International Security Strategies Today: Conceptual Framework and Application

Öz

In our article, which deals with the different conceptual features, diversities, and application problems of international security strategies, we emphasized, in eclectic context, the divergent directions of the subject. Before all else, we aimed displaying some comparisons between national and international security strategies from various angles and stating expressly the differences between them. International security strategies in application, generally come on the scene in two forms: cooperativepeaceful strategies and conflictual-coercive strategies. Furthermore, international security strategies can also take several shapes in changing coordinates system of the peace-crisis-war triangle. We also tried to analyse them in conceptual context. Besides, international security strategies, the contrary of national strategies, couldn’t exactly be understood without taking into consideration the collectivity phenomenon. Accordingly, we discussed the various collectivity levels within these strategies. As for today, the international security strategies are being forged powerfully by the combat against the international terrorism more than before. In this framework, we scrutinized this subject, as comparing the US-EU ways of strategic preferences. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Security, Strategy, Terrorism, International Security Strategy, the USA, the European Union. 

Günümüzde Uluslararası Güvenlik Stratejileri: Kavramsal Çerçeve ve Uygulama

Öz

Günümüzde uluslararası güvenlik stratejilerinin değişik kavramsal özellik, çeşitlilik ve uygulama sorunlarını ele alan makalemizde, eklektik düzlemde konunun değişik yönleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Öncelikle, ulusal ve uluslararası güvenlik stratejileri arasında değişik açılardan karşılaştırmalar yaparak, bunların farklılıklarını ortaya koymayı amaçladık. Uluslararası güvenlik stratejileri uygulanırken genel olarak iki şekilde kendilerini gösterirler: işbirlikçi-barışçı stratejiler ve zorlayıcı stratejiler. Bunun yanında, uluslararası güvenlik stratejileri, barış-kriz-savaş üçgeninin değişik koordinatlarında çeşitli şekiller de alabilmektedir. Bunları da kavramsal düzeyde analiz etmeye çalıştık. İlaveten, uluslararası güvenlik stratejileri, ulusal güvenlik stratejilerinin tersine, kolektivite olgusu dikkate alınmadan tam olarak anlaşılamaz. Dolayısıyla, bu stratejiler içinde kolektivite seviyelerini tartıştık. Günümüzde ise, uluslararası terörizmle mücadele, uluslararası güvenlik stratejilerini belirgin olarak şekillendirmeye başlamıştır. Bu konuyu ise, karşılaştırmalı olarak ABD ve AB örnekleri üzerinde durarak inceledik. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güvenlik, Strateji, Terörizm, Uluslararası Güvenlik Stratejisi, ABD, Avrupa Birliği. 

Kaynakça

1. ABBEY Nicholas, “Preventing Terrorism: Towards a New Approach”, 9 November 2001, http://www.afghan-network.net/911/terrorism.html
2. “ABD Terör Örgütleri Listesini Açıkladı”, Milliyet, 10 Nisan 2008.
3. ACKER James R. - David C. Brody, Criminal Procedure: A Contemporary Perspective, Jones&Bartlett Publishers, 2. Edition, Sudbury, MA 2004.
4. Afghanistan: Challenges and the Way Ahead, Position Paper Presented by the Govern- ment of Afghanistan at the Joint Coordination and Monitoring Board Meeting in Berlin, 30-31 January 2007.
5. ALKAN Necati, Söz Bitmeden Terörle Mücadelede Önleme Stratejileri, Uluslararası Stratejik Araştırmalar Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara 2007.
6. ALLISON Graham, Nükleer Terörizm: Önlenebilir Nihai Felaket, (çev. O. Güneş Ayas), Sal- yangoz Yayınları, İstanbul 2006.
7. ARBATOV Alexei, “Superterrorism: Implications for a New Common Security Stra- tegy”, 17 April 2003,
8. http://www.auditorium.ru/v/index.php?=vconf&c=...

9. ARBATOV Alexei, “Superterrorism: Implications for a New Security Strategy”, Micha- el Intriligator - Alexander Nikitin - Majid Tehranian, der., Eurasia: A New Peace Agenda, Elsevier, Emerald Publishing Group, Amsterdam 2005, s. 89-100.
10. BAL İdris, “Terörizm, Liberal Devlet ve Uluslararası İşbirliği”, 21. Yüzyılda Türk Dış Politi- kası, Ankara Global Araştırmalar Merkezi Yayınları, Lalezar Kitabevi, Genişletil- miş 3. Baskı, Ankara 2006, s. 887-903.
11. BAL İhsan, Alacakaranlıkta Terörle Mücadele ve Komplo Teorileri, Uluslararası Stratejik Araş- tırmalar Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara 2006.
12. BARTH Peter, “Abschreckung”, Ekkehard Lippert - Günther Wachtler, der., Frieden: Ein Handwörterbuch, Westdeutscher Verlag, GmbH, Opladen 1988, s. 25-41.
13. Base de Datos SER en el 2000 Titulo Argentina: White Paper on National Defence, http://www.ser2000.org.ar/Archivo/arg-part3.htm
14. BERNSTEİN Johannah, The Policy Relevance of the Earth Charter for Europe: A Paper Prepared for the Maastricht Forum on the Future of Europe, Maastricht University Press, Earth Charter International, The Netherlands 9-11 May 2007.
15. BISCOP Sven - Rik Coolsaet, The World is the Stage-A Global Security Strategy for the Europe- an Union, Policy Papers No. 8, Groupement d’Études et de Recherches, Notre Europe, Brussels December 2003.
16. BISCOP Sven, The European Security Strategy Implementing a Distinctive Approach to Security, Royal Defence College (IRSD-KHID), Brussels, Paper No. 82, March 2004.
17. BISCOP Sven, “From Reflections to Power: Implementing the European Security Stra- tegy”, Gunther Hauser - Franz Kernic, der., European Security in Transition, Ashga- te Publishing, Ltd., Aldershot, Hampshire 2006, s. 87-102.
18. BISCOP Sven - Edith Drieskens, “The European Security Strategy: Confirming the Cho- ice for Collective and Comprehensive Security”, Frank Hoffmeister - Jan Wou- ters - Tom Ruys, der., The United Nations and the European Union: An Ever Stronger Partnership, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 2006, pp. 267-279.
19. BUCHANAN Patrick J., Day of Reckoning: How Hubris, Ideology, and Greed are Tearing America Apart?, Macmillan, London 2007.
20. BUZAN Barry, People, States and Fear: The National Security Problems in International Relations, The University of North Carolina Press, Chicago, Ill. 1983.
21. BUZAN Barry vd., The European Security Order Recast: Scenarios for the Post-Cold War Era, Pinter Publishers, London - New York 1990.
22. BUZAN Barry, People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post- Cold War Era, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, 2. Edition, Colorado 1991.
23. BUZAN Barry, vd., Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Bo- ulder, London 1998.
24. BUZAN Barry, “Sino-Japanese and Sino-US Relations in China’s Peaceful Rise”, Journal of World Economics and Politics, Sayı: 7, 2006.
25. BYERS Michael, Soykırımdan Sonkırıma Savaş Hukuku, (çev. Hasret Dikici Bilgin), Detay Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2007.
26. CANBOLAT İbrahim S., Savaş ve Barış Arasında Dünya: Korku ve Umut Arasında İnsan, Alfa- Aktüel Kitabevi, Bursa 2003.
27. Carnegie Corporation Annual Report, Carnegie Corporation of New York, 1997, http:// www.carnegie.org/sub/about/pdcgrants.html
28. CHRISTENSEN Thomas J. - Michael A. Glosny, “Sources of Stability in U.S.-China Se- curity Relations”, Richard J. Ellings - Aaron L. Friedberg (- Michael Wills’in katkılarıyla), der., Strategic Asia: 2003-04, Fragility and Crisis, The National Bureau of Asian Research, Washington D.C. 2003, s. 53-80.
29. ÇİTLİOĞLU Ercan, “Terörizm ve Küreselleşme”, Stratejik Analiz, Aralık 2007, s. 77-85.
30. DANNREUTHER Roland, International Security: The Contemporary Agenda, Polity, Camb- ridge, U.K. 2007.
31. DETTKE Dieter, “Militaerpolitik / Sicherheitspolitik”, Wichard Woyke, der., Handwörter- buch Internationale Politik, Leske + Budrich, 4. Baskı, Opladen 1990, pp. 337-345.
32. DOMINGUEZ Jorge I. - Rafael Fernández de Castro, The United States and Mexico: Between Partnership and Conflict, Routledge, New York 2001.
33. DORFF Robert H., “Failed States After 9/11: What Did We Know and What Have We Learned?”, International Studies Perspectives, Sayı: 6, 2005, s. 20-34.
34. DORFF Robert H., “Managing National Security in the Information and Terrorism Age”, The Forum: Managing National Security, Cilt: 4, Sayı: 1, Makale: 4, 2006.
35. DWAN Renata - Zdzislaw Lachowski, “The Military and Security Dimensions of the European Union”, SIPRI Yearbook-2003: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003, s. 213-236.
36. EC Official Journal, L 344, 28 Aralık 2001.
37. EEKELEN M. Wim van, The European Convention: Working Group VIII on “Defence”, WD 02-WG VIII, Brussels 19 September 2002.
38. ELIASSON Johan, “Regional Defense Policy: The European Security and Defense Po- licy”, Jeffrey A. Weber - Johan Eliasson, der., Handbook of Military Administration, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida 2007, s. 317-346.
39. Europe’s World, “Ashraf Ghani’s “Rescue Plan for an Afghanistan Perilously Close to Its Tipping Point””, 3 April 2008, http://www.europesworld.org/EWSettings/Ar- ticle/tabid/78/Default.aspx?Id=...
40. FIERKE K.M., Critical Approaches to International Security, Polity, Cambridge, U.K. 2007.
41. FUKUYAMA Francis, Neo-Conların Sonu: Yol Ayrımındaki Amerika, (çev. Hasan Kaya), Pro- fil Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2006.
42. GLASSMAN James K., “Selling America: How Well Does U.S. Government Broadcas- ting Work in the Middle East?: Introductory Remarks”, 17 Mayıs 2004,
43. http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.20529,filter.all/pub_detail.asp
44. GREEN Michael, Japan’s Reluctant Realism: Foreign Policy Challenges in an Era of Uncertain Power, Palgrave Macmillan, 2. Edition, New York 2003.
45. HABERMAS Jürgen, Bölünmüş Batı, (çev. Dilman Muradoğlu), Yapı Kredi Yayınları- Cogito, İstanbul 2006.
46. HAMMES Thomas X., The Sling and the Stone: On War in the 21st Century, Zenith Imprint, St.Paul, Minnesota 2004.
47. HATİPOĞLU Esra, “Avrupa Birliği (AB) Sürecinin Olumsuz Sonuçlanmasının Türkiye’ye Yansımaları”, Türkiye’ye Yönelik Dış Kaynaklı Risk ve Tehditler Sempozyumu, Bildiriler, 5-6 Nisan 2007, T.C. Genel Kurmay Başkanlığı Harp Akademileri Komutanlığı Stratejik Araştırmalar Enstitüsü, Harp Akademileri Basımevi, İstanbul 2007, s. 107-118.
48. HELD David - Anthony McGrew, “Globalization and the End of the Old Order”, Tim Dunne - Michael Cox - Ken Booth, der., The Eighty Years’ Crisis: International Rela- tions, 1919-1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998, s. 219-244.
49. HELD David - Anthony McGrew, “The End of the Old Order? Globalization and the Prospects for World Order”, Review of International Studies, Cilt: 24, Sayı: 5, Aralık 1998, s. 219-245.
50. HELD David vd., Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture, Stanford Univer- sity Press, Stanford USA 1999.
51. İŞYAR Ömer Göksel, “Rusya ve Çin’in Karşılaştırmalı Avrasya Stratejileri”, Global Strate- ji, Yıl: 3, Sayı: 12, Kış 2008, s. 32-46.
52. JOHNSON William T., NATO Strategy in the 1990s: Reaping the Peace Dividend or the Whirl- wind?, Diane Publishing, Darby, Philadelphia 1995.
53. JORGENSEN K. E., “A Multilateralist Role for the EU?”, O. Elgström - M. Smith, der., European Union’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis, Routledge, London-New York 2006, s. 30-46.
54. “Joseph S. Nye Evaluates Europe’s Power to Lead”, Eurotopics, Le Temps-Switzerland, 21.02.2008,
55. http://www.eurotopics.net/en/presseschau/autorenindex/autor_nye_joseph_s/
56. KATZENSTEIN Peter, “China and Japan in the American Imperium”, Journal of World Economics and Politics, Sayı: 7, 2006.
57. KAYA Sezgin, “Küresel Terörizmle Mücadelede Alternatif Rejim Modelleri”, Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Sayı: 5, Yıl: 3, Temmuz 2005, s. 15-33.
58. KAYNAK Mahir - Emin Gürses, Büyük Ortadoğu Projesi, Timaş Yayınları, İstanbul 2007.
59. KEELTY Mick, “Challenges to Peace and Justice in the Asia-Pasific Region and the Role of the AFP in Peacekeeping and Responding to These Challenges”, 1 April 2005, The Australian Federal Police,
60. http://www.afp.gov.au/media/national_media/national_speeches/2005/peace,_justi- ce_and_reconciliation_in_the_asia_pasific_region_international_conference
61. KEYMAN E. Fuat, “Küreselleşme, Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Hegemonya”, Uluslararası İliş- kiler Dergisi, Cilt: 3, Sayı: 9, Bahar 2006, s. 1-20.
62. KOETJE Fred, “South African National Security Policy: An International Relations Perspective”, African Security Review, Cilt: 8, Sayı: 6, 1999, http://www.iss.co.za/ Pubs/ASR/8No6/SASecurity.html
63. LIND Michael, The American Way of Strategy: U.S. Foreign Policy and The American Way of Life, Oxford University Press, U.S. 2006.
64. LOBELL Steven E., “The International Realm, Framing Effects, and Security Strategi- es: Britain in Peace and War”, International Interactions, Cilt: 32, 2006, s. 27-48.
65. LOBELL Steven E., “The Second Face of Security: Britain’s ‘Smart’ Appeasement Po- licy Towards Japan and Germany”, International Relations of the Asia-Pasific, Cilt: 7, 2007, s. 73-98.
66. LORCA-SUSİNO Maria, The Reform Treaty: Its Impacts on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), MPRA Paper, No. 7183, University of Miami, July 2007.
67. MANNERS Ian, “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?”, Journal of Com- mon Market Studies, Cilt: 40, Sayı: 2, 2002, s. 235-258.
68. MAULL Hans, “Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers”, Foreign Affairs, Cilt: 69, Sayı: 5, 1990, s. 92-93.
69. MÜFTÜLER-BAÇ Meltem, “Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkilerine Güvenlik Boyutundan Bir Bakış”,
70. http://www.tesev.org.tr/etkinlik/tesevguvenlikkitabi.pdf?ref=SaglikAlani-com
71. NEACK Laura, Elusive Security: States First, People Last, Lanham, Rowman&Littlefield, (New Millennium Books in International Studies), Maryland 2007.
72. “New MCC Aids Chief Says Development Aid to Support Policy Reforms” Internatio- nal Information Programs, 7 May 2004, http://usinfo.state.gov/ei/Archive/2004/ May/07-963841.html
73. NORDLıNGER Eric A., Isolationism Reconfigured: American Foreign Policy for a New Century, Princeton Paperbacks, Princeton 1996.
74. OĞUZLU H. Tarık, “Dünya Düzenleri ve Güvenlik: Ulus-Devlet Güvenlik Anlayışı Aşılı- yor mu?”, Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, Yıl: 3, Sayı: 6, Aralık 2007, s. 7-37.
75. ORTTUNG Robert, “Introduction: Comparing National Counter-Terrorism Strategies”, R.W. Orttung - A. Makarychev, der., National Counter-Terrorism Strategies: Legal, Institutional, and Public Policy Dimensions in the US, UK, France, Turkey and Russia, (NATO Security Through Science Series, E: Human and Societal Dynamics, Cilt: 14), IOS Press, The Netherlands 2006, s. 1-12.
76. ÖZDAL Barış – Mehmet Genç, Avrupa Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası’nın Türkiye-AB İlişki- lerine Etkileri, Aktüel Yayınları, Bursa 2005.
77. ÖZDEMİR Haluk, “Başarısız Bir Devlet Olarak Irak: PKK’ya Karşı Olası Kuzey Irak Ope- rasyonunda Dikkat Edilmesi Gerekenler”, 2023 Dergisi, Sayı: 79, 15 Kasım 2007, s. 30-33.
78. PLESCH Dan, “Bush May Get UN Support For His War”, The Guardian, 15 August 2002.
79. Présidence de la République, The French White Paper on Defence and National Security, 2008,
80. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2008/livre-blanc_france_2008-11. htm
81. President of the United States, The National Security Strategy of the United States of Ameri- ca, Washington D.C.: http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2002/nss.pdf>, Eylül 2002
82. Prague Summit Declaration, 21 Kasım 2002, http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2002/p02- 127e.htm
83. ROBERT J. Pauly - Tom Lansford, Strategic Preemption: US Foreign Policy and the Second Iraq War, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Burlington, Vermont 2004.
84. ROBERTS Brad, “1995 and the End of the Post-Cold War Era”, Washington Quarterly, Cilt: 18, Sayı: 1, Kış 1995, http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/roberts.htm
85. SCHUCHTER Arnold, Regime Change: National Security in the Age of Terrorism, iUniverse, Bloomington 2004.
86. SCOTT Keith, Gareth Evans, Allen&Unwin, London 1999.
87. SHALIKASHVILI John M., Joint Vision 2010, Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Washington D.C., t.y..
88. SOLANA Javier, “A Secure Europe in a Beter World”, http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/ cmsUpload/78367.pdf
89. SÖNMEZOĞLU Faruk, Uluslararası Politika ve Dış Politika Analizi, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul 1989.
90. STANCIU Ion-Aurel, “Legitimacy of the Fight Against International Terrorism” Romani- an Military Thinking, 3/2007.
91. “Statewatch Comparative Analysis of the US, UK, UN and EU “terrorist lists”, http:// www.statewatch.org/terrorlists/listsbground.html
92. STAVRIDIS Stelios, ““Militarising” the EU: The Concept of Civilian Power Revisited”, International Spectator, Cilt: 41, Sayı: 4, 2001, s. 43-50.
93. SWANSTROM Niklas L. P. - Mikael S. Weissmann, Conflict, Conflict Prevention, Conflict Management and Beyond: A Conceptual Exploration, Concept Paper, Central Asia- Caucasus Institute, Silk Road Studies Program, Uppsala University, Sweden, Summer 2005.
94. TERRIFF Terry vd., Security Studies Today, Polity, Great Britain 1999.
95. THATCHER Chris, “Tying the Knot: Bilateral Group Proposes Greater Defence and Se- curity Integration”, Vanguard: Canada’s Premier Defence and Security Magazine, 2006, http://www.vanguardcanada.com/TyingtheKnotThatcher
96. “The 2000 Campaign: The Democratic Running Mate; Lieberman Homes In on Bush’s Foreign Policy”, New York Times, 4 November 2000.
97. The Fund for Peace, “Failed States Index Scores-“2007”,
98. http://www.fundforpeace.org/web/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22 9&Itemid=366
99. The Watson Institute for International Studies, Global Security Matrix: Definitions, http:// www.watsoninstitute.org/globalsecuritymatrix/definitions.html
100. TOPUR, Tuncer, Milli Güvenlik ve Türkiye, IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2005.
101. TÜRKMEN Füsun, “ABD’nin Dış Politikası: Devamlılık ve Değişim”, Doğu-Batı Dergisi, Sayı: 42, 2007, s. 157-180.
102. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Legislative Guide to the Universal Anti-Terrorism Conventions and Protocols, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna In- ternational Centre, Austria 2004.
103. USLU Nasuh, “ABD’nin Temel Tehdit Kaynağını Kurutma ve Hegemonya Kurma Adına Orta Doğu’ya Yönelmesi”, Doğu-Batı Dergisi, Sayı: 42, 2007, s. 127-153.
104. ÜLGER İrfan Kaya, “Avrupa Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikasının Arkaplanı, Oluşumu ve Temel Anlaşmazlık Konuları”, Refet Yinanç - Hakan Taşdemir, der., Uluslararası Güvenlik Sorunları ve Türkiye, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2002, s. 83-114.
105. VRIES G. De, “Cooperation Between the European Union and the United Nations in Counterterrorism”, Frank Hoffmeister - Jan Wouters - Tom Ruys, der., The United Nations and the European Union: An Ever Stronger Partnership, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 2006, s. 305-322.
106. WAEVER Ole, “Securitization and Desecuritization”, Ronnie D. Lipschutz, der., On Se- curity, Columbia University Press, New York 1995, s. 46-86.
107. WILLEMSEN Arnoud, European Defence Integration: A Camparison of Support in Belgium and the Netherlands, Erasmus University Press, Rotterdam 2007.
108. YALÇINKAYA Haldun, Savaş: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Güç Kullanımı, İmge Kitabevi Yayınla- rı, Ankara 2008.
109. YOST David S., “Debating Security Strategies”, NATO Review, Winter 2003,
110. http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2003/issue4/english/art4.html
111. YOUNG Philip, “From Strategic Competitor to Security Collaboration? New US-China Tri-level Strategic Relations and Taiwan Security in a Post/9/11 World”, http:// taiwansecurity.org/TS/2004Yang-1203.html