Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Polynomial based multi-criteria decision-making methods: Hermite and Legendre polynomials

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 1 , 639 - 650 , 31.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216
https://izlik.org/JA46XK64WR

Öz

This study aims to evaluate the applicability of newly developed MCDM models based on the integration of Hermite and Legendre polynomials into the decision process. By embedding orthogonal polynomial structures, the reliability of decision-making is enhanced, particularly in data environments with asymmetry, noise, and outliers. The proposed models, named Hermite MCDM and Legendre MCDM, were applied to data from 15 small ruminant farms in Kilis Province and compared with the classical VIKOR method. Up to the fifth degree, Hermite and Legendre polynomials were employed to construct decision matrices, where AHP-weighted criteria were normalized using polynomial functions. The resulting rankings were evaluated via Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Findings indicate that H_4 (x) and P_5 (x) yielded the highest similarity to VIKOR.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K., Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 58-191, 1981.
  • 2. Saaty T.L., The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • 3. Mardani A., Zavadskas E.K., Khalifah Z., Jusoh A., Nor K.M., Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature, Transport, 31 (3), 359-385, 2016.
  • 4. Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17 (2), 397-427, 2011.
  • 5. İç Y.T., Yıldırım S., Improvement of a product design using multi criteria decision making methods with taguchi method, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 27 (2), 447-458, 2012.
  • 6. Öztürk M., A hybrid approach for battery selection based on green criteria in electric vehicles: DEMATEL-QFD-interval type-2 fuzzy VIKOR, Sustainability, 17(14), 6277, 2025.
  • 7. Öztürk M., Torğul B., Paksoy T., interval type-2 fuzzy rule-based BWM approach for sustainable supplier selection, Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 10 (2), 312-336, 2022
  • 8. Korkusuz A.Y., inan U.H., Özdemir Y., Başlıgil H., Occupational health and safety performance measurement in healthcare sector using integrated multi criteria decision making methods, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 35 (1), 81-96, 2020.
  • 9. Cicciù B., Schramm F., Schramm V.B., Multi-criteria decision making/aid methods for assessing agricultural sustainability: a literature review, Environmental Science & Policy, 138, 85-96, 2022.
  • 10. Bhatia M., Williams A., Selection of criteria using MCDM techniques--an application in renewable energy, arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2303.17520, 2023.
  • 11. Mardani A., Jusoh A., Zavadskas E.K., Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–two decades review from 1994 to 2014, Expert Systems with Applications, 42 (8), 4126-4148, 2015.
  • 12. Triantaphyllou E., Multi-criteria decision making methods, Springer, 2000.
  • 13. Amor S.B., Belaid F., Benkraiem R., Ramdani B., Guesmi K., Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda, Annals of Operations Research, 325 (2), 771-793, 2023.
  • 14. Greco S., Figueira J., Ehrgott M., Multiple criteria decision analysis, Springer, 2016.
  • 15. Sandu A., Diaconu P., Delcea C., Domenteanu A., Emphasizing grey systems contribution to decision-making field under uncertainty: a global bibliometric exploration, Mathematics, 13 (8), 1278, 2025.
  • 16. Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Kildienė S., State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20 (1), 165-179, 2014.
  • 17. Öztürk M., Equipment supplier selection for sustainable hydrogen production: a group decision-making supported spherical fuzzy TOPSIS approach, Sustainability, 18 (4), 1737, 2026.
  • 18. Alturk A., Atalar M.K., An application of generating function for Hermite polynomials, Maejo international Journal of Science and Technology, 18 (3), 211-222, 2024.
  • 19. Wani S.A., Riyasat M., Khan S., Ramírez W., Certain advancements in multidimensional q-Hermite polynomials, Reports on Mathematical Physics, 94 (1), 117-141, 2024.
  • 20. Gautschi W., Orthogonal polynomials: computation and approximation, OUP Oxford, 2004.
  • 21. Martínez-Finkelshtein A., Morales R., Perales D., Zeros of generalized hypergeometric polynomials via finite free convolution: applications to multiple orthogonality, Constructive Approximation, 1-70, 2025.
  • 22. Sayal A., Jha J., Chaithra N., Nithin A., Shankar B., Gupta A., Orthogonal polynomials and their engineering applications, international Conference On Business Data Analytics, 169-186, 2023.
  • 23. Sani U., Emmanuel A.Y., Comparative analysis of least squares approximation using shifted Legendre and Hermite polynomials, Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 10 (4b), 193-203, 2024.
  • 24. Ismail, M. E., & Masson, D. R., Generalized orthogonality and continued fractions. Journal of approximation theory, 83 (1), 1-40, 1995.
  • 25. Lima F.M., Lecture notes on Legendre polynomials: their origin and main properties, arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2210.10942, 2022.
  • 26. Wang L., Guo C., Xu F., Xiao H., Hybrid uncertainty propagation for mechanical dynamics problems via polynomial chaos expansion and Legendre interval inclusion function, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 223, 111826, 2025.
  • 27. Liu F., Wang J., Fluctuation prediction of stock market index by Legendre neural network with random time strength function, Neurocomputing, 83, 12-21, 2012.
  • 28. Mohanty S., Dash R., Neural network-based bitcoin pricing using a new mutated climb monkey algorithm with TOPSIS analysis for sustainable development, Mathematics, 10 (22), 4370, 2022.
  • 29. Mohanty S., Dash R., A new dual normalization for enhancing the bitcoin pricing capability of an optimized low complexity neural net with TOPSIS evaluation, Mathematics, 11 (5), 1134, 2023.
  • 30. Ehrgott M., Klamroth K., Schwehm C., An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization, European Journal of Operational Research, 155 (3), 752-770, 2004.
  • 31. Kazem S., Hadinejad F., PROMETHEE technique to select the best radial basis functions for solving the 2-dimensional heat equations based on Hermite interpolation, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 50, 29-38, 2015.
  • 32. Hadinejad F., Kazem S., MQ-radial basis functions center nodes selection with PROMETHEE technique, Control and Optimization in Applied Mathematics, 3 (2), 27-47, 2018.
  • 33. Cıvalek Ö., Korkmaz K.A., Altunsoy F.B., Polinomal diferansiyel quadrature (PDQ) metodu ile dikdörtgen plakların statik, dinamik ve burkulma hesabı, SDU international Journal of Technological Sciences, 1 (2), 2009.
  • 34. Kozlu B., Kuru B., Yilmaz M., Güncel global jeopotansiyel modellerin farklı topografik özellikler gösteren bölgelerde Türkiye jeoid modeli-2020 (TG-20)’ye göre değerlendirilmesi, Geomatik, 10 (3), 351-363, 2025.
  • 35. Niu C., Ma H., An operator splitting Legendre-tau spectral method for Maxwell’s equations with nonlinear conductivity in two dimensions, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 437, 115499, 2024.
  • 36. Mohammed H.F., Mohammed O.H., A hybrid technique for solving fractional delay variational problems by the shifted Legendre polynomials, Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics, 9, 100635, 2024.
  • 37. Xu Z., Liu C., Liang T., Tempered fractional neural grey system model with Hermite orthogonal polynomial, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 123, 403-414, 2025.
  • 38. Polat Y., Süzülmüş S., Küçükbaş hayvan işletmelerinin hayvan refahı açısından analitik hiyerarşi süreci ve VIKOR yöntemleriyle değerlendirilmesi: Kilis ili örneği, İksad Yayınevi, 245-267, 2022.
  • 39. Bartussek H., Leeb C., Held S., Animal needs index for cattle (ANI 35 L/2000-cattle), Federal Research institute For Agriculture in Alpine Regions, 2000.
  • 40. Meşe M., Karakuş F., Van ili Edremit ilçesi küçükbaş hayvancılık işletmelerinin refah açısından değerlendirilmesi, Hayvansal Üretim, 60 (2), 97-104, 2019.
  • 41. Uzel E., Hermite polinomları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya, 2008.
  • 42. Çoban C., Hermite ve Laguerre genişlemeleri için poisson integrallerinin yakınsama hızı ve Voronovskaya teoremi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kırıkkale 2018.
  • 43. Düşünceli F., Çelik E., Numerical solution for high-order linear complex differential equations by Hermite polynomials, Iğdır University Journal of The institute of Science and Technology, 7, 189-201, 2017.
  • 44. Wang X., Jiang Y.L., An efficient hybrid reduction method for time-delay systems using Hermite expansions, International Journal of Control, 92 (5), 1033-1043, 2019.
  • 45. Akacan E., Important relations of classical orthogonal polynomials, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eastern Mediterranean University, nstitute of Graduate Studies and Research, Kıbrıs, 2020.
  • 46. Kılar N., On computational formulas for parametric type polynomials and its applications, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25 (1), 13-30, 2023.
  • 47. Cesarano C., Ramírez W., Khan S., A new class of degenerate Apostol-type Hermite polynomials and applications, Dolomites Research Notes on Approximation, 15 (1), 2022.
  • 48. Dominici, D., Asymptotic analysis of the Hermite polynomials from their differential–difference equation. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 13 (12), 1115-1128, 2007.
  • 49. Polat Y., Hermite polinomlarına dayalı çok kriterli karar verme: yeni bir model önerisi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 32 (4), 781-804, 2025.
  • 50. Polat Y., Hermite ve Laguerre polinomlarına dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: yenilikçi bir yaklaşım, Verimlilik Dergisi, 60 (1), 249-264, 2026.
  • 51. Abramowitz M., Stegun I.A., Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Courier Corporation, 55, 9-64,1965.
  • 52. Dattoli G., Ricci P.E., Cesarano C., A note on Legendre polynomials, international Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2 (4), 365-370, 2001.
  • 53. Abd-Elhameed W.M., Al-Sady A.M., Some orthogonal combinations of Legendre polynomials, Contemporary Mathematics, 1522-1551, 2024.
  • 54. McCarthy P.C., Sayre J.E., Shawyer B.L.R., Generalized Legendre polynomials, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 177 (2), 530-537, 1993.
  • 55. Platte, R. B., Trefethen, L. N., & Kuijlaars, A. B., Impossibility of fast stable approximation of analytic functions from equispaced samples. SIAM review, 53 (2), 308-318, 2011.
  • 56. Hocaoğlu M.F., Tosun E., Consensus among multi-criteria decision-making methods: Using methods as a voter, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 40 (1), 103-120, 2025.

Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 1 , 639 - 650 , 31.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216
https://izlik.org/JA46XK64WR

Öz

Bu çalışma, ÇKKV sürecine Hermite ve Legendre polinomlarının entegrasyonu ile geliştirilen yeni karar modellerinin uygulanabilirliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ortogonal polinomların karar modellerine entegrasyonu sayesinde, özellikle asimetrik, gürültülü ve uç değer içeren veri yapılarında karar verme güvenilirliğinin artırılması hedeflenmiştir. Kilis ilinde faaliyet gösteren 15 küçükbaş hayvan işletmesine ait veriler kullanılarak geliştirilen Hermite ÇKKV ve Legendre ÇKKV modelleri, klasik bir yöntem olan VIKOR ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Uygulamada, beşinci dereceye kadar Hermite ve Legendre polinomları kullanılarak karar matrisleri oluşturulmuş, AHP ile ağırlıklandırılmış kriterler polinom fonksiyonlarıyla normalize edilmiştir. Sıralama sonuçları Spearman sıralama korelasyon katsayısı ile VIKOR yöntemiyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular, özellikle H_4 (x) ve P_5 (x) polinomlarının VIKOR ile yüksek düzeyde uyum gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K., Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 58-191, 1981.
  • 2. Saaty T.L., The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • 3. Mardani A., Zavadskas E.K., Khalifah Z., Jusoh A., Nor K.M., Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature, Transport, 31 (3), 359-385, 2016.
  • 4. Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17 (2), 397-427, 2011.
  • 5. İç Y.T., Yıldırım S., Improvement of a product design using multi criteria decision making methods with taguchi method, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 27 (2), 447-458, 2012.
  • 6. Öztürk M., A hybrid approach for battery selection based on green criteria in electric vehicles: DEMATEL-QFD-interval type-2 fuzzy VIKOR, Sustainability, 17(14), 6277, 2025.
  • 7. Öztürk M., Torğul B., Paksoy T., interval type-2 fuzzy rule-based BWM approach for sustainable supplier selection, Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 10 (2), 312-336, 2022
  • 8. Korkusuz A.Y., inan U.H., Özdemir Y., Başlıgil H., Occupational health and safety performance measurement in healthcare sector using integrated multi criteria decision making methods, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 35 (1), 81-96, 2020.
  • 9. Cicciù B., Schramm F., Schramm V.B., Multi-criteria decision making/aid methods for assessing agricultural sustainability: a literature review, Environmental Science & Policy, 138, 85-96, 2022.
  • 10. Bhatia M., Williams A., Selection of criteria using MCDM techniques--an application in renewable energy, arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2303.17520, 2023.
  • 11. Mardani A., Jusoh A., Zavadskas E.K., Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–two decades review from 1994 to 2014, Expert Systems with Applications, 42 (8), 4126-4148, 2015.
  • 12. Triantaphyllou E., Multi-criteria decision making methods, Springer, 2000.
  • 13. Amor S.B., Belaid F., Benkraiem R., Ramdani B., Guesmi K., Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda, Annals of Operations Research, 325 (2), 771-793, 2023.
  • 14. Greco S., Figueira J., Ehrgott M., Multiple criteria decision analysis, Springer, 2016.
  • 15. Sandu A., Diaconu P., Delcea C., Domenteanu A., Emphasizing grey systems contribution to decision-making field under uncertainty: a global bibliometric exploration, Mathematics, 13 (8), 1278, 2025.
  • 16. Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Kildienė S., State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20 (1), 165-179, 2014.
  • 17. Öztürk M., Equipment supplier selection for sustainable hydrogen production: a group decision-making supported spherical fuzzy TOPSIS approach, Sustainability, 18 (4), 1737, 2026.
  • 18. Alturk A., Atalar M.K., An application of generating function for Hermite polynomials, Maejo international Journal of Science and Technology, 18 (3), 211-222, 2024.
  • 19. Wani S.A., Riyasat M., Khan S., Ramírez W., Certain advancements in multidimensional q-Hermite polynomials, Reports on Mathematical Physics, 94 (1), 117-141, 2024.
  • 20. Gautschi W., Orthogonal polynomials: computation and approximation, OUP Oxford, 2004.
  • 21. Martínez-Finkelshtein A., Morales R., Perales D., Zeros of generalized hypergeometric polynomials via finite free convolution: applications to multiple orthogonality, Constructive Approximation, 1-70, 2025.
  • 22. Sayal A., Jha J., Chaithra N., Nithin A., Shankar B., Gupta A., Orthogonal polynomials and their engineering applications, international Conference On Business Data Analytics, 169-186, 2023.
  • 23. Sani U., Emmanuel A.Y., Comparative analysis of least squares approximation using shifted Legendre and Hermite polynomials, Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 10 (4b), 193-203, 2024.
  • 24. Ismail, M. E., & Masson, D. R., Generalized orthogonality and continued fractions. Journal of approximation theory, 83 (1), 1-40, 1995.
  • 25. Lima F.M., Lecture notes on Legendre polynomials: their origin and main properties, arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2210.10942, 2022.
  • 26. Wang L., Guo C., Xu F., Xiao H., Hybrid uncertainty propagation for mechanical dynamics problems via polynomial chaos expansion and Legendre interval inclusion function, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 223, 111826, 2025.
  • 27. Liu F., Wang J., Fluctuation prediction of stock market index by Legendre neural network with random time strength function, Neurocomputing, 83, 12-21, 2012.
  • 28. Mohanty S., Dash R., Neural network-based bitcoin pricing using a new mutated climb monkey algorithm with TOPSIS analysis for sustainable development, Mathematics, 10 (22), 4370, 2022.
  • 29. Mohanty S., Dash R., A new dual normalization for enhancing the bitcoin pricing capability of an optimized low complexity neural net with TOPSIS evaluation, Mathematics, 11 (5), 1134, 2023.
  • 30. Ehrgott M., Klamroth K., Schwehm C., An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization, European Journal of Operational Research, 155 (3), 752-770, 2004.
  • 31. Kazem S., Hadinejad F., PROMETHEE technique to select the best radial basis functions for solving the 2-dimensional heat equations based on Hermite interpolation, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 50, 29-38, 2015.
  • 32. Hadinejad F., Kazem S., MQ-radial basis functions center nodes selection with PROMETHEE technique, Control and Optimization in Applied Mathematics, 3 (2), 27-47, 2018.
  • 33. Cıvalek Ö., Korkmaz K.A., Altunsoy F.B., Polinomal diferansiyel quadrature (PDQ) metodu ile dikdörtgen plakların statik, dinamik ve burkulma hesabı, SDU international Journal of Technological Sciences, 1 (2), 2009.
  • 34. Kozlu B., Kuru B., Yilmaz M., Güncel global jeopotansiyel modellerin farklı topografik özellikler gösteren bölgelerde Türkiye jeoid modeli-2020 (TG-20)’ye göre değerlendirilmesi, Geomatik, 10 (3), 351-363, 2025.
  • 35. Niu C., Ma H., An operator splitting Legendre-tau spectral method for Maxwell’s equations with nonlinear conductivity in two dimensions, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 437, 115499, 2024.
  • 36. Mohammed H.F., Mohammed O.H., A hybrid technique for solving fractional delay variational problems by the shifted Legendre polynomials, Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics, 9, 100635, 2024.
  • 37. Xu Z., Liu C., Liang T., Tempered fractional neural grey system model with Hermite orthogonal polynomial, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 123, 403-414, 2025.
  • 38. Polat Y., Süzülmüş S., Küçükbaş hayvan işletmelerinin hayvan refahı açısından analitik hiyerarşi süreci ve VIKOR yöntemleriyle değerlendirilmesi: Kilis ili örneği, İksad Yayınevi, 245-267, 2022.
  • 39. Bartussek H., Leeb C., Held S., Animal needs index for cattle (ANI 35 L/2000-cattle), Federal Research institute For Agriculture in Alpine Regions, 2000.
  • 40. Meşe M., Karakuş F., Van ili Edremit ilçesi küçükbaş hayvancılık işletmelerinin refah açısından değerlendirilmesi, Hayvansal Üretim, 60 (2), 97-104, 2019.
  • 41. Uzel E., Hermite polinomları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya, 2008.
  • 42. Çoban C., Hermite ve Laguerre genişlemeleri için poisson integrallerinin yakınsama hızı ve Voronovskaya teoremi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kırıkkale 2018.
  • 43. Düşünceli F., Çelik E., Numerical solution for high-order linear complex differential equations by Hermite polynomials, Iğdır University Journal of The institute of Science and Technology, 7, 189-201, 2017.
  • 44. Wang X., Jiang Y.L., An efficient hybrid reduction method for time-delay systems using Hermite expansions, International Journal of Control, 92 (5), 1033-1043, 2019.
  • 45. Akacan E., Important relations of classical orthogonal polynomials, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eastern Mediterranean University, nstitute of Graduate Studies and Research, Kıbrıs, 2020.
  • 46. Kılar N., On computational formulas for parametric type polynomials and its applications, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25 (1), 13-30, 2023.
  • 47. Cesarano C., Ramírez W., Khan S., A new class of degenerate Apostol-type Hermite polynomials and applications, Dolomites Research Notes on Approximation, 15 (1), 2022.
  • 48. Dominici, D., Asymptotic analysis of the Hermite polynomials from their differential–difference equation. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 13 (12), 1115-1128, 2007.
  • 49. Polat Y., Hermite polinomlarına dayalı çok kriterli karar verme: yeni bir model önerisi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 32 (4), 781-804, 2025.
  • 50. Polat Y., Hermite ve Laguerre polinomlarına dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: yenilikçi bir yaklaşım, Verimlilik Dergisi, 60 (1), 249-264, 2026.
  • 51. Abramowitz M., Stegun I.A., Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Courier Corporation, 55, 9-64,1965.
  • 52. Dattoli G., Ricci P.E., Cesarano C., A note on Legendre polynomials, international Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2 (4), 365-370, 2001.
  • 53. Abd-Elhameed W.M., Al-Sady A.M., Some orthogonal combinations of Legendre polynomials, Contemporary Mathematics, 1522-1551, 2024.
  • 54. McCarthy P.C., Sayre J.E., Shawyer B.L.R., Generalized Legendre polynomials, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 177 (2), 530-537, 1993.
  • 55. Platte, R. B., Trefethen, L. N., & Kuijlaars, A. B., Impossibility of fast stable approximation of analytic functions from equispaced samples. SIAM review, 53 (2), 308-318, 2011.
  • 56. Hocaoğlu M.F., Tosun E., Consensus among multi-criteria decision-making methods: Using methods as a voter, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 40 (1), 103-120, 2025.
Toplam 56 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Yadigar Polat 0000-0001-5603-2149

Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Temmuz 2025
Kabul Tarihi 28 Ocak 2026
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mart 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216
IZ https://izlik.org/JA46XK64WR
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2026 Cilt: 41 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Polat, Y. (2026). Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(1), 639-650. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216
AMA 1.Polat Y. Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları. GUMMFD. 2026;41(1):639-650. doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216
Chicago Polat, Yadigar. 2026. “Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları”. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 41 (1): 639-50. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216.
EndNote Polat Y (01 Mart 2026) Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 41 1 639–650.
IEEE [1]Y. Polat, “Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları”, GUMMFD, c. 41, sy 1, ss. 639–650, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216.
ISNAD Polat, Yadigar. “Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları”. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 41/1 (01 Mart 2026): 639-650. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216.
JAMA 1.Polat Y. Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları. GUMMFD. 2026;41:639–650.
MLA Polat, Yadigar. “Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları”. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 41, sy 1, Mart 2026, ss. 639-50, doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216.
Vancouver 1.Yadigar Polat. Polinomlara dayalı çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri: Hermite ve Legendre polinomları. GUMMFD. 01 Mart 2026;41(1):639-50. doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.1738216