Öğretim Görevlilerinin Özel Amaçlı İngilizcenin Değerlendirilmesine İlişkin İnançları: Bir Vaka Çalışması

Yıl 2024, , 1023 - 1047, 30.08.2024

Sinem Başara , Muzeyyen Nazli Gungor

https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1444003

Öz

Artan küreselleşme ile birlikte, İngilizce iletişim için en yaygın kullanılan dillerden biri haline gelmiş ve Özel Amaçlı İngilizce (ÖAİ), yirmi birinci yüzyılda küreselleşmenin etkileri ve nitelikli işçilere olan ihtiyacın artması nedeniyle daha fazla dikkat çekmeye başlamıştır. Özel Amaçlı İngilizce, belirli alanlarda İngilizce öğretmeye odaklanan İngilizcenin özel bir öğrenim dalıdır. Ölçme ve değerlendirme süreci, Özel Amaçlı İngilizceye özgün özelliklere göre özelleştirilmelidir ve öğretmen inançları, öğrencilere bu konuda nasıl öğretildiği ve değerlendirildiği üzerinde büyük etkiye sahip olabilir. Daha önceki araştırmalar, ÖAİ’nin ders tasarımına ve ihtiyaç değerlendirmesine odaklanmıştır. Ancak, öğretmenlerin ÖAİ’nin değerlendirmesi ile ilgili inançları yeterince dikkat çekmemiştir. Bu nedenle, çalışmanın amacı, yüksek öğrenimde çalışan öğretmenlerin ÖAİ’nin değerlendirmesi konusundaki inançlarını araştırmaktır. Bir devlet üniversitesinin yabancı diller fakültesindeki üç İngilizce öğretmeni, nitel bir durum çalışması için katılımcı olarak çalışmada yer almaktadır. Verileri toplamak için yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ve yedi hafta süreyle toplanan yansıtıcı günlükler kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre, katılımcılar, ÖAİ’nin değerlendirmesinin özgüllüğe sahip olduğuna inanmakta ve ÖAİ’nin değerlendirilmesinin değerli ve hesap sorulabilir olduğunu düşünmektedir. Ayrıca, ÖAİ değerlendirmesinin motivasyon eksikliğine sahip olduğuna ve adaptasyon gerektirdiğine inanılmaktadır. Ek olarak, bu inançları etkileyen faktörler arasında okul politikası, öğrenci motivasyonu ve öğretmen performansı bulunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, öğretmenlerin katılımının ve eğitiminin ÖAİ’nin değerlendirilmesi için gerekli olduğu bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Özel Amaçlı İngilizce, Değerlendirme, Öğretmen İnançları, Öğretim Görevlileri

Instructors’ Beliefs About ESP Assessment: A Case Study

Öz

With the world's increasing globalization, English has become the most widely used language for communication, and English for Specific Purposes (ESP) has begun to receive more attention in the twenty-first century due to the effects of globalization and an increase in the need for skilled workers. English for Specific Purposes is a specialized branch of English language learning that focuses on teaching English in particular fields. The assessment process must be customized to the unique characteristics of English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and teacher beliefs can significantly impact on how students are taught and assessed in this subject. Previous research has concentrated on ESP course design and needs assessment in the field. However, teachers' beliefs regarding ESP assessment have not received enough attention. As a result, the study's goal is to investigate the instructors' beliefs regarding ESP assessment in higher education. Three English instructors in a state university’s College of Foreign Languages serve as a sample for this qualitative case study. Semi-structured interviews and seven weeks of reflective journaling were used to gather the data. According to the results, participants believe that ESP assessment has specificity, and it is valuable and accountable. It is also believed that ESP assessment lacks students’ motivation and requires adaptation. The school policy, student motivation, and teacher performance in ESP assessment have influenced these beliefs. To conclude, teacher participation and education are necessary for ESP assessment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

English for Specific Purposes, Assessment, Teacher Beliefs, Instructors

Kaynakça

• Al-Salman, S. M. (2007). Global English and the role of translation. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 141-156.
• Basturkmen, H. (2014). LSP teacher education. Ibérica, (28), 17-34.
• Basturkmen, H., & Bocanegra-Valle, A. (2018). Materials design processes, beliefs, and practices of experienced ESP teachers in university settings in Spain. Key issues in English for specific purposes in higher education, 13-27.
• Borg, S. (1998). Teachers’ pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 9-38.
• Borg, S. (2003). “Review article: teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, do.” Language Teaching 36: 81 – 109.
• Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment, principles, and classroom practices. Pearson Longman.
• Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practice. Pearson Longman.
• Chang, C. W. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and practices about Esp assessment: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 2(4), 625-645.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
• Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University.
• Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
• Elo, S. & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
• Filges, T., Torgerson, C., Gascoine, L., Dietrichson, J., Nielsen, C., & Viinholt, B. A. (2019). Effectiveness of continuing professional development training of welfare professionals on outcomes for children and young people: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(4).
• Fitriyah, I., & Jannah, M. (2021). Online assessment effect in EFL classroom: An investigation on students and teachers' perceptions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 265-284.
• Graden, E. C. (1996). How language teachers' beliefs about reading instruction are mediated by their beliefs about students. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 387-395.
• Hyland, K. (2022). English for Specific Purposes: What is it and where is it taking us?. ESP Today, 10(2), 202-220.
• İlter, O. (2020). A flipped learning syllabus for teaching English for specific purposes: an action research study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Atatürk University Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum.
• Johns, A.M., & Price, D. (2014). English for specific purposes: International in scope, specific in purpose. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton & M.A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language, (4th ed., pp. 471-487). Boston: National Geographic Learning.
• Johnson, M. (1999). CALL and teacher education: Issues in course design. CALL-EJ Online, 1(2), 4-2.
• Kırkgöz, Y. (2019). ESP in teacher education. ESP teaching and teacher education: current theories and practices, 13.
• Kirovska-Simjanoska, D. (2016). Do ESP Students prefer face-to-face instruction over digitally embedded instruction? Blogs vs. reports? Debates vs. online discussion?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 170-176.
• Krippendorff K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
• Marjanovikj-Apostolovski, M. (2019). Developing teaching materials for ESP courses: The last option many ESP teachers resort to. Seeu Review, 14(1), 160-177.
• Mcgloin, S. (2008). The trustworthiness of case study methodology. Nurse Researcher, 16(1), 45-55.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
• Munby, J. (1978). Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
• Muñoz, A. P., Palacio, M., & Escobar, L. (2012). Teachers' beliefs about assessment in an EFL context in Colombia. Profile Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 14(1), 143- 158.
• Mutlu, A. (2022). Turkish EFL Teachers’ Beliefs, Practices and Challenges on Assessment. Unpublished Master Thesis, Pamukkale University Institute of Educational Sciences, Denizli.
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307-332.
• Quintão, C., Andrade, P., & Almeida, F. (2021). How to improve the validity and reliability of a case study approach? Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 9(2), 264–275.
• Rapley, T. (2004) Interviews. In Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F. & Silverman, D. (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 15-33). Sage.
• Redmann, C. (2002, June). Wanna speak English? Time Magazine, p. 45
• Robinson P. (1980). ESP (English for Specific Purposes). Oxford: Pergamon.
• Yılmazer, M. Ö., & Özkan, Y. (2017). Classroom assessment practices of English language instructors. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 324-345.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.