Kampüste Spor Deneyimi: Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kampüs Rekreasyonel Spor Deneyiminin İncelenmesi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 346 - 359, 22.09.2019

Hüseyin Çevik , Ecenur Yılmaz Ayberk Korkmaz

https://doi.org/10.31680/gaunjss.594280

Öz

Kampüs rekreasyonel spor öğrencilerin çok yönlü gelişimine katkı sağlamaktadır.
Bu gelişimin sağlanabilmesi için katılımın düzenli ve sürekli olması gerekir. Olumlu
deneyim algısı katılımın düzenli ve sürekliğinde önemli rol oynamaktadır.
Üniversiteler kampüs rekreasyonel spor programlarına katılımı arttırabilmek ve
sürekliliği sağlamak için öğrencilerin deneyim algılarını değerlendirerek plan
ve strateji geliştirmek durumundadır. Bundan dolayı bu araştırmada öğrencilerin
kampüs rekreasyonel spor deneyim algılarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Araştırmaya kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen, Anadolu Üniversitesi ve
Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi bünyesinde kampüs rekreasyonel spor
aktivitelerine katılan 259 öğrenci dahil edilmiştir. Veriler oluşturulan anket
aracılığı ile yüz yüze görüşme tekniği ile toplanmıştır. Anketin birinci
bölümünde Kampüs Rekreasyonel Spor Deneyim Ölçeği, ikinci bölümde ise kişisel
veriler formuna yer verilmiştir. Veri analizinde Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi
(DFA), t-test ve ANOVA kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları öğrencilerin kampüs
rekreasyonel spor deneyim algılarının cinsiyet, fakülte/bölüm ve öğretim yıl
değişkenlerine göre farklılaştığını ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak araştırma
bulguları, üniversite yönetimine kampüs rekreasyonel spor programı ile ilgili
farklı özellikteki öğrencilerin ihtiyaç ve beklentilerinin anlaşılması
noktasında önemli veriler sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Rekreasyonel spor, deneyim, kampüs rekreasyonu

Sports Experience On Campus: Examination Of University Students’ Campus Recreational Sports Experience

Öz

The campus recreational sports programs contribute to the multi-faceted
development of university students. Participation must be regular and
continuous for this development. The perception of positive experience plays an
important role in regular and continuous participation. Universities have to
develop plans and strategies by evaluating students' perceptions of experience
in order to increase participation in campus recreational sports programs and
ensure continuity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate students'
perceptions of campus recreational sports experience. The sample of the
research consists of 259 students who participated in campus recreational
sports within the Anadolu University and Eskişehir Technical University and
were selected by convenience sampling method. The data was collected by the
questionary using face to face interview technique. The first part of the
questionary includes Campus Recreational Sports Experience Scale and in the
second section, personal data form is given. The data were analyzed by
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), t-test, and ANOVA. The results of the
analysis revealed that students' perceptions of campus recreational sports
experience differed according to gender, faculty/department and academic year
variables. As a result, the research findings provide important data for the
university administration to understand the needs and expectations of students
with different characteristics related to the campus recreational sports
program.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Recreational sport, experience, campus recreation

Kaynakça

• Abdullah, N., & Mohamad, N. (2016). University recreational facilities service quality and students’ physical activity level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 207-212.
• Artinger, L., Clapham, L., Hunt, C., Meigs, M., Milord, N., Sampson, B., & Forrester, S. A. (2006). The social benefits of intramural sports. Naspa Journal. 43 (1), 69-86.
• Banville, D., Desrosiers, P. and Genet-Volet, Y. (2000). Translating questionnaires and inventories using a cross-cultural translation technique. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 22 (3), 374-387.
• Barcelona R. J., Mary S. W., Skye A. B. (2016). Recreational sport program design, delivery, and management. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
• Belch, H. A., Gebel, M., & Maas, G. M. (2001). Relationship between student recreation complex use, academic performance, and persistence of first-time freshmen. NASPA journal, 38(2), 254-268.
• Corbin, C.B., & Lindsey, R. (2005). Fitness for life (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
• Çevik, H., Şimşek, K. Y., & Yılmaz, İ. (2017). The evaluating of service quality in recreational sport events: kite festival sample. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences. 8(1), 73-93.
• Demir Ş. Ş. ve Kozak M. (2013). Tüketici Davranışları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Evans, K. E., Hartman, C. L., & Anderson, D. M. (2013). It’s more than a class: Leisure education’s influence on college student engagement. Innovative Higher Education, 38(1), 45-58.
• Forrester, S. (2006). An examination of the factors contributing to student satisfaction with their overall academic experience. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education. 21(1), 21-33.
• Forrester, S. (2015). Benefits of collegiate recreational sports participation: Results from the 2013 NASPA assessment and knowledge consortium study. Recreational Sports Journal. 39(1), 2-15.
• Gentile, C., Spiller, N., & Noci, G. (2007). How to sustain the customer experience: An overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. European Management Journal, 25(5), 395-410.
• Green, S., & Salkind, N. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Understanding and analysing data. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
• Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (Seventh Edition). Harlow: Pearson.
• Hill, B., & Green, B. C. (2012). Repeat participation as a function of program attractiveness, socializing opportunities, loyalty and the sportscape across three sport facility contexts. Sport Management Review, 15(4), 485-499.
• Hoang, T. V., Cardinal, B. J., & Newhart, D. W. (2016). An Exploratory Study of Ethnic Minority Students' Constraints to and Facilitators of Engaging in Campus Recreation. Recreational Sports Journal, 40(1), 69-81.
• Huesman Jr, R., Brown, A. K., Lee, G., Kellogg, J. P., & Radcliffe, P. M. (2009). Gym bags and mortarboards: Is use of campus recreation facilities related to student success? NASPA Journal, 46(1), 50-71.
• Hu, L. and Bentler, P. (1999), Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, (2), 1–55.
• Kanters, M. A., & Forrester, S. (2000). Recreational sport participation as a moderator of college stress. Recreational Sports Journal, 24(2), 11–24.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Third Edition). New York: Guilford Press.
• Ko, Y. J., & Pastore, D. L. (2007). An instrument to assess customer perceptions of service quality and satisfaction in campus recreation programs. Recreational Sports Journal, 31(1), 34-42.
• Lambrecht, K. W., Kaefer, F. & Ramenofsky, S. D. (2009) Sportscape factors Influencing spectator attendance and satisfaction at a Professional Golf Association tournament. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 18, (3), 165-172. Lindsey, R., & Sessoms, E. (2006). Assessment of a campus recreation program on student recruitment, retention, and frequency of participation across certain demographic variables. Recreational Sports Journal, 30(1), 30-39.
• Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J.L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
• Mercanoğlu, A.O., Çevik, H., ve Şimşek, K.Y. (2015). Kampüs rekreasyonu kapsamında düzenlenen sportif rekreasyon etkinliklerinin hizmet kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi: Anadolu Üniversitesi Örneği. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(9), 256-267.
• Milton, P. R., & Patton, B. J. (2011). Who enters campus recreation facilities: A demographic analysis. International Journal of Sport Management, Recreation and Tourism, 7, 11-29.
• National Intramural Recreational Sports Association. (2010). 2010 NIRSA/NASPA Consortium campus recreation impact study. http://www.nirsa.org/docs/Discover/Research/Campus_Rec_Impact_ (Erişim Tarihi 04.04.2019)
• Nunnally, J. C. ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• O’Reilly, N., Berger, I. E., Hernandez, T., Parent, M. M., & Séguin, B. (2015). Urban sportscapes: An environmental deterministic perspective on the management of youth sport participation. Sport Management Review, 18(2), 291-307.
• Osman, R. W., Cole, S. T., & Vessel, C. R. (2006). Examining the role of perceived service quality in predicting user satisfaction and behavioral intentions in a campus recreation setting. Recreational Sports Journal, 30 (1), 20-29.
• Suttikun, C., & Chang, H. J. (2016). College Students' Satisfaction and Involvement with the Recreation Center Based on Perceived Service Quality: The Moderating Effects of Health and Weight Consciousness. Recreational Sports Journal, 40(2), 179-192.
• Shin, S., Chiu, W., & Lee, H. W. (2018). For a better campus sporting experience: Scale development and validation of the collegiate sportscape scale. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 22, 22-30.
• Shonk, D. J., Carr, J. W., & De Michele, P. E. (2010). Service quality and satisfaction within campus recreation: The moderating role of identification. Recreational Sports Journal, 34(1), 9-23.
• Watson, J., Ayers, S., Zizzi, S., & Naoi, A. (2006). Student recreation centers: A comparison of users and non-users on psychosocial variables. NIRSA Journal, 30(1): 9-20.