Öz
Fingerprints are one of the most important types of evidence in crime investigation due to their permanency, uniqueness, and ease of enhancing. Demonstrators usually prefer hiding their identities by covering their faces in illegal events such as throwing stones at security forces or at businesses and residences so as to damage property. Once the fingerprints are detected on stones, it could be possible to reach the perpetrators. However, there is insufficient research about recovering fingerprints on stones and their subsequent reliability. In this study, fingerprints left on 12 different kinds of stone surface were held for 1, 3, and 5 days respectively, after which it was sought to determine whether or not suitable fingerprints could be recovered for comparison. In this study, As a result of various chemical applications in the laboratory on 12 different types of stones, it was revealed that fingerprints with sufficient characteristics could be obtained from various stone types. Fingerprints of good quality were made visible with cyanoacrylate fuming method, particularly on stones with smooth surfaces and minimal porosity such as the outer surfaces of red brick, marble, mosaic, ceramic, tile and granite. After more than a hundred and thirty years, fingerprints still remain to be considered as one of the most important sources of evidence. It is evaluated that fingerprints developed from stones which were thrown during an assault could be instrumental in identification of a perpetrator.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Davis, L., Fisher, R. (2015). Fingermark recovery from riot debris: Bricks and stones. Science and Justice 55: 97-102.
- Donche, A., Loyan, S. (1996). Development of Latent Fingerprints on Stones. Forensic Identification 46, (5): 543.
- Fisher, B., Fisher, D. (2012). Technics of Crime Scene Investigations. 8th edition. USA: CRC Press.
- Hefetz, I., Cohen, A., Cohen, Y., Chaikovsky, A. (2014). Development of Latent Fingermarks from Rocks and Stones. Journal of Forensic Sciences 59(5):1226-1230.
- Lee, CH., Gaensleen, R.E. (2001). Advances in Fingerprint Technology. 2nd edition. USA: CRC Press.
- Liu, S., Mi, Zhongliang., Wu, Jian., Dalrymple, B. (2019). Detecting Latent Prints on Stone and Other Difficult Porous Surfaces via Indanedione/Zinc Chloride and Laser. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine 2(4):203.
- Saferstein, R, (2017). Criminalistics-An Introduction to Forensic Sciences. USA: Pearson
- Yadav, P.K. (2019). Development of fingerprints on thermal papers—a review. Egyptian J of Forensic Sci 47: 1-8.
Öz
Fingerprints are one of the most important types of evidence in crime investigation due to their permanency, uniqueness, and ease of enhancing. Demonstrators usually prefer hiding their identities by covering their faces in illegal events such as throwing stones at security forces or at businesses and residences so as to damage property. Once the fingerprints are detected on stones, it could be possible to reach the perpetrators. However, there is insufficient research about recovering fingerprints on stones and their subsequent reliability. In this study, fingerprints left on 12 different kinds of stone surface were held for 1, 3, and 5 days respectively, after which it was sought to determine whether or not suitable fingerprints could be recovered for comparison. In this study, As a result of various chemical applications in the laboratory on 12 different types of stones, it was revealed that fingerprints with sufficient characteristics could be obtained from various stone types. Fingerprints of good quality were made visible with cyanoacrylate fuming method, particularly on stones with smooth surfaces and minimal porosity such as the outer surfaces of red brick, marble, mosaic, ceramic, tile and granite. After more than a hundred and thirty years, fingerprints still remain to be considered as one of the most important sources of evidence. It is evaluated that fingerprints developed from stones which were thrown during an assault could be instrumental in identification of a perpetrator.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Davis, L., Fisher, R. (2015). Fingermark recovery from riot debris: Bricks and stones. Science and Justice 55: 97-102.
- Donche, A., Loyan, S. (1996). Development of Latent Fingerprints on Stones. Forensic Identification 46, (5): 543.
- Fisher, B., Fisher, D. (2012). Technics of Crime Scene Investigations. 8th edition. USA: CRC Press.
- Hefetz, I., Cohen, A., Cohen, Y., Chaikovsky, A. (2014). Development of Latent Fingermarks from Rocks and Stones. Journal of Forensic Sciences 59(5):1226-1230.
- Lee, CH., Gaensleen, R.E. (2001). Advances in Fingerprint Technology. 2nd edition. USA: CRC Press.
- Liu, S., Mi, Zhongliang., Wu, Jian., Dalrymple, B. (2019). Detecting Latent Prints on Stone and Other Difficult Porous Surfaces via Indanedione/Zinc Chloride and Laser. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine 2(4):203.
- Saferstein, R, (2017). Criminalistics-An Introduction to Forensic Sciences. USA: Pearson
- Yadav, P.K. (2019). Development of fingerprints on thermal papers—a review. Egyptian J of Forensic Sci 47: 1-8.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Kriminoloji (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Kasım 2023 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 5 Mayıs 2022 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2 |
Bu dergi creative commons Atıf-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.