Klinik Araştırma

Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery

Cilt: 32 Sayı: 3 1 Ağustos 2022
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery

Öz

Objective: Circumcision is the excision and removal of skin part that covers glans penis which is called as prepicium, Dorsal penile nevre block (DPNB) is used alone or in combination with general anesthesia for circumcision. Application of a laryngeal mask (LMA) is preferred especially in pediatric age group because it requiresless anesthetic substance, it doesn’t trigger laryngeal reflexes. Our aim was to compare DPNB application under sedation and LMA application for management of anesthesia in circumcision surgery. Material and Methods: The thousand and ten patients who had DPNB under sedation and LMA were compared with regards to duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, duration of recovery, need for postoperative analgesia, complications, and season of surgery. Results: Duration of surgery, anesthesia, and recovery were significantly shorter in DPNB application under sedation compared with LMA application (p<0,05). For postoperative analgesia caudal block was applied to 72, and IV analgesics were applied to 433 patients who had LMA application. DPNB provided sufficient analgesia. Conclusion: Application of DPNB under sedation provides both adequate anesthesia and postoperative pain control by allowing less surgery, anesthesia, and recovery durations than LMA application.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Circumcision Surgery, Dorsal penile nevre block, Laryngeal mask

Kaynakça

  1. 1. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics 2012; 130: 585-586.
  2. 2. August DA Everett LL. Pediatric ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin 2014; 32: 411-429.
  3. 3. Bellieni CV, Alagna MG, Buonocore G. Analgesia for infants’ circumcision. Ital J Pediatr. BioMed Central; 2013; 39: 38.
  4. 4. Beyaz SG. Comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy of caudal block versus dorsal penile nerve block with levobupivacaine for circumcision in children. Korean J Pain 2011; 24: 31‐35.
  5. 5. Polaner DM, Taenzer AH, Walker BJ, et al. Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN): a multi-institutional study of the use and incidence of complications of pediatric regional anesthesia. AnesthAnalg 2012; 115: 1353-1364.
  6. 6. Mancuso T, Burns J. Ethical concerns in the management of pain in the neonate. PediatrAnesth 2009; 19: 953–957.
  7. 7. Sabuncu U, Kusderci HS, Oterkus M, Abdullayev R, Demir A, Uludag O, Ozdas S, Goksu M. AuraGain and i-Gel laryngeal masks in general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Performance characteristics and effects on hemodynamics. Saudi Med J 2018; 39(11): 1082-1089. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.11.22346
  8. 8. Pennant J, White P. The laryngeal mask airway: Its usesing anesthesiology. Anaesthesiology 1993; 79: 144. 9. Bateman DV. Correspondence. Anaesthesia 1975;30: 101.
  9. 10. Soh CR, Ng SBA, Lim SL. Dorsal penile nerve block. PaediatrAnaesth 2003; 13: 329-333.
  10. 11. Soliman MG, Tremblay NA. Nerve block of the penis for postoperative pain relief in children. Anesth Analg 1978; 57: 495–498.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Uludag, Ö., Duran, M., Dumlupınar, E., Apaydın, Ö., & Abeş, M. (2022). Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery. Genel Tıp Dergisi, 32(3), 345-349. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1115842
AMA
1.Uludag Ö, Duran M, Dumlupınar E, Apaydın Ö, Abeş M. Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery. Genel Tıp Derg. 2022;32(3):345-349. doi:10.54005/geneltip.1115842
Chicago
Uludag, Öznur, Mehmet Duran, Ebru Dumlupınar, Öğünç Apaydın, ve Musa Abeş. 2022. “Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery”. Genel Tıp Dergisi 32 (3): 345-49. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1115842.
EndNote
Uludag Ö, Duran M, Dumlupınar E, Apaydın Ö, Abeş M (01 Ağustos 2022) Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery. Genel Tıp Dergisi 32 3 345–349.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Uludag, M. Duran, E. Dumlupınar, Ö. Apaydın, ve M. Abeş, “Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery”, Genel Tıp Derg, c. 32, sy 3, ss. 345–349, Ağu. 2022, doi: 10.54005/geneltip.1115842.
ISNAD
Uludag, Öznur - Duran, Mehmet - Dumlupınar, Ebru - Apaydın, Öğünç - Abeş, Musa. “Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery”. Genel Tıp Dergisi 32/3 (01 Ağustos 2022): 345-349. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1115842.
JAMA
1.Uludag Ö, Duran M, Dumlupınar E, Apaydın Ö, Abeş M. Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery. Genel Tıp Derg. 2022;32:345–349.
MLA
Uludag, Öznur, vd. “Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery”. Genel Tıp Dergisi, c. 32, sy 3, Ağustos 2022, ss. 345-9, doi:10.54005/geneltip.1115842.
Vancouver
1.Öznur Uludag, Mehmet Duran, Ebru Dumlupınar, Öğünç Apaydın, Musa Abeş. Comparison of Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Laryngeal Mask Applications for the Management of Circumcision Surgery. Genel Tıp Derg. 01 Ağustos 2022;32(3):345-9. doi:10.54005/geneltip.1115842