Donanım Etkisi: Eldeki Bir Kuş Daldaki İki Kuştan İyi midir?

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 1560 - 1573, 25.08.2025

Hüsnü Bilir

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1655221

Öz

Bu çalışma donanım etkisi kavramını ve kültürel faktörlerin bu etki üzerindeki rolünü ele almaktadır. Donanım etkisi, bireylerin sahip oldukları ürünlere, sahip olmadan önce biçtiklerinden daha yüksek bir değer atfetmeleri durumudur. Buna göre bir ürünün birey tarafından algılanan değeri o insanın alıcı mı yoksa satıcı mı olduğuna bağlı olarak değişmektedir. Bu bakımdan ürünün sübjektif değerlendirmesini açıklamak için literatürde ürüne bağlılık, kayıptan kaçınma, işlem maliyeti, gelir etkisi, belirsizlik gibi farklı kavramlar kullanılmasına rağmen, bu durumun açıklanmasında en sık kullanılan kavram donanım etkisidir. Psikolojik ve ekonomik kökenleri olan bu etki, özellikle kayıptan kaçınma, duygusal bağlılık, statüko tercihi ve referans bağımlılığı gibi faktörlerle açıklanmaktadır. Literatürdeki deneysel çalışmalar, kişisel ve kültürel farklılıkların donanım etkisini nasıl şekillendirdiğini göstermektedir. Örneğin piyasa deneyimi yüksek bireylerde bu etkinin azaldığı, bireysellik-kolektivizm gibi kültürel unsurların ise bu eğilimi etkilediği gözlemlenmiştir. Bu çerçevede bu çalışma, donanım etkisi olarak nitelendirilen “bilişsel yanlılık”ın evrensel değil kültürel olarak inşa edilen bir fenomen olabileceğini öne sürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Donanım Etkisi , Bilişsel Yanlılık , Rasyonalite , Kültür

The Endowment Effect: Is a Bird in the Hand Worth More than Two in the Bush?

Öz

This study examines the concept of the endowment effect and the role of cultural factors in shaping this phenomenon. The endowment effect refers to the tendency of individuals to assign a higher value to items they own compared to items they do not yet possess. Accordingly, the perceived value of a product by an individual varies depending on whether that person is a buyer or a seller. In this respect, although various concepts such as attachment to the product, loss aversion, transaction cost, income effect, and uncertainty are used in the literature to explain the subjective evaluation of a product, the most frequently employed concept in this explanation is the endowment effect. Rooted in both psychological and economic principles, this effect is explained through factors such as loss aversion, emotional attachment, status quo preference, and reference dependence. Experimental studies in the literature highlight how cultural differences influence the strength of the endowment effect. For example, it has been observed that individuals with higher market experience exhibit a weaker endowment effect, while cultural elements such as individualism and collectivism shape this tendency. The study, in this regard, suggests that the endowment effect, which is described as “cognitive bias”, is not a universal phenomenon but rather a culturally constructed concept.

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Endowment Effect , Cognitive Bias , Rationality , Culture

Kaynakça

• Achtypi, E., Ashby, N. J. S., Brown, G. D. A., Walasek, L., & Yechiam, E. (2021). The endowment effect and beliefs about the market. Decision, 8(1), 16-35.
• Apicella, C. L., Azevedo, E. M., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Evolutionary origins of the endowment effect: Evidence from hunter-gatherers. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1793-1805.
• Ariely, D. (2013). Akıldışı ama öngörülebilir: Kararlarımızı biçimlendiren gizli kuvvetler (Çev. A. H. Gül & F. Şar). İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.
• Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains?. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 134-138.
• Arlen, J., & Tontrup, S. (2015). Does the endowment effect justify legal intervention? The debiasing effect of institutions. The University of Chicago Press the journal of Legal Studies, 44(1), 143-182.
• Bagga, C. K., Bendle, N. & Cotte, J. (2020). Object valuation and non-ownership possession: How renting and borrowing impact willingness-to-pay. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 97-117.
• Bao, H. X., & Gong, C. M. (2016). Endowment effect and housing decisions. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(4), 341-353.
• Barbosa, A. A. S., Nobre, F. C., Nobre, L. H. N. & Bento, F. J. S. (2024). Conservative bias and endowment effect in investment decision-making process: Development and validation of scale. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental (RGSA), 18(7), e08356.
• Bauer, T. K. & Schmidt, C. M. (2008). WTP vs. WTA: Christmas presents and the endowment effect. IZA Discussion Paper Series, No: 3855. Available at: https://docs.iza.org/dp3855.pdf
• Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: the mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 229-237.
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possesions and the extended-self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
• Bischoff, I. (2008). Endowment effect theory, prediction bias and publicly provided goods: An experimental study. Enviromental and Resource Economics, 39, 283-296.
• Botchway, E., Verpooten, J., van der Beken, I., Baršyté, J. & Dewitte, S. (2023). The endowment effect in the circular economy: Do broken products face less of a trading barrier than intact or repaired ones?. Sustainability, 15, 11813.
• Brenner, L., Rottenstreich, Y., Sood, S. & Bilgin, B. (2007). On the psychology of loss aversion: Possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 369-376.
• Brosnan, S. F., Jones, O. D., Gardner, M., Lambeth, S. P. & Schapiro, S. J. (2012). Evolution and the expression of biases: Situational value changes the endowment effect in chimpanzees. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 378-386.
• Brosnan, S. F., Jones, O. D., Lambeth, S. P., Mareno, M. C., Richardson, A. S. & Schapiro, S. J. (2007). Endowment effects in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17(19), 1704-1707.
• Buccafusco, C. & Sprigman, C. (2010). Valuing intellectual property: An experiment. Cornell Law Review, 96, 1.
• Carney, K., Kremer, M., Lin, X. & Rao, G. (2022). The endowment effect and collateralized loans. NBER Working Paper No. w30073. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4122802.
• Chan, E. & Saqib, N. (2018). Reversing the endowment effect by empowering buyers and sellers. European Journal of Marketing, 52(9/10), 1827-1844.
• Chatterjee, P., Irmak, C. & Rose, R. L. (2013). The endowment effect as self enhancement in response to threat. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 460-476.
• Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V. & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114(3), 517-537.
• Cheung, K. S., Wong, S. K. & Yiu, C. Y. (2024). Endowment effects of shared ownership: Evidence from Hong Kong, Housing, Theory and Society, 41(3), 271-291.
• Christiaanse, S., Haartsen, T. & Venhorst, V. (2023). Aversion to loss of place: The endowment effect for local facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, 102101.
• Colucci, D., Franco, C., & Valori, V. (2024). The endowment effect with different possession times and types of items. Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 110, 102216.
• Dertwinkel-Kalt, M., & Köhler, K. (2016). Exchange asymmetries for bads? Experimental evidence. European Economic Review, 82, 231-241.
• Dietz, S., & Venmans, F. (2019). The endowment effect, discounting and the environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 97, 67-91.
• Dobelli, R. (2022). Doğru düşünme sanatı: Kaçınmanız gereken 52 mantık hatası (Çev. A. Alacaoğlu). İstanbul: Pegasus Yayınları.
• Engelmann, D., & Hollard, G. (2010). Reconsidering the effect of market experience on the “endowment effect." Econometrica, 78(6), 2005-2019.
• Faulk, L. H., Settlage, D. M., & Wollscheid, J. R. (2019). Influencing positive student behaviour using the endowment effect. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 13(1), 20-29.
• Frenkel, S., Heller, Y., & Teper, R. (2017). The endowment effect as a blessing. Working Papers 2017-06, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics.
• Gal, D. (2006). A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 23–32.
• Gobel, M. S., Ong, T. & Harris, A. J. L. (2014). A culture-by-context analysis of endowment effects. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36, 2269-2274.
• Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Are adults better behaved than children? Age, experience, and the endowment effect. Economics Letters, 70(2), 175-181.
• Henrich, J. (2000). Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. American Economic Review, 90(4), 973-979.
• Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-78.
• Horowitz, J. K., & McConnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(3), 426-447.
• Hossain, T., & List, J. A. (2012). The behaviorist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Management Science, 58(12), 2151-2167.
• Huck, S., Kirchsteiger, G. & Oechssler, J. (2005). Learning to like what you have: Explaining the endowment effect. The Economic Journal, 115, 689-702.
• Isoni, A. (2011). The willingness-to-accept/willingness-to-pay disparity in repeated markets: Loss aversion or ‘bad-deal’ aversion?. Theory and Decision, 71, 409-430.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325-1348.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
• Kanngiesser, P., Santos, L. R., Hood, B. M., & Call, J. (2011). The limits of endowment effects in great apes (pan paniscus, pan troglodytes, gorilla gorilla, pongo pygmaeus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125(4), 436-445.
• Katona, G. (1953). Rational behavior and economic behavior. Psychological Review, 60(5), 307-318.
• Kırmızıaltın, E. (2021). Davranışsal iktisat: Kısa bir giriş-Kurucu düşünürler. Ankara: Heretik Yayınları.
• Klass, G., & Zeiler, K. (2013). Against endowment theory: Experimental economics and legal scholarship, 61 UCLA Law Review 2. Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/199.
• Knetsch, J. L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review, 79, 1277–1284.
• Knetsch, J. L. & Sinden, J. A. (1984). Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(3), 507-521.
• Korobkin, R. (2003). The endowment effect and legal analysis. Northwestern University Law Review, 97, 1227-1291.
• Korobkin, R. (2014). Wrestling with the endowment effect, or how to do law and economics without the Coase theorem. E. Zamir & D. Teichman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law (300-334). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Lakshminarayanan, V., Chen, M. K. & Santos, L. R. (2008). Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1511), 3837-3844.
• Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337-341.
• Lin, C. H., Chuang, S. C., Kao, D. T., & Kung, C. Y. (2006). The role of emotions in the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(4), 589-597.
• List, J. A. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies?. Quarterly journal of economics, 118(1), 41-71.
• List, J. A. (2004). Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica, 72(2), 615-625.
• Litovsky, Y., Loewenstein, G., Horn, S., & Olivola, C. Y. (2022). Loss aversion, the endowment effect, and gain-loss framing shape preferences for noninstrumental information. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 119(34), e2202700119.
• Maddux, W. W., Yang, H., Falk, C., Adam, H., Adair, W., Endo, Y., Carmon, Z., & Heine, S. J. (2010). For whom is parting with possessions more painful? Cultural differences in the endowment effect. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1910-1917.
• Morewedge, C. K. (2021). Psychological ownership: Implicit and explicit. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 125-132.
• Morewedge, C. K., Shu, L. L., Gilbert, D. T. & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 947-951.
• Morrison, G. C. (2000). The endowment effect and expected utility. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47(2), 183-197.
• Nayakankuppam, D., & Mishra, H. (2005). The endowment effect: rose-tinted and dark-tinted glasses. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 390-395.
• Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 119-128.
• Penon, I. E., & Ortega, S. R. (2018). The endowment effect on entrepreneurs: A risky attachment. Estudios de Economia, 45(2), 231-249.
• Plott, C. R., & Zeiler, K. (2005). The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the "endowment effect," subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations. American Economic Review, 95(3), 530-545.
• Plott, C. R., & Zeiler, K. (2007). Exchange asymmetries incorrectly interpreted as evidence of endowment effect theory and prospect theory?. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1449-1466.
• Pryor, C., Perfors, A., & Howe, P. D. L. (2018). Reversing the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(3), 275-286.
• Ratan, A. (2014). Anticipated regret or endowment Effect? A reconsideration of exchange asymmetry in laboratory experiments. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 14(1), 277-298.
• Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2007). Possession, feelings of ownership, and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 107-114.
• Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59.
• Shtudiner, Z., Klein, G., Zwilling, M., & Kantor, J. (2019). The value of souvenirs: Endowment effect and religion. Annals of Tourism Research, 74, 17-32.
• Simon, H. (1955). A Behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.
• Simon, H. (1986). Rationality in psychology and economics. The Journal of Business, 59(4), 209-224.
• Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39-60.
• Tomal, M. (2024a). Real estate brokerage and endowment effects in the housing market: Evidence from Poland. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 28(2), 143-151.
• Tomal, M. (2024b). The endowment effect and housing studies: The role of multiple reference points. Critical Housing Analysis, 11(2), 184-193.
• Torbarina, M., Jelenc, L., Franulović, A. M., & Jukić, I. (2021). Endowment effect in the used cars market. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3957090.
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainity: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 39(4), 251-278.
• Tunçel, T., Hammitt, J. K. (2014). A new meta-analysis on the WTP/WTA disparity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(1), 175-187.
• Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). Buying and selling exchange goods: Outcome information, curiosity and the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 459-468.
• Van Dijk, E., & Van Knippenberg, D. (1996). Buying and selling exchange goods: Loss aversion and the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 517-524.
• Wang, X. T., Ong, L. S., & Tan, J. H. (2015). Sense and sensibility of ownership: Type of ownership experience and valuation of goods. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 58, 171-177.
• Weaver, R., & Frederick, S. (2012). A reference price theory of the endowment effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 696-707.
• Xing, B. (2023). Endowment effect: from the perspective of employees’ loyalty, perceived value and used car pricing. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 21, 240-248.
• Yang, W. (2023). The endowment effect: A behavioural economic perspective on land use policy, environmental protection and taxation. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 21, 62-68.
• Zhang, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2005). The role of anticipated emotions in the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 316-324.