0-6 Aylık Bebeği Olan Primipar Annelerin Emzirme Motivasyonu ve Emzirme Mitleri Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 6, 1137 - 1152

Emine Bakır , Emine Karacan , Elif Dağlı

Öz

ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 0-6 aylık bebek sahibi primipar annelerin emzirme motivasyonu ile emzirme mitleri arasındaki ilişkiyi ve emzirme motivasyonunu etkileyen faktörleri belirlemektir.
Yöntemler: Bu tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel bir çalışmadır. Veriler, Ağustos-Aralık 2024 tarihleri ​​arasında Türkiye'nin güneyindeki özel bir hastanenin çocuk polikliniklerinde toplandı. Çalışmaya gönüllü olan 252 anne dahil edildi.
Sonuçlar: Annelerin toplam PBMS puanları ile aile tipi, eğitim düzeyi, sigara içme durumu, gebelik sayısı, doğum şekli, emzirme eğitimi alma, eş desteği alma, emzirmede eş desteği alma ve emzirmede sosyal destek alma arasında; toplam BMS puanları ile yaş, eğitim düzeyi, gelir durumu, gebelik sayısı, emzirme eğitimi alma ve emzirmede sosyal destek alma arasında farklar vardı (p<.05). Ek olarak, toplam PBMS ve BMS puanları arasında düşük düzeyde, negatif anlamlı bir korelasyon bulundu (r=-0.127, p<.05). Ayrıca, aile tipinin (B=15.663, t=6.676, p<.05), sigara içmenin (B=7.296, t=4.202, p<.05), emzirme eğitimi almanın (B=-7.648, t=-4.328, p<.05) ve emzirmeye yönelik sosyal destek almanın (B=-4.308, t=2.066, p<.05) primipar annelerin emzirme motivasyon düzeylerini anlamlı şekilde yordadığı bulundu.
Sonuçlar: Araştırma sonuçları, sosyo-demografik, obstetrik ve bazı faktörlerin emzirme motivasyonunu ve emzirme mitlerinin düzeyini etkilediğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca, emzirme mitleri ile motivasyonlar arasında negatif, düşük düzeyde bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Bu durum, emzirme mitleri yüksek olan bireylerin motivasyon düzeylerinin düşük olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
Anahtar kelimeler: Primipar, anne, motivasyon, mitler, emzirme

Anahtar Kelimeler

Primipar , anne , motivasyon , mitler , emzirme

The Relationship Between Breastfeeding Motivation and Breastfeeding Myths of Primiparous Mothers with 0-6 Month-Old Babies

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between breastfeeding motivation and breastfeeding myths of primiparous mothers with 0-6 month old babies and the factors affecting breastfeeding motivation.
Methods: This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study. Data were collected in pediatric outpatient clinics in a private hospital in the south of Turkey between August and December 2024. 252 mothers who volunteered for the study were included.
Results: There were differences between the total PBMS scores of the mothers and family type, education level, smoking status, number of pregnancies, delivery type, receiving breastfeeding education, receiving spousal support, receiving spousal support in breastfeeding and receiving social support in breastfeeding; and there were differences between the total BMS scores and age, education level, income status, number of pregnancies, receiving breastfeeding education and receiving social support in breastfeeding (p<.05). In addition, a low-level, negatively significant correlation was found between the total PBMS and BMS scores (r=-0.127, p<.05). Moreover, it was found that family type (B=15.663, t=6.676, p<.05), smoking (B=7.296, t=4.202, p<.05), receiving breastfeeding education (B=-7.648, t=-4.328, p<.05) and receiving social support for breastfeeding (B=-4.308, t=2.066, p<.05) significantly predicted the breastfeeding motivation levels of primiparous mothers.
Conclusions: The research results show that socio-demographic, obstetric and some factors affect breastfeeding motivation and the level of breastfeeding myths. Moreover, a negative, low-level relationship was found between breastfeeding myths and motivations. This situation reveals that individuals with higher breastfeeding myths have lower motivation levels.
Key words: Primiparous, mother, motivation, myths, breastfeeding

Anahtar Kelimeler

Primiparou , mother , motivation , myths , breastfeeding

Kaynakça

• 1. Korukcu O, Deliktas A, Aydin R, Kabukcuoglu K. Investigation of the relationship between the psychosocial health status and fear of childbirth in healthy pregnancies. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 2017; 7(4): 152-158.
• 2. Özen EG, Ege E. Fear of childbirth and related factors in primiparous and multiparous pregnant women: a comparative study. Journal of General Health Sciences 2022; 4(1): 1-11.
• 3. Yıldız I, Gölbaşı Z. 4-6 aylık bebeği olan annelerin emzirme davranışları ile bebek beslenme tutumlarının belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 2020; 14(4): 554-563.
• 4. Koyucu RG, Ülkar D, Erdem B. Comparison of pregnancy stress in primiparous and multiparous pregnant women. Inonu University Health Services Vocational School Journal 2020; 8(3): 652-663.
• 5. Şenol DK, Pekyiğit AÇ. The effect of breastfeeding education given to primiparous pregnant women in the childbirth preparation class on prenatal breastfeeding self-sufficiency perception. Bozok Medical Journal 2021; 11(2): 8-15.
• 6. Balogun OO, Dagvadorj A, Anigo KM, Ota E, Sasaki S. Factors influencing breastfeeding exclusivity during the first 6 months of life in developing countries: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review. Matern Child Nutr 2015; 11: 433-451.
• 7. Wood NK, Woods NF, Blackburn ST, Sanders EA. Interventions that enhance breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity: a systematic review. Mcn Am J Matern Child Nurs 2016; 41(5): 299-307 8. Şahin BM. Özerdoğan N. Emzirmenin sürdürülmesi ve başarısında anahtar faktör: öz-belirleme kuramına dayalı emzirme motivasyonu. 2018; 27(4): 291-295.
• 9. Çiltaş NY, Tuncer SK. Definition of distress in pregnancy: Erzincan example. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Health Sciences Institute Journal 2019; 7(1): 15-24.
• 10. Akçay I, Bal DM. Primipar emzirme motivasyon ölçeği'nin Türkçe'ye uyarlanması: geçerlik-güvenilirlik çalışması. Ankara Med J 2020; 1: 79-89.
• 11. Sugino R, Pongtiku AL. Socio-cultural aspects of exclusive breastfeeding in SOTA district (Borderstates of Papua New Guinea and Merauke, Papua Province). Int J Sci Basic Appl Res 2016; 30(4): 109-121.
• 12. Binici DK, Tuncer SK. Investigation of perceived stress and affecting factors in primiparous and multiparous pregnant women. Midwifery and Health Sciences Journal 2020; 3(3): 189-202.
• 13. Yağcan H, Hazar HU, Özsoy S. The effect of breastfeeding counselling course on students' belief in breastfeeding myths: a case-control study. International Social Sciences Studies Journal 2022; 8(96): 974-983.
• 14. Lange A, Nautsch A, Weietmann K, Ittermann J, Heckmann M. Breastfeeding motivation in Pomerania: survey of neonates in Pomerania (SNIP-Study). International Breastfeeding Journal 2017; 12(1): 3.
• 15. Mızrak Şahin B, Özerdogan N, Ozdamar K, Gursoy E. Factors affecting breastfeeding motivation in primiparous mothers: An application of breastfeeding motivation scale based on self-determination theory. Health care for women international 2019; 40(6): 637-652.
• 16. Nisa F, Damayanti N, Suhariadi F, Anggasari Y, Dewi FE, Arini D, Rahman FS. Breastfeeding based on breastfeeding self-efficacy and social support in Wonokromo Surabaya. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 2021; 9(28): 1026-1031.
• 17. Gök E, Bakır S, Ertem G. Comparison of breastfeeding motivation and perceived social support levels of primiparous and multiparous women in the postpartum period. Journal of Tepecik Education & Research Hospital 2023; 33(1).
• 18. Çimen BÜ, Topal CA, Boztepe H. Relationship between breastfeeding self-efficacy, breastfeeding motivation, and self-esteem. Mediterranean Nursing & Midwifery 2024; 4(2): 105-111.
• 19. Dağlı E, Reyhan FA. The effect of online hypno-breastfeeding and solution-focused psychoeducation on mothers’ breastfeeding motivation and perception of insufficient milk: Randomized controlled study. Health Care for Women InternatIonal 2024; 45(7): 796-810.
• 20. Stocdale J, Sinclair Kernohan MG, McCrum-Gardner E, Keller J. Sensitivity of the breastfeeding motivational measurement scale: a known group analysis of first-time mothers. PloS One 2013; 8(12): e82976.
• 21. WHO/UNICEF. Tracking progress for breastfeeding policies and programmes: Global breastfeeding scorecard, 2017. Access date: 13.11.2024 Access address: http://www.who.int /nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/global-bf-scorecard-2017/en/.
• 22. Yılmaz NS, Aker MN, Gönenç İM, Topuz Ş. Development of the breastfeeding myths scale. Breastfeeding Medicine 2024; 19(1): 40-46.
• 23. World Health Organization. Essential Nutrition Actions: Mainstreaming Nutrition Through the Life-Course, Geneva; 2019. Access date: 10.10.2024 Access address: https://iris.who.int/bits tream/handle/10665/326261/9789241515856-eng.pdf .
• 24. Çaylan N, Yalçın SS. Türkiye’de ve Dünya’da emzirmenin durumu: Emzirmenin desteklenmesi için öneriler. Başkan, S. (Ed.), Çocuk Beslenmesi, 1. Baskı, Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri 2020; 4-10.
• 25. UNICEF. Global Breastfeeding Scorecard 2023: Rates of Breastfeeding Increase Around the World Through Improved Protection and Support, 2023. Access date: 10.10.2024 Accessaddress:https://www.unicef.org/media/150586/file/Global%20breastfeeding%20scorecard%202023.pdf.
• 26. Gölbaşı Z, Eroğlu K, Kaya D. Determining the belief status of women who have given birth to breast milk and breastfeeding myths. KOU Health Sciences Journal 2018; 4(2): 32-43 .
• 27. DeMaria AL, Ramos-Ortiz J, Basile K. Breastfeeding trends, influences, and perceptions among Italian women: a qualitative study. Int J Qual Stud Health Wellbeing 2020; 15(1): 1734275.
• 28. Sabancı Baransel E, Uçar T, Güney E. Effects of prenatal breastfeeding education on postnatal breastfeeding fear in pregnant women in the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial. Int J NursPract 2022; e13105.
• 29. Koura H. Myths about Breastfeeding. Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal 2019; 17(2): 109-113 30. Akram A, Mahmood R, Sajid M. Myths of breastfeeding regarding mothers’ diet. Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University 2017; 11(1).
• 31. Tomczewska Z, Jaron A, Kacperczyk-Bartnik J, Dobrowolska-Redo A, Romejko-Wolniewicz E. Breastfeeding myths: the prevalence among the population of Polish women. Ginekologia Polska 2024.
• 32. Nsiah-Asamoah C, Doku DT, Agblorti S. Mothers’ and grandmothers’ misconceptions and socio-cultural factors as barriers to exclusive breastfeeding: a qualitative study involving health workers in Two Rural Districts of Ghana. PloS One 2020; 15(9): e0239278.
• 33. Kavle JA, LaCroix Dau EH, Engmann C. Addressing barriers to exclusive breastfeeding in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and programmatic implications. Public Health Nutrition 2017; 20(17): 120-134.
• 34. Mennella JA, Yourshaw LM, Morgan LK. Breastfeeding and smoking: short-term effects on infant feeding and sleep. Pediatrics 2007; 120(3): 497-502.
• 35. Napierala M, Mazela J, Merritt TA, Florek, E. Tobacco smoking and breastfeeding: effect on the lactation process, breast milk composition and infant development. A critical review. Environmental research 2016; 151: 321-338.
• 36. Isytiaroh I. Myths and failure of exclusive breastfeeding: A Study in Buuran Community Health Center, Pekalongan Regency, Central Java. IJNP (Indonesian Journal of Nursing Practices) 2018; 2(2): 77-82.
• 37. Kiragu R, Neupane JE, Kandel S. Knowledge, attitude, and challenges of exclusive breastfeeding among prımigravidas 2014.
• 38. Kaya Şenol D, Pekyiğit A. The effect of postpartum stress on breastfeeding self-efficacy in normal birth and cesarean section. Journal of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Neonatology Medicine 2021; 18(4): 1062-1069.
• 39. Keten Edis E, Bal S, Koç E, Başgöl Ş. Determination of traumatic birth perception and breastfeeding self-efficacy levels of women who had emergency and planned cesarean sections. Celal Bayar University Health Sciences Institute Journal 2023; 10(4): 372-380.
• 40. Tseng JF, Chen SR, Au HK, Chipojola R, Lee GT, Lee PH, Shyu ML, Kuo SY. Effectiveness of an integrated breastfeeding education program to improve self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding rate: A single-blind, randomised controlled study. Int J NursStud 2020; 111: 103770.
• 41. Yeşil Y, Ekşioğlu A, Ceber Turfan E. The effect of hospital-based breastfeeding group education given early period on breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding status. J Neonatal Nurs 2022.
• 42. Rempel LA, Rempel JK, Moore KCJ. Relationships between types of father breastfeeding support and breastfeeding outcomes. Maternal and Child Nutrition 2016; 13(3): e123.
• 43. Yılmaz Ö. Emzirme sürecinde babaların desteğinin annelerin emzirme öz‐yeterliğine ve emzirme motivasyonuna etkisi. Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Aile Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi 2021.
• 44. Kahveci R, Kıvanç Ö. Babaların emzirme destek davranışlarının annelerin emzirme motivasyonu üzerine etkisi. Sağlık ve Toplum Dergisi 2023; 33(2): 103-110.
• 45. Lau CYK, Fong DYT, Chan VHS, Lok KYW, Ng JWY, Sing C, Tarrant M. The effect of maternal self-regulated motivation on breastfeeding continuation. Maternal and child health journal 2022; 26(2): 441-448.