Türk Kültüründe Kadınların Cinsellik ve Cinsel Şiddet Algısı - Kadınlar Bu Zor Ayrımın Farkında Mı?: Niteliksel Araştırma

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3, 289 - 295

Ebru Cirban Ekrem Aylin Kurt

https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1366272

Öz

Amaç: Türkiye'de yaşayan kadınların cinsel yaşamlarını cinsel arzuları doğrultusunda mı yoksa cinsel şiddet olarak mı yaşadıklarına dair algılarını belirlemeyi amaçladık.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu nitel çalışma, 18 kadınla derinlemesine görüşme yapılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Aralık 2021-Temmuz 2022 tarihleri arasında derinlemesine ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde içerik analizi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmada üç tema belirlendi: (1) evliliğin yapı taşı (2) şiddet olarak cinsellik (3) cinsel şiddetin etkileri. Katılımcılar cinselliği evliliğin ve eş sadakatinin devamı için temel bir unsur olarak görmekteydi. Katılımcılar cinselliği erkeklerin farklı düşündüklerini, cinsel istek olmadığında cinsel işlevin kadının seks objesi olduğu bir şiddet eylemi olduğunu vurguladı. Cinsel şiddetin yanı sıra bazı kadınlar cinsel içerikli sözel ve psikolojik şiddete de maruz kalmaktaydı.
Sonuç: Araştırmanın sonunda kadınların cinselliği evliliğin devamı ve eşlerine bağlılığın devamı için temel bir unsur olarak gördükleri belirlendi. Katılımcılar zaman zaman cinsel şiddete ve şiddetin farklı türlerine maruz kaldıklarını belirtti.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algı, cinsellik, cinsel şiddet, şiddet, kadın

Proje Numarası

Bu çalışma proje kapsamında yapılmamıştır.

Women's Perception of Sexuality and Sexual Violence in Turkish Culture - Are Women Aware of This Difficult Distinction?: A Qualitative Research

Öz

Background/Aims: We aimed to determine the perceptions of women living in the Turkey whether they live their sexual life in line with their sexual desires or as sexual violence.
Methods: This qualitative study was carried out with 18 women by in-depth interviews. In-depth and semi- structured interviews were conducted between December 2021- July 2022. Content analysis was used for data analysis.
Results: Three themes were identified in the study: (1) the building block of marriage (2) sexuality as violence (3) the effects of sexual violence. The participants emphasized that their different expressions of sexuality from their groups, when they do not feel sexual desire, the sexual function is an act of violence in which the woman is the object of sex. Sexual harassment, some women were also exposed to verbal and psychological violence of a sexual nature.
Conclusion: At the end of the study, it was determined that women saw sexuality as a fundamental element for the continuation of marriage and commitment to their spouse. Participants stated that they were occasionally exposed to sexual violence and different types of violence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Perception, sexuality, sexual violence, violence, women

Etik Beyan

The protocol for the research has been approved by Ethical permission for the study was obtained from Bartin University Social and Human Sciences Ethics Board (Date: 16.12.2021, Approval Number: 2021-SBB-0487).

Destekleyen Kurum

None.

Proje Numarası

Bu çalışma proje kapsamında yapılmamıştır.

Kaynakça

• Conley TD, Klein V. Women get worse sex: A confound in the explanation of gender differences in sexuality. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022;17(4):960-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211041598
• Wright S, Bowling J, McCabe S, Benson JK, Stambaugh R, Cramer RJ. Sexual violence and nonconsensual experiences among alt-sex communities’ members. J. Interpers. Violence. 2022;37(23-24):21800-21825. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211062999
• WHO. Factsheet-Sustainable Development Goals: health targets. Violence, health and sustainable development. Published [2022]. Accessed [25 November 2022]. https://www.euro.who.int/en/SDG_factsheets
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Fast Facts: Preventing Sexual Violence. Published [2022]. Accessed [25 November 2022]. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html
• Kıray Vural B, Taşdemir Yiğitoğlu G, Zencir G. The evaluation of the subjection of married women todomestic violence in terms of submissive behaviors in Turkey: A descriptive study. PPC. 2022;52:527-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.13010
• Tel H, Kocataş S, Güler N, Tel Aydın H, Akgül Gündodu N. Status of domestic violence exposure among married women andthe affecting factors. IBAD. 2019;Special Volume:256–264. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.611511
• United Nations Department of Public Information. Violence Against Women. Published [2015]. Accessed [25 November 2022]. www.un.org/en/events/endviolenceday
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family and Social Policies, General Di-rectorate on the Status of Women. Combating violence against women. National Action Plan (2016‐2020). General Directorate on the Status of Women.
• Balarabe K. The legal status and perceptions of sexual rights among some selected Stakeholders in Nigeria. Sex. Cult. 2022;26:1090-1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09933-7
• Ussher JM, Hawkey A, Perz J, Liamputtong P, Sekar J, Marjadi B, Schmied V, Dune T, Brook E. Crossing boundaries and fetishization: experiences of sexual violence for trans women of color. J. Interpers. Violence. 2022;37(5-6):3552-3584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520949149
• Farvid P, Saing R. “If I don’t allow him to have sex with me, our relationship will be broken”: Rape, sexual coercion, and sexual compliance within marriage in rural Cambodia. VAW. 2022;28(6-7):1587-1609. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211021130
• Lewis P, Bergenfeld I, Trang QT, Minh TH, Sales JM, Yount KM. Gender norms and sexual consent in dating relationships: a qualitative study of university students in Vietnam. Cult. Health Sex. 2022;24(3):358-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2020.1846078
• Sakızcıoğlu S, Doğan T. Married individuals’ opinions on the case of marital rape: A qualitative study. Istanbul University Journal of Women’s Studies. 2020;20:19-49.
• Abdolmanafi A, Farvid P, Tilley PJM, Dadahi A. “Men’s power can be overridden by women’s sexual power”: married women’s talk about gender and sexuality in contemporary Iran. Sex. Cult. 2022;26:136-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09882-1
• Cirban Ekrem E. The sexual dimension of domestic violence. Archives Medical Review Journal. 2021;30(1):31-36. https://doi.org/10.17827/aktd.823570
• Akalin A., Ayhan F. Intimate partner ciolence against women in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2021;43(1):68-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2021.1949764
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population. Studies Summary Report of Research on Domestic Violence Against Women in Turkey. Ankara. 2014.
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications; 2017.
• Lietz CA, Langer CL, Furman R. Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work: Implications from a study regarding spirituality. Qual. Soc. Work. 2006;5(4):441–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325006070288
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. IJQHC. 2007;19(6):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
• Yang Y, Lewis FM, Wojnar D. Culturally embedded risk factors for Cambodian husband–wife HIV transmission: From women’s point of view. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2016;48(2):154–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12193
• Brickell K. Clouding the judgment of domestic violence law: Victim blaming by institutional stakeholders in Cambodia. J. Interpers. Violence. 2017;32(9):1358–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515588919
• Bond-Winterstein T, Avieli H. The lived experience of older women who are sexually abused in the context of lifelong IPV. VAW. 2022;28(2):443-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211000132
• Cha C, Lee M. Healing from sexual violence among young women in South Korea. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs.2022;31:51-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12931