LABİOPLASTİ KONULU MAKALELERİN BİLİM HARİTALAMA TEKNİĞİ İLE ANALİZİ

Yıl 2022, , 358 - 365, 31.08.2022

Esra Comert

https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1008019

Öz

Amaç: Labioplasti, labia minoranın cerrahi olarak küçültülmesidir. Labioplasti son yıllarda giderek daha popüler hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı literatürde yer alan labioplasti konulu araştırmaların bilim haritalama tekniği ile analiz edilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada yararlanılan veriler, yüksek kaliteli ve etkili bilimsel makalelerden alınan özetlerin ve referansların yer aldığı Web of Science Core Colection ,Scopus ve PubMed veri tabanlarından alınmıştır. Veri seti Python program dili ve onun altındaki Pandas kütüphanesi kullanılarak birleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler R-Studio’nun içerisindeki Biblioshiny aracılığıyla ile analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Labioplasti konusunda yapılan çalışmaların sorumlu yazarlarının ülkeleri bazında yapılan analiz sonuçları makale sayılarına göre ABD’nin toplam 85 makale ile önde olduğu görülmektedir. Gemma Sharp toplam makale sayısı bakımında 19 makale ile en çok makale yayınlayan yazar durumundadır. Labioplasti konusunda en fazla makale yayımlayan kaynak 58 makale ile Aesthetic Surgery Journal isimli dergidir.
Sonuç: Makalemizde son dönemin en çok ilgi duyulan konularında labioplasti konusu bilim haritalama yönüyle analiz edilmiştir. Literatürde sık rastlanmaya bu çalışmanın alanındaki çalışmalara ışık tutacağı değerlendirilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Labioplasti, Bilim Haritalama, Web of Science Core Colection, PubMed

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

yok

Analysis of Articles on Labioplasty with Science Mapping Technique

Öz

Objective: Labiaplasty is the surgical reduction of the labia minora. Labiaplasty has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study is to analyze the studies on labiaplasty in the literature with the science mapping technique.
Materials and Methods: The data used in this study were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus and PubMed databases, which contain abstracts and references from high quality and effective scientific articles. The dataset is assembled using the Python programming language and the underlying Pandas library. The obtained data were analyzed with Biblioshiny in R-Studio.
Results: The results of the analysis made on the basis of the countries of the responsible authors of the studies on labiaplasty show that the USA is ahead with a total of 85 articles according to the number of articles. Gemma Sharp is the author with the highest number of articles with 19 articles in terms of total number of articles. The source that publishes the most articles on labiaplasty is the Aesthetic Surgery Journal with 58 articles.
Conclusion: In our article, the subject of labiaplasty has been analyzed in terms of science mapping, which is the most interesting subject of the last period. It is considered that this study, which is frequently encountered in the literature, will shed light on the studies in its field.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Labiaplasty, Science Mapping, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

• 1. Gowda AU, Chopra N, Khalifeh M. Indications, Techniques and Complications of Labiaplasty. Eplasty. 2015 Aug 18;15:ic46–ic46.
• 2. Al-Jumah MM, Al-Wailiy SK, Al-Badr A. Satisfaction Survey of Women After Cosmetic Genital Procedures: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia. Aesthetic Surg journal Open forum. 2020 Nov 10;3(1):ojaa048–ojaa048.
• 3. Özer M, Mortimore I, Jansma EP, Mullender MG. Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques, and ethics. Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Mar;15(3):175–89.
• 4. Sorice SC, Li AY, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. Why Women Request Labiaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):856–63.
• 5. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11:959–75.
• 6. Chen C. Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Data Inf Sci. 2017;2(2):1–40.
• 7. Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ Res Methods. 2015;18(3):429–72.
• 8. Kurutkan MN, Orhan F. Kalite Prensiplerinin Görsel Haritalama Tekniğine Göre Bibliyometrik Analizi. Ankara: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018.
• 9. Raan T. Advances in bibliometric analysis: Research performance assessment and science mapping. In 2014. p. 17–28.
• 10. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011 Jul;62(7):1382–402.
• 11. Oshodi OS, Awuzie BO, Akotia J, Ademiloye AS, Ngowi A. A bibliometric analysis of recycled concrete research (1978–2019). Built Environ Proj Asset Manag. 2020;
• 12. Li J, Hale A. Output distributions and topic maps of safety related journals. Saf Sci. 2016;82:236–44.
• 13. Nasir A, Shaukat Dar K, Hameed IA, Luo S, Mahboob T, Iqbal F, et al. A Bibliometric Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Social Sciences: A Review of Influential Aspects and Conceptual Structure. IEEE Access. 2020 Jul;8:133377–402.
• 14. Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics. 1991;22(1):155–205.
• 15. Raposo P, Touya G, Bereuter P. A Change of Theme: The Role of Generalization in Thematic Mapping. Vol. 9, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020.
• 16. Sivertsen G, Rousseau R, Zhang L. Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting. J Informetr. 2019;13(2):679–94.
• 17. Kamdem JP, Duarte AE, Lima KRR, Rocha JBT, Hassan W, Barros LM, et al. Research trends in food chemistry: A bibliometric review of its 40 years anniversary (1976–2016). Food Chem [Internet]. 2019;294:448–57. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814619308167
• 18. Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2006;69(1):131–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
• 19. Harzing A. Reflections On The H-Index. Bus Leadersh. 2012;1(9):101–6.
• 20. Sullivan N. “The price to pay for our common good”: Genital Modification and the Somatechnologies of Cultural (In) difference. Soc Semiot. 2007;17(3):395–409.
• 21. Boddy J. The normal and the aberrant in female genital cutting: Shifting paradigms. HAU J Ethnogr Theory. 2016;6(2):41–69.
• 22. Honoré LH, O’Hara KE. Benign enlargement of the labia minora: Report of two cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1978 May 1;8:61–4.
• 23. TÜBİTAK Ulakbim Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi. Bilim Dallarında Dünya, Ülkeler ve Gruplara Ait Veriler: Tıbbi Bilimler (2010-2015). 2020.
• 24. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Latest International Study Shows Global Rise In Cosmetic Surgery. New York; 2018.
• 25. Scimago. Journal & Country Rank [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php