The relation between neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality rates of endovascular aortic repair patients
Öz
Aim
To represent our results of EVAR/TEVAR procedures for thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies and the relation between the post-procedural neurological adverse events and in-hospital mortality.
Material and Method
Patients who underwent EVAR/TEVAR procedures between November 2016 and May 2021 included in this retrospective study. Patients with a history of any cerebrovascular event before the intervention were excluded. Patients divided into two groups according to occurrence of any early neurological complications.
Results
A total of 60 patients who underwent EVAR/TEVAR procedures were evaluated. Group 1 included 37 (78.7%) patients who had no neurological complication. Group 2 included 10 (21.3%) patients who had a postoperative neurological complication. The intensive care unit stay time was significantly longer in Group 2 than Group 1 (1.7 ± 2.0 days in Group 1 vs 6.2 ± 5.1 days in Group 2, p=0.021). Overall mortality rate was 19.1% (9 of 47 patients). The mortality rate of the Group 2 was significantly higher than Group 1 (2 of 37 (5.4%) patients in Group 1 vs 7 of 10 patients (70%) in Group 2, p=0.001). American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification score was significantly higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (3.5 ± 0.6 in Group 1 vs 4.1 ± 0.3 in Group 2, p=0.016). The most common early postoperative neurological complication was lack of recovery of consciousness (no postoperative consciousness).
Conclusion
The occurrence of any postoperative neurological adverse event has an additive effect to the in-hospital mortality rate of TEVAR and EVAR procedures.
Anahtar Kelimeler
EVAR, TEVAR, neurological deficit, in-hospital mortality
Proje Numarası
yok
Kaynakça
- Upchurch GR, Escobar GA, Azizzadeh A, Beck AW, Conrad MF, Matsumura JS, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73:55S-83S.
- Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, May M, Anderson SG, Benjamin EJ, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:636–46.
- Hu FY, Fang ZB, Leshnower BG, Duwayri Y, Jordan WD, Gillespie TW, et al. Contemporary evaluation of mortality and stroke risk after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:718-727.e5.
- Chung J, Corriere MA, Veeraswamy RK, Kasirajan K, Milner R, Dodson TF, et al. Risk factors for late mortality after endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:549–55.
- Scali ST, Chang CK, Feezor RJ, Hess PJ, Beaver TM, Martin TD, et al. Preoperative prediction of mortality within 1 year after elective thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:1266–73.
- Goodney PP, Travis L, Lucas FL, Fillinger MF, Goodman DC, Cronenwett JL, et al. Survival after open versus endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair in an observational study of the Medicare population. Circulation. 2011;124:2661–9.
- Fairman RM, Criado F, Farber M, Kwolek C, Mehta M, White R, et al. Pivotal results of the Medtronic Vascular Talent Thoracic Stent Graft System: the VALOR trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:546–54.
- Malas MB, Freischlag JA. Interpretation of the results of OVER in the context of EVAR trial, DREAM, and the EUROSTAR registry. Semin Vasc Surg. 2010;23:165–9.
- Quinney BE, Parmar GM, Nagre SB, Patterson M, Passman MA, Taylor S, et al. Long-term single institution comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair and open aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1592–7; discussion 1597-8.
- Messé SR, Bavaria JE, Mullen M, Cheung AT, Davis R, Augoustides JG, et al. Neurologic Outcomes from High Risk Descending Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Operations in the Era of Endovascular Repair. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9:344–51.