Afrika’nın İndirgemeci İmajları, Kaynakları Sorgulamak ve Pasif Bir Kurban olarak Yeni Kuşaklar: Tarihi ve Küresel Temsili Pratikler Üzerinde Bir Değerlendirme

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 12, 89 - 114, 01.01.2017

Abdulaziz Dino Gidreta

Öz

Afrika’nın yaygın indirgemeci imajı yeni nesil Afrika kuşakları üzerinde giderek artan bir endişe yaratmaya devam etmektedir. Afrika’nın tamamının aynı yapıda olduğu indirgenmezse bile “Afrika imajı” diye klasik ve meşhur bir söylem bulunmaktadır. Oluşturulan indirgemeci imajın ‘pasif kurbanı’ olan şimdiki Afrika kuşakları üzerinde oluşan zararlı etkilerden dolayı düşük imaj algısı endişe verici olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Yeni Afrika kuşaklarının, imajın büyük bir önem kazandığı uluslararası dinamik sahnede düşük bir ‘benlik’ ve ‘rol algılamaya’ gitme riskleri oldukça fazladır. Bir başka ifadeyle, düşük imaj algısının yarattığı kaygı ve pasif tutum, Afrika ve Afrikalıların küresel siyasal, ekonomik ve kültürel paylaşımda dışlamasına sebep olmaktadır. Afrika imaj konusunda ‘gerçek ve imaj’ ve ‘eleştiri ve yanlış temsil’ gibi tartışılabilir konular olsa bile, Afrika’nın indirgemeci imaj inşasına neden olan tarihi ve devam eden küresel fenomenler sorgulamalıdır. Bu bağlamda, Afrika’nın indirgemeci imajların tarihi kölelik ve sömürgecilik dönemlere kadar geri döner. O zamandan bu yana, hiçbir coğrafik ya da kültürel grubun imajı Afrika’nın kadar kolay-kolay ve acımasızca zarar verilmedi. Bu makale Afrika karşı indirgemeci imaj inşasına katkısı olabileceği zannedilen tarihi ve devam eden küresel fenomenleri değerlendirmektedir. Bütün bu imaj endişeleri yaratmasına katkısı olabilecekleri varsayarak sömürge sergiler, misyoner koleksiyonları, oryantal ve Avrupa-merkezci anlatılar, dünya enformasyon ve iletişim düzensizliği, dünya haritanın inşası, kalkınma ve insani müdahale gibi pratikler üzerinde genel bir değerlendirme yapmaktadır. Afrika’nın kalkınmasına olumsuz etkilemesinden dolayı bahsedilen tarihi ve küresel temsili pratikler sorgulaması gerekir. İmaj restorasyon ve promosyon odaklı karşı -stratejiler gerektiğini de bu makalede vurgulanmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afrika’nın İmajı, Sömürge Sergileri, Oryantal ve Avrupa-Merkezci Anlatıları, Dünya En

Africa’s Reductive Images, Contesting the Sources, and New Generations as Passive Victims: A Reflection on Historical and Global Representational Practices

Öz

The impacts of African ‘reductive images’ on the new African generation has become a growing concern. Though the entire Africa cannot be condensed into a homogenous feature, there has been a classic subject matter commonly discoursed as ‘African image’. This subject is worrisome for its undesirable impact on contemporary African generations as bearers of negative images and ‘passive victims’. There is a growing risk of pushing these generations into reduced ‘self-conception’ and ‘role-perception’ in the international spheres of dynamics where reputation matters a lot. In other words, such anxieties and acts of passiveness would lead Africa and Africans to be sidelined in global socio-economic shares. While this subject inscribes several arguable themes including ‘reality versus image’ and ‘criticism versus misrepresentation’, it sounds vital to discover and challenge its historical and global basis. In this regard, the hi/story of African ‘reductive images’ goes as far back as the start of slavery and colonialism. Since then, perhaps no image of a geo-cultural region has been as simply degraded as African one. This article attempts to make a reflective review on historical and global representational practices that, directly or indirectly, contribute to the reductive images of African continent. It mainly considers the practices of colonial exhibitions, missionary collections, Oriental and Eurocentric narratives, world information and communication dis/order, world mapping and spatial imagery, as well as developmental and humanitarian interventions. The article comes to confront these mis/representational practices and phenomena for their collectively injurious effects on the pace of African development. Essentially, there is urgent need for counter-strategies aiming at image restoration and promotion

Anahtar Kelimeler

Africa’s Images, Colonial Exhibitions, Oriental And Eurocentric Narratives, World Information

Kaynakça

• Blake, M. (2013). Worlds apart: Uganda tops list of most ethnically diverse countries on Earth while South Korea comes bottom. Daily Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2326136.
• • Brooks, M. D. (2013). Civilizing the metropole: The role of the 1889 Parisian universal exposition’s colonial exhibits in creating greater France. The University of Central Florida undergraduate Research Journal, 6(2), pp. 71-81.
• • Chandra, R. (2004). Communication Media and Social Change. Delhi: Isha Books.
• • Chang, H.Y. (2013). To View Two Views: A Case Study of Cross-Cultural Communication in Museum Exhibitions. New York: ProQuest LLC.
• • Confino, A. (1997). Collective memory and cultural history: Problems of method. The American Historical Review, 102 (5), pp. 1386-1403.
• • Corbey, R. (1993). Ethnographic showcases, 1870-1930. American Anthropological Association, Cultural Anthropology, 8(3), pp. 338-369.
• • Debalke, T. (2016, February 02). Corporate council on Africa or corruption council for African authoritarian regimes? Retrieved from http://ecadforum.com/2016/02/02/corporate-council-on-africa-or-corruption-council.
• • Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks. Translated by Charles Lam Markmann. London: Pluto Press
• • Gilman, S. L. (1985). Black bodies, white bodies: Towards an iconography of female sexuality in late nineteenth-century arts, medicine, and literature. Chicago Journals, Critical Inquiry, 12 (1), pp. 204-242.
• • Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage Publications.
• • Harry, I. (2015). Revisiting the new world information and communication order dialectic using Nigerian newspapers directional focus as case study. New Media and Mass Communication, 35, pp. 73-84.
• • Korasick, J. E. (2005). Collecting Africa: African material culture displays and the American image of Africa, 1885-1930. New York: ProQuest.
• • Lindfors, B. (2001). Hottentot, Bushman, Kaffir: The making of racist stereotypes in 19th-century Britain. In Palmberg, M. (Eds.), Encounter images in the meetings between Africa and Europe (pp. 54 -75). Borås: Centraltryckeriet Åke Svenson AB.
• • Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy: Volume one. London: Hazell, Watson & Viney Ltd.
• • McCombs M.E. & Shaw D. L. (1979). The Agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36 (2), pp. 176-187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• • Mezzana D. (2005). A cancerous image: The causes of Africa’s negative and reductive image. African Societies. Two-Monthly E-Magazine on the Invisible Africa. Retrieved from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ digitaldemocracy.
• • Pitchford, S. (2008). Identity tourism: Imaging and imagining the nation. West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing.
• • Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, A Division of Random House.
• • Sanchez-Gómez L. (2009). Imperial faith and catholic missions in the grand exhibitions of the Estado Novo. Analise Social, 44(193), pp. 671-692.
• • Schiffman, R. (2013). Hunger, food security, and the African land grab. Retrieved from http://voiceseducation.org/node/7873.
• • Selwyn-Holmes, A. (2009, August 12). Vulture stalking a child. Retrieved from https://iconicphotos. org/2009/08/12/.
• • Servaes, J. (2002). Communication for development: One world, multiple cultures. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
• • Servaes, J. (2007). Harnessing the UN system into a common approach on communication for development. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
• • The true size of Africa. (2013, n.d.). Inside/Out. Retrieved from http://insideoutpaper.org/the-true-sizeof-africa (2013).
• • Tomaseilli, K.G. (2007). Mediterranean chic; video and development. Studies in Documentary Film, 1(3), pp. 297-317.
• • Turvill, W. (2013). Africa as you’ve never seen it before: Clever comparison shows it’s really as big as China, India, the United States AND most of Europe put together. Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2445615.