ANKARA’DA ULAŞIM TÜRLERİNİN ENERJİ KULLANIMI VE MEKANSAL YAPIYA ETKİLERİ

Öz

Ulaşım türlerinin gelişimi ve mekansal yapıların gelişimi sürekli birbirleriyle ve nüfus ile etkileşim halindedir. Bu faktörleri şekillendiren faktörler, farklı coğrafyalara bağlı olarak farklılıklar göstermektedirler. Bu çalışmada, Ankara örneğinde, ulaşım türlerinin enerji tüketimlerine göre bir karşılaştırması ortaya konarak, mekansal yapıdaki değişimlerin bir değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ankara, ulaşım türleri, enerji, mekansal yapı.

Kaynakça

1. Knoflacher, H., “Wechselbeziehungen zwischen
2. Raumplanung, Verkehr und Energie”, SIRMitteilungen
3. und Berichte, Band 26, pp.17-21,
4. -
5. Yildiz, E.V.,”Interaction of Spatial Structures and
6. Energy for Mobility”, World Congress on
7. Transport Research-2004, Istanbul, Turkey,
8. -

9. Knoflacher, H. and T. Macoun., Ökologie und
10. Strassenverkehr, Reports UBA-89-035,
11. Umweltbundesamt, Wien, 1989.
12. Würdemann, G., “Handlungsfelder der
13. räumlichen Planung für eine lebenswerte und
14. verkehrssparsame Stadt und Region”,
15. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, Heft 6,
16. pp.351-368, 1998.
17. WCED, Our Common Future (Brundtland
18. Report), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
19. Newman, P. and J. Kenworthy, Sustainability
20. and Cities Overcoming Automobile
21. Dependence, Island Press, Washington,DC,1999.
22. OECD-EMCT, Urban Travel and Sustainable
23. Development, France,1995.
24. Frehn, M., “Verkehrsvermeidung durch
25. wohnungsnahe Infrastruktur”, Raumforschung
26. und Raumordnung, Heft 2, pp. 102- 111, 1995.
27. Sieber, N., “Vermeidung von Personenverkehr
28. durch veränderte Siedlungsstrukturen”,
29. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Heft 2,
30. pp. 94-101, 1995.
31. DİE, Genel Nüfus Sayımı, Ankara,1997.
32. Altaban, Ö., “Cumhuriyetin Kent Planlama
33. Politikalari ve Ankara Deneyimi”, 75 Yılda
34. Degisen Kent ve Mimarlik, Tarih Vakfi
35. Yayinlari, Istanbul, 1998.
36. Yildiz, E.V., The Analysis of the Development
37. of Spatial Structures Mobility in Ankara,
38. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria, 2003.
39. Tekeli, I., "Kent Ici Yolcu Tasima Hizmetlerinin
40. Örgütlenmesinin Gelisimi", Ankara 1985'den
41. 'e (Ankara from 1985 to 2015), EGO, s.
42. -71, Ankara,Turkey, 1987.
43. ABB (Ankara Greater City Municipality),
44. Ankara Traffic and Transportation
45. Improvements Study, Mass Transportation,
46. Ankara, 1998.
47. EGO (Ankara Greater City Municipality, EGO
48. General Directorate), Ankara Urban
49. Transportation Studies-1992, Ankara, 1995.
50. EGO (Ankara Greater City Municipality, EGO
51. General Directorate), EGO Passenger
52. Transportation 1999, UPRSD-32, Ankara,
53. -
54. Schnabel, W. and D. Lohse, Grundlagen der
55. Strassenverkehrstechnik und der
56. Verkehrsplanung, Band 1, 2.Auflage, Verlag für
57. Bauwesen, Berlin, 1997.
58. Macoun, T., Wien auf Solaren Pfaden-
59. Potentiale Erneuerbarer Energien im
60. Verkehrssektor des Raumes Wien- Stoffflüsse
61. und deren Steuerungspotentiale, Diplomarbeit,
62. TU-Wien, 1998.
63. EGO (Ankara Greater City Municipality, EGO
64. General Directorate), Transportation Survey,
65. Home Interview Survey, Ankara Urban
66. Transportation Study, vol.2, Ankara, 1987.
67. EGO (Ankara Greater City Municipality, EGO
68. General Directorate), Ankara Transportation
69. Household Survey-1992, Ankara, 1995.
70. Nijkamp, P., “Reflections on Gravity and Entropy
71. Models”, Regional Science and Urban
72. Economics 5, pp. 203-225, 1975.
73. Testa, B. and L.B. Kier, “Emergence and
74. Dissolvence in the Self-organisation of Complex
75. Systems”, Entropy 2, pp.1-25, 2000.
76. Mossello, M.T., “The Possibilities and Limits of
77. Self-Organisation”, The City and Its Sciences,
78. ed: Bertuglia,C.S; Bianchi, G.; Mela,A., Physica
79. Verl.,Germany, 1998.
80. Camagni, R., “Beyond Complexity in Urban
81. Development Studies”, The City and Its
82. Sciences, ed: Bertuglia,C.S; Bianchi, G.;
83. Mela,A., Physica Verl.,Germany, 1998.
84. Owens, S., “Integrating Urban Transport and
85. Land Use Planning Policies”, Sustainable
86. Transport in Central and Eastern European
87. Cities-Proceedings of the Workshop on Transport
88. and Environment in Central and Eastern
89. European Cities, ECMT-OECD, Bucharest,
90. Romania, 1995