Klinik Araştırma

EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS

Cilt: 35 Sayı: 2 30 Nisan 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS

Öz

Abstract Aims: Perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) operasyonu sonrası gelişebilen şiddetli ve dirençli kanamalar ve buna bağlı gerekebilen transkatater anjioembolizasyon (TAE) ihtiyacının değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı . Methods: PNL operations performed in two clinics in the last eight years were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with persistent and severe bleeding and a need for TAE were assessed in terms of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative findings. Results: The number of patients who underwent TAE was 14. The mean age was 40.9 years. The mean duration of operation was 80.1 minutes. The duration of fluoroscopy was 7.7 minutes (2.2-16 min). The mean hematocrit decrease of the patients was 11.8% (4.4-22.1%). The mean time from surgery to embolization was 5.6 days (1-11 days). Tthe mean nephrostomy time was 3.8 days (1-7), and the mean hospital stay was 4.9 days (2-10). 12 Fr access sheath was used in 1 patient, 20 Fr access sheath in 1 patient, 26 Fr access sheath in 1 patient, and 30 Fr access sheath in 11 patients. Conclusions: Bleeding requiring intervention after PNL is a condition that should be managed and treated well. The patient's characteristics, PNL technique, and per-operative findings cannot predict this condition. Larger scale prospective randomized studies are needed for definitive results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Nephrolithiasis, transcatheter angioembolization, fluoroscopy

Kaynakça

  1. 1- Muslumanoglu AY, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, Tepeler A, Esen T, et al. Updated epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in Turkey. I: Changing characteristics of urolithiasis. Urol Res. 2011 Aug;39(4):309-14
  2. 2- Rupel E, Brown R. Nephroscopy with removal of stone following nephrostomy for obstructive calculous anuria. J Urol 1941;46: 177-82
  3. 3- Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10:257-9
  4. 4- Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel-away sheath: an alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997; 11(3):171-2
  5. 5- Guidelines on Urolithiasis, European Urology Association, 2013, pp 1-100
  6. 6- Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, Cormio L, Zhang X, Louie M, et al. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 2011;25:1275-80
  7. 7- Lee WJ, Smith AD, Cubelli V, Badlani GH, Lewin B, Vernace F, et al. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:177-80
  8. 8- Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, St Lezin MA. Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 1994;152(6 Pt 1):1977-81
  9. 9- Turna B, Nazli O, Demiryoguran S, Mammadov R, Cal C. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: variables that influence hemorrhage. Urology 2007;69:603-7
  10. 10- Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ Jr, Barrett DM, Benson RC Jr, et al. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol 1985;134:1077-81

Kaynak Göster

APA
Sarıkaya, M., & Kandemir, E. (2025). EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS. Genel Tıp Dergisi, 35(2), 226-231. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1552117
AMA
1.Sarıkaya M, Kandemir E. EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS. Genel Tıp Derg. 2025;35(2):226-231. doi:10.54005/geneltip.1552117
Chicago
Sarıkaya, Mehmet, ve Emre Kandemir. 2025. “EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS”. Genel Tıp Dergisi 35 (2): 226-31. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1552117.
EndNote
Sarıkaya M, Kandemir E (01 Nisan 2025) EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS. Genel Tıp Dergisi 35 2 226–231.
IEEE
[1]M. Sarıkaya ve E. Kandemir, “EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS”, Genel Tıp Derg, c. 35, sy 2, ss. 226–231, Nis. 2025, doi: 10.54005/geneltip.1552117.
ISNAD
Sarıkaya, Mehmet - Kandemir, Emre. “EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS”. Genel Tıp Dergisi 35/2 (01 Nisan 2025): 226-231. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1552117.
JAMA
1.Sarıkaya M, Kandemir E. EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS. Genel Tıp Derg. 2025;35:226–231.
MLA
Sarıkaya, Mehmet, ve Emre Kandemir. “EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS”. Genel Tıp Dergisi, c. 35, sy 2, Nisan 2025, ss. 226-31, doi:10.54005/geneltip.1552117.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Sarıkaya, Emre Kandemir. EVALUATİON OF THE NEED FOR ANGİOEMBOLİZATİON AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLİTHOTOMY İN CHİLDREN AND ADULTS. Genel Tıp Derg. 01 Nisan 2025;35(2):226-31. doi:10.54005/geneltip.1552117