Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Fetal Development

Yıl 2024, , 440 - 444, 31.08.2024
https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1354363

Öz

Aims: The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of electromagnetic field exposure during pregnancy on fetal anthropometric measurements by means of ultrasonography.
Methods: This is a cross sectional study. The study was conducted among 261 pregnant women who applied to the Obstetrics and Gynecology outpatient clinic. A face-to-face questionnaire was applied to 261 volunteer pregnant women and fetal anthropometric measurements (head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), biparietal diameter (BPD)) were performed by transabdominal ultrasound.
Results: The mean age of the pregnant women in this study was 29.65 ± 6. 140. (53.6%) of the pregnant women were between the ages of 25-34, 260 (99.6%) were married, 85 (32.6%) were high school graduates and 184 (70.5%) were housewives. The income of 116 (44.4%) pregnant women was equal to their expenses. The frequency of those exposed to electromagnetic fields at home is 98.5%. There was no difference found between FL, AC, HC and BPD values and electromagnetic field exposure at home, exposure to x-ray or tomography (p>0.05). It was observed that FL, HC, BPD ultrasonographic measurement values were significantly lower in people exposed to electromagnetic field at work compared to those not exposed to electromagnetic field at work.
Conclusion: It was observed that FL, HC, BPD ultrasonographic measurement values were significantly lower in people exposed to electromagnetic field at work. There are studies that show the negative effects of electromagnetic field on the fetus, especially during pregnancy, although there is no definitive evidence. Studies to be carried out on this subject can be a guide for protection from the negative effects of electromagnetic field.

Kaynakça

  • Saliev T, Begimbetova D, Masoud AR, Matkarimov B. Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields: Two sides of a coin. Vol. 141, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. Elsevier Ltd; 2019. p. 25–36.
  • Jangid P, Rai U, Sharma RS, Singh R. The role of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on female fertility: A review. Int J Environ Health Res. 2022;
  • Gökoğlan E, Ekinci M, Özgenç E, İlem-Özdemir D, Aşıkoğlu M. Radiation and Its Effects on Human Health. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020 Sep;3(25):289–94.
  • Williams PM, Fletcher S. Health Effects of Prenatal Radiation Exposure. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82(5).
  • IARC. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2013;102.
  • Feychting M, Forssén U, Floderus B. Occupational and Residential Magnetic Field Exposure and Leukemia and Central Nervous System Tumors. Epidemiology. 1997 Jul;8(4):384.
  • Seomun GA, Lee J, Park J. Exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and childhood cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 1;16(5 May).
  • Júlvez J, Paus T, Bellinger D, Eskenazi B, Tiemeier H, Pearce N, et al. Environment and brain development: Challenges in the global context. Vol. 46, Neuroepidemiology. S. Karger AG; 2016. p. 79–82.
  • Davis D, Birnbaum L, Ben-Ishai P, Taylor H, Sears M, Butler T, et al. Wireless technologies, non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and children: Identifying and reducing health risks. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2023 Feb 1;53(2).
  • Mortazavi SMJ, Shirazi KR, Mortazavi G. The study of the effects of ionizing and non-ionizing radiations on birth weight of newborns to exposed mothers. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013 Jan;4(1):213–7.
  • Mahram M, Ghazavi M. The effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on pregnancy and fetal growth, and development. Arch Iran Med. 2013;16(4):221–4.
  • Kashani ZA, Pakzad R, Fakari FR, Haghparast MS, Abdi F, Kiani Z, et al. Electromagnetic fields exposure on fetal and childhood abnormalities: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 18, Open Medicine (Poland). De Gruyter Open Ltd; 2023.
  • Irani M, Aradmehr M, Ghorbani M, Baghani R. Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Abortion in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vol. 30, Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia; 2023. p. 70–80.
  • Li DK, Chen H, Ferber JR, Odouli R, Quesenberry C. Exposure to magnetic field non-ionizing radiation and the risk of miscarriage: A prospective cohort study. Vol. 7, Scientific Reports. Nature Publishing Group; 2017.
  • Zhou F, Ma C, Li Y, Zhang M, Liu W. The Effect of Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Pregnancy Outcome: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Clin Case Rep [Internet]. 2022;7:2326. Available from: http://anncaserep.com/
  • Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, Hubmann G, Jandrisovits R, Kern M, et al. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev Environ Health. 2016 Sep 1;31(3):363–97.
  • Col-Araz N. Evaluation of factors affecting birth weight and preterm birth in southern Turkey. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(4):459–62.
  • Tsarna E, Reedijk M, Birks LE, Guxens M, Ballester F, Ha M, et al. Associations of Maternal Cell-Phone Use during Pregnancy with Pregnancy Duration and Fetal Growth in 4 Birth Cohorts. Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1270–80.
  • Baste V, Oftedal G, Møllerløkken OJ, Hansson Mild K, Moen BE. Prospective Study of Pregnancy Outcomes after Parental Cell Phone Exposure: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Epidemiology. 2015 Jul 4;26(4):613–21.
  • Kömürcü Karuserci Ö, Çöl N, Demirel C. May electromagnetic field exposure during pregnancy have a negative effect on anthropometric measurements of the newborn? Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019 Dec 29;44:290–5.
  • Sage C, Burgio E. Electromagnetic Fields, Pulsed Radiofrequency Radiation, and Epigenetics: How Wireless Technologies May Affect Childhood Development. Child Dev. 2018 Jan 1;89(1):129–36.
  • Kömürcü Karuserci Ö, Çöl N, Demirel C. May electromagnetic field exposure during pregnancy have a negative effect on anthropometric measurements of the newborn? Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019 Dec 31;44:290–5.
  • Ren Y, Chen J, Miao M, Li DK, Liang H, Wang Z, et al. Prenatal exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic field and its impact on fetal growth. Environ Health. 2019 Jan 11;18(1).
  • Mahram M, Ghazavi M. The Effect of Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Pregnancy and Fetal Growth, and Development. Vol. 16, Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2013.
  • de Vocht F, Lee B. Residential proximity to electromagnetic field sources and birth weight: Minimizing residual confounding using multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Environ Int. 2014;69:51–7.
  • Yavuz C, Arslanyılmaz MM, Vaizoğlu SA, Keskin C, Öngöre R, Güler Ç. Electromagnetic field levels in houses close to high power line and symptoms. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019 Dec 31;44:263–71.
  • Papadopoulou E, Haugen M, Schjølberg S, Magnus P, Brunborg G, Vrijheid M, et al. Maternal cell phone use in early pregnancy and child’s language, communication and motor skills at 3 and 5 years: The Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa). BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 5;17(1).
  • Tsarna E, Reedijk M, Birks LE, Guxens M, Ballester F, Ha M, et al. Associations of Maternal Cell-Phone Use during Pregnancy with Pregnancy Duration and Fetal Growth in 4 Birth Cohorts. Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1270–80.
  • Han J, Cao Z, Liu X, Zhang W, Zhang S. Effect of early pregnancy electromagnetic field exposure on embryo growth ceasing. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2010 May;39(3):349–52.
  • Bracken MB, Belanger K, Hellenbrand K, Dlugosz L, Holford TR, McSharry JE, et al. Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields During Pregnancy with Emphasis on Electrically Heated Beds. Epidemiology. 1995 May;6(3):263–70.

Elektromanyetik Alan Maruziyetinin Fetal Gelişime Etkisi

Yıl 2024, , 440 - 444, 31.08.2024
https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1354363

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı gebelikte elektromanyetik alan maruziyetinin fetal antropometrik ölçümler üzerine etkisini ultrasonografi yardımıyla değerlendirmektir.
Yöntemler: Bu kesitsel bir çalışmadır. Araştırma Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum polikliniğine başvuran 261 gebe ile gerçekleştirildi. 261 gönüllü gebeye yüz yüze anket uygulandı ve transabdominal ultrason ile fetal antropometrik ölçümler (baş çevresi (HC), karın çevresi (AC), femur uzunluğu (FL), bipariyetal çap (BPD)) yapıldı.
Bulgular:Araştırmaya katılan gebelerin yaş ortalaması 29,65±6,140 idi. Gebelerin 140'ı (%53,6) 25-34 yaş aralığında, 260'ı (%99,6) evli, 85'i (%32,6) lise mezunuydu. 184'ü (%70,5) ev hanımıydı. 116 (%44,4) gebenin geliri harcamalarına eşitti. Evde elektromanyetik alanlara maruz kalanların sıklığı %98,5’ti. FL, AC, HC ve BPD değerleri ile evde elektromanyetik alan maruziyeti, röntgen veya tomografiye maruz kalma arasında fark bulunamadı (p>0,05). İş yerinde elektromanyetik alana maruz kalan kişilerde FL, HC, BPD ultrasonografik ölçüm değerlerinin iş yerinde elektromanyetik alana maruz kalmayanlara göre anlamlı derecede düşük olduğu görüldü.
Sonuç: İş yerinde elektromanyetik alana maruz kalan kişilerde FL, HC, BPD ultrasonografik ölçüm değerlerinin anlamlı derecede düşük olduğu görüldü. Kesin bir kanıt bulunmamakla birlikte, özellikle hamilelik döneminde elektromanyetik alanın fetüs üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini gösteren çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Bu konuda yapılacak çalışmalar elektromanyetik alanın olumsuz etkilerinden korunmak için yol gösterici olabilir.

Kaynakça

  • Saliev T, Begimbetova D, Masoud AR, Matkarimov B. Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields: Two sides of a coin. Vol. 141, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. Elsevier Ltd; 2019. p. 25–36.
  • Jangid P, Rai U, Sharma RS, Singh R. The role of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on female fertility: A review. Int J Environ Health Res. 2022;
  • Gökoğlan E, Ekinci M, Özgenç E, İlem-Özdemir D, Aşıkoğlu M. Radiation and Its Effects on Human Health. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020 Sep;3(25):289–94.
  • Williams PM, Fletcher S. Health Effects of Prenatal Radiation Exposure. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82(5).
  • IARC. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2013;102.
  • Feychting M, Forssén U, Floderus B. Occupational and Residential Magnetic Field Exposure and Leukemia and Central Nervous System Tumors. Epidemiology. 1997 Jul;8(4):384.
  • Seomun GA, Lee J, Park J. Exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and childhood cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 1;16(5 May).
  • Júlvez J, Paus T, Bellinger D, Eskenazi B, Tiemeier H, Pearce N, et al. Environment and brain development: Challenges in the global context. Vol. 46, Neuroepidemiology. S. Karger AG; 2016. p. 79–82.
  • Davis D, Birnbaum L, Ben-Ishai P, Taylor H, Sears M, Butler T, et al. Wireless technologies, non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and children: Identifying and reducing health risks. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2023 Feb 1;53(2).
  • Mortazavi SMJ, Shirazi KR, Mortazavi G. The study of the effects of ionizing and non-ionizing radiations on birth weight of newborns to exposed mothers. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013 Jan;4(1):213–7.
  • Mahram M, Ghazavi M. The effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on pregnancy and fetal growth, and development. Arch Iran Med. 2013;16(4):221–4.
  • Kashani ZA, Pakzad R, Fakari FR, Haghparast MS, Abdi F, Kiani Z, et al. Electromagnetic fields exposure on fetal and childhood abnormalities: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 18, Open Medicine (Poland). De Gruyter Open Ltd; 2023.
  • Irani M, Aradmehr M, Ghorbani M, Baghani R. Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Abortion in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vol. 30, Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia; 2023. p. 70–80.
  • Li DK, Chen H, Ferber JR, Odouli R, Quesenberry C. Exposure to magnetic field non-ionizing radiation and the risk of miscarriage: A prospective cohort study. Vol. 7, Scientific Reports. Nature Publishing Group; 2017.
  • Zhou F, Ma C, Li Y, Zhang M, Liu W. The Effect of Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Pregnancy Outcome: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Clin Case Rep [Internet]. 2022;7:2326. Available from: http://anncaserep.com/
  • Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, Hubmann G, Jandrisovits R, Kern M, et al. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev Environ Health. 2016 Sep 1;31(3):363–97.
  • Col-Araz N. Evaluation of factors affecting birth weight and preterm birth in southern Turkey. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(4):459–62.
  • Tsarna E, Reedijk M, Birks LE, Guxens M, Ballester F, Ha M, et al. Associations of Maternal Cell-Phone Use during Pregnancy with Pregnancy Duration and Fetal Growth in 4 Birth Cohorts. Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1270–80.
  • Baste V, Oftedal G, Møllerløkken OJ, Hansson Mild K, Moen BE. Prospective Study of Pregnancy Outcomes after Parental Cell Phone Exposure: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Epidemiology. 2015 Jul 4;26(4):613–21.
  • Kömürcü Karuserci Ö, Çöl N, Demirel C. May electromagnetic field exposure during pregnancy have a negative effect on anthropometric measurements of the newborn? Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019 Dec 29;44:290–5.
  • Sage C, Burgio E. Electromagnetic Fields, Pulsed Radiofrequency Radiation, and Epigenetics: How Wireless Technologies May Affect Childhood Development. Child Dev. 2018 Jan 1;89(1):129–36.
  • Kömürcü Karuserci Ö, Çöl N, Demirel C. May electromagnetic field exposure during pregnancy have a negative effect on anthropometric measurements of the newborn? Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019 Dec 31;44:290–5.
  • Ren Y, Chen J, Miao M, Li DK, Liang H, Wang Z, et al. Prenatal exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic field and its impact on fetal growth. Environ Health. 2019 Jan 11;18(1).
  • Mahram M, Ghazavi M. The Effect of Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Pregnancy and Fetal Growth, and Development. Vol. 16, Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2013.
  • de Vocht F, Lee B. Residential proximity to electromagnetic field sources and birth weight: Minimizing residual confounding using multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Environ Int. 2014;69:51–7.
  • Yavuz C, Arslanyılmaz MM, Vaizoğlu SA, Keskin C, Öngöre R, Güler Ç. Electromagnetic field levels in houses close to high power line and symptoms. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019 Dec 31;44:263–71.
  • Papadopoulou E, Haugen M, Schjølberg S, Magnus P, Brunborg G, Vrijheid M, et al. Maternal cell phone use in early pregnancy and child’s language, communication and motor skills at 3 and 5 years: The Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa). BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 5;17(1).
  • Tsarna E, Reedijk M, Birks LE, Guxens M, Ballester F, Ha M, et al. Associations of Maternal Cell-Phone Use during Pregnancy with Pregnancy Duration and Fetal Growth in 4 Birth Cohorts. Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1270–80.
  • Han J, Cao Z, Liu X, Zhang W, Zhang S. Effect of early pregnancy electromagnetic field exposure on embryo growth ceasing. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2010 May;39(3):349–52.
  • Bracken MB, Belanger K, Hellenbrand K, Dlugosz L, Holford TR, McSharry JE, et al. Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields During Pregnancy with Emphasis on Electrically Heated Beds. Epidemiology. 1995 May;6(3):263–70.
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)
Bölüm Original Article
Yazarlar

Ferit Kaya 0000-0002-0261-6293

Mehmet Can Nacar 0000-0001-5463-4197

Eda Fulden Tutar 0000-0002-5343-2603

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Ağustos 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ağustos 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Eylül 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Kaya F, Nacar MC, Tutar EF. The Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Fetal Development. Genel Tıp Derg. 2024;34(4):440-4.