Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 , 55 - 69 , 30.04.2026
https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM

Öz

Embodied carbon emissions play a critical role in mitigating climate change in the built environment. Reducing the embodied carbon footprint has become increasingly important across distinct areas. Construction activities have a remarkable impact on embodied carbon emissions. During building use, material and component obsolescence, or the end of their service lifetime, triggers building replacements. These replacement-based construction activities lead to embodied carbon emissions. The replacements vary due to distinct material and component choices and have variations in embodied carbon emissions. Hence, this study aims to assess the impact of material selection on embodied carbon emissions for building replacements in the scope of a representative building in Tokat. The embodied carbon emissions of replaceable building elements and components were manually calculated for the use phase of the buildings. In this regard, two distinct replacement-based scenarios were created for the reference building. While conventional materials were selected for replacements in the first scenario, low-carbon materials were chosen in the second. The results revealed that 36% of embodied carbon emissions (12.7 t CO2e) can be reduced by choosing more environmentally friendly materials with lower carbon emissions, such as wooden, water-based, and emulsion-based materials. The waterproofing membranes, roofing tiles, windows, and interior doors were significant elements and components in the case study, helping reduce total embodied carbon emissions. The results showed the importance of material selection for building replacements, which is crucial for architects, engineers, and decision-makers to provide more sustainable solutions within the scope of replacement-based embodied carbon emissions.

Kaynakça

  • Bacheva, T. S., Raposo Grau, J. F., 2025. Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies, Buildings 2025, Vol. 15, Page 1661. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 15(10), p. 1661. doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS15101661.
  • Balasbaneh, A. T., Bin Marsono, A. K., Gohari, A., 2019. Sustainable materials selection based on flood damage assessment for a building using LCA and LCC, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier, 222, pp. 844–855. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.03.005.
  • Barbhuiya, S., Das, B. B., 2023. Life Cycle Assessment of construction materials: Methodologies, applications and future directions for sustainable decision-making, Case Studies in Construction Materials. Elsevier, 19, p. e02326. doi: 10.1016/J.CSCM.2023.E02326.
  • Bayraktar, M., Binatlı, B., Üzümoğlu, T., 2023. Türkiye Bina Sektörü Karbonsuzlaşma Yol Haritası. Available at: https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/meslekihizmetler/menu/turkiye_bina_sektoru_karbonsuzlasma_yol_haritasi_-v1_20231218095757.pdf (Accessed: 19 March 2025).
  • Bradford, K., Gentry, R., Ben-Alon, L., Kurtis, K., 2025. Construction 3D printing material selection: Minimizing cost and carbon footprint of residential wall assemblies, Construction and Building Materials. Elsevier, 493, p. 143150. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2025.143150.
  • BRE Global, 2018. Methodology for the Environmental Assessment of Buildings Using EN 15978:2011. Available at: https://www.greenbooklive.com/filelibrary/EN_15804/PN326-BRE-EN-15978-Methodology.pdf (Accessed: 3 July 2022).
  • Cabeza, L. F., Boquera, L., Chàfer, M., Vérez, D., 2021. Embodied energy and embodied carbon of structural building materials: Worldwide progress and barriers through literature map analysis, Energy and Buildings. Elsevier, 231, p. 110612. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2020.110612.
  • Cabeza, L. F., Bai, Q., Bertoldi, P., Kihila, J.M., Lucena, A.F.P., Mata, É., Mirasgedis, S., Novikova, A., Saheb, Y., 2022. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change, Chapter 9: Buildings, Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.011.
  • Chen, D., Chen, S., Xiong, X., Li, X., 2025. Embodied carbon emissions from the materialization of office buildings in China: A systematic review of range, characteristics and impact factors, Journal of Building Engineering. Elsevier, 113, p. 114065. doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2025.114065.
  • Chen, Z., Yu Lau, S. S., Zhang, Z., Yeung Lau, S. S., Kee, T., 2025. A modular framework for estimating carbon emissions from building component replacements in LCA, Energy and Buildings. Elsevier, 349, p. 116424. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2025.116424.
  • Dsilva, J., Zarmukhambetova, S., Locke, J., 2023. Assessment of building materials in the construction sector: A case study using life cycle assessment approach to achieve the circular economy, Heliyon. Elsevier, 9(10), p. e20404. doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E20404.
  • Google Maps (n.d.). Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/@40.3267185,36.5122626,2659m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTIwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D (Accessed: 26 October 2025).
  • Huang, B., Zhang, H., Ullah, H., Lv, Y., 2025. BIM-based embodied carbon evaluation during building early-design stage: A systematic literature review, Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Elsevier, 112, p. 107768. doi: 10.1016/J.EIAR.2024.107768.
  • Jeleniewicz, K., Szlachetka, O., Mazur, Ł., 2025. Environmental and circularity assessment of steel and timber structures in a small-scale residential building, Journal of Building Engineering. Elsevier, 110, p. 113020. doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2025.113020.
  • MoEUCC, n.d. Tip Projeler, MoEUCC (T.C. Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change). Available at: https://yapiisleri.csb.gov.tr/tip-projeler-i-111207 (Accessed: 26 October 2025).
  • Myint, N. N., Shafique, M., 2024. Embodied carbon emissions of buildings: Taking a step towards net zero buildings, Case Studies in Construction Materials. Elsevier, 20, p. e03024. doi: 10.1016/J.CSCM.2024.E03024.
  • One Click LCA, n.d. One Click LCA Database . Available at: https://oneclicklca.com/why-us/capabilities/global-lca-data (Accessed: 27 May 2025).
  • Resmi Gazete, n.d. Tebliğ. Available at: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/05/20050526-10.htm (Accessed: 14 May 2024).
  • Sturgis, S., 2017. Embodied and whole life carbon assessment for architects. London.
  • UNEP, 2023. Building Materials and the Climate: Constructing a New Future, Building Material and the Climate: Constructing a New Future. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. doi: 10.59117/20.500.11822/43293.

Malzeme Seçiminin Yenileme Tabanlı Gömülü Karbon Emisyonlarına Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi: Tokat İlinde Bir Vaka Çalışması

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 , 55 - 69 , 30.04.2026
https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM

Öz

Gömülü karbon emisyonları yapılı çevrede iklim değişikliği azaltımında kritik bir role sahiptir. Gömülü karbon ayakizinin azaltılması farklı alanlarda giderek daha önemli hale gelmiştir. İnşaat faaliyetleri, gömülü karbon emisyonlarında dikkate değer bir bir etkiye sahiptir. Bina kullanımı sırasında, malzeme ve bileşenlerin eskimesi veya hizmet ömürlerinin sona ermesi, binada yenilemeler yapılmasını tetikler. Bu yenileme bazlı inşaat aktiviteleri gömülü karbon emisyonlarına sebeb olmaktadır. Binalardaki yenileme uygulamaları, farklı malzeme ve bileşen seçimleri nedeniyle değişiklik göstermekte ve gömülü karbon emisyon sonuçlarında farklılıklara neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Tokat'taki temsili bir binayı vaka çalışması olarak ele alarak, bina yenilemelerinde malzeme seçiminin gömülü karbon emisyonları üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bina kullanım aşamasındayken, değiştirilebilir olan yapı elemanları ve bileşenleri için gömülü karbon emisyonları manuel olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bu bağlamda, vaka çalışması için bina yenilemesi bazında iki farklı senaryo oluşturulmuştur. Birinci senaryoda, bina yenilemeleri için geleneksel malzemeler seçilirken, ikinci senaryoda düşük karbonlu malzemeler seçilmiştir. Sonuçlar, düşük karbon emisyonuna sahip olan ahşap, su bazlı ve emülsiyon bazlı malzemeler gibi daha çevre dostu malzemelerin seçilmesiyle, gömülü karbon emisyonlarının %36'sının (12,7 t CO2e) azaltılabileceğini ortaya koymuştur. Vaka çalışmasında, su yalıtım membranlarının, çatı kiremitlerinin, pencerelerin ve iç kapıların toplam gömülü karbon emisyonlarını azaltmada önemli yapı elemanları ve bileşenleri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, mimarlar, mühendisler ve karar vericiler için yenilemeye dayalı gömülü karbon emisyonları açısından daha sürdürülebilir çözümler sunabilmek adına, bina yenilemelerinde malzeme seçiminin önemini ortaya koymuştur.

Kaynakça

  • Bacheva, T. S., Raposo Grau, J. F., 2025. Embodied Impacts in Buildings: A Systematic Review of Life Cycle Gaps and Sectoral Integration Strategies, Buildings 2025, Vol. 15, Page 1661. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 15(10), p. 1661. doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS15101661.
  • Balasbaneh, A. T., Bin Marsono, A. K., Gohari, A., 2019. Sustainable materials selection based on flood damage assessment for a building using LCA and LCC, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier, 222, pp. 844–855. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.03.005.
  • Barbhuiya, S., Das, B. B., 2023. Life Cycle Assessment of construction materials: Methodologies, applications and future directions for sustainable decision-making, Case Studies in Construction Materials. Elsevier, 19, p. e02326. doi: 10.1016/J.CSCM.2023.E02326.
  • Bayraktar, M., Binatlı, B., Üzümoğlu, T., 2023. Türkiye Bina Sektörü Karbonsuzlaşma Yol Haritası. Available at: https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/meslekihizmetler/menu/turkiye_bina_sektoru_karbonsuzlasma_yol_haritasi_-v1_20231218095757.pdf (Accessed: 19 March 2025).
  • Bradford, K., Gentry, R., Ben-Alon, L., Kurtis, K., 2025. Construction 3D printing material selection: Minimizing cost and carbon footprint of residential wall assemblies, Construction and Building Materials. Elsevier, 493, p. 143150. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2025.143150.
  • BRE Global, 2018. Methodology for the Environmental Assessment of Buildings Using EN 15978:2011. Available at: https://www.greenbooklive.com/filelibrary/EN_15804/PN326-BRE-EN-15978-Methodology.pdf (Accessed: 3 July 2022).
  • Cabeza, L. F., Boquera, L., Chàfer, M., Vérez, D., 2021. Embodied energy and embodied carbon of structural building materials: Worldwide progress and barriers through literature map analysis, Energy and Buildings. Elsevier, 231, p. 110612. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2020.110612.
  • Cabeza, L. F., Bai, Q., Bertoldi, P., Kihila, J.M., Lucena, A.F.P., Mata, É., Mirasgedis, S., Novikova, A., Saheb, Y., 2022. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change, Chapter 9: Buildings, Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.011.
  • Chen, D., Chen, S., Xiong, X., Li, X., 2025. Embodied carbon emissions from the materialization of office buildings in China: A systematic review of range, characteristics and impact factors, Journal of Building Engineering. Elsevier, 113, p. 114065. doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2025.114065.
  • Chen, Z., Yu Lau, S. S., Zhang, Z., Yeung Lau, S. S., Kee, T., 2025. A modular framework for estimating carbon emissions from building component replacements in LCA, Energy and Buildings. Elsevier, 349, p. 116424. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2025.116424.
  • Dsilva, J., Zarmukhambetova, S., Locke, J., 2023. Assessment of building materials in the construction sector: A case study using life cycle assessment approach to achieve the circular economy, Heliyon. Elsevier, 9(10), p. e20404. doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E20404.
  • Google Maps (n.d.). Available at: https://www.google.com/maps/@40.3267185,36.5122626,2659m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTIwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D (Accessed: 26 October 2025).
  • Huang, B., Zhang, H., Ullah, H., Lv, Y., 2025. BIM-based embodied carbon evaluation during building early-design stage: A systematic literature review, Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Elsevier, 112, p. 107768. doi: 10.1016/J.EIAR.2024.107768.
  • Jeleniewicz, K., Szlachetka, O., Mazur, Ł., 2025. Environmental and circularity assessment of steel and timber structures in a small-scale residential building, Journal of Building Engineering. Elsevier, 110, p. 113020. doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2025.113020.
  • MoEUCC, n.d. Tip Projeler, MoEUCC (T.C. Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change). Available at: https://yapiisleri.csb.gov.tr/tip-projeler-i-111207 (Accessed: 26 October 2025).
  • Myint, N. N., Shafique, M., 2024. Embodied carbon emissions of buildings: Taking a step towards net zero buildings, Case Studies in Construction Materials. Elsevier, 20, p. e03024. doi: 10.1016/J.CSCM.2024.E03024.
  • One Click LCA, n.d. One Click LCA Database . Available at: https://oneclicklca.com/why-us/capabilities/global-lca-data (Accessed: 27 May 2025).
  • Resmi Gazete, n.d. Tebliğ. Available at: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/05/20050526-10.htm (Accessed: 14 May 2024).
  • Sturgis, S., 2017. Embodied and whole life carbon assessment for architects. London.
  • UNEP, 2023. Building Materials and the Climate: Constructing a New Future, Building Material and the Climate: Constructing a New Future. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. doi: 10.59117/20.500.11822/43293.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mimarlıkta Malzeme ve Teknoloji, Sürdürülebilir Mimari, Mimarlık (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Hatice Bıyık

Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Kabul Tarihi 9 Ocak 2026
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2026
IZ https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2026 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Bıyık, H. (2026). Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi, 15(1), 55-69. https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM
AMA 1.Bıyık H. Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat. GBAD. 2026;15(1):55-69. https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM
Chicago Bıyık, Hatice. 2026. “Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat”. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi 15 (1): 55-69. https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM.
EndNote Bıyık H (01 Nisan 2026) Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi 15 1 55–69.
IEEE [1]H. Bıyık, “Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat”, GBAD, c. 15, sy 1, ss. 55–69, Nis. 2026, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM
ISNAD Bıyık, Hatice. “Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat”. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi 15/1 (01 Nisan 2026): 55-69. https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM.
JAMA 1.Bıyık H. Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat. GBAD. 2026;15:55–69.
MLA Bıyık, Hatice. “Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat”. Gaziosmanpaşa Bilimsel Araştırma Dergisi, c. 15, sy 1, Nisan 2026, ss. 55-69, https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM.
Vancouver 1.Hatice Bıyık. Evaluation of Material Selection Impact on Replacement-based Embodied Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Tokat. GBAD [Internet]. 01 Nisan 2026;15(1):55-69. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA46TD45FM