pandey, S., & E. Stazyk, (2008). Antecedents and correlates of public service motivation. J. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Ed.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (101–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Park, J., & Lee, K. H. (2020). Organizational politics, work attitudes and performance: The moderating role of age and public service motivation (PSM). International Review of Public Administration, 25(2), 85-105.
• Parola, H. R., Harari, M. B., Herst, D. E., & Prysmakova, P. (2019). Demographic determinants of public service motivation: A meta-analysis of PSM-age and-gender relationships. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1397-1419.
• Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.
• Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 3-12.
• Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. public administration review. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.
• Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. London: Pitman Marshfield.
• Potipiroon, W., & Ford, M. T. (2017). Does public service motivation always lead to organizational commitment? Examining the moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and ethical leadership. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 211-238.
• Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1-32.
• Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414-426.
• Rosen, C. C., Chang, C. H., Johnson, R. E., & Levy, P. E. (2009). Perceptions of the organizational context and psychological contract breach: Assessing competing perspectives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 202-217.
• Saylık, A., Demir, S., & Hazar, S. (2022). Kamu liderliği ile kamu hizmet motivasyonu ilişkisinde mesleki bağliliğin araci rolü. Anadolu Eğitim Liderliği ve Öğretim Dergisi, 10(2), 71-88.
• Scott, P. G., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red tape and public service motivation: findings from a national survey of managers in state health and human services agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25(2), 155-180.
• Sunaryo, S., & Suyono, J. (2013). A test of model of the relationship between public service motivation, job satisfaction and organization citizenship behavior. Review Integrative Business & Economics, 2(1), 384-398.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Publishing.
• Taylor, J. (2007). The impact of public service motives on work outcomes in Australia: A comparative multi‐dimensional analysis. Public administration, 85(4), 931-959.
• Van Loon, N. M., Leisink, P., & Vandenabeele, W. (2013). Talking the talk of public service motivation: How public organization logics matter for employees' expressions of PSM. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(14), 1007-1019.
• Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545-556.
• Vandenabeele, W. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM—Performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 11-34.
• Vandenabeele, W., & Skelcher, C. (2015). Public service motivation—Practical problems, scientific evidence and the role of a research community. Public Money & Management, 35(5), 321-327.
• Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2003). Developments in organizational politics: How political dynamics affect employee performance in modern work sites. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Wright, B. E., & Kim, S. (2004). Participation’s influence on job satisfaction: The importance of job characteristics. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24(1), 18-40.