GELENEKSEL WEB TABANLI ÖĞRETİM SİSTEMLERİNDEN UYARLANIR ÖĞRETİM SİSTEMİNE GEÇİŞ: UHÖS İÇİN TASARIM YAKLAŞIMLARININ İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Geleneksel bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemleri kullanıcıların bireysel farklılıklarını dikkate almaksızın tüm kullanıcılar için aynı öğretim stratejisini kullanarak statik sayfalardan oluşan öğretim materyalini öğrencilere sunmaktadırlar. Bu durum, bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemlerinin sınıf ortamında gerçekleştirilen yüz-yüze öğretim yöntemine alternatif olamadığı gibi, öğretim etkinliği açısından kabul edilebilir bir kazanımın sağlanamamasına sebep olmaktadır. Bu makalede, bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemlerinde öğrenim verimliliğini üst düzeye çıkartan, geleneksel sistemlerden tamamen farklı bir mimari yapıya ve tasarım yaklaşımına sahip Uyarlanır Hipermedya Öğretim Sistemi (UHÖS) incelenmektedir. Çalışmada genel bir UHÖS mimarisi verilmiştir. UHÖS’ün merkezi bileşeni olan öğrenci modelinin oluşturulması ve bu model içerisinde kullanıcının bilgi alanı hakkındaki bilgi düzeyinin tespit edilmesi örnek bir uygulama ile açıklanmıştır. UHÖS'ün geleneksel sistemlere göre üstünlükleri sunulmuş ve mevcut çalışmalar değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uyarlanır hipermedya öğretim sistemi, bilgisayar destekli öğretim sistemi, kullanıcı modelleme, bilgi alanı modelleme, uyarlama modeli

Kaynakça

1. Brusilovsky, P., “Adaptive navigation support in
2. educational hypermedia: the role of student
3. knowledge level and the case for metaadaptation”,
4. British Journal of Educational
5. Technology”, Vol. 34, No 4, 487–497, (2003).
6. Anderson, J. R., “The Expert Module”,
7. Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems,
8. -53, (1988).

9. Kavcic, A., "Fuzzy User Modeling for Adaptation
10. in Educational Hypermedia", IEEE
11. Transactions on Systems, Applications and
12. Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 4, (2004).
13. Cao, L., “Designing Web-Based Adaptive
14. Learning Environment: Distils as an Example”,
15. Ph. D. Thesis Faculty of New Jersey Institute of
16. Technology, (2001).
17. Rubim de Assis, A. S. F, “Inferring Dynamic
18. Learner Behavior for User Modeling in
19. Continuously Adapting Hypermedia”, Ph. D.
20. Thesis Faculty of Rensselaer Polytechnic
21. Institute Troy, New York, (2006).
22. Brusilovsky, P., “Developing adaptive
23. educational hypermedia systems: from design
24. models to authoring tools”, School of
25. Information Sciences University of Pittsburgh
26. Pittsburgh PA 15260, (2003).
27. Kahraman, H. T., Colak, I., Sagiroglu, S., “A
28. Web Based Adaptive Educational System”, Sixth
29. International Conference on Machine Learning
30. and Applications, IEEE computer society, 286-
31. , (2007).
32. Brusilovsky, P., “Hypadapter: An Adaptive
33. Hypertext System for Exploratory Learning and
34. Programming”, Adaptive Hypertext and
35. Hypermedia, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 117-
36. , (1996).
37. Ihsak, Z., Arshad M. M. R., Sumari P., “Adaptive
38. Hypermedia System in Education (review of
39. available technologies)”, IEEE ICICS-PCM
40. Singapore, 15-18, (2003).
41. Fan, J. P., Macredie. R. D., “Gender Differences
42. and Hypermedia Navigation: Principles for
43. Adaptive Hypermedia Learning Systems”,
44. Advances in Web-Based Education:
45. Personalized Learning Environments Chapter
46. , Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science
47. Publishing, 1-21, (2005).
48. De Bra, P., Houben, G. J., and Wu, H., “AHAM: A
49. Dexter-based reference model for adaptive
50. hypermedia applications”, Proceedings of the 10th
51. ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia
52. New York: ACM Press, 147–156, (1999).
53. Halasz, F. G., Schwartz, M., “The Dexter Hypertext
54. Reference Model”, NIST Hypertext Standardization
55. Workshop Gaithersburg, 1-40, (1990).
56. Brusilovsky, P., “Methods and techniques of
57. adaptive hypermedia” User Modeling and User
58. Adapted Interaction, 87-129, (1996).
59. Brusilovsky, P., “User Modeling and User-Adapted
60. Interaction”, Adaptive Hypermedia, 11, (2001).
61. Karampiperis, P., Sampson, D., “Adaptive
62. Resources Sequencing in Educational
63. Hypermedia Systems”, Educational Technology
64. and Society, 128-147, (2005).
65. Çolak, İ., Sagiroglu, S., Kahraman, H. T.,
66. “Architecture of Web Based Adaptive
67. Educational Hypermedia System”, Second
68. International Conference on Innovations in
69. Learning for the Future 2008 e-Learning, 358-
70. , (2008).
71. Armani. J., Botturi. L., “Bridging the Gap with
72. MAID: A Method for Adaptive Instructional
73. Design”, Advances in Web-Based Education:
74. Personalized Learning Environments, Hershey,
75. PA, USA: Information Science Publishing,
76. -178, (2005).
77. Magoulas, G. D., Papanikolaou, K. A.,
78. Grigoriadou, M., “Neuro-fuzzy Synergism for
79. PlNNing the Content in a Web-based Course”,
80. Informatics 25, 39-48, (2001).
81. Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis,
82. H., Magoulas, G. D., “Personalizing the
83. Interaction in a Web-based Educational
84. Hypermedia System: the case of INSPIRE”,
85. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction,
86. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 213-267, (2003).
87. Castillo, G., Gama, J., Breda, A. M., “An
88. Adaptive Predictive Model for Student
89. Modelling”,Advances in Web-Based Education:
90. Personalized Learning Environments, Hershey,
91. PA, USA: Information Science Publishing, 70-
92. , (2005).
93. Henze, N., Naceur, K., Nejdl, W., Wolpers, M.,
94. “Adaptive hyperbooks for constructivist
95. teaching”, Künstliche Intelligenz, (4), (1999).
96. Hockemeyer, C., Held, T., & Albert, D., RATH -
97. "A relational adaptive tutoring hypertext WWWenvironment
98. based on knowledge space theory”,
99. Proceedings of CALISCE'98, 4th International
100. conference on Computer Aided Learning and Instruction in Science and Engineering, June
101. -17, (1998).
102. NeumNN, G., & Zirvas, J., SKILL - A scalable
103. internet-based teaching and learning system. In
104. H. Maurer, & R. G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of
105. WebNet'98, World Conference of the WWW,
106. Internet, and Intranet, November 7-12, (1998).
107. Weber, G., Kuhl, H.-C., & Weibelzahl, S.,
108. “Developing adaptive internet based courses
109. with the authoring system NetCoach”
110. Proceedings of Third workshop on Adaptive
111. Hypertext and Hypermedia, July 35-48, (2001).
112. Pilar da Silva, D., Durm, R. V., Duval, E., &
113. Olivié, H., “Concepts and documents for
114. adaptive educational hypermedia: a model and a
115. prototype”, Computing Science Reports,
116. Eindhoven University of Technology, 35-43.
117. (1998).
118. De Bra, P., & Ruiter, J.-P., “AHA! Adaptive
119. hypermedia for all”, Proceedings of
120. WebNet'2001, World Conference of the WWW
121. and Internet, 262-268, (2001).
122. Vassileva, J., “DCG + GTE: Dynamic Courseware
123. Generation with Teaching Expertise”, Instructional
124. Science, 317-332, (1998).
125. Kelly, D., Tangney, B., “ ‘First Aid for You’:
126. Getting to know your Learning Style using
127. Machine Learning”, Proceedings of the Fifth
128. IEEE International Conference on Advanced
129. Learning Technologies (ICALT’05), (2005).
130. Martinez, F. E., Chen, S.Y., Liu, X., “Survey of
131. Data Mining Approaches to User Modeling for
132. Adaptive Hypermedia”, IEEE Transactions On
133. Systems, Applications And Reviews, Vol. 36,
134. No.6, 734-749, (2006).
135. Martinez, F. E., Magoulas, G., Chen, S.,
136. Macredie, R., “Modeling human behavior in
137. user-adapted systems: Recent advances using
138. soft computing techniques”, Expert Systems with
139. Applications ELSEVIER, 320-329, (2005).
140. Lee, C-S., Singh, Y. P., “Student modeling using
141. principal component analysis of SOM clusters”,
142. Proceedings of the IEEE International
143. Conference on Advanced Learning
144. Technologies (ICALT’04), 480-484, (2004).
145. Nykanen, O., “Inducing Fuzzy Models for
146. Student Classification”, Educational
147. Technology & Society, 223-234, (2006).
148. Wenger, E., "Artificial intelligence and tutoring
149. systems", Computational approaches to the
150. communication of knowledge, ACM SIGCHI
151. Bulletin, 71-73, (1988).
152. Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J., Schwarz, E., “Webbased
153. Education for All: A Tool for
154. Development Adaptive Courseware”, Computer
155. Networks and ISDN Systems, Proceedings of
156. Seventh International World Wide Web
157. Conference, 291-300, (1998).
158. De Bra, P., Aerts, A., Berden, B., de Lange, B.,
159. Rousseau, B., Santic, T., Smits, D., Stash, N.,
160. “AHA! The Adaptive Hypermedia Architecture”,
161. HT’03, Nottingham, United Kingdom, ACM 1-
162. -704-4/03/0008, 1-4, (2003).
163. Brusilovsky, P., Anderson, J., "An adaptive
164. system for learning cognitive psychology on the
165. Web", Proceedings of WebNet'98, World
166. Conference of the WWW, Internet, and
167. Intranet, 92-97, (1998).
168. Millan, E., De-La-Cruz, J. L. P., “A Bayesian
169. Diagnostic Algorithm for Modeling and its
170. Evaluation”, User Modeling and User Adapted
171. Interaction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 281-
172. , (2002).
173. Castillo, G., Gama, J., & Medas, P., "Adaptation
174. to drifting concepts", Progress in Artificial
175. Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial
176. Intelligence, SpringerVerlag, (2003).
177. Wludyka. P. S., Jacobs. S. L., “Runs Rules and PCharts
178. for Multistream Binomial Processes”,
179. Communications in Statistics -Simulation and
180. Computation, 97–142, (2002).
181. Lucas. J. M., Davis. D. J., Saniga. E. M.,
182. “Detecting improvement using Shewhart
183. attribute control charts when the lower control
184. limit is zero”, IEEE Transactions, 38:8, 699–
185. , (2007).
186. Wang. Z., Ma. W., “Design of an Optimum
187. Adaptive Control Chart for Attributes”,
188. Proceedings of the 2003 Systems and
189. Information Engineering Design Symposium,
190. -219, (2003).
191. Tsiriga, V., Virvou, M., “A Framework for the
192. Initialization of Student Models in Web-based
193. Intelligent Tutoring Systems”, User Modeling and
194. User-Adapted Interaction, Pages: 289-316, (2004).
195. Mitchell. T. M., “Machine Learning”, McGraw-
196. Hill Science/Engineering/Math, 154-184, (1997).
197. Conati. C., Gertner. A., Vanlehn. K., “Using
198. Bayesian Networks Uncertainty in Student
199. Modeling”, www.cs.ubc.ca/~conati/mypapers/
200. umuai2002.pdf, 1-42, (2002).
201. Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D.,
202. Rommelse, K., “The Lumiere Project: Bayesian
203. User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs
204. of Software Users”, Adaptive Systems &
205. Interaction Microsoft Research, 1-10, (1998).
206. Conati, C., Gertner, A. S., Van Lehn, K.,
207. Druzdzel, M. J., “On-Line Student Modeling for
208. Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian
209. Networks”, Proceedings of the Sixth
210. International Conference on User Modeling
211. (UM-97), 1-12, (1997).
212. Hibou, M., Labat, J. M., “Embedded Bayesian
213. network student models”, Information Technology
214. Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET
215. Proceedings of the Fifth International
216. Conference, IEEE, 468-472, (2004).
217. Stern, M. K., "Using Adaptive Hypermedia and
218. Machine Learning to Create Intelligent Web Based Courses", Ph. D. Thesis, University of
219. Massachusetts Amherst, 11-122, (2001).
220. Weber, G., Brusilovsky, P., "An Adaptive
221. Versatile System for Web-based Instruction",
222. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence
223. in Education, 351-384, (2001).
224. Chen, Q., Norcio, A. F., “Modeling Users with
225. Neural Architectures”, Neural Networks, 1992.
226. IJCNN, International Joint Conference, Vol. 1,
227. IEEE, 547-552, (1992).
228. Herder, E., Dijk, B., “Site Structure and User Navigation:
229. Models, Measures, and Methods”, Adaptable and
230. Adaptive Hypermedia Systems, Chapter 2, Hersley PA
231. USA: IRM Press, 19-36, (2005).