Evaluation of microleakage scores of flowable bulk-fill and flowable conventional composites according to different adhesive application modes

Yıl 2024, , 17 - 24, 03.01.2024

Sevda Öztürk Yeşilırmak , Burcu Oglakci , Zümrüt Ceren Özduman , Evrim Eligüzeloğlu Dalkılıç

https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.1239947

Öz

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of different application modes of the universal adhesive system on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
Materials and Methods: In this study, sixty sound human premolar teeth were used. Standardized Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of teeth, with the cervical margin on the dentin and the occlusal margin on the enamel surface. Specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups according to composite resin type (Filtek Z250/FZ, Metafil Bulk Fill/MB, and Nova Compo HF/NC) and application modes of the universal adhesive (selective etch/SEE and self-etch/SE): Group FZ+SEE, Group FZ+SE, Group MB+SEE, Group MB+SE, Group NC+SEE, and Group NC+SE. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C and subjected to 10,000 thermocycles. Then, the teeth were stored in 0.5% methylene blue dye for 24 hours. They were examined under a stereomicroscope (40x) to evaluate microleakage. The data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p<0.05).
Results: At the occlusal margin, Group MB+SE showed a statistically lower microleakage value compared to Group FZ+SE, and Group MB+SEE showed a statistically lower microleakage value than Group FZ+SEE (p<0.05). For all restorative materials, at both the occlusal and cervical margins, no significant differences in microleakage were found between the application modes (p>0.05). Except for Group NC+SE, statistically higher microleakage scores were observed at the cervical margin than at the occlusal margin for all restorative materials (p<0.05).
Conclusion: It has been determined that Class V flowable bulk-fill composite resin restorations with both application modes of the universal adhesive system have a better microleakage performance than microhybrid composite resins at the occlusal margin.

Anahtar Kelimeler

composite dental resin, dental leakage, dental adhesive

Akışkan bulk-fill ve akışkan geleneksel kompozitlerin farklı adeziv uygulama yöntemlerine göre mikrosızıntı skorlarının değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, universal adeziv sistemin farklı uygulama yöntemlerinin sınıf V akışkan kompozit restosyonların kenar mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, toplam 60 adet sağlam premolar diş kullanıldı. Dişlerin bukkal yüzeylerine, servikal kenarı dentinde ve okluzal kenarı minede olacak şekilde standardize edilmiş Sınıf V kaviteler (3 mm x 3 mm x 1.5 mm) hazırlandı. Örnekler, kompozit rezin tipi (Filtek Z250/FZ, Metafil Bulk Fill/MB ve Nova Compo HF/NC) ve universal adezivin uygulama yöntemlerine göre (selektif etch/SEE ve self-etch/SE) rastgele 6 gruba ayrıldı: Grup FZ+SEE, Grup FZ+SE, Grup MB+SEE, Grup MB+SE, Grup NC+SEE, Grup NC+SE. Örnekler, 24 saat 37° C’de distile su içerisinde bekletildi ve 10.000 döngüde termal siklusa tabi tutuldu. Ardından, %0.5 metilen mavisi solüsyonunda 24 saat süresince bekletildi. Mikrosızıntı tespiti için, stereomikroskop altında (40x büyütme) incelendi. Verilerin istatistiksel analizinde, Kruskal Wallis ve Mann-Whitney U testleri kullanıldı (p<0.05).
Bulgular: Okluzal kenarda, Grup MB+SE, Grup FZ+SE’ye göre ve Grup MB+SEE, Grup FZ+SEE’ye göre istatistiksel olarak daha düşük mikrosızıntı değeri gösterdi (p<0.05). Hem okluzal hem servikal kenarda, tüm restoratif materyaller için, uygulama yöntemleri arasında mikrosızıntı açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p>0.05). Grup NC+SE hariç, diğer tüm gruplarda servikal kenarda okluzal kenara göre istatistiksel olarak daha fazla mikrosızıntı değeri gözlendi (p<0.05).
Sonuç: Universal adeziv sistemin her iki uygulama yöntemi kullanılarak elde edilen Sınıf V akışkan bulk-fill kompozit rezin restorasyonların, okluzal kenardaki mikrosızıntı performansının mikrohibrit kompozit rezinlere göre daha iyi olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kompozit dental rezin, Dental sızıntı, Dental adeziv

Kaynakça

• 1.Gluzman R, Katz RV, Frey BJ, McGowan. Prevention of root caries: a literature review of primary and secondary preventive agents. Spec Care Dentist 2013;33:133–40.
• 2.Burgess JO, Gallo JR. Treating root-surface caries. Dent Clin of North Am 2002;46: 385–404.
• 3.Krejci I, Planinic M, Stavridakis M, Bouillaguet S. Resin composite shrinkage and marginal adaptation with different pulse-delay light curing protocols. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113: 531–6.
• 4.Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater 2013;29: 269–77.
• 5.Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28.
• 6.Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in class V cavities. Am J Dent 2003; 16:239–43.
• 7.Roggendorf MJ, Kramer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4- mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite J Dent 2011; 39: 643-7.
• 8.Rosales-Leal IJ. Microleakage of class v composite restorations placed with etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives before and after thermocycling. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:225-9.
• 9.Bolgul BS, Anya B, Simsek I, Celenk S, Seker O, Kilinc G. Leakage testing for different adhesive systems and composites to permanent teeth. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:787-91
• 10.Hanabusa, M, Kimura S, Hori A, Yamamoto T. Effect of irradiation source on the dentin bond strength of a one-bottle universal adhesive containing an amide monomer. J Adhes Sci Technol 2019; 33: 2265-80. 11.Arısu HD, Uctaslı MB, Eliguzeloglu E, Ozacn S, Omürlü H. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations. Oper Dent 2008;33:135–41.
• 12.Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials Dent Mater 2005; 21: 864-81.
• 13.Naguib GH, Bakhsh TA, Turkistani AA, Mously HA, Fattouh M, Hamed MT. Noninvasive Adaptation Appraisal of Antimicrobial Nano-Filled Composite. Int Dent J. 2022;20:S0020-6539(22)00263-5.
• 14.Atalay C, Uslu A, Yazici AR. Does laser etching have an effect on application mode of a universal adhesive?-A microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84(1):125-32.
• 15.Krishna Muppalla JN, Harikumar V, Sarathchandra P, Reddy SJ, Rajani P. Effect of modulated photoactivation of bulkfill composite on microleakage in fluorosed and nonfluorosed teeth: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(2):180-4.
• 16.Daghrery A, Yaman P, Lynch M, Dennison J. Evaluation of micro-CT in the assessment of microleakage under bulk fill composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2022;35(2):128-32.
• 17.Amarante de Camargo DA, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L, de Sousa Neto MD, Consani S Influence of the methodology and evaluation criteria on determining microleakage in dentin-restorative interfaces Clin Oral Investig 2006; 10: 317-23.
• 18.Malekafzali B, Asnaashari M, Javadi F. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary canine teeth prepared with high-speed diamond bur, ER:YAGlaser and ER,CR:YSGG laser. Laser Ther 2017; 26: 195-202.
• 19.Moazzami SM, Sarabi N, Hajizadeh H, Majidinia S, Li Y, Meharry MR, Shahrokh H. Efficacy of four lining materials in sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2014;39(3):256–63.
• 20.Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Déjou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(4):295–308.
• 21. Zanatta RF, Wiegand A, Dullin C, Borges AB, Torres CRG, Rizk M. Comparison of micro-CT and conventional dye penetration for microleakage assessment after different aging conditions. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019; 89, 161–7.
• 22.Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites Dent Mater 2012; 28: 801-9.
• 23.Bedran-de-Castro AK, Pereira PNR, Pimenta LAF, Thompson JY. The effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on nanolekage of class II restorations. J Adhes Dent 2004;6: 221–6.
• 24.Xie C, Han Y, Zhao XY, Wang ZY, He HMl. Microtensile bond strength of one- and two-step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling. Oper Dent 2010;35:547-55.
• 25. Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:295-308.
• 26. De Souza FH, Rocha AC, Rubini A, Klein-Junior CA, Demarco FF. Influence of adhesive system and bevel preparation on fracture strength of teeth restored with composite resin. Braz Dent J 2010;21:327–31.
• 27. Perdigao J, Swift JE. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion. Roberson TM, Heymann HO. Art and science of operative dentistry, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2006; 245–79.
• 28. Tuna EB, Ozel E, Kasimoglu Y, Firatli E. Investigation of the Er: YAG laser and diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different flowable composites. Microsc Res Tech 2017;80:530-6.
• 29. Zanatta RF, Wiegand A, Dullin C, Borges AB, Torres CRG, Rizk M. Comparison of micro-CT and conventional dye penetration for microleakage assessment after different aging conditions. . Int J Adhes Adhes 2019;89:161-7.
• 30. Lee JH, Um CM, Lee IB. Rheological properties of resin composites according to varia- tions in monomer and filler composition. Dent Mater 2006;22:515–26.
• 31.El-Damanhoury H, Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related proper- ties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014;39:374–82.
• 32.Kumar GA, Shahina P, Kumar AM, Lalit L. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of bulk fill packable resin composite restorations and bulk fill flowable resin composite restoration in class v cavity preparation - an in vitro study. NRD. 2022;11:1-14.
• 33. Kuno Y, Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Junior CAK, Foxton RM. Incorporation of a hydrophilic amide monomer into a one-step self-etch adhesive to increase dentin bond strength: effect of application time. Dent Mater J 2019; 38(6) 892-9.
• 34. Ahmed MH, Yoshihara K, Mercelis B, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Quick bonding using a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Investig 2020;4: 2837-51.
• 35. Fathpour K, Bazazzade A, Mirmohammadi H. A comparative study of cervical composite restorations microleakage using dental universal bonding and two-step self-etch adhesive. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(9):1035-40.
• 36. Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 172-5.
• 37. Anil Kumar S., Varun Krishnan VP, Jyothi KN, Venugopal P, Sharath Kumar P. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of G-aenial Universal Flo, Smart Dentin Replacement and Tetric Evo Ceram bulk fill resin composite restorations in class v cavity preparation: an in-vitro study. Int Dent J Stud Res 2018;6:7-12.
• 38. Zhao XY, Li SB, Gu LJ, Li Y. Detection of marginal leakage of class V restorations in vitro by micro–computed tomography. Oper Dent. 2014;39:174–80.
• 39. Bin Shuwaish M, AlHussaini A, AlHudaithy L, AlDukhiel S, AlJamhan A, Alrahlah A. Efects of diferent antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk fll composite bonded to diferent tooth structures. BMC Oral Health. 2016;21(1):348.
• 40. Bouru MO, Taraboanta I, Stoleriu S, Andrian S, Pancu G, Nica I, Sufaru IG, Iovan G. The Influence of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Dentine Pre-Treatment on Adhesive Interface and Marginal Sealing. Medicana 2023;59(2):278.