Postoperatif Abdominal Apselerde Perkütan Drenajın Rolü; 111 Hastanın Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 4, 242 - 247, 01.12.2020

Ogün Erşen Sezgin Yılmaz

Öz

Amaç: Perkütan drenaj, postoperatif abdominal apselerde günümüzde %70-100 başarı oranı ve %1-10 arasında değişen nüks oranı ile tercih edilen ilk yöntem halini almıştır. Çalışmamızda batın cerrahisi sonrası abdominal abse gelişen, görüntüleme eşliğinde perkütan yöntemlerle drenaj yapılan ve başarılı bir şekilde tedavi edilen 111 hastanın verilerini sunmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2013 ve Ocak 2018 arasındaki 5 yıllık süre boyunca, Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Hastanesinin Genel Cerrahi Kliniğinde yatan, postoperatif apse nedeniyle perkütan drenaj yapılan 137 hasta dosyası incelendi. Kriterlere uygun 111 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi.Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 58.1±16.6 idi. 68 %61 erkek, 43 %39 kadın hasta mevcuttu. 8 %7 hastaya sadece aspirasyon yapıldı, 103 %93 hastaya ise pigtail drenaj kateteri takıldı. Drenaj kateterinin çıkması, tıkanması, drenajın bozulması ve apse tekrarı gibi nedenlerle 9 %8 hastaya işlem tekrarlandı. Drenaj gerektiren apsenin en sık bulunduğu lokalizasyon %25 ile subhepatik bölge olurken en az görülen bölgeler ise %1.8 ile suprahepatik ve psoas kası çevresi idi. Tüm hastaların %40’ını safra kesesi ve safra yollarına yönelik operasyon yapılan hasta grubunun oluşturduğu görüldü. Hastaların ortalama serviste yatış süresi 15±17.5 gün olmakla birlikte tüm hastaların ortalama takip süresi drenlerin çekildiği tarih ise 17.5±18 gün idi.Sonuç: Çalışmamızda pankreas cerrahisi sonrası oluşan abdominal apsesi olan hastaların, perkütan drenaj ile en uzun süre hastanede yatan hasta grubu olduğu görüldü. Yerleşim olarak değerlendirildiğinde ise, en uzun yataklı tedavi ve takip gerektiren apse alanı gastrohepatik aralık idi. Çalışmamızda ilgi çekici olarak abdominal apse nedeni mide cerrahisi olan hastalar iyileşmenin en hızlı olduğu grup olarak tespit edildi

Anahtar Kelimeler

Abdominal apse, perkütan drenaj, cerrahi

The role of percutaneous drainage in the treatment of postoperative abdominal abscess; 111 patient

Öz

Objective: Percutaneous drainage has become the first method of choice for postoperative abdominal abscesses with a success rate of 70-100% and recurrence rates of 1-10%. In this study, we aimed to present the data of 111 patients who developed abdominal abscess after abdominal surgery, underwent percutaneous drainage with imaging and successfully treated.Material and Methods: During the 5-year period between January 2013 and January 2018, 137 patients who had percutaneous drainage due to postoperative abscess who were hospitalized in the General Surgery Clinic of Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Hospital were examined. 111 patients who met the criteria were included in the study.Results: The mean age of the patients was 58.1 ± 16.6 years. There were 68 61% male and 43 39% female patients. Only 8 7% patients underwent aspiration, and 103 93% patients underwent a pigtail drainage catheter. The procedure was repeated in 9 8% patients because of drainage catheter dislocation, obstruction and drainage failure. The most common localization of the abscess requiring drainage was the subhepatic region with 25%, while the least seen regions were suprahepatic and psoas muscle circumference with 1.8%. It was seen that 40% of all patients were operated for gall bladder and bile ducts. The mean duration of hospitalization was 15 ± 17.5 days, and the mean follow-up period was 17.5 ± 18 days for all patients.Conclusion: In our study, patients with abdominal abscess after pancreas surgery were the longest hospitalized patients with percutaneous drainage. The location of the abscess area requiring the longest inpatient treatment and follow-up was gastrohepatic interval. In our study, patients with abdominal surgery due to abdominal abscess were found to be the group with the fastest recovery

Anahtar Kelimeler

Abdominal abscess, percutanous drainage, surgery

Kaynakça

• 1. Mehta NY, Copelin EL. Abdominal Abscess. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing 2019.
• 2. Duszak RJ, Levy JM, Akins EW et al. Percutaneous catheter drainage of infected intra-abdominal fluid collections. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000;215:1067–75.
• 3. Zhao N, Li Q, Cui J, Yang Z, Peng T. CT-guided special approaches of drainage for intraabdominal and pelvic abscesses: One single center's experience and review of literature. Medicine 2018;97:42.
• 4. Celep RB, Özsoy M, Bal A, et al. Normal CD4 Sayılı HIV Pozitif Bir Hastada Fournier Gangreni. Abant Tıp Dergisi 2014; 3: 180-2.
• 5. Palacio EP, Rizzi NG, Reinas GS, et al. Open drainage versus percutaneous drainage in the treatment of tropical pyomyositis. Prospective and randomized study. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition) 2010;45: 260-8.
• 6. Asai N, Ohkuni Y, Yamazaki I, Kaneko N, Aoshima M, Kawamura Y. Therapeutic impact of CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage in treatment of deep tissue abscesses. Brazil J Infect Dis 2013;17: 483-6.
• 7. Hsu RB, Chen RJ, Wang SS, Chu SH. Determinants of successful surgical revascularization for failed angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. J Formos Med Assoc 2002;101: 815-9.
• 8. Ochsner A, Graves AM. Subphrenic abscess: an analysis of 3,372 collected and personal cases. Ann Surg 1933;98:961- 90.
• 9. Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Fullen WD, Shook CD. Intra-abdominal abscesses. Am J Surg 1973;125:70-9.
• 10. Levison MA. Percutaneous versus open operative drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1992;6:525-44.
• 11. Fry DE, Clevenger FW. Reoperation for intra-abdominal abscess. Surg Clin North Am 1991;71:159-74.
• 12. Koperna T, Schulz F. Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection. World J Surg 2000;24:32-7.
• 13. Montravers P, Lepers S, Popesco D. Postoperative management. Critical care in intra-abdominal infection after surgical intervention. Presse Med 1999;28:196-202.
• 14. Li PH, Tee YS, Fu CY et al. The Role of Noncontrast CT in the Evaluation of Surgical Abdomen Patients. Am Surg 2018;84:1015-21.
• 15. Zens TJ, Rogers AP, Riedesel EL et al. The cost effectiveness and utility of a "quick MRI" for the evaluation of intra-abdominal abscess after acute appendicitis in the pediatric patient population. J Pediatr Surg 2018;53:1168-74.
• 16. Guizzetti L, Zou G, Khanna R et al. Development of Clinical Prediction Models for Surgery and Complications in Crohn's Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2017;12: 167-77.
• 17. Schein M. Management of intra-abdominal abscesses. In: Holzheimer RG, Mannick JA, editors. Surgical Treatment: Evidence-Based and Problem-Oriented. Munich: Zuckschwerdt, 2001.
• 18. Antevil JL, Egan JC, Woodbury RO et al. Abdominal computed tomography for postoperative abscess: Is it useful during the first week?. J Gastro Surg 2006;10:901-5.
• 19. Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, Birkett DH et al. Percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscesses guided by ultrasound and computed tomography. Am J Roentgenology 1979;133:1-8.
• 20. Mikami K. C-arm cone beam computed tomography with fluoroscopic overlay for needle guidance during percutaneous drainage of abnormal fluid collections undetectable by ultrasound. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2015;2:193.
• 21. Dhurve, AS, Bodade RM, Bugga RR, Nandu VV, Meshram MM. Clinical study of intra-abdominal abscess and its management by percutaneous USG guided drainage. Int Surg J 2018;5: 2211-6.
• 22. Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, Johnson WC, Birkett DH, Nabseth DC. Percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscesses: a five-year experience. N Engl J Med 1981; 305:653–7.
• 23. Lambiase RE, Deyoe L, Cronan JJ, Dorfman GS. Percutaneous drainage of 335 consecutive abscesses: results of primary drainage with 1-year follow-up. Radiology 1992; 184:167 –79.
• 24. Gervais DA, Ho CH, O'Neill MJ et al. Recurrent abdominal and pelvic abscesses: incidence, results of repeated percutaneous drainage, and underlying causes in 956 drainages. Am J Roentgen 2004;182: 463-6.
• 25. Singh S, Chaudhary P, Saxena N et al. Treatment of liver abscess: prospective randomized comparison of catheter drainage and needle aspiration. Annals of Gastroenterology: Quarterly Publication of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2013;26: 332.
• 26. VanSonnenberg E, Mueller PR, Ferrucci Jr JT. Percutaneous drainage of 250 abdominal abscesses and fluid collections. Part I: Results, failures, and complications. Radiology 1984;151: 337-41.