Araştırma Makalesi

Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020)

Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2 29 Nisan 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020)

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study was to reveal descriptive data about postgraduate theses on anatomy and to determine their general trends. Material and Methods: Between the years 2016-2020 National Thesis Center of basic medical sciences, published in the department of anatomy thesis full text of 390; each of the thesis, name, type, year of publication, systematic and topographical anatomy class, study design, keywords, the situation of receiving budget support, the academic advisor, the title, the author's gender, bachelor degree and the publication of a thesis at the University of recorded and investigated. Frequency and percentage values were used for descriptive statistics and categorical variables. Results: Of the thesis, 237 (60.8%) were written by women, 242 (62.1%) were master's theses, 254 (65.1%) thesis advisor were professor, 113 (29%) received budget support, and 169 (43.3%) used radiological methods. The bachelor degree of the thesis authors was ranked as physiotherapy and rehabilitation (n=167, 42.8%), biology (n=64, 16.4%), nursing (n=58, 14.9%) and medicine (n=57, 14.6%). Of the thesis, 126 (32.3%) were from the head region and 174 (44.9%) were from the movement system. The most used keywords; computed tomography (n=58), morphometry (n=41), anthropometry (n=30), anatomy (n=27) and magnetic resonance imaging (n=25) were detected. Conclusion: In this study, bibliometric data about theses on anatomy were invastigated and a wide range of information was presented to the researchers in anatomy field. In recent years, it has been seen that female researchers and physiotherapists have come to the fore in anatomy postgraduate education. It can be said that especially studies involving the movement and nervous system or the head, lower and upper extremities attract the attention of researchers. In addition, radiological, experimental animal and anthropometric methods are frequently used in study designs. The result of the study is expected to shed light on anatomy graduate students, clinicians and researchers who carry out/will carry out their academic study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anatomy, bibliometric analysis, theses

Kaynakça

  1. Türkiye Yükseköğretim Sistemi. Available at: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/2019/Higher_Education_in_Turkey_2019_tr.pdf. Erişim tarihi 14 Haziran 2021. (Accessed June 14, 2021.).
  2. Tonta Y, Akbulut M. Türkiye’de lisansüstü tezlere açık erişim. Türk Kütüphaneciliği. 2019;33(4):219-48.
  3. Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu. Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi. Available at: https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/. Erişim tarihi 16 Haziran 2021. (Accessed June 146 2021.)
  4. Cuschieri S, Grech V, Savona-Ventura C. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): How to write a scientific thesis. Early human development. 2018;127:101-5.
  5. Murray, R. "EBOOK: How to Write a Thesis." (2017).
  6. Gül İ, Yeşiltaş A, Keklik B. Sağlık Yönetimi Lisansüstü Programlarında Yapılan Tezlerin Profili-Profile Of The Thesis Made In Health Management Postgraduate Programs. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2015;1(13):231-44.
  7. Küçükoğlu S, Başar HK. Çocuk İhmali ve İstismarına Türkiye’de Yapılan Lisansüstü Tezler Açısından Bir Bakış. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;2(1):11-8.
  8. De Bakker FG, Groenewegen P, Den Hond F. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & society. 2005;44(3):283-317.
  9. Adanır SS, Bahşi İ, Kervancıoğlu P, Orhan M, Cihan ÖF. Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018. Anatomy. 2020;14(1):39-43.
  10. Duque Oliva EJ, Cervera Taulet A, Rodríguez Romero C. A bibliometric analysis of models measuring the concept of perceived quality inproviding internet service. Innovar. 2006;16(28):223-43.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kundakcı, Y. E., & Ünver, N. (2022). Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020). Genel Tıp Dergisi, 32(2), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.970852
AMA
1.Kundakcı YE, Ünver N. Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020). Genel Tıp Derg. 2022;32(2):182-189. doi:10.54005/geneltip.970852
Chicago
Kundakcı, Yunus Emre, ve Nadire Ünver. 2022. “Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020)”. Genel Tıp Dergisi 32 (2): 182-89. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.970852.
EndNote
Kundakcı YE, Ünver N (01 Nisan 2022) Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020). Genel Tıp Dergisi 32 2 182–189.
IEEE
[1]Y. E. Kundakcı ve N. Ünver, “Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020)”, Genel Tıp Derg, c. 32, sy 2, ss. 182–189, Nis. 2022, doi: 10.54005/geneltip.970852.
ISNAD
Kundakcı, Yunus Emre - Ünver, Nadire. “Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020)”. Genel Tıp Dergisi 32/2 (01 Nisan 2022): 182-189. https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.970852.
JAMA
1.Kundakcı YE, Ünver N. Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020). Genel Tıp Derg. 2022;32:182–189.
MLA
Kundakcı, Yunus Emre, ve Nadire Ünver. “Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020)”. Genel Tıp Dergisi, c. 32, sy 2, Nisan 2022, ss. 182-9, doi:10.54005/geneltip.970852.
Vancouver
1.Yunus Emre Kundakcı, Nadire Ünver. Examination of theses on anatomy in the field of basic medical sciences (2016-2020). Genel Tıp Derg. 01 Nisan 2022;32(2):182-9. doi:10.54005/geneltip.970852