Aslanın Gözünden: Antik Sikkelerdeki Cepheden Aslan Tasvirleri Üzerine İkonolojik Gözlemler

Yıl 2023, , 81 - 118, 12.11.2023

Florian Haymann

https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1252079

Öz

Makale, Yunan Arkaik döneminden MÖ birinci yüzyıla kadar cepheden aslan tasvirli en önemli sikke tiplerine genel bir bakış sunmaktadır. Mızrak ısıran aslanlar çalışmaya dahil edilmemiştir ve ayrı bir çalışmanın konusu olacaktır. Antik yazılı gelenekten yola çıkan yazar, antik metinlerde defalarca bahsedilen aslan bakışının etkisini temel alarak açıklamalar sunmaktadır. İlgili arka yüzler ve temsil biçimleri de eklendiğinde, sikke resimlerinde Apollo, Artemis, Athena, Hera ve Herakles gibi dini kültlere yapılan göndermeleri tespit etmek mümkündür. Ancak yöneticiler cepheden aslan tasvirlerini de belirli amaçlar için kullanmışlardır. Cepheden verilen aslan Apollon’un güneş temsilini ifade etmek için en uygun olanı gibi görünüyordu. Aslan ve Loxías arasında özellikle yakın bir bağlantı olduğu Rhegion için gösterilmiştir. Samos örneği, bir otokratın – muhtemelen yine güneşsel niteliklere işaret etmek için – ‘cepheden aslan başı’ amblemini seçebileceğini göstermektedir. Ancak Akamenid etkisi altında aslan düzenli olarak hükümdarın kurbanı olmuştur – her ne kadar özellikle tehlikeli ve korkutucu olsa da, cepheden vurgulanmıştır. Aynı durum, imge seçimi Plinius’un tamamen aslanın görüş alanına odaklanan refleksine şaşırtıcı derecede yakın olan Lysimachos için de geçerlidir. Ayrıca aslan maskelerinin genellikle Herakles’in eylemiyle ilişkilendirildiği gösterilebilir, bu da ön yüzün özel anlam nüansları getirdiği başka sikke imgelerinin ortaya çıkmasına neden olmuştur, örneğin özel bir çabanın gösterilmesi veya iki sikke imgesi arasında anlatısal bir bağlantı gibi. Bir örnekte, bir dikdörtgenin içinden sıçrayan cepheden bir aslan Athena kültü ile ilişkilendirilmiştir. Bir başka cepheden aslan grubu ise apotropaik-demonik bir karaktere sahip olabilir ve esas olarak gözlemciye sabitlenmiş gözlerle aktarılmış olabilir. Burada Gorgoneion ile bir bağlantı görebiliriz. Çok görülen vahşi aslan imgesine gelince, İncil’deki bir kaynak hayvanların bu süreçte özellikle sinirli ve tehlikeli olduklarını öne sürmektedir. Son olarak, aslanlar ve leoparların dikkatle ayrılması tavsiye edilmiş, leoparların özellikle ‘insanı yok eden’ tanrı Dionysos’u önden perspektifle tasvir etmek için uygun olduğu belirtilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aslanlar, ikonografi, numismatik, sanat tarihi, önsellik

In the Eye of the Lion: Iconological Observations on Frontal Depictions of Lions on Ancient Coins

Öz

This article provides an overview of the most important coin types depicting frontal lions from the Greek Archaic period to the first century BC. The spear-biting lions are not included in this paper as they form the subject of a separate study. Starting from the ancient written tradition, explanations are offered based on the effect of the lion’s gaze, which is repeatedly mentioned in ancient texts. With the addition of the respective reverses and modes of representation, it is possible to identify references to religious cults: Apollo, Artemis, Athena, Hera and Heracles. But rulers also used frontal lion images for specific purposes. To express the solar aspect of Apollo, frontality seemed the most appropriate. A particularly close connection between the lion and Loxías has been demonstrated for Rhegion. The example of Samos shows that an autocrat could choose the emblem of a “frontal lion’s head” – probably also to suggest solar qualities. Under Achaemenid influence however, the lion regularly became the victim of the ruler – albeit a particularly dangerous and fearsome one, which was emphasised through its frontality. The same goes for Lysimachus, whose choice of image is astonishingly close to Pliny’s reflex, which focuses entirely on the lion’s sight. It is also shown that lion masks are often associated with the deeds of Heracles, which also gave rise to other coin images in which the use of frontality brought special nuances of meaning, for example the illustration of special effort or a narrative connection between two coin images. In one case, a frontal lion leaping out of a rectangle was associated with the cult of Athena. Another group of frontal lions may have had an apotropaic-demonic character, mainly conveyed by the eyes fixed on the observer. Here we can see a connection with the Gorgoneion. As for the frequent image of devouring lions, a biblical source suggests that the animals were particularly irritable and dangerous during this process. Finally, it was recommended that lions and leopards should be carefully separated, with leopards being particularly suitable for depicting the ‘man-destroying’ god Dionysus in frontal perspective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

lions, iconography, numismatics, art history, frontality

Im Auge des Löwen: ikonologische Beobachtungen an frontalen Löwendarstellungen auf antiken Münzen

Öz

This article provides an overview of the most important coin types depicting frontal lions from the Greek Archaic period to the first century BC. The spear-biting lions are not included in this paper as they form the subject of a separate study. Starting from the ancient written tradition, explanations are offered based on the effect of the lion’s gaze, which is repeatedly mentioned in ancient texts. With the addition of the respective reverses and modes of representation, it is possible to identify references to religious cults: Apollo, Artemis, Athena, Hera and Heracles. But rulers also used frontal lion images for specific purposes. To express the solar aspect of Apollo, frontality seemed the most appropriate. A particularly close connection between the lion and Loxías has been demonstrated for Rhegion. The example of Samos shows that an autocrat could choose the emblem of a “frontal lion’s head” – probably also to suggest solar qualities. Under Achaemenid influence however, the lion regularly became the victim of the ruler – albeit a particularly dangerous and fearsome one, which was emphasised through its frontality. The same goes for Lysimachus, whose choice of image is astonishingly close to Pliny’s reflex, which focuses entirely on the lion’s sight. It is also shown that lion masks are often associated with the deeds of Heracles, which also gave rise to other coin images in which the use of frontality brought special nuances of meaning, for example the illustration of special effort or a narrative connection between two coin images. In one case, a frontal lion leaping out of a rectangle was associated with the cult of Athena. Another group of frontal lions may have had an apotropaic-demonic character, mainly conveyed by the eyes fixed on the observer. Here we can see a connection with the Gorgoneion. As for the frequent image of devouring lions, a biblical source suggests that the animals were particularly irritable and dangerous during this process. Finally, it was recommended that lions and leopards should be carefully separated, with leopards being particularly suitable for depicting the ‘man-destroying’ god Dionysus in frontal perspective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

lions, iconography, numismatics, art history, frontality

Kaynakça

• H. R. Baldus, Die Siegel Alexanders des Großen. Versuch einer Rekonstruktion auf literarischer und numismatischer Grundlage, Chiron 17, 1987, 395-449.
• M. Barasch, Imago Hominis. Studies in the language of art, Wien 1991.
• J. P. Barron, The silver coins of Samos, London 1966.
• R. Bianchi Bandinelli – E. Vergara Caffarelli – G. Caputo, The Buried City. Excavations at Leptis Magna, London 1966.
• P. Bisaillon, The cult of Apollo in the Milesian colonies along the coast of the Black Sea: an inventory of archaeological data, M.A. Thesis, Université de Montréal 2017.
• F. Bodenstedt, Die Elektronmünzen von Phokaia und Mytilene, Tübingen 1981.
• A. Brehm (Hg.), Brehms Tierleben. Allgemeine Kunde des Tierreichs. Dritte, gänzlich neubearbeitete Auflage von Prof. Dr. Pechuel-Loeche, Leipzig-Wien 1890.
• L. Bürchner, RE VII/2, 1912, Sp. 1664-1672, s. v. Gortyn.
• H. Cahn, Die Löwen des Apollon, Museum Helveticum 7/4, 1950, 185-199.
• H. Cahn, Skione – Stagira – Akanthos, in: H. Bloesch – H. Isler – G. Seiterle (Hgg.), Zur griechischen Kunst: Hansjörg Bloesch zum sechzigsten Geburtstag am 5. Juli 1972, AntK Beiheft 9, 1973, 7-13.
• J.-M. Carbon, Dolphin-pillars, EA 46, 2013, 27-34.
• F. Carbone, Usi monetari a Gortina e Festòs: cronologie e aspetti produttivi, Diss. Salerno 2016.
• A. Carty, Polycrates, Tyrant of Samos. New Light on Archaic Greece, Stuttgart 2015.
• B. Deppert-Lippitz, Die Münzprägung Milets vom vierten bis ersten Jahrhundert v. Chr., Typos V, Aarau-Frankfurt-Salzburg 1984.
• J. Desneux, Les tétradrachmes d’Akanthos, Brüssel 1949.
• K. P. Erhart, The development of the facing head motif on Greek coins and its relation to classical art, Diss. Garland 1979.
• W. Fischer-Bossert, Zur Löwenjagd des Lykischen Sarkophages aus Sidon, AA 2003/1, 195-200.
• W. Fischer-Bossert, Die Eule der Athena, in: U. Wartenberg – M. Amandry (Hgg.), ΚΑΙΡΟΣ. Contributions to Numismatics in Honor of Basil Demetriadi, New York 2015, 45-54.
• W. Fischer-Bossert, Ein karisches Monster, in: W. Fischer-Bossert – M. Baer – N. Schindel (Hgg.), Cista Mystica. Festschrift für Wolfgang Szaivert. VIN 23, Wien 2020, 119-168.
• D. Frey, Dämonie des Blickes, Abhdlg. d. geistes- u. sozialwissenschaftl. Klasse d. Akad. d. Wissenschaften u. d. Literatur Mainz 6, 1953, 245-296.
• A. Frey, Loxias, in: DNP 7, 450-451.
• C. Fritz – P. Fosse – G. Tosello – G. Sauvet – M. Azema, Ours et lion: réflexion sur la place des carnivores dans l’art paléolithique, in: J.-P. Brugal – A. Gardeisen – A. Zucker (edd.), Prédateurs dans tous leurs états. Evolution, biodiversité, interactions, mythes, symboles. XXXIe rencontres internationales d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes, Antibes 2011, 299-324.
• L. Frobenius, Kulturgeschichte Afrikas. Prolegomena zu einer neuen Gestaltlehre, Gütersloh 1954.
• H. Gaebler, Die antiken Münzen von Makedonia und Paionia, 2 Bde., Berlin 1906 u. 1935.
• H. G. Gundel, Zodiakos. Tierkreisbilder im Altertum. Kosmische Bezüge und Jenseitsvorstellungen im antiken Alltagsleben, Mainz 1992.
• F. Haymann, Zu den Frontalbildnissen der beiden Licinii, JNG 71, 2021, 287-310.
• F. Haymann, Politische und andere Deutungsmöglichkeiten von Gorgoneia auf Münzen. Online Zeitschrift zur Antiken Numismatik 4, 1-32.
• H. Herzfelder, Les monnaies d’argent de Rhegion frappées entre 461 et le milieu du IVe siècle av. J. C., Paris 1957.
• O. Hoover, Handbook of Greek Coinage Series, bislang I-XI, Lancaster 2009-2020.
• R. Hilbert, Die Elektronprägung von Milet. NOMISMATA 9, 2 Bde., Bonn 2018.
• R. Hilbert, Bemerkungen zu frühen Elektronprägungen, JNG 69/70, 2020, 1-34.
• J. G. F. Hind, Archaeology of the Greeks and Barbarian Peoples around the Black Sea (1982-1992), Archaeological Report 39, 1992-1993, 82-112.
• Historia Numorum Online | http://hno.huma-num.fr/.
• M. Hoernes, Urgeschichte der bildenden Kunst in Europa von den Anfängen bis um 500 vor Christi. Dritte Auflage. Durchgesehen und ergänzt von Oswald Menghin, Wien 1925.
• O. Hoover, Handbook of Coins of Macedon and Its Neighbors. Part II: Thrace, Skythia, and Taurike, Sixth the First Centuries BC, HGC 3, Lancaster 2017.
• F. Hölscher: Die Bedeutung archaischer Tierkampfbilder [Beiträge zur Archäologie 5], Würzburg 1972.
• F. Imhoof-Blumer – O. Keller, Tier- und Pflanzenbilder auf Münzen und Gemmen des klassischen Altertums, Leipzig 1889.
• O. Keller, Die antike Tierwelt, 2 Bde., Leipzig 1909 u. 1913.
• M. M. Khorasani, Der Schwanz des Löwen, Schwert & Klinge Sommer 2008, 18-23.
• F. Kolb, Lykien. Geschichte einer antiken Landschaft, Darmstadt 2018.
• K. Konuk, The Electrum Coinage of Samos in the Light of a Recent Hoard, in: E. Schwertheim – E. Winter (Hgg.), Neue Forschungen zu Ionien, Asia Minor Studien 54, Bonn, 2005, 43-55; Tfn. 1-2.
• L. Lazarini, A contribution to the study of the Archaic billon coinage of Lesbos. Online:
• https://www.academia.edu/6913591/A_contribution_to_the_study_of_the_Archaic_billon_coinage_of_Lesbos (zuletzt abgerufen: 24.4.2023).
• D. MacDonald, An introduction to the history and coinage of the kingdom of Bosporus, Lancaster 2005.
• D. McCall, The prevalence of lions: kings, deities and feline symbolism, Paideuma 19/20, 1973/1974, 130-145.
• Y. Meshorer – S. Qedar, Samarian Coinage, Numismatic Studies and researches IX, Jerusalem 1999.
• P. Mondrun, Entre Nestos et Achélôos: Variations sur la “Mésopotamie Grecque” du Lion, in: J.-P. Brugal – A. Gardeisen – A. Zucker (Hgg.), Prédateurs dans tous leurs états. Evolution, biodiversité, interactions, mythes, symboles. XXXIe rencontres internationales d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes, Antibes 2011, 351-363.
• P. Müller, Löwen und Mischwesen in der archaischen griechischen Kunst: eine Untersuchung über ihre Bedeutung, Diss., Zürich 1978.
• W. Müseler, Lykische Münzen in europäischen Privatsammlungen, Gephyra Einzelschriften 4, Istanbul 2016.
• W. Müseler, Between Mesopotamia and Greece: Cultural influences in Cilician Coin-iconography from the Late 5th to the Early 4th Century BC, Gephyra 22, 2021, 69-133.
• W. Müseler, Geteilte Bilderwelten: kopierte Motive, wandernde Stempelschneider oder zentrale Prägestätten; vier Fallstudien, Schweizer Münzblätter 72, 2022, H. 287, 51-71.
• E. T. S. Newell, Some unpublished coins of Eastern dynasts, Numismatic Notes and monographs 30, New York 1926.
• J. Nollé, Die Abwehr der wilden Schweine, München 2001.
• J. Nollé, Notizen zur antiken Numismatik 3. Der Löwe von Sardeis, NZ 128, 2022, 9-62.
• W. F. Otto, Dionysos. Mythos und Kultus, Frankfurt 1933.
• Th. Rakoczy, Böser Blick, Macht des Auges und Neid der Götter: eine Untersuchung zur Kraft des Blickes in der griechischen Literatur, Tübingen 1996.
• G. Le Rider, Monnaies crétoises du Ve au Ier siècle av. J. C., Paris 1966.
• L. Robert, Monuments de gladiateurs dans l’Orient grec, Hellenica 7, 1949, 126-151.
• F. X. Ryan, Die Herrschaft des Demoteles auf Samos, Studia Humaniora Tartuensia 7, 2006, A.2 (https://doi.org/10.12697/sht.2006.7.A.2).
• S. Seligmann, Der böse Blick und Verwandtes: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Aberglaubens aller Zeiten und Völker, 2 Bde., Graz 1910.
• M. Seyer, Der Herrscher als Jäger. Untersuchungen zur königlichen Jagd im persischen und makedonischen Reich vom 6.-4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. sowie unter den Diadochen Alexanders des Großen, Wien 2007.
• M. Seyer, Zum Löwengrab von Xanthos, in: F. Blakolmer – M. Seyer – H. D. Szemethy (Hgg.), Angekommen auf Ithaka. Festgabe für Jürgen Borchhardt zum 80. Geburtstag, Wien 2016, 67-82.
• G. Shipley, A history of Samos 800-188 BC, Oxford 1987.
• F. Sinisi, Facial marks on Parthian coins: a sign of skin-desease? NZ 124, 2018, 117-140.
• K. Konuk, Sylloge Nummorum Graecorum: Turkey 1: The Muharrem Kayhan Collection, Bordeaux-Istanbul 2002.
• M. I. Stefanakis – N. P. M. Konstantinidi, Associating the image with the myth on ancient Cretan coins: three case-studies, Fortunatae 32, 2020, 757-785.
• A. Steier, Art. Löwe, in: RE XII,1, 1926, 967-990.
• M. N. Tod, The scorpion in Graeco-Roman Egypt, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 25/1, 1939, 55-61.
• J. M. C. Toynbee, Tierwelt der Antike. Übersetzt von M. R. Alföldi – D. Misslbeck, Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt 17, Mainz 1983.
• H. Vidin, The loyalty of a city to its deity. Miletus and Apollon, in: H. Vidin – S. Kerschbaum (Hgg.), Traditions through empires. Cities of Asia Minor and their coin images, AMS 99, Bonn 2021, 43-72.
• M. P. Wahl, Motivwanderungen. Studien zu Übernahme und Verbreitung von Münzmotiven der Westgriechen in der Klassik. VIN 24, Wien 2021.
• L. Weidauer, Probleme der frühen Elektronprägung, Typos I, Fribourg 1975.
• R. T. Williams, The silver coinage of Velia, Royal Numismatic Society special publications 25, London 1992.
• P. Wyssmann, Vielfältig geprägt. Das spätperserzeitliche Samaria und seine Münzbilder, Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 288, Leuven 2019.
• N. Zenzen, Das edle Ungeheuer. Die Semantik des Löwen in Bildwerken des antiken Vorderen Orients und Griechenlands, Tübinger archäologische Forschungen 26, Rahden 2018.