Truva’nın Ortaçağa Entelektüel Mirası: Bizans Kültür Hayatının Yapıtaşı Olarak Homeros

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 162 - 196, 28.02.2019

Hıdır Nezih Bamyacı

https://doi.org/10.32958/gastoria.465833

Öz

Ortaçağ tarihi boyunca Truva’nın coğrafi
konumu bilinmemesine ve bu bölge bu dönemde kilit bir rol oynamamasına rağmen
Truva’nın toplumların hafızası ve kültüründe tuttuğu yer açısından bu konu
Ortaçağ tarihi araştırmacıları açısından hala cazibesini korumaktadır. Pek çok
Ortaçağ toplumunun aksine Bizanslılar Homeros’un metinlerine doğrudan erişme
şansına sahiplerdi ve bu metinlerle temaslarını 15. yüzyıla kadar kesintisiz
bir şekilde sürdürdüler. Bu ilişki içerisinde Bizanslılar eğitimden edebiyata
pek çok alanda bu eserlerden faydalandılar, bu eserlerin diline ve içerdiği
bilgeliğe hayranlık duydular, onların kopyalarını çıkardılar, muhafaza ettiler,
incelediler, alıntıladılar, yorumladılar, kendi çağlarının ihtiyaçları
doğrultusunda uyarladılar ve bu eserlerin başka toplumlara intikalini
sağladılar. Bu çalışma Homeros’un eserlerinin Bizans’a nasıl intikal ettiği ve
Bizanslıların bu eserlerden nasıl faydalandığı sorularından hareketle Bizans’ın
Truva’nın entelektüel mirası ile kurduğu bu dinamik ve çok boyutlu ilişkinin
anlamlı bir panoramasını sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bizans İmparatorluğu, Homeros, Truva

Intellectual Legacy of Troy in the Middle Ages: Homer as a Basic Part of Byzantine Cultural Life

Öz

Although location of
Troy remained unknown during the Middle Ages and the area played no key role in
this period, the topic still attracts scholars of Medieval history in terms of
Troy’s place in memories and cultural lives of the Medieval societies. Unlike
many other Medieval societies, the Byzantines had the opportunity of a direct
access to the works of Homer and they kept their touch with these texts
uninterrupted until the 15^th century. In the course of this
relationship the Byzantines benefitted from these works in many fields of study
from education to literature, they admired language and wisdom in them, they
made copies of them, preserved them, studied them, cited them, interpreted
them, they adapted them according to the needs of their time, and they
transmitted them to the other nations. This study aims to provide meaningful
panorama of this dynamic and multi-dimensional relationship of Byzantium with
intellectual legacy of Troy with reference to the questions of how works of
Homer were transmitted to Byzantium and how the Byzantines made use of them.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Byzantine Empire, Homer, Troy

Kaynakça

• Baker, S. (2018). Eski Roma: Bir imparatorluğun yükselişi ve çöküşü. (E. Duru, Çev.). Say Yayınları.Barrow, R. H. (2002). Romalılar. (E. Gürol, Çev.). İz Yayıncılık.Basileios. (1999). Yunan Edebiyatının Nasıl Okunacağı Konusunda Gençlere Söylev. (Çev. Ö. Arıkan). Cogito, (17), 13–35.Bazzani, M. (2007). The historical poems of Theodore Prodromos, the epic-Homeric revival and the crisis of the intellectuals in the twelfth century. Byzantinoslavica, (65), 211–28.Berg, B. van den. (2017). The wise Homer and his erudite commentator: Eustathios’ imagery in the proem of the parekbolai on the Iliad. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 41(1), 30–44.Bourbouhakis, M. (2017). Byzantine Literary Criticism and the Classical Heritage.A. Kaldellis ve N. Siniossoglou (Ed.) , The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium (ss. 113–128). Cambridge University Press.Browning, R. (1975). Homer in Byzantium. Viator, 6, 15–34. Browning, R. (1995). Eustathios of Thessalonike revisited. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 40, 83–90.Browning, R. (1997). Teachers. G. Cavallo (Ed.), The Byzantines (ss. 95–116). Chicago: University of Chicago Pres.Budelmann, F. (2002). Classical commentary in Byzantium: John Tzetzes on ancient Greek literature. R. K. Gibson ve C. S. Kraus (Ed.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory (ss. 141–69). Leiden: Brill.Cameron, A., ve Cameron, A. (1964). Christianity and tradition in the historiography of the late empire. The Classical Quarterly, 14(2), 316–328.Cullhed, E. (2014). The blind barn and “I”: Homeric biography and authorial personas in the twelfth century. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 38(1), 49–67.Dickey, E. (2017). Classical scholarship: The Byzantine contribution. A. Kaldellis ve N. Siniossoglou (Ed.), The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium (ss. 63–78). Cambridge University Press.Downey, G. (1958). Byzantium and the classical tradition. Phoenix, 12(3), 125–129. Geanakoplos, D. J. (1966). Byzantine east and Latin west: Two worlds of christendom in Middle Ages and Renaissance; Studies in ecclesiastical and cultural History. New York: Harper & Row.Geanakoplos, D. J. (1986). Byzantium: Church, society, and civilization seen through contemporary eyes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Hadas, M. (1963). Hellenistic literature. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 17, 21–35. Herington, C. J. (1969). Homer: A Byzantine perspective. Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, 8(3), 432–434.Herrin, J. (2016). Bizans: Bir Ortaçağ imparatorluğunun şaşırtıcı yaşamı. (U. Kocabaşoğlu, Çev.). İletişim Yayınları.Howlett, J. (1981). Some classical saints in the Russian tradition. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 172–178). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of BirminghamHunger, H. (1969). On the imitation (ΜΙΜΗΣΙΣ) of antiquity in Byzantine literature. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 23/24, 15–38. Hunger, H. (1981). The classical tradition in Byzantine literature: The importance of rhetoric. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 35–47). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham.Jeffreys, E. (2014). We need to talk about Byzantium: or, Byzantium, its reception of the classical world as discussed in current scholarship, and should classicists pay attention? Classical Receptions Journal, 6(1), 158–174. Jenkins, R. J. H. (1963a). The Hellenistic origins of Byzantine civilization: Report on the Dumbarton Oaks symposium of 1962. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 17, 403–405. Jenkins, R. J. H. (1963b). The Hellenistic origins of Byzantine literature. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 17, 37–52. Kaldellis, A. (2007). Historicism in Byzantine thought and literature. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 61, 1–24.Kaldellis, A. (2008). Hellenism in Byzantium: The transformations of Greek identity and the reception of the classical tradition. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.Kaldellis, A. (2009). Classical scholarship in twelfth-century Byzantium. C. Barber ve D. Jenkins (Ed.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics (ss. 1–43). Leiden ve Boston: Brill.Kaldellis, A. (2011). Scholarship, Byzantine. M. Finkelberg (Ed.), The Homer Encyclopedia. Blackwell Publishing.Kaldellis, A. (2012). The Byzantine role in the making of the corpus of classical Greek historiography: A preliminary investigation. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 132, 71–85. Kaldellis, A. (2015). Byzantine readings of ancient historians: Texts in translation, with introductions and notes. London: Routledge.Kazhdan, A. P.. (Ed.). (1991). The oxford dictionary of Byzantium. New York: Oxford University Press.Kazhdan, A. P., ve Constable, G. (1982). People and power in Byzantium: An introduction to modern Byzantine studies. Washington, D.C: Dumbarton Oaks, Center for Byzantine Studies, Trustees for Harvard University.Kazhdan, A. P., ve Franklin, S. (1984). Studies on Byzantine literature of the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire] ; New York : Paris: Cambridge University Press ; Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Kazhdan, A. P., ve Wharton, A. J. (1985). Change in Byzantine culture in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.Kennedy, G. A. (1981). The clasical tradition in rhetoric. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 20–34). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham.Littlewood, A. R. (2005). Literature. J. Harris (Ed.), Palgrave Advances in Byzantine History (ss. 133–146). London: PalgraveMacmillan.Maguire, H. (1981). The classical tradition in the Byzantine ekphrasis. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 94–102). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham.Mango, C. (1975). Byzantine literature as a distorting mirror: an inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 21 May 1974. Clarendon Press.Mango, C. (1981). Discontinuity with the classical past in Byzantium. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 48–57). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham.Mango, C. (2018). Bizans: Yeni Roma İmparatorluğu. (G. Ç. Güven, Çev.). Yapı Kredi Yayınları.Markopoulos, A. (2008). Education. E. Jeffreys, J. F. Haldon ve R. Cormack (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies (ss. 785–795). New York: Oxford University Press.Matzukis, C. (1992). Homer within Byzantine framework. Akroterion, 37(1), 2–5. Miller, T. S. (1976). The plague in John VI Cantacuzenus and Thucydides. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 17(4), 385–395.Mullett, M. E. (1981). The classical tradition in the Byzantine letter. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 75–93). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham.Niarchos, C. (1981). The philosophical background of the eleventh-century revival of learning in Byzantium. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 127–135). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham.Nünlist, R. (2012). Homer as a blueprint for speechwriters: Eustathius’ commentaries and rhetoric. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 52(3), 493–509.Pontani, F. (2007). The first Byzantine commentary on the Iliad: Isaac Porphyrogenitus and his scholia. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 99(2), 551–596.Pontani, F. (2015). Scholarship in the Byzantine Empire (529–1453). F. Montanari, S. Matthaios, ve A. Rengakos (Ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (C. 1, ss. 297–455).Ronchey, S. (1991). An introduction to Eustathios’ “Exegesis in Canonem Iambicum”. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 45, 149–158. Scott, R. D. (1981). The classical tradition in Byzantine historiography. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 61–74). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham.Sluiter, I. (1992a). Some notes on the edition of Tzetzes’ Ilias-Exegesis. Mnemosyne, 45(4), 482–500.Sluiter, I. (1992b). Tzetzes on a mini-thesis in Homer; the ’eπipphmata θetika. Mnemosyne, 45(4), 526–529.Şengel, D. (2003). Sources and context of the Renaissance historiography concerning the origin of Turks. M. Soykut (Ed.), Historical Image of the Turk in Europe: Fifteenth Century to the Present (ss. 175–196). İstanbul: İsis Press.Tekin, O. (2016). Eski Yunan ve Roma tarihine giriş. İletişim Yayınları.Treadgold, W. T. (1981). Photios and the reading public for classical philology in Byzantium. M. Mullett ve R. Scott (Ed.), Byzantium and the Classical Tradition (ss. 123–126). Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham.Valiavitcharska, V. (2013). Rhetoric in the hands of the Byzantine grammarian. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 31(3), 237–260. Wilson, N. G. (1983). Scholars of Byzantium. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.