IPv6 PROTOKOLÜNE GEÇİŞ MALİYET ANALİZİ ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

IPv4 protokolünden IPv6 protokolüne geçişte çeşitli donanım ve yazılım uyumsuzluklarının giderilmesi vegüvenliğin sağlanması gerekliliklerinden dolayı ek bir maliyet oluşumu söz konusudur ve bu maliyet her ülkeiçin sahip olunan bilişim altyapısının IPv6 destekleme oranına göre farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu nedenle geçişstratejileri belirlenirken her bir yöntem için maliyet analizinin de yapılması gerekmektedir. Bu amaçla kamu veözel sektörün mevcut durumunun ve IPv6’ya geçilmesi durumunda duyacakları ihtiyaçların bilinmesi önem arzetmiş ve tarafların bilişim altyapısını ve IPv6'ya hazır olup olmadıklarını belirlemek amacıyla iki farklı anketçalışması yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, anketlerden elde edilen veriler ışığında kamu ve İSS'lerin IPv6'ya geçişkonusunda, altyapılarının genel olarak IPv6'ya hazır olmadığı, geçiş maliyetinin ise beklentilerin üstünde olacağıdeğerlendirilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• IPv6, Geçiş Maliyet Analizi, Anket, Protokol

Kaynakça

1. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SyY81S9,
2. Address Allocation for Private Internets,
3. 11.2011.
4. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63SybztXc,
5. The IP Network Address Translator (NAT),
6. 11.2011.
7. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Sye6llD,
8. IP Mobility Support for IPv4, 25.11.2011.

9. Majstor F. “Does IPv6 protocol solve all security
10. problems of IPv4?”, In: Information Security
11. Solutions Europe, Vienna, Austria.07-09 Ekim
12. -
13. Mohacsi J., Szigeti S., Maray T., “Testing IPv6
14. Implementations”, Computer Networks and
15. ISDN Systems, Vol.30, 1617-1625, 1998.
16. Zagar D., Grgic K., Rimac-Drlje S., “Security
17. Aspects In IPv6 Networks – Implementations
18. And Testing”, Computers and Electrical
19. Engineering, Vol.33, 425-437, 2007.
20. Cooper M., Yen D. C., “IPv6:Business
21. Applications And Implementation Concerns”,
22. Computer Standards&Interfaces, Vol.28, 27-
23. , 2005.
24. Nikkel B. J., “An Introduction to Investigating
25. IPv6 Networks”, Digital Investigation, Vol.4,
26. -67, 2007.
27. Mackay M., Edwards C., “A Managed IPv6
28. Transitioning Architecture for Large Network
29. Deployments”, IEEE Internet Computing, 42-
30. , 2009.
31. Jayanthi J. G., Rabara S. A., “Transition and
32. Mobility Management in the Integrated IPv4 and
33. IPv6 Network”, IEEE International Conference
34. on Electronics and Information Engineering,
35. ICEIE 2010, Vol.1, 162-166, 2010.
36. Shin M., Han Y., Kim H. , “IPv6 Operations and
37. Deployment Scenarios over IEEE 802.16
38. Networks”, IEEE ICACT2007, 12-14 February
39. -
40. Knoth A., Neuhäuser D., “IPv6-only Nodes in
41. Corporate and Academic Networks”, Sixth
42. International Conference on Networking and
43. Services, 91-96, IEEE Computer Society, 07-13
44. Mart 2010.
45. Xia Y., Lee B.S., Yeo C.K., Seng V. L. S., “An
46. IPv6 Translation Scheme for Small and Medium
47. Scale Deployment”, Second International
48. Conference on Advances in Future Internet,
49. IEEE Computer Society, 108-112, 18-25 July
50. -
51. Yan-ge C., Zi-yi H., Shui-mu T., “IPv6 network
52. comprehensive deployment on campus network”,
53. International Conference on Environmental
54. Science and Information Application
55. Technology, 631-634, IEEE Computer Society,
56. -05 July 2009.
57. Kizilkaya Aydogan, E., Soylu M. Y., Gencer C.
58. Cetin S., Soysal M., Bektas O., Yuce E., Ozturk
59. Y., Gokirmak Y., Sagiroglu S., “AHP Model for
60. Transition from IPv4 to IPv6”. Journal of the
61. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi
62. University Vol 26, No 3, 701-709, 2011.
63. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SygQ3Hk,
64. CITC Internet Services Development Project:
65. Phase II : IPv6 Strategy for the Kingdom of Saudi
66. Arabia, 25.11.2011.
67. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63SyifG6P,
68. Mikawa S., “IPv6 Activities in Japan”, IPv6
69. Promotion Council / TF for IPv4 Exhaustion
70. NTT Communications, 25.11.2011.
71. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63SylJhGy,
72. Summary of the responses to the ITU-TSB
73. Questionnaire on IPv6 address allocation and
74. encouraging the deployment of IPv6, ITU-TSB,
75. 11.2011.
76. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SymQmZ
77. O, IA Connect Vendor Questionnaire,
78. Department of Defense (DoD) IA Connect
79. Knowledge Center, 25.11.2011.
80. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SynUu3O,
81. Roberts, P., Internet Society Organization
82. Member IPv6 Study, Internet Society,
83. 11.2011.
84. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Syp8xtn,
85. Jiang S. and Carpenter B., Questionnaire On ISP
86. IPv6 Deployment, 25.11.2011.
87. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63Syq4QW7
88. Questionnaire on IPv6 address allocation and
89. encouraging the deployment of IPv6, ITU,
90. Geneva, 25.11.2011.
91. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63SyrV5RW
92. IPv6 Transitioning Roadmap, 25.11.2011.
93. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63T0lh8hE,
94. RTI study pegs Internet protocol transfer cost at
95. $25B in U.S., Triangle Business Journal, 3
96. February 2006, 25.11.2011.
97. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Syu7o0R,
98. European IPv6 Action Plan ARIN/CAIDA
99. survey, 25.11.2011.
100. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Syux7Tl,
101. ARIN/CAIDA survey results, 25.11.2011.
102. Fernandes J., Friacas C., “IPv6 Benchmarking”,
103. ITU Workshop on IPv6, Geneva, Italy, 22-23
104. June 2005.
105. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63Syy5Wm
106. H, Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
107. Specification, 25.11.2011.
108. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63SyzSsZe,
109. Mandatory Reference - IPv6 Plans and Standards Mandatory Reference - Mission BCP and DRP
110. Checklist, 25.11.2011.
111. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Sz0fhGy,
112. United States Government Accountability Office.
113. Report to Congressional Requesters. May 2005.
114. Internet Protocol, 25.11.2011.
115. İnternet: http://www.rti.org/pubs/IPv6_costbenefit.
116. pdf, IPv6, Economic Impact Assessment,
117. 11.2011.
118. İnternet: http://www.webcitation.org/63Sz2QrH8,
119. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
120. Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Progress
121. Report, 25.11.2011.
122. Sağıroğlu Ş., Karacan, H., Alkan, M., Ünver, M.,
123. Orcan, S. ve Yavanoğlu, U. “Ulusal IPv6
124. Protokol Altyapısı Tasarımı Ve Geçişi Projesi:
125. Anket Çalışması”, Ulusal IPv6 Konferansı,
126. Ankara, s.19-25, 2011.
127. Anderson D. R., Sweeney D. J and Williams,
128. T.A., “Statistics For Business and Economics”,
129. South-Western College Publishing, Ohio, 1999.
130. İnternet:http://www.webcitation.org/63T15Vr2D,
131. Memorandum For The Chief Information
132. Officers, Office of E-Government and
133. Information Technology SUBJECT: Transition
134. Planning for Internet Protocol Version 6,
135. 11.2011.