DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN HUMANITARIAN LOGISTICS: IMPACT ON AGILITY, TRUST AND COLLABORATION

Öz

Humanitarian aid logistics is the process of managing resources, materials, people and in-formation to ensure that aid reaches those in need quickly and effectively after a disaster. The supply chain must be flexible and adaptable to effectively coordinate post-disaster aid, ensuring that the right goods are in the right places at the right times. This study aims to examine the impact of digital transformation on agility, trust and collaboration in the humani-tarian aid logistics supply chain. Digital transformation enhances supply chain efficiency by leveraging information technologies and digitalisation processes, while also fostering trust among stakeholders. Digitalisation improves information sharing during disaster response and makes supply chain processes more adaptable. Agile supply chains deliver faster and more effective services during disasters, while digital solutions enable the monitoring and understanding of the process. Furthermore, digital transformation facilitates collaboration and coordination among supply chain personnel, ensuring aid is delivered fairly and on time. The study's findings suggest that digital transformation is crucial for enhancing the effective-ness of humanitarian aid logistics supply chains and that digital technologies facilitate more efficient responses to disasters in aid operations. It presents a model to clarify the link between digital transformation and supply chain agility. It highlights the advantages of digital transformation in humanitarian aid logistics, particularly in improving key elements such as agility, trust and collaboration. The results obtained from the literature review provide strate-gic recommendations to humanitarian aid logistics actors on how to implement digital trans-formation more effectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Humanitarian Logistics
• Digital Transformation
• Supply Chain Agility
• Collaboration

Destekleyen Kurum

There is no supporting organisation

Etik Beyan

No ethics committee approval is required for the study

DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN HUMANITARIAN LOGISTICS: IMPACT ON AGILITY, TRUST AND COLLABORATION

Öz

Humanitarian logistics is the process of managing resources, supplies, people, and informa-tion so that help can get to people who need it quickly and effectively after a disaster. To effectively coordinate post-disaster aid and make sure that the right goods are in the right places at the right times, the supply chain needs to be flexible and able to change. This study seeks to examine the influence of digital transformation on agility, trust, and collabora-tion within the humanitarian logistics supply chain. Digital transformation enhances supply chain efficiency through the application of information technologies and digitalization proces-ses, while simultaneously fostering trust among stakeholders. This paper examines the inf-luence of digital transformation on agility in humanitarian logistics through a literature review. Digitalization improves the sharing of information during disaster response and makes supply chain processes more adaptable. During disasters, agile supply chains provide faster and better services, while digital solutions make it easier to track and understand the pro-cess. Also, digital transformation makes it easier for people in the supply chain to work to-gether and coordinate their efforts, which makes sure that help is delivered fairly and on ti-me. This study examines the impact of digital transformation on humanitarian logistics by evaluating how digitalization affects supply chain agility, trust, and collaboration. The study's findings indicate that digital transformation is essential for enhancing the efficacy of humanitarian logistics supply chains, and that digital technologies facilitate more efficient res-ponses to disasters in aid activities. The paper offers a model to clarify the connection between digital transformation and supply chain agility. This study emphasizes the advan-tages of digital transformation in humanitarian logistics, especially in improving essential elements like agility, trust, and collaboration. The results give humanitarian logistics players strategic advice on how to make digital transformation work better.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Humanitarian Logistics
• Digital Transformation
• Supply Chain Agility
• Collaboration

Destekleyen Kurum

There is no supporting organisation

Etik Beyan

No ethics committee approval is required for the study

Kaynakça

1. Abourokbah, S. H., Mashat, R. M., & Salam, M. A. (2023). Role of Absorptive Capacity, Digital Capability, Agility, and Resilience in Supply Chain Innovation Performance. Sustaina-bility, 15, 3636. doi:10.3390/su15043636
2. Al Jabri, M. A., Shaloh, S., Shakhoor, N., Haddoud, M. Y., & Obeidat, B. Y. (2024). The Im-pact of Dynamic Capabilities on Enterprise Agility: The İntervening Roles of Digital Transformation and IT Alignment. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100266.
3. Altay, N., & Labonte, M. (2014). Challenges in Humanitarian İnformation Management and Exchange: Evidence From Haiti. Disasters, 38(1), 50-72.
4. Apte, A. (2010). Humanitarian Logistics: A New Field of Research and Action (Cilt 3). Now Publishers. doi:10.1561/0200000014
5. Arias Aranda, D., Fernandez, L. M., & Stantchev, V. (2019). Integration of Internet of Thıngs And Blockchain to Increase Humanitarian Aid Supply Chains Performance. The 5th In-ternational Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), 96, s. 140-145. Liverpool. doi:10.1109/ICTIS.2019.8883757.
6. Aylak, B. L., Oral, O., & Yazıcı, K. (2021). Yapay Zeka ve Makine Öğrenmesi Tekniklerinin Lojistik Sektöründe Kullanımı. El-Cezerî Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 8(1), 74-93.
7. Baharmand, H., Comes, T., & Lauras, M. (2019). Defining and Measuring The Network Flexi-bility of Humanitarian Supply Chains: İnsights From The 2015 Nepal Earthquake. An-nals of Operations Research, 283(1), 961-1000. doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2713-y
8. Balcik, B., & Beamon, B. M. (2008). Facility Location in Humanitarian Relief. International Journal of Logistics, 11(2), 101-121. doi:10.1080/13675560701561789

9. Başkol, M. (2014). Tedarik Zinciri İlişkilerinde Başarı Faktörü Olarak Güven Unsuru: Kav-ramsal Bir Çalışma. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 10(21), 129-146. doi:10.11122/ijmeb.2014.10.21.551
10. Ben-Daya, M., Hassinib, E., & Bahrouna, Z. (2019). Internet of Things And Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 4719-4742. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140
11. Charles, A., Lauras, M., & Wassenhove, L. V. (2010). A Model to Define and Assess The Agi-lity of Supply Chains: Building on Humanitarian Experience. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management(40), 722-741.
12. Daud, M. S., Hussein, M. Z., Nasir, M. E., Abdullah, R., Kassim, R., & Suliman, M. S. (2016). Humanitarian Logistics and Its Challenges: The Literature Review. International Jo-urnal of Supply Chain Management, 5(3), 107-110.
13. DeGroote, S. E., & Marx, T. G. (2013). The Impact of IT on Supply Chain Agility and Firm Performance: Anempirical İnvestigation. International Journal of Information Mana-gement, 33, 909-916. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.001
14. Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Foropon, C., Graham, G., Giannakis, M., & Mishra, D. B. (2022). Agility in Humanitarian Supply Chain: An Organizational İnformation Processing Perspective and Relational View. Annals of Operations Research(319), 559-579. doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03824-0
15. Dubey, R., Singh, T., & Gupta, O. K. (2016). Impact of Agility, Adaptability and Alignment on Humanitarian Logistics Performance: Mediating Effect of Leadership. Global Business Review, 16(5), 812-831. doi:10.1177/0972150915591463
16. Ertem, M. A., Buyurgan, N., & Rossetti, M. D. (2010). Multiple-Buyer Procurement Auctions Framework for Humanitarian Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(3), 202-227. doi:10.1108/09600031011035092
17. Ganguly, K. K., Padhy, R., & Rai, S. S. (2017). Managing The Humanitarian Supply Chain: A Fuzzy Logic Approach. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Envi-ronment, 8(5), 521-536. doi:10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2015-0038
18. Hudnurkar, M., Jakhar, S., & Rathod, U. (2014). Factors Affecting Collaboration in Supply Chain: A literature Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences(133), 189-202. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.184
19. Jermsittiparsert, K., & Pithuk, L. (2019). Exploring the Link between Adaptability, Informa-tion Technology, Agility, Mutual Trust, and Flexibility of a Humanitarian Supply Chain. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(2), 432-447.
20. Kabra, G., & Ramesh, A. (2016). Information Technology, Mutual Trust, Flexibility, Agi-lity,Adaptability:Understanding Their Linkages and Impact on Humanitarian Supply Chain Management Performance. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 7(2), 79-103. doi:10.1002/rhc3.12096
21. Kaya, S., & Yıldız, B. New Trend in Supply Chain and Logistics Operations: Blockchain Tech-nology. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences, 6(2), 217-225.
22. Khan, M., Jacquemod, A. N., & Jacquemod, J. (2023). Digital Platforms and Supply Chain Traceability for Robust Information and Effective Inventory Management: The Media-ting Role of Transparency. Logistics, 7(25), 1-20. doi:10.3390/logistics7020025
23. Khan, M., Khan, M., Ali, A., Khan, M. I., Ullah, I., & Iqbal, M. (2022a). Digitalization for Fast, Fair, and Safe Humanitarian Logistics. Logistics, 31. doi:10.3390/logistics6020031
24. Khan, M., Parvaiz, G. S., Ali, A., Jehangir, M., Hassan, N., & Bae, J. (2022b). A Model for Un-derstanding the Mediating Association of Transparency between Emerging Technolo-gies and Humanitarian Logistics Sustainability. Sustainability, 14, 6917. doi:10.3390/su14116917
25. Khan, M., Yong, L. H., & Han, S. W. (2019). A Systematic Review of Performance Enhance-ment of Humanitarian Logistics through Transparency: Current Status and Perspecti-ves. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 549-568.
26. Khanuja, A., & Jain, R. K. (2016). A Study of Agile Supply Chain Frameworks. R. K. Jain, & H. Trivedi içinde, Lean Imperatives Lessons from Indian Organizations (s. 21-30). ASQ India.
27. Kim, J. W., Rhee, J. H., & Park, C. H. (2024). How Does Digital Transformation Improve Supply Chain Performance: A Manufacturer’s Perspective. Sustainability, 16(7), 3046.
28. Kovacs, G., & Spens, K. M. (2007). Humanitarian Logistics in Disaster Relief Operations. In-ternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(2), 99-114. doi:10.1108/09600030710734820
29. Kunz, N., Wassenhove, L. N., Besiou, M., Hambye, C., & Kovács, G. (2017). Relevance of Hu-manitarian Logistics Research: Best Practices And Way Forward. International Jour-nal of Operations &Production Management, 37(11), 1585-1599. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-04-2016-0202
30. L’Hermitte, C., Bowles, M., Tatham, P., & Brooks, B. (2015). An İntegrated Approach to Agi-lity in Humanitarian Logistics. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 209-233.
31. L'Hermitte, C., & Nair, N.-K. C. (2021). A Blockchain-Enabled Framework for Sharing Logis-tics Resources During Emergency Operations. Disasters, 45(3), 527-554. doi:10.1111/disa.12436
32. Lambe, C. J., Wittmann, C. M., & Spekman, R. E. (2001). Social Exchange Theory and Rese-arch on Business-toBusiness Relational Exchange. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 8(3), 1-36. doi:10.1300/J033v08n03_01
33. Mason, S. J., Cole, M. H., Ulrey, B. T., & Yan, L. (2002). Improving Electronics Manufacturing Supply Chain Agility Through Outsourcing. International Journal of Physical Distribu-tion & Logistics Management, 32(7), 610-620. doi:10.1108/09600030210442612
34. Narayanan, S., Narasimhan, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2015). Assessing The Contingent Effects of Collaboration on Agility Performance in Buyer–Supplier Relationships. Journal of Ope-rations Management, 33, 140-154.
35. Placzek, E., & Switalska, A. (2023). New Technologies in Humanitarian Logistics. Journal of Public Governance, 3(65), 48-58. doi:10.15678/PG.2023.65.3.04
36. Preindl, R., Nikolopoulos, K., & Litsiou, K. (2020). Transformation Strategies for The Supply Chain: The İmpact Of İndustry 4.0 And Digital Transformation. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21(1), 26-34. doi:10.1080/16258312.2020.1716633
37. Rasyidi, R. A., & Kusumastuti, R. D. (2020). Supply Chain Agility Assessment of An Indone-sian Humanitarian Organization. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 10(4), 629-652.
38. Roh, S., Lin, H. H., & Jang, H. (2022). Performance İndicators for Humanitarian Relief Logis-tics in Taiwan. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 38, 173-180.
39. Saad, S., Maina, J., Perera, T., & Bahadori, R. (2023). Blockchain-Based Traceability System for Enhanced Humanitarian Supply Chain Management. Andrew Thomas, W. M. Lyn-don Murphy, V. Dispenzza, & D. Jones içinde, Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXVI (s. 151-161). IOS Press.
40. Shalini, S., & Devi, T. (2022). Digital Transformation. P. Kaliraj, & T. Devi içinde, Industry 4.0 Technologies for Education: Transformative Technologies and Application. New York: Auerbach Publications.
41. Shayganmehr, M., Gupta, S., Laguir, I., Stekelorum, R., & Kumar, A. (2024). Assessing the Role of İndustry 4.0 for Enhancing Swift Trust and Coordination in Humanitarian Supply Chain. Annals of Operations Research, 1053-1085. doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04430-4
42. Suifan, T., Saa’da, R., Alazab, M., Sweis, R., Abdallah, A., & Alhyari, S. (2020). Quality of In-formation Sharing, Agility, and Sustainability of Humanitarian Aid Supply Chains: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(5), 118-131.
43. Sutrisno, A., Handayani, D., Caesarendra, W., & Gunawan, I. (2020). Categorization of Reli-ability Performance Indicators of Humanitarian Response Supply Chain. IOP Confe-rence Series: Materials Science and Engineering. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/722/1/012007
44. Swanson, R. D., & Smith, R. J. (2013). A Path to a Public–Private Partnership: Commercial Logistics Concepts Applied to Disaster Response. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(4), 335-346. doi:10.1111/jbl.12031
45. Thomas, A. (2003). Humanitarian Logistics: Enabling Disaster Response. Fritz Institute.
46. Thomas, A. S., & Kopczak, L. R. (2005). From Logistics to Supply Chain Management: The Path forward in the Humanitarian Sector. Fritz Institute, 15, 1-15.
47. Thomas, A., & Mizushima, M. (2005). Logistics Training: Necessity or Luxury? Forced Migra-tion Review, 60-61.
48. Thomas, R., & Skinner, L. (2010). Total Trust and Trust Asymmetry: Does Trust Need to Be Equally Distributed in Interfirm Relationships? Journal of Relationship Marketing, 9(1), 43-53. doi:10.1080/15332660903551875
49. Tomasini, R. M., & Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). From Preparedness to Partnerships: Case Study Research on Humanitarian Logistics. International TRransactions in Operatio-nal Research, 549-559. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00697.x
50. Tse, Y. K., Zhang, M., Akhtar, P., & MacBryde, J. (2016). Embracing Supply Chain Agility: An İnvestigation in The Electronics İndustry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(1), 140-156.
51. Vhikai, R., Mugoni, E., Mataka, A. P., & Saruchera, F. (2024). Digitalisation and Efficient Humanitarian Logistical Operations in Zimbabwe. Cogent Social Sciences,, 10(1). doi:10.1080/23311886.2024.2321725
52. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and A Research. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 118-144.
53. Wu, M. Y., Weng, Y. C., & Huang, I. C. (2012). A Study of Supply Chain Partnerships Based on The Commitment‐Trust Theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(4), 690-707.
54. Yıldız, B. (2020). İnsani Yardım Lojistiği. H. M. Mutlu içinde, Tedarik Zinciri Lojistikte Güncel Konular ve Stratejik Yaklaşımlar (s. 43-72). Bursa: Ekin.
55. Yılmaz, H. (2016). Tedarik Zincirinde Güvenin Firma Performansı Üzerine Etkisinde İşbirlikçi Avantajın Mediatör Rolü. (Yüksek lisans Tezi) İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi. İstanbul.
56. Zhang, J., Wang, Z., & Ren, F. (2019). Optimization of Humanitarian Relief Supply Chain Reliability: A Case Study of The Ya’an Earthquake. Annals of Operations Research, 283, 1551-1572. doi:10.1007/s10479-018-03127-5
57. Zhou, H., Wang, Q., Li, L., Teo, T. S., & Yang, S. (2023). Supply Chain Digitalization and Per-formance İmprovement: A Moderated Mediation Model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(6), 993-1008.