An Integrated Socio-Economic-Environmental Model Addressing Sustainable Development in Türkiye

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 2321 - 2340, 27.11.2025

Bayram Aydın , Emine İlkin Aydın , Aslı Ural

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1707697

Öz

Sustainable development is a multifaceted process that is not limited to the increase in production and income levels, but also includes social, environmental, and economic dimensions. The main purpose of this study is to examine the effects of social, environmental, and economic factors on development in Türkiye. In the study, the social dimension is represented by gender inequality, the environmental dimension is showcased by greenhouse gas emissions, and the economic dimension is presented by economic growth. In addition, household consumption expenditures, which are also evaluated within the social dimension, are included as a control variable in the study. For this purpose, the model established in the study employs annual data from the period 1990-2022, and the ARDL bounds test approach is used to examine the long-term relationship between the variables. The results obtained show that environmental degradation and gender inequality have negative effects on sustainable development in the long term, while consumption expenditures and economic growth positively affect economic development. This finding reveals that development cannot be reduced to economic indicators alone, and social and environmental factors also directly affect the quality of development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable Development , Economic Growth , Gender Inequality , Environmental Degradation , ARDL Bounds Test

Türkiye’de Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmayı Ele Alan Entegre Bir Sosyo-Ekonomik-Çevresel Model

Öz

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma yalnızca üretim ve gelir düzeylerindeki artışla sınırlı olmayan, sosyal, çevresel ve ekonomik boyutları da içeren çok yönlü bir süreçtir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı da Türkiye’de sosyal, çevresel ve ekonomik faktörlerin kalkınma üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Çalışmada sosyal boyut toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliği ile, çevresel boyut sera gazı salınımı ile ve ekonomik boyut ise ekonomik büyüme ile temsil edilmiştir. Ayrıca çalışmada hane halkı tüketim harcamaları ise kontrol değişken olarak yer almıştır. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada kurulan modelde 1990-2022 dönemindeki yıllık bazda veriler istihdam edilmiş olup, değişkenler arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, uzun dönemde çevresel bozulma ve toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliğinin sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerinde olumsuz etkiler yarattığını, buna karşılık tüketim harcamaları ve ekonomik büyümenin ise kalkınmayı olumlu yönde etkilediğini göstermiştir. Bu bulgu, kalkınmanın yalnızca ekonomik göstergelere indirgenemeyeceğini, sosyal ve çevresel faktörlerin de kalkınmanın niteliğini doğrudan etkilediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma , Ekonomik Büyüme , Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitsizliği , Çevresel Bozulma , ARDL Sınır Testi

Kaynakça

• Adanma, U. M., & Ogunbiyi, E. O. (2024). A comparative review of global environmental policies for promoting sustainable development and economic growth. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(5), 954-977.
• Aduku, E. B., Anyanwu, O. C., & Edeme, R. K. (2022). Gender gap, intensive growth and economic welfare in Sub-Saharan African countries. Environmental sustainability, growth trajectory and gender: Contemporary issues of developing economies (153-165). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Agbenyo, W., Jiang, Y., Ding, Z., Titriku, J. K., & Ntim-Amo, G. (2022). Impact of climate change on cocoa production in Africa: An approach of cross-sectional ARDL. International Journal of Environmental Research, 16(5), 91.
• Ahmad, N., Youjin, L., Žiković, S., & Belyaeva, Z. (2023). The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: Evidence from China. Technology in Society, 72, 102184.
• Akhtar, R., Masud, M. M., Jafrin, N., & Shahabudin, S. M. (2023). Economic growth, gender inequality, openness of trade, and female labour force participation: A nonlinear ARDL approach. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(3), 1725-1752.
• Akinwande, T. S., Turuc, F., Seraj, M., & Ozdeser, H. (2025). The link between gender inequality, financial development, and economic growth in Nigeria: A spectral Granger causality approach. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 2429-2439.
• Ali, A., Audi, M., Bibi, C., & Roussel, Y. (2021). The impact of gender inequality and environmental degradation on human well-being in the case of Pakistan: A time series analysis. MPRA Paper No. 106655, posted 16 Mar 2021.
• Alper, F. Ö., & Alper, A. E. (2017). Karbondioksit emisyonu, ekonomik büyüme, enerji tüketimi ilişkisi: Türkiye için bir ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı. Sosyoekonomi, 25(33), 145-156.
• Altunç, Ö. F., Karakuş, K., & Akyıldız, A. (2017). Uluslararası göç ve çevre kirliliği arasındaki ilişkinin ekonometrik analizi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(60), 76-85.
• Altuzarra, A., Gálvez-Gálvez, C., & González-Flores, A. (2021). Is gender inequality a barrier to economic growth? A panel data analysis of developing countries. Sustainability, 13(1), 367.
• Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: Evidence from the commonwealth of independent states. Energy Policy, 38(1), 650–655.
• Asongu, S., & Odhiambo, N. (2020). Inequality and the economic participation of women in sub-Saharan Africa: An empirical investigation. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 11(2), 193-206.
• Awan, A. M., & Azam, M. (2022). Evaluating the impact of GDP per capita on environmental degradation for G-20 economies: does N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve exist?. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(9), 11103-11126.
• Baker L. F., & Mudge J. F. (2012) Making statistical significance more significant. Significance, 9(3), 29–30.
• Barin, N. E., Kundak, S., & Cenikli, V. S. (2020). The effects of female employment on economic growth: An application of panel data on the member countries of the organisation of Islamic cooperation. Contemporary issues in business economics and finance (29-44). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Barro, R. J. (1996). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 5698. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5698
• Bayoud, H. A. (2021). Tests of normality: New test and comparative study. Communications in Statistics Simulation and Computation, 50(12), 4442–4463. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1643883.
• Bertay, A. C., Dordevic, L., & Sever, C. (2025). Gender inequality and economic growth: Evidence from industry-level data. Empirical Economics, 1-36.
• Birleşmiş Milletler (2025). Erişim adresi: https://turkiye.un.org/tr/sdgs
• Brundtland Report (1987). Our Common Future. United Nations.
• Butty, O. N., Seraj, M., & Özdeşer, H. (2025). Does energy poverty contribute to gender inequality and environmental degradation in Africa?. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 19(1), 101-116.
• Çağındı, Y., & Dolu, A. (2024). Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliğinin ekonomik büyümeye etkisi: OECD ülkeleri özelinde bir inceleme. Turkish Studies-Economics, Finance, Politics, 19(4).
• Das, M., & Basumatary, R. (2020). Academic and law serials impact of gender inequality in education on economic development in India: An economic analysis. Indian Journal of Social Research, 61(6), 271–286.
• De Mello, L. R. (1997). Foreign direct investment in developing countries and growth: A selective survey. The Journal of Development Studies, 34(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389708422501
• Devadas, S., & Kim, Y. E. (2020). Exploring the potential of gender parity topromote economic growth. Research & Policy Briefs. World BankGroup.
• Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079.
• Erdogan, S. (2024). Linking green fiscal policy, energy, economic growth, population dynamics, and environmental degradation: Empirical evidence from Germany. Energy Policy, 189, 114110.
• Esen, Ö., & Seren, G. Y. (2022). The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic performance in Turkey: evidence from a cointegration approach. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 41(4), 592-607.
• Fluchtmann, J., Keese, M., & Adema, W. (2024). Gender equality and economic growth: Past progress and future potential. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 304.
• Ghosh, S. (2022). How trade diversification and economic growth affect gender inequality in female labour market participation? The case of India. Journal of Economics and Development, 24(2), 127-141.
• Hariram, N. P., Mekha, K. B., Suganthan, V., & Sudhakar, K. (2023). Sustainalism: An integrated socio-economic-environmental model to address sustainable development and sustainability. Sustainability, 15(13), 10682.
• Ilham, M. I. (2021). Economic development and environmental degradation in Indonesia: Panel data analysis. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 22(2), 185-200.
• Ivanovski, Z., Stojanovski, T., & Narasanov, Z. (2015). Volatility and Kurtosis of Daily Stock Returns at MSE. UTMS Journal of Economics, 6(2), 209–221.
• Kaplan, E. (2025). Türkiye’s sustainability challenge: An empirical ARDL analysis of the impact of energy consumption, economic growth, and agricultural growth on carbon dioxide emissions. Sustainability, 17(13), 6077.
• Kelly, A. M., & Nembot Ndeffo, L. (2025). Understanding the nexus: economic complexity and environmental degradation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 27(1), 423-437.
• Kleven, H., & Landais, C. (2017). Gender inequality and economic development: fertility, education and norms. Economica, 84(334), 180-209.
• Litti, M. R., Saleh, S. E., & Dai, S. I. S. Causality analysis between gender inequality and economic growth. European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability, 5(2), 33-37.
• Luo, J., Ali, S. A., Aziz, B., Aljarba, A., Akeel, H., & Hanif, I. (2023). Impact of natural resource rents and economic growth on environmental degradation in the context of COP-26: Evidence from low-income, middle-income, and high-income Asian countries. Resources Policy, 80, 103269.
• Muhammad, B., Khan, M. K., Khan, M. I., & Khan, S. (2021). Impact of foreign direct investment, natural resources, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth on environmental degradation: evidence from BRICS, developing, developed and global countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 21789-21798.
• Onogwu. D. J. (2021). Gender inequality and economic development: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa. Research Square.
• Ozcan, B., Tzeremes, P. G., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 84, 203-213.
• Özdemir, E. A., & Altay, A. (2021). Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği ve ekonomik kalkınma ilişkisi: OECD ülkeleri analizi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 36(3), 601-665.
• Öztürk, A. C., & Tiftikçigil, B. Y. (2022). The impact of sectoral greenhouse gas emissions on economic growth in Turkey. Journal of Life Economics, 9(4), 241-253.
• Pamuk, M., & Bektaş, H. (2014). Türkiye’de eğitim harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 77-90.
• Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 559-586.
• Rahman, M. M. (2020). Environmental degradation: The role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation. Journal of Environmental Management, 253, 109742.
• Rochmanto, H. B., & Al Azies, H. (2025). Understanding gender inequality in Indonesia: An AI approach to evaluating socio-economic factors for sustainable development. International Conference on Political, Social Sciences, and Humanities (ICPSH) (Vol. 1, 1-9).
• Roy, S. K. (2023). A reassessment of the conflicting relationship between gender inequality and economic growth. International Journal of Multidisiplinary Educational Research, 12(8), 113-122.
• Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of the Total Environment, 786, 147481.
• Şahin, Ü. A., Onat, B., & Ayvaz, C. (2018). Climate change and greenhouse gases in Turkey. Recycling and Reuse Approaches for Better Sustainability (201-214). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Santos Silva, M., & Klasen, S. (2021). Gender inequality as a barrier to economic growth: A review of the theoretical literature. Review of Economics of the Household, 19(3), 581-614.
• Sayıştay (2025). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları. https://www.sayistay.gov.tr/pages/127-surdurulebilir-kalkinma-amaclari
• Schumm, W. R., Pratt, K. K., Hartenstein, J. L., Jenkins, B. A., & Johnson, G. A. (2013). Determining statistical significance (alpha) and reporting statistical trends: Controversies, issues, and facts. Comprehensive Psychology, 2, 03-CP.
• Seguino, S. (2000). Gender inequality and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 28(7), 1211-1230.
• Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K., & Sadorsky, P. (2016). The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: Implications for sustainable development. Energy Economics, 55, 52-68.
• Solow R. M. (1993). An almost practical step toward sustainability. Resource Policy, 19(3), 162–72.
• Talafha, Q., Bashayreh, A., Abdelhadi, S., & Alsamman, A. Y. (2025). Consequences of gender inequality on economic development: an empirical approach for OECD countries. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 149.
• Tansel, A., & Gungor, N. (2013). Gender effects of education on economic development in Turkey. Journal of Economic Studies, 40(6), 794-821.
• TUİK (2023), İşgücü İstatistikleri. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Isgucu-Istatistikleri-I.-Ceyrek:-Ocak-Mart,-2023-49380
• Türkyılmaz, S., & Öztürk, K. N. (2024). Analysis of factors affecting CO2 emissions in türkiye using quantile regression. Sustainability, 16(22), 9634.
• Ullah, A., & Ali, A. (2024). Investigating corruption, income inequality, and environmental degradation in Pakistan: A time series analysis.
• Vede, D. S. (2021). Economic empowerment of women in India. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(10), 7434–7437.
• Xing, L., Khan, Y. A., Arshed, N., & Iqbal, M. (2023). Investigating the impact of economic growth on environment degradation in developing economies through STIRPAT model approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 182, 113365.