Sosyal medya kullanıcılarına sağlanan All-on-4 dental implant sistemi hakkındaki bilgilerin yararlılığı

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, diş hekimliğinde sıklıkla tercih edilen All-on-4 dental implant sistemi hakkındaki bilgilerin yer aldığı YouTube™ videolarını inceleyerek bilgilerin yararlılığını ve içeriğini değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: ‘All-on-4 dental implant’ anahtar kelimeleriyle yapılan YouTube™ video taramasında ilk 150 video izlenerek değerlendirmeye alındı. Analiz kriterlerine uymayan 70 video değerlendirme dışı bırakılarak geriye kalan 80 videonun analizi yapıldı. Analizi yapılan tüm videoların bilgi içeriklerine göre 9 puan üzerinden yararlılık skorları belirlendi: 0-2 puan aralığındakiler yetersiz (kod 0), 3-5 puan aralığındakiler orta (kod 1) ve 6-9 puan aralığındakiler mükemmel (kod 2). Videoların süresi, izlenme sayısı, beğeni sayısı, beğenmeme sayısı ve yorum sayısı gibi demografik bilgileri kaydedildi. Tüm videolar yüklenme kaynağına (sağlık uzmanları, sağlık şirketi ve bilgilendirme web sitesi, bireysel kullanıcı) ve video tipine (hasta deneyimi, eğitsel) göre sınıflandırıldı. İstatistiksel analiz için Anova, Kruskal Wallis testi, ki-kare testi ve Pearson-Spearman testi kullanılarak anlamlılık düzeyi p<0.05 olarak belirlendi.

Bulgular: Videoların yararlılık skorları ortalaması 0.45 bulundu. Videoların yararlılık skorları ile demografik bilgileri karşılaştırıldığında sadece video süresi ile aralarında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu bulundu (p=0.002). Yararlılık skoruyla izlenme oranı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki yoktu (p=0.522). Video tipleri ile yararlılık skoru arasında anlamlı bir ilişki vardı ve bu anlamlılık eğitsel videolar lehineydi (p=0.022). Ayrıca etkileşim indeksi ile yükleme kaynağı arasında da anlamlı bir ilişki vardı ve bireysel kullanıcı lehineydi (p=0.008).

Sonuç: All-on-4 dental implant sistemi hakkındaki videoların yararlılığı kısıtlı bulunmuştur. Bu tür videoların konunun uzmanları tarafından denetlenmesi gerektiği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diş implantı
• diş protezi
• sosyal medya

The usefulness of information about All-on-4 dental implant system provided for social media users

Öz

Objective: To evaluate the content and usefulness of information by examining YouTube™ videos that contain information about the All-on-4 dental implant system, which is often preferred in dentistry.

Materials and Method: The first 150 YouTube™ videos listed using the search phrase “All-on-4 dental implant” were watched and evaluated. Based on the analysis criteria, 70 videos were excluded from further evaluation and the remaining 80 videos were analyzed. A 9-point “Usefulness” score was developed according to the information content of the analyzed videos, in which 0–2 was poor (code 0), 3–5 was moderate (code 1), and 6–9 was excellent (code 2). Demographic data of the videos, such as duration, number of views, likes and dislikes, and comments, were evaluated. All videos were categorized according to upload source (healthcare professionals, healthcare company, information website or individual users) and video type (patient experience or educational). For statistical analysis, Anova, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, and Pearson-Spearman tests were used and the significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results: The mean usefulness score of the videos was 0.45. In comparisons between usefulness score and demographic data of the videos, an association was found between the usefulness score and video duration (p=0.002), but not with viewing rate (p=0.522). Furthermore, we found a relationship between the usefulness score and video type, specifically with educational videos (p=0.022). There was also an association between the interaction index and upload source, which is individual users (p=0.008).

Conclusion: The usefulness of information in the videos about the All-on-4 dental implant system available on YouTube™ is of limited value. It is recommended that such videos are reviewed in advance by subject-matter professionals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dental implant
• dental prosthesis
• social media

Kaynakça

1. Giannobile WV, Lang NP. Are dental implants a panacea or should we better strive to save teeth? J Dent Res 2016;95:5-6.
2. Boven GC, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient's satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:220-33.
3. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Methods to treat the edentulous posterior maxilla: implants with sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:867-71.
4. Bhering CL, Mesquita MF, Kemmoku DT, Noritomi PY, Consani RL, Barão VA. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016;69:715-25.
5. Malhotra AO, Padmanabhan TV, Mohamed K, Natarajan S, Elavia U. Load transfer in tilted implants with varying cantilever lengths in an all-on-four situation. Aust Dent J 2012;57:440-5.
6. Baggi L, Pastore S, Di Girolamo M, Vairo G. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:9-21.
7. Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:836-55.
8. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75:511-6.

9. Malò P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:2–9.
10. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:88-94.
11. Saleh Saber F, Ghasemi S, Koodaryan R, Babaloo A, Abolfazli N. The comparison of stress distribution with different implant numbers and inclination angles in all-on-four and conventional methods in maxilla: a finite element analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2015;9:246-53.
12. Riordain RN, Hodgson T. Content and quality of website information on the treatment of oral ulcers. Br Dent J 2014;217:15.
13. Alexa 2020. The top 500 sites on the web. http://www.alexa.com/topsites. Accessed 25 March 2020.
14. Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens 2014;8:481-90.
15. Altan Şallı G, Egil E. Are YouTube videos useful as a source of information for oral care of leukemia patients? Quintessence Int 2020;51:78-85.
16. Hutchison CM, Cave V, Walshaw EG, Burns B, Park C. YouTube™ as a source for patient education about the management of dental avulsion injuries. Dent Traumatol 2020;36:207-11.
17. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTube™ as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2017;44:90-6.
18. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016;22:202-8.
19. Özdal Zincir Ö, Bozkurt AP, Gaş S. Potential patient education of YouTube videos related to wisdom tooth surgical removal. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:481-4.
20. Pasaoglu Bozkurt A, Gaş S, Özdal Zincir Ö. YouTube video analysis as a source of information for patients on impacted canine. Int Orthod 2019;17:769-75.
21. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:1776-83.
22. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Botto J. The all-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: a longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:565-77.
23. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Nunes M. The All-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: a longitudinal study with 5-13 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:538-49.
24. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75:511-6.
25. Aslan M. Maksillada açılı implantlar kullanılarak yapılan immediat yüklemenin kısa dönem sonuçları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2020;30:75-82.
26. Randeree E. Exploring technology impacts of Healthcare 2.0 initiatives. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:255-60.
27. Malo P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:310-20.
28. Agliardi EL, Pozzi A, Stappert CF, Benzi R, Romeo D, Gherlone E. Immediate fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: a prospective clinical and radiological study after 3 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:292-302.
29. Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTube™ video analysis. Angle Orthod 2018;88:208-14.
30. Strychowsky JE, Nayan S, Farrokhyar F, MacLean J. YouTube: a good source of information on pediatric tonsillectomy? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:972-5.