Temporomandibular eklem ağrısına ilişkin web sitelerinin kalite, güvenilirlik ve okunabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 1, 13 - 19, 03.01.2025

Selcen Eser Mısır , Perihan Dalgalı Evli , Kübra Gülnur Topsakal , Merve Kurun Aksoy

Öz

ÖZET
AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı temporomandibular eklem ağrısı hakkında bilgi veren web sitelerinin güvenilirliğini,kalitesini ve okunabilirliğini değerlendirmektir.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Google Chrome (Google, Mountain View, California, ABD) üzerinde 9 Haziran 2023 tarihinde “jaw pain” anahtar kelimeleri ile internet araması yapıldı
ve ilk 50 web sitesinin linkleri kaydedildi. Dahil edilme kriterlerini sağlayan 37 sitenin değerlendirilmesinde dört farklı değerlendirme aracı DISCERN aracı, Hastalar için Kaliteli Bilgi Sağlanması (EQIP) aracı, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) kriterleri, Readability Index kullanılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler için SPSS 25 istatistik yazılımı kullanıldı ve p<0.05 istatistiksel
olarak anlamlı kabul edildi.
BULGULAR: Çalışma kapsamında ilk 50 web sitesi kayıt altına alınmış ve toplam 37 web sitesi dahil edilme kriterlerine uygunluk göstermiş ve değerlendirilmiştir. DISCERN, EQIP ve JAMA indeksi için ortalama değerler sırasıyla 2.05±0.911, 62.4±11.6 ve 0.486±0.692 idi. Ayrıca, yüksek güvenilirliğe sahip olanlar toplam site sayısının %5,4’ünü (n=2) oluştururken, bu sitelerin %50’si (n=1)
özel hastaneler ve %50’si (n=1) bloglar (web günlükleri) tarafından yüklenmiştir.
SONUÇ: Bu çalışmanın bulgularına dayanarak, internette çene ağrısı ile ilgili bilgi veren sitelerin kalitesi, güvenilirliği ve okunabilirliğinin sonuçları farklılık göstermekle birlikte, orta-düşük düzeyde olduğu sonucuna varılabilir. Türk Ortodonti Derneği (TOD) gibi mesleki dernek ve kuruluşlar, kamuya açık çevrimiçi kaynaklardaki bilgilerin kalitesini ve güvenilirliğini sağlamak için benzer
araştırmalar yapabilir ve sonuçları yayınlayabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Halk sağlığı diş hekimliği, internet, sosyal medya, temporomandibular eklem ağrısı

Etik Beyan

halka açık platform kullanıldığından etik kurul gerekmemektedir

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Teşekkür

yok

Evaluation of the quality, reliability, readability of websites on temporomandibular joint pain

Öz

ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, quality, and readability of websites providing information on temporomandibular joint pain.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: An internet search was performed on Google Chrome (Google, Mountain View, California, USA) on June 9, 2023, with the keywords “jaw pain”
and the links of the first 50 websites were saved. Four different evaluation tools the DISCERN instrument, The Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP), the
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, Readability Index were used to evaluate 37 sites that met the inclusion criteria. SPSS 25 statistical
software was used for the statistical analyses and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Within the scope of the study, the first 50 websites were registered and a total of 37 websites met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. The mean
values for DISCERN, EQIP, and the JAMA index were 2.05±0.911, 62.4±11.6 and 0.486±0.692, respectively. In addition, those with high credibility constituted %5.4
(n=2) of the total number of sites and %50 (n=1) of these sites were uploaded by private hospitals, and %50 (n=1) by blogs (web logs).
CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that the quality, reliability and readability of websites providing information about jaw pain on the
internet vary but are at a medium-low level. Professional associations and organizations, such as the Turkish Orthodontic Society (TOD), may conduct similar research
and publish the results to ensure the quality and reliability of the information in publicly available online resources.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Temporomandibular joint, Internet, Readability, Quality, Reliability

Kaynakça

• Öztürk T. Üniversitelere ait internet web sitelerinin ortodonti hastaları için sağladığı bilgi kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2021;8:1-106.
• Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, et al. European citizens’ use of e-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 2007;7:53.
• Meredith P, Emberton M, Wood C. New directions in information for patients. BMJ 1995;311:4–5.
• Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on Youtube. PLoS One. 2013;8:824-69.
• Türp JC, Schmutzer G, Brähler E, Häuser W. Prevalence of selfreported jaw pain in Germany: Two cross-sectional surveys of the general German population. Clin Oral Invest 2016;20:1895-901.
• Chang WD, Lee CL, Lin HY, Hsu YC, Wang CJ, Lai PT. A meta-analysis of clinical effects of low-level laser therapy on temporomandibular joint pain. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;26:1297-300.
• Deste Gökay G, Görürgöz C, Doğanay Yıldız E. Temporomandibular disfonksiyon ile ilgili Türkçe YouTube™ videolarının içerik değerlendirilmesi: kesitsel çalışma. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dent Sci 2022;28:31-40.
• Fitzmaurice DA, Adams JL. A Systematic review of patient information leaflets for hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2000;14:259–62.
• Google Trends. Accessed June 9, 2023 https://trends.google.com. tr/trends/?geo=TR
• Akbulut AS. İnternet ortamındaki şeffaf plak tedavisi ile ilgili bilgilerin okunabilirlik analizi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniv Diş Hek Derg 2022;4:1-7
• Erişim tarihi: 01-06-2023, https://gs.statcounter.com/browsermarket-share/all/turkey/
• Olkun HK, Demirkaya AA. Evaluation of internet information about lingual orthodontics using DISCERN and JAMA tools. Turk J Orthod 2018;31:50-4.
• Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ video analysis. Angle Orthod 2018;88:208-14.
• Ateşman E. Measuring readability in Turkish. AU Tömer Dil Derg 1997;58:171-4.
• Moult B, Franck LS, Brady H. Ensuring quality information for patients: development and preliminary validation of a new instrument to improve the quality of written health care information. Health Expect 2004;7:165–75.
• Charvet-Berard AI, Chopard P, Perneger TV. Measuring quality of patient information documents with an expanded EQIP scale. Patient Educ Couns 2008;70:407-11.
• Vaona A, Marcon A, Rava M, Buzzetti R, Sartori M, Abbinante C, et al. Quality evaluation of JAMA patient pages on diabetes using the ensuring quality information for patient (EQIP) tool. Prim Care Diabetes 2011;5:257-63.
• Olkun HK, Demirkaya AA, Aras B. The quality of internet information on lingual orthodontics in the English language, with DISCERN and JAMA. J Orthod 2019;46:20-6.
• Canigur Bavbek N, Baloş Tuncer B. Information on the internet regarding orthognathic surgery in Turkey: Is it an adequate guide for potential patients? Turk J Orthod 2017;30:78-83.
• Kılınç DD, Sayar G. Assessment of reliability of YouTube videos on orthodontics. Turk J Orthod 2019;32:145-50.
• Paksoy T, Şen SC, Ustaoğlu G, Bulut DG. What do TikTok videos offer us about dental implant treatment? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023;124:101320.
• Cotugna N, Vickery CE, Carpenter-Haefele KM. Evaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in health-related journals. J Community Health 2005;30:213–9
• Melloul E, Raptis DA, Oberkofler CE, Dutkowski P, Lesurtel M, Clavien PA. Donor information for living donor liver transplantation: where can comprehensive information be found? Liver Transpl 2012;18:892-900.
• Palma AF, Zuk G, Raptis DA, Franck S, Eylert G, Frueh FS, et al. Quality of information for women seeking breast augmentation in the internet. Journal Plast Surg Hand Surg 2016;50:262-71.
• Sabaté RL, Diego L. Are we offering patients the right medicines information? a retrospective evaluation of readability and quality in online patient drug information. European J Hosp Pharm 2021;28:144-8.
• Vahabi M, Ferris L. Improving written patient education materials: a review of the evidence. Health Educ J 1995;54:99–106.
• Bernier MJ. Developing and evaluating printed education materials: a prescriptive model for quality. Orthop Nurs 1993;12:39–46.
• Arthur VAM. Written patient information: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 1995;21:1081–6.
• Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. Youtube for information on rheumatoid arthritis—a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39:899-903.
• Olkun HK., Olkun RS. Evaluation of the quality of information on the internet about 2019 coronavirus outbreak in relation to orthodontics. Health Technol 2021;11:437–41.
• Vaira LA, Sergnese S, Salzano G, Maglitto F, Arena A, Carraturo E, et al. Are YouTube videos a useful and reliable source of information for patients with temporomandibular joint disorders? J Clin Med 2023;12:817.
• Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu GA. Quality analysis of disc herniation videos on Youtube. World Neurosurg 2019;124:799-804.
• Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, Hamati F, LaPrade RF, Forsythe B, et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2019;27:109-14.