Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015)

Seher Özcan; Serçin Karataş

EN TR

Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015)

Öz

Engagement is an important element for student success and gaining permanent learning. So what engages our students? Faculty has critical role in educational environment with the instructional structure they provide. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the trends in studies involving instructional faculty engagement. Engagement of the faculty is an important factor in the permanent learning of the students, quality of the institution, and more importantly, one's own productivity. Conducted studies in this way, it will be possible to determine which factors are more influential on faculty engagement and on the other hand; it will help to see the gap in the literature. The literature examined and analyzed based on subject areas, theories and models, delivery modes, research methods, used statistics, and collected data. It is reviewed 99 full-text publication found in widely used databases. Based on the results, the most prominent subject areas were found to be institutional factors for the main themes and institutional supports for the sub-themes. It was observed that the JD-R model was predominantly used, and the f2f (face-to-face) method was preferred as an educational method. It was seen that correlational studies were common while surveys were the most frequently used data collection method.

Anahtar Kelimeler

engagement,faculty engagement,instructional engagement,engagement research,trend

Öğretim Elemanlarının Bağlılığına İlişkin Yapılan Araştırmalarda Eğilimler (2010-2015)

Öz

Bağlılık, öğrenci başarısı ve kalıcı öğrenme için önemli bir unsurdur. Söz konusu öğrenci bağlılığı olduğunda ise öğretim elemanı eğitim ortamında sağladığı öğretimin niteliği ile kritik bir role sahiptir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma öğretim elemanlarının bağlılığı ile ilgili çalışmalardaki eğilimleri değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Öğretim elemanı bağlılığı, öğrencilerin kalıcı öğrenmesinde, kurumun kalitesinde ve daha da önemlisi öğrencinin kendi üretkenliğinde önemli bir faktördür. Bu çalışma öğretim elemanı bağlılığı ile ilgili yapılan araştırmaları betimlemesi ve genel bir resim ortaya koyması açısından önemlidir. Böylelikle yapılan çalışmanın bağlılık üzerine çalışan araştırmacılara alan yazındaki eksiklikleri görmeleri açısından yol gösterici olacağı düşünülmektedir. Öğretim elemanı bağlılığı ile ilgili alan yazında 2010-2015 yılları arasında yayınlanan araştırmalar; konu alanı, kuram ve model, eğitim dağıtım şekli, araştırma yöntemi, kullanılan istatistik ve toplanan verilere göre incelenip analiz edilmiştir. Yaygın olarak kullanılan veri tabanlarında bulunan 99 tam metin yayını gözden geçirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, öne çıkan ana tema kurumsal faktörler olurken, alt temada ise kurumsal destekler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. İncelenen çalışmalarda JD-R modelinin ağırlıklı olarak kullanıldığı ve daha çok yüz yüze eğitimin ortamlarında araştırma yapıldığı dikkat çekmektedir. Korelasyonel çalışmaların yaygın olduğu, anketlerin en sık kullanılan veri toplama yöntemi olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bağlılık,Öğretim elemanı bağlılığı,Öğretime bağlılık,Bağlılık araştırmaları,Eğilim

Kaynakça

Alhawiti, M. M. (2011). Faculty perceptions about attributes and barriers impacting the diffusion of online education in two Saudi Universities (Order No. 3453898). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (868276692). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/868276692?accountid=11054
Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), n2.
Bailey C., Madden A., Alfes K., Robinson D., Fletcher L., Holmes J., Buzzeo J. & Currie G. (2015). Evaluating the evidence on employee engagement and its potential benefits to NHS staff: a narrative synthesis of the literature. London: NIHR.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of educational psychology, 99(2), 274.
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-200. DOI: 10.1080/02678370802393649
Bakker, A. B. & Hakanen, J. J. (2013), Work engagement among public and private sector dentists, In: Burke, R. J., Noblet, A. J., Cooper, C. L. (eds.), Human Resource Management in the Public Sector, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 109-131
Barman, A., & Saikat, R. (2011). Faculty Engagement in Higher Educational Institution-A proposed model. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, (7), 143-164.
Betts, K. (2009). Online human touch (OHT) training & support: A conceptual framework to increase faculty engagement, connectivity, and retention in online education, part 2. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 29-48.
Blackburn, H. A. (2014). A mixed methods study: Assessing and understanding technology pedagogy and content knowledge among college level teaching faculty (Order No. 3629463). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1562250625). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1562250625?accountid=11054

Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Drysdale, J. S. (2014). The nature of teacher engagement at an online high school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 793-806. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12089
Conrad, R. M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2011). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction (Vol. 38). John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W., (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Education.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper.
Dalal, R. S., Brummel, B. J., Wee, S. & Thomas, L. L. (2008). Defining employee engagement for productive research and practice. Industrial and organizational psychology, 1(01), 52-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00008.x
Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. American Psychological Association.
Elstad, E., Christopherson, K., & Turmo, A. (2011). Social exchange theory as an explanation of organizational citizenship behaviour among teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(4), 405-421. DOI: 10.1080/13603124.2010.524250
Evans, K. E., Hartman, C. L., & Anderson, D. M. (2013). “It’s More Than a Class”: Leisure Education’s Influence on College Student Engagement.Innovative Higher Education, 38(1), 45-58.
Fowler, P. R., & Boylan, H. R. (2010). Increasing student success and retention: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(2), 2-10.
Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating case study and survey research methods: an example in information systems. European journal of information systems,3(2), 112-126.
González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Lloret, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles?. Journal of vocational behavior, 68(1), 165-174. DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.003
Hogan, R. L., & McKnight, M. A. (2007). Exploring burnout among university online instructors: An initial investigation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(2), 117-124. DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.03.001
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724. DOI: 10.2307/256287
Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human relations, 45(4), 321-349. DOI: 10.1177/001872679204500402
Kolbe, R. H., & Burnett, M. S. (1991). Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. Journal of consumer research, 243-250.
Krueger, J., & Killham, E. (2005). At work, feeling good matters. Gallup Management Journal.
Leiter, M. P. & Maslach, C. (2004). Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being: Vol. 3. Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies (pp. 91-134). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Leijten, F. R., van den Heuvel, S. G., van der Beek, A. J., Ybema, J. F., Robroek, S. J., & Burdorf, A. (2015). Associations of work-related factors and work engagement with mental and physical health: a 1-year follow-up study among older workers. Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 25(1), 86-95.
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24.
Lu, H., While, A. E., & Barriball, K. L. (2005). Job satisfaction among nurses: a literatüre review. International journal of nursing studies, 42(2), 211-227. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.003
Maslach, C. & Leiter, M.P. (1997). The Truth about Burnout. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Medinger, E. P. (2009). Faculty Perceptıons Of Team-Developed Onlıne Courses. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, Minnesota.
Meyer, J.P. & N.J. Allen. 1997. Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan [. Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). New York: Routledge.
Munson, V. (2013). Teacher engagement in a northwestern British Columbia School district (Order No. MR94116). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1412340333). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1412340333?accountid=11054
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Engagement in a profession: The case of undergraduate teaching. Daedalus, 134(3), 60-67.
Norman, D. A., & Spohrer, J. C. (1996). Learner-centered education. Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 24-27.
Okur, M. R. & Yüzer, T.V. (2011). E-Öğrenmede Öğretim Elemanı Desteği. Birim Balcı Demirci, Gonca Telli Yamamoto ve Uğur Demiray (Ed.), Türkiye'de E-Öğrenme: Gelişmeler ve Uygulamalar II (s. 75-85). T. C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Schaufeli, W.B. (2013). What is engagement? In C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, A. Shantz, & E. Soane (Eds.), Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Selmer, J., Jonasson, C., & Lauring, J. (2014). Knowledge processing and faculty engagement in multicultural university settings: A social learning perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(2), 211-229. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2012.706808
Shani, N., & Narayanasamy.P.S, (2011). The Role Of Employee Engagement And Strategic Tool In HRM. International Journal of Management 2(2), pp. 25 – 32.
Stenerson, J., Blanchard, L., Fassiotto, M., Hernandez, M., & Muth, A. (2010). The role of adjuncts in the professoriate. Peer Review, 12(3), 23-26.
Truss, C., Alfes, K., Delbridge, R., Shantz, A., and Soane, E.C. (2013a), Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, London: Routledge.
Zone, E. J. (2013). The relationship of perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and years of online teaching experience to work engagement among online undergraduate adjunct faculty members (Order No. 3570880). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1419934767). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1419934767?accountid=11054

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Seher Özcan ^*
0000-0001-8473-3807
Türkiye

Serçin Karataş
0000-0002-1731-0676

Yayımlanma Tarihi

14 Ekim 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Temmuz 2019

Kabul Tarihi

9 Eylül 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 5

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA96YH35WY

APA

Özcan, S., & Karataş, S. (2019). Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015). Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 18-38. https://izlik.org/JA96YH35WY

AMA

1.Özcan S, Karataş S. Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015). GEBD. 2019;5:18-38. https://izlik.org/JA96YH35WY

Chicago

Özcan, Seher, ve Serçin Karataş. 2019. “Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015)”. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 5 (Ekim): 18-38. https://izlik.org/JA96YH35WY.

EndNote

Özcan S, Karataş S (01 Ekim 2019) Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015). Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 5 18–38.

IEEE

[1]S. Özcan ve S. Karataş, “Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015)”, GEBD, c. 5, ss. 18–38, Eki. 2019, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA96YH35WY

ISNAD

Özcan, Seher - Karataş, Serçin. “Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015)”. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 5 (01 Ekim 2019): 18-38. https://izlik.org/JA96YH35WY.

JAMA

1.Özcan S, Karataş S. Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015). GEBD. 2019;5:18–38.

MLA

Özcan, Seher, ve Serçin Karataş. “Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015)”. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 5, Ekim 2019, ss. 18-38, https://izlik.org/JA96YH35WY.

Vancouver

1.Seher Özcan, Serçin Karataş. Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015). GEBD [Internet]. 01 Ekim 2019;5:18-3. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA96YH35WY

Trends in Studies Regarding the Instructional Engagement of Faculty Members (2010-2015)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğretim Elemanlarının Bağlılığına İlişkin Yapılan Araştırmalarda Eğilimler (2010-2015)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster