Uncovering the Risks: Investigating the Impact of Abnormal 50 g Results of Two-Step Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening in Pregnant Women
Öz
Background/Aims: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent medical concern among pregnant women. Timely identification and management of GDM can mitigate the potential for maternal and fetal complications. The present study aimed to explore the maternal characteristics that may result in an isolated elevation in the 50 g Glucose Challenge Test (GCT) results (Pre-GDM condition) and to assess the impact of Pre-GDM status on fetal and neonatal outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective trial included 177 pregnant women and 177 infants. All pregnant women who applied to the antenatal clinic were screened for GDM. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with abnormal GCT (50 g levels) but normal 100 g-OGTT results (study or Pre-GDM group) and those with normal 50 g results (control group).
Results: The advanced maternal age (AMA) rate was higher in the study group. (14.80% vs. 4.80%, p=0.028). There was a difference between the groups in maternal weight measurements at the first pregnancy visit. The rate of overweighted patients (more than 80 kg at the first pregnancy visit) was higher in the Pre-GDM group (35.20% vs. 5.80%, p<0.001). The rate of fetal macrosomia was higher in the Pre-GDM group (10.20% vs. 0, p<0.05). It was determined that the neonate's head circumference (HC) was larger in the Pre-GDM group (35.15 vs. 34.69, p=0.029) Emergent (primary) cesarean section (C/S) rate with cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) indication was higher in the fetal macrosomia group (p<0.05). The power of the current study was determined as 87%
Conclusions : According to study result the patients in the Pre-GDM group is at risk of fetal macrosomia, which increases the risk of C/S. In overweighted and patients over 35 years old, 75 g OGTT may be more sensitive in detecting glucose metabolism disorders.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Sharma AK, Yerrabelli D, Sagili H, Sahoo JP, Gaur GS, Kumar A. Relationship between advanced glycated end products and maternal cognition in gestational diabetes: a case control study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2022;35(25):7806-11.
- Ozyurt R, Asicioglu O, Gultekin T, Gungorduk K, Boran B. The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women who were admitted to Istanbul Teaching and Research Hospital Obstetric and Gynecology Department. JOPP Derg. 2013;5(1):7-12.
- Ashwal E, Hod M. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Where are we now? Clinica chimica acta. 2015;451:14-20.
- Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Page KA. Gestational diabetes mellitus: risks and management during and after pregnancy. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2012;8(11):639.
- Esakoff TF, Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Screening for gestational diabetes: different cut-offs for different ethnicities? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2005;193(3):1040-4.
- Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, Muise M, Vandermeer B, Aktary WM, et al. Screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. Evidence report/technology assessment. 2012(210):1.
- Bardenheier BH, Imperatore G, Devlin HM, Kim SY, Cho P, Geiss LS. Trends in pre-pregnancy diabetes among deliveries in 19 US states, 2000− 2010. American journal of preventive medicine. 2015;48(2):154-61.
- Seval MM, Cavkaytar S, Atak Z, Cagman M. Should we interpret the results of ‘two-step’glucose screening again according to the obstetric outcomes? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2016;36(6):705-9.
- Sauer MV. Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health. Fertility and sterility. 2015;103(5):1136-43.
- Division UNDoEaSAP. World Fertility Patterns 2015–Data Booklet (ST/ESA/SER. A/370)2015.