The Impact of Digitalization on Unemployment in Türkiye: Investigating the Interactive Role of Education

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 2358 - 2370, 27.11.2025

Emre Gökçeli

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1684498

Öz

Digitalization has been a key part of production, improving efficiency but also raising concerns about its impact on jobs. There is no consensus in the literature on the impact of digitalization on unemployment. Some believe it will replace workers, while others argue that it can boost productivity and create new job opportunities. To enrich this discussion from a different perspective, this study aims to explore how digitalization affects the unemployment rate and the role of education in this relationship during the period 2001–2023, using the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) technique in Türkiye. To represent digitalization, the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique is applied to obtain a single indicator using the variables commonly used as proxies for digitalization in the literature, namely internet usage, broadband subscription, and mobile subscription. The results of this study can be listed as follows: i) Digitalization is associated with a higher unemployment rate. ii) However, when digitalization is coupled with an increase in the level of education, its effect on employment becomes more positive, as a more educated workforce is better equipped to adapt to the demands of the digital economy, ultimately reducing unemployment. iii) A higher GDP also decreases the unemployment rate. iv) To test the robustness of the FMOLS results, Canonical Cointegrating Regression (CCR) is also applied, confirming their reliability. Based on these findings, several policy implications are discussed, and recommendations for future research in this field are provided.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digitalization , Unemployment , Education

Dijitalleşmenin Türkiye'de İşsizliğe Etkisi: Eğitimin Etkileşimli Rolünün Araştırılması

Öz

Dijitalleşme üretimin önemli bir parçası haline gelerek verimliliği arttırmakta, ancak istihdam üzerindeki etkileri konusunda ise bazı endişelere sebep olmaktadır. Dijitalleşmenin işsizlik üzerindeki etkisi hakkında literatürde fikir birliği bulunmamaktır. Bazı çalışmalar dijitalleşmenin iş gücünün yerini alacağını öne sürerken, bazıları ise verimliliği artırarak yeni iş fırsatları yaratabileceğini savunmaktadır. Bu tartışmayı farklı bir bakış açısıyla zenginleştirmek amacıyla, mevcut çalışma dijitalleşmenin işsizlik oranını nasıl etkilediğini ve bu ilişkide eğitimin rolünü 2001–2023 döneminde Türkiye için, Tam Modifiye Edilmiş En Küçük Kareler (FMOLS) tekniğini kullanarak incelemeyi hedeflemiştir. Dijitalleşmeyi temsil etmek için, literatürde dijitalleşme için yaygın olarak kullanılan değişkenlerden, yani internet kullanımı, geniş bant aboneliği ve mobil abonelik değişkenlerinden tek bir gösterge elde etmek amacıyla Temel Bileşenler Analizi (PCA) tekniği uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları şu şekilde sıralanabilir: i) Dijitalleşme, daha yüksek bir işsizlik oranıyla ilişkilidir. ii) Fakat dijitalleşmeyle beraber eğitim seviyesinde artış meydana geldiğinde dijitalleşmenin istihdam üzerindeki etkisi pozitife dönmektedir, yani işsizlik oranını azalmaktadır. Çünkü daha eğitimli bir iş gücü dijital ekonominin işçi taleplerine cevap vererek işsizliğin azalmasına neden olmaktadır. iii) Daha yüksek bir GSYİH’de işsizlik oranını düşürmektedir. iv) FMOLS ile elde edilen sonuçların güvenilirliğini test etmek için, Kanonik Eşbütünleşme Regresyonu (CCR) metodu da uygulanmış ve sonuçların güvenilirliği doğrulanmıştır. Bu bulgulara dayanarak, birkaç politika önerisi tartışılmış ve bu alanda gelecekte yapılması planlanan araştırmalar için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijitalleşme , İşsizlik , Eğitim

Kaynakça

• Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American economic review, 108(6), 1488-1542. doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696
• Akalin, G. (2024). Dijitalleşme Türkiye’de gelir eşitsizliğini nasıl etkilemektedir?. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (81), 60-71. doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1429793
• Aly, H. (2022). Digital transformation, development and productivity in developing countries: Is artificial intelligence a curse or a blessing?. Review of Economics and Political Science, 7(4), 238-256. Doi 10.1108/REPS-11-2019-0145
• Anoruo, E., & Braha, H. (2005). Corruption and economic growth: The African experience. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 7(1), 43-55.
• Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
• Başol, O., Sevgi, H., & Yalçın, E. C. (2023). The effect of digitalization on youth unemployment for EU countries: Treat or threat?. Sustainability, 15(14), 11080. doi.org/10.3390/su151411080
• Cirillo, V., Evangelista, R., Guarascio, D., & Sostero, M. (2021). Digitalization, routineness and employment: An exploration on Italian task-based data. Research Policy, 50(7), 104079. doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104079
• Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American statistical association, 74(366a), 427-431. doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
• Gobble, M. M. (2018). Digitalization, digitization, and innovation. Research-Technology Management, 61(4), 56-59. doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1471280
• Harrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2014). Does innovation stimulate employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries. International Journal of industrial organization, 35, 29-43. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.06.001
• Hazarika, S. (2020). Impact of digitalization on employment of personnel in banking sector: A case study of India. International Journal of Management, 11(9). Doi: 10.34218/IJM.11.9.2020.092
• Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1551-1580. doi.org/10.2307/2938278
• Koç, P., & Şahpaz, K. İ. (2023). Analysis of the causality relationship among digitalisation, unemployment rate, and divorce rates: A research on Türkiye. Sosyoekonomi, 31(56), 151-169. Doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.02.07
• Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Schmidt, L. D., & Seegmiller, B. (2021). Technology-skill complementarity and labor displacement: Evidence from linking two centuries of patents with occupations. National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Larsson, A., & Teigland, R. (2020). The digital transformation of labor. Taylor & Francis.
• Lassébie, J., & Quintini, G. (2022). What skills and abilities can automation technologies replicate and what does it mean for workers? New evidence. OECD Social, Employment, and Migration Working Papers, (282), 0_1-66. Doi.org/10.1787/646aad77-en
• Maitah, M., Toth, D., & Kuzmenko, E. (2015). The effect of GDP per capita on employment growth in Germany, Austria and the Czech Republic: Macroeconomic analysis. Rev. Eur. Stud., 7, 240.
• Majchrowska, A., & Zólkiewski, Z. (2012). The impact of minimum wage on employment in Poland. Investigaciones Regionales-Journal of Regional Research, (24), 211-239.
• Malik, S. (2010). Impact of education and health on employment in Pakistan: A case study. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, (18).
• Michaels, G., Natraj, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2014). Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over twenty-five years. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 60-77. Doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00366
• Park, J. Y. (1992). Canonical cointegrating regressions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 119-143. doi.org/10.2307/2951679
• Paun, C. V., Nechita, R., Patruti, A., & Topan, M. V. (2021). The impact of the minimum wage on employment: An EU panel data analysis. Sustainability, 13(16), 9359. http://doi.org/10.3390/su13169359
• Pegkas, P. (2015). The impact of FDI on economic growth in Eurozone countries. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 12(2), 124-132. doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2015.05.001
• Phillips, P. C., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. The review of economic studies, 57(1), 99-125. doi.org/10.2307/2297545
• Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
• Riddell, W. C., & Song, X. (2011). The impact of education on unemployment incidence and re-employment success: Evidence from the US labour market. Labour economics, 18(4), 453-463. doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2011.01.003
• Sinha, M., Tirtosuharto, D., Ray Chaudhury, A., & Basu, P. (2023). FDI, digitalization and employment: empirical evidence from developing economies. Studies in Economics and Finance, 40(4), 740-756.
• Sitompul, T., & Simangunsong, Y. (2019). The analysis of the impact of GDP, FDI, minimum wage on employment in Indonesia. International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities, 2(2), 53-62. doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v2i2.17
• Ünlüoğlu, M., & Aydınbaş, G. (2023). Seçilmiş makroekonomik, sosyal değişkenler ve internet penetrasyon oranının medeni durum ile ilişkisi üzerine analiz. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 18(3), 811-833. Doi: 10.17153/oguiibf.1291620
• Vivarelli, M. (2014). Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: A survey of economic literature. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(1), 123-154. Doi 10.2753/JEI0021-3624480106.
• Ying, Y. H., Chang, K., & Lee, C. H. (2014). The impact of globalization on economic growth. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 17(2), 25-34.