Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback

Hale Ülkü Aydın; Kemal Sinan Özmen

doi:10.17152/gefad.1447219

TR EN

Mesleğe Yeni Başlamış ve Deneyimli Öğretmenlerin Sözel Düzeltici Dönüte İlişkin İnançları ve Tutumları

Öz

Bu çalışma mesleğe yeni başlamış ve deneyimli öğretmenlerin sözel düzeltici dönüt hakkındaki inançları ve beyan edilmiş tutumlarını ve bu iki grup arasındaki benzerlikleri ve farklılıkları incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada araştırma sorularına cevap bulmak amacıyla belirli nitel ve nicel araştırma tekniklerinden faydalanılmıştır. Nitel yöntem olarak mesleğe yeni başlamış ve deneyimli öğretmenlerin sözel düzeltici dönüt hakkındaki inançlarını ortaya çıkarmak için bazı mülakatlar gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın nicel kısmı Hata Düzeltme Durumları Benzetimi’nden gelen veriden oluşmaktadır. Mesleğe yeni başlamış ve deneyimli öğretmenlerden her bir duruma nasıl ve neden karşılık vereceklerini yazmaları istenmiştir. Bu aracın amacı mesleğe yeni başlamış ve deneyimli öğretmenlerin beyan edilmiş davranışlarını belirlemektir. Sonuçlar mesleğe yeni başlamış ve deneyimli öğretmenlerin sözel düzeltici dönüte ilişkin inanç ve tutumları arasında bazı benzerlikler olmasına rağmen, dil bileşenlerine ilişkin hataları düzeltme konusunda kullandıkları sözel düzeltici dönüt tekniklerinin ve inançlarının farklılık gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sözel düzeltici dönüt, EFL mesleğe yeni başlamış öğretmenler, Mesleğe yeni başlamış öğretmenlerin inançları, EFL deneyimli öğretmenler, Deneyimli öğretmenlerin inançları

Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback

Öz

This study aims to investigate novice and experienced teachers’ stated beliefs and attitudes about oral corrective feedback (OCF) and the similarities and differences between them. Certain qualitative and quantitative research techniques were employed in this study to answer the research questions. Regarding qualitative design, some interviews were conducted to find out novice and experienced teachers’ stated beliefs about OCF. The quantitative part of the study is based on data collected through Situations for Error Correction (SEC) Simulation. The novice and experienced teachers were asked to write how they would respond to each situation and why they would respond that way. The aim of this tool was to identify the novice and experienced teachers’ stated attitudes. The results indicated that although there were some similarities between the novice and experienced teachers’ beliefs and attitudes about OCF, their OCF strategies and beliefs varied regarding correcting errors concerning language components.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Oral corrective feedback, EFL novice teachers, Novice teachers’ beliefs, EFL experienced teachers, Experienced teachers’ beliefs

Kaynakça

Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behaviour: The effects of knowledge of results, incentives and reinforcement on learning and performance. Penguin Books.
Bailey, K. M. (1996). The best laid plans: Teachers’ in-class decisions to depart from their lesson plans. Voices from the Language Classroom, 15-40.
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 243-272. doi:10.1093/applin/25.2.243
Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing. Brians, P. (2003). Common errors in English usage. Franklin, Beedle & Associates, Inc..
Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436-458. doi:10.1177/1362168814563200
Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors.. Language learning, 27(1), 29-46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00290.x
Clark, C. M. (1984). Teachers' thought processes (No. 72). Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
Dilans, G. (2010). Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), 787-816. doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.6.787
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Issues and terminology. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, 1-11.
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193-220. doi:10.1177/136216880000400302

Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65. doi:10.1080/0013188960380104
Fanselow, J. F. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10(5), 583-593. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1977.tb03035.x
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1977). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Retrieved from http://books.google.ie/books?id=RbWJrgEACAAJ&dq=The+Discovery+of+Grounded+Theory:+Strategies+for+Qualitative+Research.&hl=&cd=3&source=gbs_api
Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed?. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 255-270. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00004-1
Hendrickson, J. M. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 62(8), 387-398.doi:10.2307/32617
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use. Routledge.
Kasper, G. (1985). Repair in foreign language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 200-215. doi:10.1017/S0272263100005374
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Permagon.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies In Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 429-4.doi:10.1017/S0272263100009517
Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N., & Spada, N. M. (1999). How Languages are Learned. Oxford University Press, USA. Retrieved from http://books.google.ie/books?id=wlYTbuCsR7wC&dq=Lightbown,+P.+M.,+%26+Spada,+N.+(1999).+How+languages+are+learned&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141. doi:10.1093/applin/4.2.126
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
Long, M. (2001). Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology. In K. De Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66. doi:10.1017/S0272263197001034
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 32(2), 265-302. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990520
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1-40. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000365
Méndez, E. H., & Cruz, M. R. R. (2012). Teachers' perceptions about oral corrective feedback and their practice in EFL classrooms. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 14(2), 63-75.
Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. Tesol Quarterly, 30(1), 131-153. doi:10.2307/3587610
Özmen, K. S., & Aydın, H. U. (2015). Examining student teachers' beliefs about oral corrective feedback: Insights from a teacher education program in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(12), 141-164. doi:10.14221/ajte.2015v40n12.10
Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 36(4), 573-595. doi:10.2307/3588241
Peacock, M. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers' beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29(2), 177-195. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00010-0
Roothooft, H. (2014). The relationship between adult EFL teachers' oral feedback practices and their beliefs. System, 46, 65-79. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.07.012
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263-300. doi:10.1191/1362168804lr14
Swan, M., & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English: A teacher's guide to interference and other problems (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge.White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition, 1-210.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Temel Eğitim (Diğer), Alan Eğitimleri (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hale Ülkü Aydın ^*
0009-0006-9249-378X
Türkiye

Kemal Sinan Özmen
0000-0002-4454-235X
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ağustos 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Mart 2024

Kabul Tarihi

15 Mayıs 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1447219

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA86TP59TY

APA

Aydın, H. Ü., & Özmen, K. S. (2024). Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(2), 1115-1144. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1447219

AMA

1.Aydın HÜ, Özmen KS. Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback. GEFAD. 2024;44(2):1115-1144. doi:10.17152/gefad.1447219

Chicago

Aydın, Hale Ülkü, ve Kemal Sinan Özmen. 2024. “Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback”. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 44 (2): 1115-44. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1447219.

EndNote

Aydın HÜ, Özmen KS (01 Ağustos 2024) Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 44 2 1115–1144.

IEEE

[1]H. Ü. Aydın ve K. S. Özmen, “Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback”, GEFAD, c. 44, sy 2, ss. 1115–1144, Ağu. 2024, doi: 10.17152/gefad.1447219.

ISNAD

Aydın, Hale Ülkü - Özmen, Kemal Sinan. “Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback”. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 44/2 (01 Ağustos 2024): 1115-1144. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1447219.

JAMA

1.Aydın HÜ, Özmen KS. Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback. GEFAD. 2024;44:1115–1144.

MLA

Aydın, Hale Ülkü, ve Kemal Sinan Özmen. “Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback”. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 44, sy 2, Ağustos 2024, ss. 1115-44, doi:10.17152/gefad.1447219.

Vancouver

1.Hale Ülkü Aydın, Kemal Sinan Özmen. Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback. GEFAD. 01 Ağustos 2024;44(2):1115-44. doi:10.17152/gefad.1447219

Mesleğe Yeni Başlamış ve Deneyimli Öğretmenlerin Sözel Düzeltici Dönüte İlişkin İnançları ve Tutumları

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Beliefs and Stated Attitudes About Oral Corrective Feedback

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster