Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Investigation of Perceptions of Nurses Working in Surgical Units on Crab Basket Syndrome: A Descriptive Study

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4, 574 - 585, 29.08.2025
https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1607010

Öz

Abstract
Aims: This study was conducted to investigate the perceptions of crab basket syndrome among nurses working in surgical units.
Method: The descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 206 nurses actively working in the surgical units of four hospitals in the Mediterranean region between January 24 2023-June 24 2024. The research data were collected face to face with the "Introductory Information Form and Crab Basket Syndrome Scale." Descriptive statistics, Independent Sample Student t test and Kruskal Wallis-H tests were used in the evaluation of the data.
Results: The mean age of the nurses was 36.51±8.51 years. Of the nurses who participated in the study, 81% were female, 65.7% were married, 43.8% were undergraduated degree, and 28.6% had 1-5 years of professional experience. This study found that the behavioural sub-dimension score of the nurses who were dissatisfied with the institution they worked in and who did not trust the nurse in charge of the service they worked in was higher and more significant than the other groups (p<0.05). Nurses was found that who were dissatisfied with the communication with their colleagues in the unit and who do not trust their colleagues had higher mean scores in the cognitive, emotional, behavioural sub-dimensions and total score of the crab basket syndrome scale and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Nurses found that who did not find the competition in the working environment absolutely correct was higher cognitive sub-dimension score of and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (χ² = 7.819; p = 0.020).
Conclusions: It has been observed that nurses working in surgical units experience crab basket syndrome. To reduce the crab basket syndrome in surgical wards, a non-competitive, reliable and supportive working environment that increases nurses' trust in the institution, the nurse in charge and their teammates should be provided.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Lake ET. Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25(3):176–88. Doi: 10.1002/nur.10032.
  • 2. Aiken LH, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Smith HL, Flynn L, Neff DF. Effects of nurse staffing and Nurse Education on Patient Deaths in Hospitals with Different Nurse Work Environments. Med Care. 2011;49(12):1047–53. Doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182330b6e.
  • 3. Karahan E, Çelik S, Sugeçti S. Investigation of Workload Perception, Patient Safety Attitude and Affecting Factors of Nurses Working in Surgical Clinics. J Educ Res Nurs. 2021;18(1):1–9. Doi: 10.5152/jern.2021.65983.
  • 4. Erdağı S, Özer N. Examination of the working environments, perceptions of patient safety culture, and burnout levels of nurses working in surgical clinics. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci. 2015;18(2):94–106. Doi: 10.17049/ahsbd.90265.
  • 5. Bialous SA, Sarna L, Wells MJ, Brook JK, Kralikova E, Pankova A, et al. Impact of online education on nurses’ delivery of smoking cessation interventions with implications for evidence‐based practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017;14(5):367–76. Doi: 10.1111/wvn.12197.
  • 6. Mert S, Kersu Ö, Sayilan AA. Examining the Job Stress Experienced by Surgical Nurses and Their Psychological Resilience Status. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2023;10(1):1–10. Doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2023.22265.
  • 7. Sykes M, Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Kang E. Surgical team mapping: implications for staff allocation and coordination. AORN J. 2015;101(2):238–48. Doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2014.03.018.
  • 8. Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, Bonacum D, Brookey J, Graham S, et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):678–85. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.002.
  • 9. Baker DP, Amodeo AM, Krokos KJ, Slonim A, Herrera H. Assessing teamwork attitudes in healthcare: development of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e49. Doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036129.
  • 10. Mickan S, Rodger S. The organizational context for teamwork: comparing health care and business literature. Aust Health Rev. 2000;23(1):179–92. Doi: 10.1071/ah000179.
  • 11. Miller CD. Exploring the crabs in the barrel syndrome in organizations. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2019;26(3):352–71. Doi: 10.1177/1548051819849009.
  • 12. Miller CD. Interpersonal competitive dynamics in the workplace: The dark side of demographic similarity. [Doctoral Thesis]. The University of Texas at Dallas; 2016.
  • 13. Özdemir Y, Üzüm B. Crab Syndrome. In: Kaygın E, Kosa G, editors. Organizational Behavior with Its Negative Aspects. 2019. p. 125–138.
  • 14. Soubhari T, Kumar Y. The crab-bucket effect and its impact on job stress: an exploratory study with reference to autonomous colleges. Int J Recent Innov Trends Comput Commun. 2014;2(10):3022–7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v2i10.3342.
  • 15. Aydın GZ, Oğuzhan G. The “crabs in a bucket” mentality in healthcare personnel: A phenomenological study. Hitit Univ J Soc Sci Inst. 2019;12(2):618–30. Doi: 10.17218/hititsosbil.628375.
  • 16. Efe Sayan N, Altuntaş S. Perception of crab basket syndrome as a career obstacle in academician nurses. BANU J Health Sci Res. 2024;6(3):575–84. doi:10.46413/boneyusbad.148492
  • 17. Fettahlıoğlu ÖO, Alkış Dedeoğlu A. Crab in barrel syndrome and scale development study. J Int Soc Res. 2021;14(77):125–38.
  • 18. Karacabay K, Savcı A, Çömez S, Çelik N. Determination of the Relationship Between Surgical Nurses' Perceptions of Workload and Their Tendency to Make Medical Errors. Mersin Univ J Health Sci. 2020;13(3):404–17. Doi: 10.26559/mersinsbd.686481.
  • 19. Kinter O, Katı Y. The mediation effect of job stress and burnout on the relationship between workload and turnover intention: An application in the healthcare sector. Aybü Külliye Int J Soc Sci. 2022;23(4):852–63. Doi: 10.37880/cumuiibf.1090558.
  • 20. Altıntaş M, Topçu T. Views of public employees on the crab barrel syndrome: A qualitative study. J Adm Sci. 2024;22(52):448–78. doi:10.35408/comuybd.1396898.
  • 21. Othman MI, Khalifeh A, Oweidat I, Nashwan AJ. The relationship between emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment among first‐line nurse managers in Qatar. J Nurs Manag. 2024;32(1):5114659. Doi: 10.1111/jonm.13750.
  • 22. Ermiş SA, Akyol G. The Relationship of Academicians' Levels of Crabs in a Barrel Syndrome and Their Organizational Justice. Akdeniz J Sport Sci. 2023;6(2):476-496. doi:10.38021/asbid.1253699.
  • 23. O'Flynn-Magee K, Rodney P, Maitland S, Proznick K, Turner H, Esson L, et al. The CRAB workshop: Using forum theatre and cognitive rehearsal to address bullying in nursing education. Qual Adv Nurs Educ. 2021;7(2):1–16. doi:10.17483/2368-6669.1290.
  • 24. İşcan ÖF, Sayın U. Determination of the Relationship Between Surgical Nurses' Perceptions of Workload and Their Tendency to Make Medical Errors. Atatürk Univ J Econ Adm Sci. 2010;24(4):195–216.
  • 25. Lawrence TB, Robinson SL. Ain’t Misbehaving: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. J Nurs Manag. 2007;33(3):378–94. doi:10.1177/0149206307300814.
  • 26. Li M, Xu X, Kwan HK. Consequences of workplace ostracism: A meta-analytic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:641302. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641302.
  • 27. Andrews MC, Woolum A, Mesmer-Magnus J, Viswesvaran C, Deshpande S. Reducing turnover intentions among first-year nurses: The importance of work centrality and coworker support. Health Serv Manage Res. 2024;37(2):88–98. doi:10.1177/09514848211051234.
  • 28. Davis SG, Davis E, Kintz K, Opsahl A. Nurse educator perceptions of workplace collegiality. Nurse Educ. 2022;47(5):288–92. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001131.
  • 29. Besen DB, Günbaş M, Dervişoğlu M. COVID-19 experiences of Turkish intensive care nurses: A qualitative study. Turk J Intensive Care. 2023;21(3):126–34. doi:10.4274/tybd.galenos.2023.12345.
  • 30. Thorpe K, Kalischuk RG. A collegial mentoring model for nurse educators. Nurs. Forum. 2003;38(1):5–15. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2003.tb01197.x.
  • 31. Han NK, Lee T, Kim J. A comparative study on trust, collaboration, and teamwork of other healthcare personnel by nurses working on integrated nursing care service wards versus nurses on general wards. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020;26(4):316–30. doi:10.11111/jkana.2020.26.4.316.
  • 32. Singh C, Jackson D, Munro I, Cross W. Job experiences, challenges, revelations and narratives of nurse academics: A qualitative study. JAN. 2022;78(8):2622–33. doi:10.1111/Jan. 15232.
  • 33. Gillet N, Fouquereau E, Bonnaud-Antignac A, Mokounkolo R, Colombat P. The mediating role of organizational justice in the relationship between transformational leadership and nurses’ quality of work life: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. IJNS. 2013;50(10):1359–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.012.
  • 34. Hahm SY, Gu M, Sok S. Influences of communication ability, organizational intimacy, and trust among colleagues on job satisfaction of nurses in comprehensive nursing care service units. Front. Public Health. 2024;12:1354972. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354972.
  • 35. Kim SY, Kim EK, Kim B. Effects of nurses’ self-leadership and team trust on organizational commitment. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016;22(4):353–61. doi:10.11111/jkana.2016.22.4.353
  • 36. Lee BS, Eo YS, Lee MA. Development of job satisfaction scale for clinical nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018;48(1):12–25. doi:10.4040/jkan.2018.48.1.12.
  • 37. Hadi-Moghaddam M, Karimollahi M, Aghamohammadi M. Nurses’ trust in managers and its relationship with nurses’ performance behaviors: A descriptive-correlational study. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00574-2.
  • 38. Abdallah SAE, Mostafa SAM. Effects of toxic leadership on intensive care units staff nurses’ emotional intelligence and their organizational citizenship behaviors. TSNJ. 2021;22(3):211–40. doi:10.21608/tsnj.2021.123456.
  • 39. Bakkal E, Serener B, Myrvang NA. Toxic leadership and turnover intention: Mediating role of job satisfaction. Rev. Cercet. si Interv. Soc. 2019;66:88–102.
  • 40. Farghaly Abdelaliem SM, Abou Zeid MAG. The relationship between toxic leadership and organizational performance: The mediating effect of nurses’ silence. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01034-5.
  • 41. Yalçın T, Macit M. The effect of psychological well-being on organizational deviance behaviors and intention to leave work: A research in health institutions. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam Univ J Fac Econ Adm Sci. 2022;12(2):47–69.

Cerrahi Birimlerde Çalışan Hemşirelerin Yengeç Sepeti Sendromu Algılarının İncelenmesi: Tanımlayıcı Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4, 574 - 585, 29.08.2025
https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1607010

Öz

Amaç: Cerrahi birimlerde çalışan hemşirelerin yengeç sepeti sendromu algılarının incelenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel olarak yürütülen araştırma 24 Ocak 2023-24 Haziran 2024 tarihleri Akdeniz bölgesinde yer alan dört hastanenin cerrahi birimlerinde aktif olarak çalışan 206 hemşire ile yapılmıştır. Araştırma verileri “Tanıtıcı Bilgi Formu ve Yengeç Sepeti Sendromu Ölçeği ile yüz yüze toplanmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, bağımsız Örneklem T testi ve Kruskal-Wallis H testi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Hemşirelerin yaş ortalaması 36,51±8,51 olduğu saptanmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan hemşirelerin %81’i kadın, %65,7’si evli, %43,8’i lisans mezunu ve %28,6’sı 1-5 yıl mesleki deneyime sahiptir. Bu çalışmada çalıştığı kurumdan memnun olmayan ve çalıştığı servisin sorumlu hemşiresine güvenmeyen hemşirelerin davranışsal alt boyut puanının diğer gruplara göre daha yüksek ve anlamlı olduğu saptanmıştır (p<0.05). Çalıştığı servisteki arkadaşları ile kuruduğu iletişimden memnun olmayan ve çalışma arkadaşlarına güvenmeyen hemşirelerin bilişsel, duygusal, davranışsal alt boyutları ve Yengeç Sepeti Sendromu ölçeği toplam puanı ortalamalarının daha yüksek oluğu ve gruplar arasındaki farkın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu saptanmıştır (p<0.05). Çalışma ortamındaki rekabeti kesinlikle doğru bulmayan hemşirelerin bilişsel alt boyutu puanının daha yüksek olduğu ve gruplar arasındaki farkın istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu bulunmuştur (χ² = 7.819; p = 0.020).
Sonuç: Cerrahi birimlerde çalışan hemşirelerin yengeç sepeti sendromu yaşadığı görülmüştür. Cerrahi servislerinde yengeç sepeti sendromunu azaltmak için, hemşirelerin kuruma, sorumlu hemşireye ve ekip arkadaşlarına olan güvenini artıran, rekabetten uzak, güvenilir ve destekleyici bir çalışma ortamı sağlanmalıdır.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Lake ET. Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25(3):176–88. Doi: 10.1002/nur.10032.
  • 2. Aiken LH, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Smith HL, Flynn L, Neff DF. Effects of nurse staffing and Nurse Education on Patient Deaths in Hospitals with Different Nurse Work Environments. Med Care. 2011;49(12):1047–53. Doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182330b6e.
  • 3. Karahan E, Çelik S, Sugeçti S. Investigation of Workload Perception, Patient Safety Attitude and Affecting Factors of Nurses Working in Surgical Clinics. J Educ Res Nurs. 2021;18(1):1–9. Doi: 10.5152/jern.2021.65983.
  • 4. Erdağı S, Özer N. Examination of the working environments, perceptions of patient safety culture, and burnout levels of nurses working in surgical clinics. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci. 2015;18(2):94–106. Doi: 10.17049/ahsbd.90265.
  • 5. Bialous SA, Sarna L, Wells MJ, Brook JK, Kralikova E, Pankova A, et al. Impact of online education on nurses’ delivery of smoking cessation interventions with implications for evidence‐based practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017;14(5):367–76. Doi: 10.1111/wvn.12197.
  • 6. Mert S, Kersu Ö, Sayilan AA. Examining the Job Stress Experienced by Surgical Nurses and Their Psychological Resilience Status. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2023;10(1):1–10. Doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2023.22265.
  • 7. Sykes M, Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Kang E. Surgical team mapping: implications for staff allocation and coordination. AORN J. 2015;101(2):238–48. Doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2014.03.018.
  • 8. Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, Bonacum D, Brookey J, Graham S, et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):678–85. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.002.
  • 9. Baker DP, Amodeo AM, Krokos KJ, Slonim A, Herrera H. Assessing teamwork attitudes in healthcare: development of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e49. Doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036129.
  • 10. Mickan S, Rodger S. The organizational context for teamwork: comparing health care and business literature. Aust Health Rev. 2000;23(1):179–92. Doi: 10.1071/ah000179.
  • 11. Miller CD. Exploring the crabs in the barrel syndrome in organizations. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2019;26(3):352–71. Doi: 10.1177/1548051819849009.
  • 12. Miller CD. Interpersonal competitive dynamics in the workplace: The dark side of demographic similarity. [Doctoral Thesis]. The University of Texas at Dallas; 2016.
  • 13. Özdemir Y, Üzüm B. Crab Syndrome. In: Kaygın E, Kosa G, editors. Organizational Behavior with Its Negative Aspects. 2019. p. 125–138.
  • 14. Soubhari T, Kumar Y. The crab-bucket effect and its impact on job stress: an exploratory study with reference to autonomous colleges. Int J Recent Innov Trends Comput Commun. 2014;2(10):3022–7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v2i10.3342.
  • 15. Aydın GZ, Oğuzhan G. The “crabs in a bucket” mentality in healthcare personnel: A phenomenological study. Hitit Univ J Soc Sci Inst. 2019;12(2):618–30. Doi: 10.17218/hititsosbil.628375.
  • 16. Efe Sayan N, Altuntaş S. Perception of crab basket syndrome as a career obstacle in academician nurses. BANU J Health Sci Res. 2024;6(3):575–84. doi:10.46413/boneyusbad.148492
  • 17. Fettahlıoğlu ÖO, Alkış Dedeoğlu A. Crab in barrel syndrome and scale development study. J Int Soc Res. 2021;14(77):125–38.
  • 18. Karacabay K, Savcı A, Çömez S, Çelik N. Determination of the Relationship Between Surgical Nurses' Perceptions of Workload and Their Tendency to Make Medical Errors. Mersin Univ J Health Sci. 2020;13(3):404–17. Doi: 10.26559/mersinsbd.686481.
  • 19. Kinter O, Katı Y. The mediation effect of job stress and burnout on the relationship between workload and turnover intention: An application in the healthcare sector. Aybü Külliye Int J Soc Sci. 2022;23(4):852–63. Doi: 10.37880/cumuiibf.1090558.
  • 20. Altıntaş M, Topçu T. Views of public employees on the crab barrel syndrome: A qualitative study. J Adm Sci. 2024;22(52):448–78. doi:10.35408/comuybd.1396898.
  • 21. Othman MI, Khalifeh A, Oweidat I, Nashwan AJ. The relationship between emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment among first‐line nurse managers in Qatar. J Nurs Manag. 2024;32(1):5114659. Doi: 10.1111/jonm.13750.
  • 22. Ermiş SA, Akyol G. The Relationship of Academicians' Levels of Crabs in a Barrel Syndrome and Their Organizational Justice. Akdeniz J Sport Sci. 2023;6(2):476-496. doi:10.38021/asbid.1253699.
  • 23. O'Flynn-Magee K, Rodney P, Maitland S, Proznick K, Turner H, Esson L, et al. The CRAB workshop: Using forum theatre and cognitive rehearsal to address bullying in nursing education. Qual Adv Nurs Educ. 2021;7(2):1–16. doi:10.17483/2368-6669.1290.
  • 24. İşcan ÖF, Sayın U. Determination of the Relationship Between Surgical Nurses' Perceptions of Workload and Their Tendency to Make Medical Errors. Atatürk Univ J Econ Adm Sci. 2010;24(4):195–216.
  • 25. Lawrence TB, Robinson SL. Ain’t Misbehaving: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. J Nurs Manag. 2007;33(3):378–94. doi:10.1177/0149206307300814.
  • 26. Li M, Xu X, Kwan HK. Consequences of workplace ostracism: A meta-analytic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:641302. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641302.
  • 27. Andrews MC, Woolum A, Mesmer-Magnus J, Viswesvaran C, Deshpande S. Reducing turnover intentions among first-year nurses: The importance of work centrality and coworker support. Health Serv Manage Res. 2024;37(2):88–98. doi:10.1177/09514848211051234.
  • 28. Davis SG, Davis E, Kintz K, Opsahl A. Nurse educator perceptions of workplace collegiality. Nurse Educ. 2022;47(5):288–92. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001131.
  • 29. Besen DB, Günbaş M, Dervişoğlu M. COVID-19 experiences of Turkish intensive care nurses: A qualitative study. Turk J Intensive Care. 2023;21(3):126–34. doi:10.4274/tybd.galenos.2023.12345.
  • 30. Thorpe K, Kalischuk RG. A collegial mentoring model for nurse educators. Nurs. Forum. 2003;38(1):5–15. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2003.tb01197.x.
  • 31. Han NK, Lee T, Kim J. A comparative study on trust, collaboration, and teamwork of other healthcare personnel by nurses working on integrated nursing care service wards versus nurses on general wards. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020;26(4):316–30. doi:10.11111/jkana.2020.26.4.316.
  • 32. Singh C, Jackson D, Munro I, Cross W. Job experiences, challenges, revelations and narratives of nurse academics: A qualitative study. JAN. 2022;78(8):2622–33. doi:10.1111/Jan. 15232.
  • 33. Gillet N, Fouquereau E, Bonnaud-Antignac A, Mokounkolo R, Colombat P. The mediating role of organizational justice in the relationship between transformational leadership and nurses’ quality of work life: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. IJNS. 2013;50(10):1359–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.012.
  • 34. Hahm SY, Gu M, Sok S. Influences of communication ability, organizational intimacy, and trust among colleagues on job satisfaction of nurses in comprehensive nursing care service units. Front. Public Health. 2024;12:1354972. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354972.
  • 35. Kim SY, Kim EK, Kim B. Effects of nurses’ self-leadership and team trust on organizational commitment. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016;22(4):353–61. doi:10.11111/jkana.2016.22.4.353
  • 36. Lee BS, Eo YS, Lee MA. Development of job satisfaction scale for clinical nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018;48(1):12–25. doi:10.4040/jkan.2018.48.1.12.
  • 37. Hadi-Moghaddam M, Karimollahi M, Aghamohammadi M. Nurses’ trust in managers and its relationship with nurses’ performance behaviors: A descriptive-correlational study. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00574-2.
  • 38. Abdallah SAE, Mostafa SAM. Effects of toxic leadership on intensive care units staff nurses’ emotional intelligence and their organizational citizenship behaviors. TSNJ. 2021;22(3):211–40. doi:10.21608/tsnj.2021.123456.
  • 39. Bakkal E, Serener B, Myrvang NA. Toxic leadership and turnover intention: Mediating role of job satisfaction. Rev. Cercet. si Interv. Soc. 2019;66:88–102.
  • 40. Farghaly Abdelaliem SM, Abou Zeid MAG. The relationship between toxic leadership and organizational performance: The mediating effect of nurses’ silence. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01034-5.
  • 41. Yalçın T, Macit M. The effect of psychological well-being on organizational deviance behaviors and intention to leave work: A research in health institutions. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam Univ J Fac Econ Adm Sci. 2022;12(2):47–69.
Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)
Bölüm Original Article
Yazarlar

Seda Cansu Yeniğün Akbulut 0000-0002-9712-9171

Bahar Aksoy 0000-0003-0466-5918

Züleyha Ögür 0000-0002-4713-7309

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 29 Ağustos 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Ağustos 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 25 Aralık 2024
Kabul Tarihi 8 Mayıs 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Yeniğün Akbulut SC, Aksoy B, Ögür Z. Investigation of Perceptions of Nurses Working in Surgical Units on Crab Basket Syndrome: A Descriptive Study. Genel Tıp Derg. 2025;35(4):574-85.